| 论我国反兴奋剂处罚救济机制的完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 柴芳墨.论我国反兴奋剂处罚救济机制的完善[J].体育科研,2017(5):8-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 柴芳墨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京航空航天大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国反兴奋剂处罚机制重视实体处罚而忽视程序救济之特点长期为学术界和体育界所诟病。人权保护原则、惩罚与救济相适应原则、程序正义原则为反兴奋剂处罚之救济提供了坚实的法理依据。借鉴域外相关经验，仲裁并辅之司法介入的方式对反兴奋剂处罚予以救济是实现反兴奋剂有效管理的制度闭环，考虑到目前国际形势和在我国现实国情，应将运动员在反兴奋剂处罚方面的程序性权利作为立法根基，同时建立行业内仲裁和适当司法介入机制为反兴奋剂处罚提供救济。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反兴奋剂处罚 救济 仲裁 司法介入 |
| 收稿时间： | 2017/8/23 0:00:00 |
On the Perfection of the Remediation of Anti-Doping Sanctions in China |
| |
| CHAI Fangmo.On the Perfection of the Remediation of Anti-Doping Sanctions in China[J].Sports Science Research,2017(5):8-14. |
| |
| Authors: | CHAI Fangmo |
| |
| Affiliation: | BeiHang University |
| |
| Abstract: | China''s anti-doping sanctions place emphasis on physical punishment and ignore procedural relief, which has long been criticized by the academic and sports circles. The principle of human rights protection, the principle of punishment and relief and the principle of procedural justice have provided a solid legal basis for the remediation of anti-doping sanctions. According to the relative experience of foreign countries, effective management of anti-doping requires sports arbitration and judicial intervention in order to provide relief to anti-doping sanctions. In view of the current international situation and the actual situation in China, the procedural rights of athletes in anti-doping should be reflected in legislation. Besides, intra-industry arbitration and appropriate judicial intervention mechanism should be established so as to to provide remedies for anti-doping sanctions. |
| |
| Keywords: | anti-doping sanction remediation arbitration judicial intervention |
|
| 点击此处可从《体育科研》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《体育科研》下载全文 |
