| 中美科研不端嫌疑人隐私权保护制度之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董兴佩.中美科研不端嫌疑人隐私权保护制度之比较[J].科学学研究,2012,30(5):667-672. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董兴佩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东科技大学学报编辑部,山东青岛,266590 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 美国对科研不端嫌疑人的隐私权保护较为重视,隐私权保护制度较为完备,它以成熟完善的法律体系为基础,对惩戒机构及人员的隐私保护职责,对调查程序中嫌疑人隐私权保护,对查实和结案后的嫌疑人隐私权保护等都有详细而具体的规定,操作性强。相比较,我国对隐私权的保护重视不够,科研不端嫌疑人隐私权保护制度的法律依据层次较低,没有对隐私权完整保护的法律基础,有关惩戒机构隐私权保护职责的规定较为原则、模糊,缺乏明确、具体的保护措施。我们需要借鉴美国相关规定,完善我国相应制度,切实保护科研不端嫌疑人的隐私权。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科研不端行为 科研不端嫌疑人 隐私权 美国 中国 |
A comparative study on sino-US systems of privacy protection of suspects involved in scientific misconduct |
| |
| DONG Xing-pei.A comparative study on sino-US systems of privacy protection of suspects involved in scientific misconduct[J].Studies in Science of Science,2012,30(5):667-672. |
| |
| Authors: | DONG Xing-pei |
| |
| Affiliation: | DONG Xing-pei(Institute of Higher Education,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Great significance is attached to privacy protection of suspects involved in scientific misconduct in the United States with the help of its relatively mature privacy-protection system,which provides elaborate and feasible provisions concerning protection both of disciplinary agencies and their staff and of the suspects involved during or after the investigation procedure.Comparatively speaking,inadequate attention has been given to suspects’ privacy protection in scientific misconduct in China,which results from the insufficiency of specific protective measures and the vague provisions from disciplinary agencies.Therefore,we should use American practice as a salutary lesson and improve corresponding regulations to better protect the privacy of suspects involved in scientific misconduct. |
| |
| Keywords: | scientific misconduct suspects of scientific misconduct privacy America China |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载全文 |
|
