共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
谈谈ISBN号的不唯一现象 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
李昌健 《大学图书情报学刊》1997,(1):41-41
ISBN号Intemational Standard Book Number的简称,是国际通行的出版物代码,它“唯一代表某种书的某一版本,当同一种图书的开本、装帧或价格不同时书号也就不同”(引自《中国大百科全书图书馆学情报档案学卷》第157页“国际标准书号”条目)。就理论而言-每种图书都应该有它自己唯一的ISBN号,不同种图书的 相似文献
2.
由于出版界对ISBN的滥用,造成了ISBN诸多不规范现象,给图书馆采购及著录带来了困扰。针对在处理不规范ISBN时只著录与正题名相对应的ISBN或不予著录的观点,提出了图书馆应在我国《普通图书著录规则》的指导下,采取更详尽规范的著录方法。 相似文献
3.
本文从图书后面的条形码出发,简述ISBN号的来源、发展与变更。对ISBN号最后一位数的计算,判断该书号的图书正版或盗版;详细介绍了ISBN号从10位数升级到13位数后与条形码的关系。 相似文献
4.
本文针对机读目录的编制特点,对在ISBN号或价格上存在不同的重购图书,提出了两种处理方法,并对二者进行了对比分析。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
时代正在从图书杂志信息、物流信息的数字化转向出版内容的数字化,在这个意义上讲,从2005年开始再次成为焦点的ISBN问题,可以说是与从1980年开始提出的ISBN问题不同的问题。对于日本出版行业来说,思维方式不能仅仅停留在铅字文化阶段,而迫切需要认识今天的文字信息与使用者的关系,重新把握ISBN问题。 相似文献
9.
10.
蒋鸿标 《高校文献信息研究》2002,(2):21-25
针对目前多卷书和丛书的处理较为混乱的状况,通过对图书著录单位和图书馆借阅权限的描述,提出以ISBN作为多卷书和丛书集中或分散处理的依据的观点,即有多少个ISBN,就作多少条著录数据,同时分类号要与选取的正题名相一致,并阐述集中著录、分散著录、分册著录的区别,采用ISBN作为依据的合理性及其五大好处。 相似文献
11.
Margaret Hepp Harrison 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2012,28(3):204-217
Book publishers now have more products to keep track of than ever before: books, eBooks, apps, online products, and the list goes on. Traditionally publishers have used the ISBN to track products in the supply chain. But with as many as 24 ISBNs now associated with a bestselling title, the publishing industry looks to a new identifier, the International Standard Text Code (ISTC), to keep ISBNs in check. In a sea of data, will the ISTC help keep publishers afloat, or weigh them down? 相似文献
12.
多卷书的处理不宜“一刀切”——对《多卷书处理之我见》的质疑 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
对多卷书的处理不宜不问情况通通分散处理,应视其ISBN的不同情况相应地作集中或分散处理,即各分卷共用一个ISBN的多卷应采用整套著录法,各分卷有独立的ISBN的多卷书应采用分卷著录法。 相似文献
13.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(4):59-68
The use of uniform title for serials and monographic series with generic titles, a practice that began with the adoption of the Anglo-American Calaloging Rules, second edition, creates many problems and should be substantially modified or discontinued. Alternative practices would be to place the qualifier to a generic title in the 245 (title) field itself or to return to the use of corporate author main entry. Although local procedures can help make uniform titles manageable, adjustments in current uniform title procedures should be made in AACR2, even before AACR3 is published, and these adjustments should be incorporated into AACR3. 相似文献
14.
科学性是所有图书赖以存在的基础,也是编写各级各类教材应遵循的普遍原则,具体到不同的图书,其内涵与要求又有所差别。《国际少儿汉语》是一套少儿对外汉语教材,对其科学性的把关主要注意三个方面:书名与前言,教材内容,以及教材与学科理论的关系。 相似文献
15.
由于编目员对著录规则理解的差异,有两种情况的封面题名和书脊题名的著录存在一些问题,一种是封面题名或书脊题名与200字段中的正题名相同,但从属于它们的其它题名信息或分辑题名不同的情况;另一种是封面题名或书脊题名直接是题名页的副题名的情况。封面题名和书脊题名的著录应该首先要明确字段著录条件和设置目的,不要重复制作检索点;其次要考虑用户利用的便利性,不应遗漏检索点;同时要把握好客观著录的原则,并且充分发挥编目员的主观能动性。 相似文献
16.
Maria J. Grant 《Health information and libraries journal》2013,30(4):259-260
The chances are the first thing you when you set out to write an article is the title. But what factors transform a mediocre title into a good title? Firstly, it should be both informative and specific, using words or phrases likely to be used when searching for information, for example ‘nurse education’ rather than simply ‘nurse’. Secondly, it should be concise yet convey the main ideas clearly; articles with short titles reporting study findings have been found to attract higher numbers of viewing and citations. Thirdly, provide details of the study design to assist the reader in making an informed choice about the type of project your article is reporting. In taking these small steps when developing your title, your title can present a more concise, retrievable and clear articulation of your article. 相似文献
17.
18.
科技论文结论与结语的对比分析 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
针对科技期刊论文结尾部分使用"结论"或"结语"2种不同层次标题的现象,对结论与结语的内容进行对比分析.认为"结论"与"结语"的概念不同,应根据实际内容恰当使用"结论"或"结语"作论文相应部分的标题. 相似文献
19.
Rachel Turner 《Cataloging & classification quarterly》2020,58(6):591-602
AbstractTo determine the state of the cataloging job market, this study compares job advertisements from August 2016-August 2018 advertising for jobs with cataloging in the title, metadata in the title, and cataloging and metadata in the title. Given ongoing concerns about the impact of metadata jobs on the cataloging job market, this study asks the questions: Are cataloging jobs in fact “disappearing” and becoming metadata jobs? Are entry-level jobs disappearing, perhaps contributing to the idea that there is a lack of qualified catalogers? Is there a difference in position level between cataloging and metadata job advertisements that can account for a lack or perceived lack of available cataloging jobs? Are there more entry-level or mid/supervisory positions advertised? Are cataloging and metadata jobs really separate, or should they be considered one position called cataloging and metadata? 相似文献