共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
John A. Clark 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(2):128-141
Abstract In 1964, Richard Peters examined the place of philosophy in the training of teachers. He considered three things: Why should philosophy of education be included in the training of teachers; What portion of philosophy of education should be included; How should philosophy be taught to those training to be teachers. This article explores the context of the time when Peters set out his views, describes philosophy of education at the London Institute of Education at one period in Peters’ time there, and then discusses the current state of philosophy of education, using New Zealand as an example of opportunities and challenges. Finally, asking whether Peters was nearly right about the place of philosophy in the training of teachers, it is concluded that he was right about its importance but got it wrong about his conception of philosophy. 相似文献
2.
NAOKO SAITO 《Journal of Philosophy of Education》2020,54(5):1306-1313
In response to Ruth Heilbronn and Adrian Skilbeck's thoughtful review of my American Philosophy in Translation, I take up three aspects of the argument about which I want both to defend my position and to clarify it further. The first is the use of examples in philosophy and philosophy of education. The second raises the question of how far American philosophy, as a philosophy in response to crisis, can answer to the contemporary crisis of the pandemic. The third addresses some educational implications of American philosophy in translation by paying attention to the particularities of its language—especially in respect of such considerations as distance education, international exchange without travel and alternative routes of political education through withdrawal and through the creation in digital space of what Thoreau called ‘beautiful knowledge’. 相似文献
3.
JOHN WHITE 《Journal of Philosophy of Education》2016,50(3):448-460
This article is a critical discussion of two recent papers by Michael Hand on moral education. The first is his ‘Towards a Theory of Moral Education’, published in the Journal of Philosophy of Education in 2014 (Volume 48, Issue 4). The second is a chapter called ‘Beyond Moral Education?’ in an edited book of new perspectives on my own work in philosophy and history of education, published in the same year. His two papers are linked in that he applies the theory outlined in the former to a critique in the latter of my views on education in altruism in a 1990 publication. I introduce this article by outlining the tradition of recent philosophical thought about moral education, beginning with that of Richard Peters, in which Hand is working. 相似文献
4.
Bruce Haynes 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(2):123-127
Abstract Paul Hirst claimed that Richard Peters ‘revolutionised philosophy of education’. This does not accord with my experience in the Antipodean periphery. My experience of the work of Wittgenstein, Austin and Kovesi before reading Peters and Dewey, Kuhn and Toulmin subsequently meant that Peters was a major but not revolutionary figure in my understanding of philosophy of education. 相似文献
5.
D.N. Aspin 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(2):219-235
Abstract In this article I describe the analytic approach adopted by Peters, his colleagues and followers of the ‘London line’ in the 1960s and 1970s and argue that, even in those times, other approaches to philosophy of education were being valued and practised. I show that Peters and his colleagues later became aware of the need for philosophy of education to become aware of and take in hand a new set of agendas and address the list of substantive issues inherent in the contexts and political considerations beginning to impinge on education in the 1980s and beyond. I argue that there is much to be said for adopting a postempiricist problem-solving approach and point to the ways in which an evolutionary epistemology may be usefully applied to many of the problems of modern educational discourse. But I also seek to show how the abiding axiological concerns of Peters may still serve as the substantive background and definition of the value emphasis of the aims and directions in which philosophers of education are currently still working. 相似文献
6.
James S. Kaminsky 《Educational studies》1991,17(3):217-232
It would be convenient to pretend that the histories of educational philosophy in Britain and, by extension, the USA and Australia, were responses to a common social and intellectual history but convenience in this case could only be accomplished at the expense of explanatory power. The history of educational philosophy in these three places is parallel but not in common. Philosophy of education in Britain is more closely related to philosophy than is philosophy of education in the USA. Philosophy of education in the USA appropriated the lead of the American Social Science Association and initially retained closer connections with social science than did its English counterpart. Nevertheless, it is argued here that educational philosophy's reference to social science—Victorian and modern—is the missing explanatory element in modem histories of the discipline. The appropriation of education by social science—a common feature of the intellectual history of education in Britain, Australasia, and the USA—leavened the research agenda of educational philosophy in Britain. Peters’ educational work can be best understood as an attempt to reunite education with moral philosophy such that the study of education would resume a profile similar to its nineteenth‐century counterpart, when it was moral philosophy that provided the most interesting discussions of human nature, primitive customs, and social institutions—education among them. 相似文献
7.
Kevin Harris 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(2):182-190
Abstract This paper outlines aspects and dimensions of my ‘relationship’ with Richard Peters from 1966 onward. The underlying suggestion is that, while Peters’ contribution to philosophy of education was undeniably of major proportions, both that contribution and his legacy are institutional rather than substantive. 相似文献
8.
ANTON LUIS SEVILLA 《Journal of Philosophy of Education》2016,50(4):639-654
This article builds on the growing literature on the Kyoto School of Philosophy and its influences on the field of Education. First, I argue that the influence of the Kyoto School of Philosophy is historically significant in Japan, and that the connection between this philosophical school and the philosophy of education is by no means superficial. Second, I suggest that this school contributes a unique view of ‘negative education’ founded in the philosophical idea of ‘nothingness’. I examine how this negative education is manifest both in religious cultivation and in more general views of education, and I develop these ideas through the models of self‐negation proposed by Nishitani Keiji and Hisamatsu Shin'ichi. Third, taking up the Herbartian idea of ‘pedagogical tact’, I analyse the characteristics of the I‐Thou relationship, in the vector of nothingness, implicit in the above‐mentioned view of education. I examine two approaches to this relationship—one of ‘sharing in nothingness’ as found in Nishitani and Hisamatsu, and one that goes beyond the idea of ‘sharing’ and accommodates alterity, as found in Nishida Kitarô and Nishihira Tadashi. By threshing out these three points, I hope to highlight the continued pedagogical relevance of the philosophical ideas of the Kyoto School. 相似文献
9.
10.
John White 《British Journal of Educational Studies》2019,67(2):187-200
Until recently teacher education in England has always contained a ‘philosophical’ element – to do with what education is for in the light of human nature. The paper traces its history since 1839, through inspirational approaches – based first on religion and later on psychology – to the critical approach of R S Peters and his colleagues in the 1960s. It then looks at the existential crisis faced by this kind of philosophy of education after changes in education policy in the 1980s; and at ways it has found of overcoming it – at the expense, however, of partially turning away from its earlier raison d’être in teacher education. The paper concludes with a discussion of what would be needed for it to resume its old role. 相似文献
11.
张楚廷先生主要以教育为论域阐释着他的哲学.先生对于人本理念、生命情怀、审美精神、哲学情结和民族深情的一以贯之的坚持和关切,凝结成其教育哲学的灵魂和主旨.先生的哲学堪称"我们中国人自己的哲学". 相似文献
12.
AbstractLudwig Wittgenstein suggests that ‘A serious and good philosophical work could be written consisting entirely of jokes’. The idea for this dialogue comes from a conversation that Michael Peters and Morwenna Griffiths had at the Philosophy of Education of Great Britain annual meeting at the University of Oxford, 2011. It was sparked by an account of an assessment of a piece of work where one of the external examiners unexpectedly exclaimed ‘I knew Jean-Paul Sartre’, trying to trump the discussion. This conversation is a dialogue about comedy and humor as a basis for philosophy, education and pedagogy that provides an introduction to recent works and a context for ongoing research. The concluding section provides further reflection on some of the main themes, drawing attention to the significance of humor in dialogues within philosophy and education, and suggesting that it has a particular role in resisting managerialism at all levels of educational institutions. 相似文献
13.
Ivan Snook 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(2):191-201
Abstract I argue that, after Dewey, Peters was the first modern philosopher of education to write material (in English) that was both philosophically respectable and relevant to the day-to-day concerns of teachers. Since then, some philosophers of education have remained (more or less) relevant but not really respectable while others have ‘taken off into the skies’ learning acclaim from the philosophical community but ceasing to produce anything which would be of any relevance to teachers in their work. I suggest that Peters might again point the way towards a form of academic philosophy of education that is both relevant and reasonably respectable. 相似文献
14.
姚萍 《江西教育学院学报》2014,(2):156-158
哲学是追求生活中的智慧。哲学教育的目的和功能在于使人学会思考、教人经得起痛苦和磨炼。在素质教育视域中,哲学教育是心理素质教育和人文素质教育。当前中国高校普遍存在以"非哲学"的方式进行所谓的哲学教育。哲学教育改革的关键在于以"哲学对话"的方式恢复哲学教育的应有功能。 相似文献
15.
中国哲学与西方哲学不是一种语言视域中的概念,二者可以视为具有类似的宇宙论起源,但核心范畴不同,在漫长的历史演化进程中所形成的文化向度不同。目前,西方哲学已经开始了新一轮的转向：知识论向语言论的转向。但中国哲学由于汉语作为象形文字的局限,在新一轮哲学发展方向的选择上无所适从。正确地审视中国哲学的缺陷,以西方哲学——＂philosophy＂的视域审视我们的哲学,在今天的哲学界显得尤其重要。 相似文献
16.
The article is an essay on Naoko Saito's recently published book American Philosophy in Translation. We attempt to draw out the central argument of the book as it moves through its eight chapters. The author finds that American philosophy, which she takes to be rooted in pragmatism, whilst it owes much to Dewey, needs to be reconstructed in order to meet contemporary political challenges, with their implications for political education. She asks questions such as what is the place of the tragic sense of life in philosophical thought? What is a philosophy of affirmation and chance? How are we to understand the significance of the untranslatable? What are these connections between transcendence, translation and transformation? More specifically, how are we to understand the distinction between philosophy in translation and philosophy as translation? And how does all this offer us new ways of thinking about the current state of democracy, political education and education more generally? One specific suggestion is that an education in foreign language can be transformative in terms of political education. The article concludes that Saito's project throws up some important ideas that are pertinent to our times. We question the central idea regarding language education, whilst we welcome this scholarly volume. 相似文献
17.
哲学与哲学教育 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
宋清华 《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2005,32(2):1-6
哲学陷入困境的原因在于我们以非哲学的方式教授哲学,哲学有自己的特点,哲学的特点就是沉思和分析。哲学本身是一种本体的或形而上学的思;哲学是一种面向前提的思;哲学是一种面向生活世界的思。哲学应体现出对智慧的追求,对人的价值、意义的思考,以及对时代的关注,应引导学生学习哲学的思维方式,进入哲学活动的世界。 相似文献
18.
刘玉蓉 《昆明师范高等专科学校学报》2006,28(3):33-37
艾思奇的《大众哲学》是马克思主义哲学大众化的开山之作。介绍了《大众哲学》写作的历史背景，它在哲学大众化方面的特点和优点，以及在我国马克思主义哲学的宣传、教育、普及工作中的重要贡献，并对我国建国后马克思主义哲学大众化的历史进行了反思。 相似文献
19.
贾可春 《湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2001,23(4)
陈波教授撰写的《奎因哲学研究》一书是中国第一本系统研究奎因哲学的专著。该书的突出特点在于 ,作者力图按照奎因哲学的内在逻辑 ,把它作为一个完整的体系加以考察 ,并提出了一系列独到的观点。此外该书作者把奎因哲学放在大陆哲学这一背景下进行评价 ,也显新意迭出。书中在评述奎因哲学的同时 ,还表现了对中国学术事业的极大关切 相似文献
20.
Philosophy for Children as the Wind of Thinking 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Nancy Vansieleghem 《Journal of Philosophy of Education》2005,39(1):19-35
In this paper I want to analyse the meaning of education for democracy and thinking as this is generally understood by Philosophy for Children. Although we may be inclined to applaud Philosophy for Children's emphasis on children, critical thinking, autonomy and dialogue, there is reason for scepticism too. Since we are expected as a matter of course to subscribe to the basic assumptions of Philosophy for Children, we seem to become tied, as it were, to the whole package, without reservation. Following ideas of Hannah Arendt, I draw attention to the instrumentalised nature of Philosophy for Children and the loss of originality that this instrumentalisation means. This does not mean that I wish to abandon Philosophy for Children. The point is rather that I want to examine whether or not another kind of philosophy for children is possible. 相似文献