| 李辉.科技论文综合评价体系的研究与思考.编辑学报,2010,22(1):7-9 |
| 科技论文综合评价体系的研究与思考 |
| Research and thought of sci-tech paper evaluation system |
| 投稿时间：2009-09-04 修订日期：2009-09-04 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技论文 评价体系 评价方法 科技期刊编辑工作 |
| 英文关键词: scientific paper evaluation system evaluation method editing work of sci-tech periodicals |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 977 |
| 全文下载次数: 765 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技论文的评价工作是科技期刊实现优质信息资源汇聚,进而创造经济效益和社会效益的重要保障,关系到读者、作者与编者的切身利益和正常的编辑出版秩序,是一项综合性的社会系统工程。围绕这一中心,阐述科技论文综合评价体系的基本结构,分析常用的评价方法并比较了各自相对于评价目标的优劣特点,指明科技期刊编辑部在这一体系中的枢纽地位和主要任务,并列举编辑利用期刊特有的语言传递评价意见的若干可行方法。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The evaluation of scientific papers is an important guarantee for sci-tech periodicals to realize the aggregation of high-quality sources and obtain both economic and social benefits, which not only influences the immediate interests of readers, authors and editors but also affects the normal order of editing and publishing. Therefore it is a comprehensive social system project. Around this subject, the basic structure of scientific paper evaluation system is discussed in detail, and the common evaluation methods are researched with comparing the superior or inferior characteristics of each method relative to evaluation object respectively. It is pointed that sci-tech periodical editorial department has a pivot position and undertakes important tasks in this system, besides, several available methods are presented for editors to transmit evaluations by periodical's special language. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
