科技伦理失范原因的撤稿现状分析及其治理策略思考——基于撤稿观察数据库
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

暨南大学学报编辑部

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

B82 ;G230

基金项目:

中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会(YJH202204);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(21622808);广东省高水平科技期刊建设项目


Analysis of the Current Situation of Retraction and its Management Strategy for Reasons of Ethical Misconduct in Scientific Research-- Based on Retraction Watch Database
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    首先,调查了撤稿观察数据库(RWD)中截至2022年5月21日因“缺伦理审批”或“无患者知情同意”科技伦理失范(EMSR)论文的发表及撤回(包括撤稿、关注、更正)时间、署名作者来源国家及机构、来源期刊及出版商、学科分布及相关撤回原因等状况;结果显示,近年来全球EMSR原因撤回论文呈上升趋势,且中国作者参与的数量增加明显,95.35%的EMSR撤回论文集中在健康科学和基础生命科学领域。其次,结合科技伦理问题呈现的多样性和复杂性,提出了强化科研活动全流程科技伦理监管策略;最后,作为期刊人,从压实主体责任的视角,提出了科技期刊参与科技伦理协同治理的思考和建议:科技期刊可通过对科研者的伦理宣传教育、投稿论文的协同伦理审查把关以及撤稿惩戒等手段发挥协同共治的作用。

    Abstract:

    First, we investigated the situation of Ethical Misconduct in Scientific Research (EMSR) withdraw (including Retraction,express of concern and correction) from the Retraction Watch Database (RWD) by the end of 2022 on May 21,the information about the withdrawal papers because of "lack of ethical approval" or "None of patients' informed consent" were analysed including the published and withdraw date, the authorship , the source countries and organizations, the source journals and publishers, the subject distribution and related withdraw reasons; The results showed that in recent years, the number of withdraw papers due to EMSR was on the rise globally, and the number of Chinese authors' participation increased significantly. 95.35% of EMSR withdraw were concentrated in the fields of health sciences and basic life sciences. Secondly, according to the diversity and complexity of scientific and technological ethics problems,we puts forward the strategy of strengthening the scientific and technological ethics supervision in the whole process of scientific research activities. Finally, as a journal person, from the perspective of compacting the subject responsibility, this paper puts forward some thoughts and suggestions for sci-tech journals on the participation in collaborative governance of scientific and technological ethics: sci-tech journals can play a role in collaborative governance by means of ethical publicity and education for researchers, collaborative ethical review of submitted papers and punishment the ethical misconduct papers by withdrawal.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈咏梅,丛敏,王景周,孙升云.科技伦理失范原因的撤稿现状分析及其治理策略思考——基于撤稿观察数据库[J].,2022,(24).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-08
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-14
  • 录用日期:2022-10-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-16
  • 出版日期:

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
关闭
关闭