知识价值性、企业权力对知识转移的影响研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 39-46.

知识价值性、企业权力对知识转移的影响研究

刘立, 党兴华

西安理工大学经济与管理学院, 陕西西安 710054

收稿日期:2013-12-03 修回日期:2015-07-28 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2015-12-22
通讯作者: 刘立
作者简介:刘立(1985-),女(汉),陕西西安人,西安理工大学经济与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:技术创新理论与知识管理。
党兴华(1952-),男(汉),陕西蒲城人,西安理工大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向:技术创新理论与知识管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金:基于知识权力的技术创新网络治理机理及实现研究(基金编号:70972051;起止时间:2009.01-2012.12);国家自然科学基金:技术创新网络惯例形成及在网络治理中的作用机理研究(基金编号:71372171;起止时间:2014.01-2017.12);陕西省高校重点学科专项资金建设项目资助(107-5X1201)。

A study on the effect of knowledge value andenterprise power on knowledge transfer

Liu Li, Dang Xinghua

School of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China

Received:2013-12-03 Revised:2015-07-28 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2015-12-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在资源依赖理论和战略权变理论基础上,构建创新合作网络中企业知识价值性、企业权力与知识转移之间关系的理论模型。以西安市信息技术产业为研究对象,采用QAP多元回归方法对企业知识价值性、企业权力与知识转移的关系进行实证研究,将知识价值性划分为知识关键性、知识不可替代性和知识中心性三个维度。研究结果表明:知识关键性和知识不可替代性对企业权力具有显著正向影响,而知识中心性对企业权力的影响不显著;企业权力在知识关键性和知识转移之间具有中介作用;企业权力在知识不可替代性与知识转移之间具有中介作用;而企业权力在知识中心性和知识转移之间中介作用不显著。

关键词: 知识关键性, 知识不可替代性, 知识中心性, 企业权力, 知识转移

Abstract: On the basis of the resource dependence theory and the strategic contingencies theory, this paper constructed the theoretical model of the relationship between knowledgevalue, enterprise power and knowledge transfer in the innovation cooperation network. Based on the data collected from Xi'an information technology industry, we used the Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) multiple regression method to test hypotheses. The value of enterprise's knowledge was divided into such three dimensions as knowledge criticality, knowledge non-substitutability and knowledge centrality. The results showed that knowledge criticality and knowledge non-substitutability positively correlated with enterprise power, but knowledge centrality did not correlate with enterprise power; the mediating effect of enterprise power on the relationship between knowledge criticality and knowledge transfer; the mediating effect of enterprise power on the relationship between knowledge non-substitutability and knowledge transfer; But the mediating effect of enterprise power did not act on the relationship between knowledge centrality and knowledge transfer.

Key words: knowledge criticality, knowledge non-substitutability, knowledge centrality, enterprise power, knowledge transfer

中图分类号:

F273.1

刘立, 党兴华. 知识价值性、企业权力对知识转移的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(12): 39-46.

Liu Li, Dang Xinghua. A study on the effect of knowledge value andenterprise power on knowledge transfer[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(12): 39-46.

参考文献

[1] Collins C. J., Smith K. G. Knowledge exchange and combination:The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(3):544-560. [2] Hansen M.T. Knowledge networks:Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies[J].Organization Science, 2002,13(3):232-248. [3] Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23(2):242-266. [4] Darr E. D., Kurtzberg T. R. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000,82(1):28-44. [5] Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness:Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal (Winter Special Issue), 1996,(17):27-43. [6] Hansen M. T., Mors M. L., Lovas B. Knowledge sharing in organizations:Multiple networks, multiple phases[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(5):776-793. [7] Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns[J]. Management Science, 2005,51(5):756-771. [8] Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation:The role of intrafirm networks[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998,41(4), 464-476. [9] Sze-Sze Wong, Violet T. Ho and Chay Hoon Lee. A power perspective to interunit knowledge transfer:Linking knowledge attributes to unit power and the transfer of knowledge[J]. Journal of Management,2008, 34(1):127-151. [10] Pérez-Nordtvedt L.,Kedia B.L., Datta D.K., Rasheed A. AEffectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer:An empirical examination[J]. Journal of Management Strdies, 2008,45(4):714-744. [11] Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Lee C. A., Schneck R. E., Pennings J. M. A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971,16(2):216-229. [12] Hinings C. R., Hickson D. J., Pennings J. M., Schneck R. E. Structural conditions of intraorganizational power[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974,19(1):22-44. [13] 景秀艳.网络权力与企业投资空间决策-以台资网络为例[J].人文地理,2009(4):50-55.Jing Xiuyan. Network power and enterprise investment decision space-as taiwan network an example[J]. Human Geography, 2009(4):50-55. [14] Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. The bases and use of power in organizational decision making:The case of a university[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974,19(4), 453-473. [15] Tushman M. L. A political approach to organizations:A review and rationale[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1977,2(2):206-216. [16] Astley W. G., Sachdeva P. S. Structural sources of intraorganizational power:A theoretical synthesis[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9(1):104-113. [17] Wijk V. R., Jansen J P, Lyles M. A. Inter-and intra-organizational knowledge transfer:A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008,45(4):830-853. [18] Inkpen A. C., Tsang E.W.K. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005,30(1):146-l65. [19] Ranjay Gulati, Maxim Sytch. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships:Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(1):32-69. [20] Pfeffer J. Power in organizations[M].Marshfield,MA:Pitman,1981. [21] Lachman R. Power from What? A reexamination of its relationship with structural conditions[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1989,34(2):231-251. [22] Astley W. G., Zajac E. J. Beyond dyadic exchange:Functional interdependence and sub-unit power[J].Organization Studies,1990,11(4):481-501. [23] Brass D. J., Burkhardt M. E. Networks and organizations:Structure, form and action[M]. Cambridge,MA:Harvard Business School Press,1992:191-215. [24] Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks-Conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1979, 1(3):215-239. [25] Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(4):473-496. [26] Blau P. M. Exchange and power in social life[M]. London:Wiley,1964. [27] Emerson R. M. Power-dependence relations[J]. American Sociological Review, 1962,(27):31-41. [28] Alvesson M. Organizations as rhetoric:Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1993,30(6):997-1015. [29] Mudambi R., Navarra P. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004,(35):385-406. [30] Schulz M. The uncertain relevance of newness:Organizational learning and knowledge flows[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(4):661-681. [31] Gresov C., Stephens C. The context of interunit influence attempts[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993,38(2):252-276. [32] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(5):79-96.