共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 298 毫秒
1.
The paper presents the results of an international questionnaire survey of the attitudes of senior authors towards scholarly publishing. It was commissioned by the Publishers Association (PA) and the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM). A total of 5,513 authors participated. The questionnaire included 22 closed questions and one open‐ended question that 1,943 authors used to freely express their views. Using QSR N6 textual analysis software, their comments were processed and themes extracted. The main concerns of the authors were the peer‐review process, faster publishing, better access to journals, journal prices, and issues related to electronic publishing. 相似文献
2.
David Nicholas Hamid R. Jamali M. Paul Huntington Ian Rowlands 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(3):212-220
This paper presents the results of a major investigation by questionnaire of author attitudes towards scholarly publishing, which was funded by the Publisher's Association. Altogether, the views of nearly 4,000 authors were obtained and this paper concerns just those thousand or so authors who accepted the invitation to write freely about their own personal feelings and experiences. Using QSR N6 textual analysis software, their comments were processed and themes extracted. While the rest of the questionnaire, which was formed of closed‐question, tick‐box type questions, clearly must have had some impact on their thinking, the authors had considerable latitude in regard to what they could say. The paper provides a unique opportunity to hear their views directly. The pressing topics turned out to be (in rough order of concern): the peer‐review system, copyright, journal prices, alternative business models for journal publishing, big deals, Elsevier, electronic publishing and digital journals. 相似文献
3.
从作者指南入手提高科技期刊学术友好度 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
科技期刊以学术友好的方式提供学术出版,是其服务于学术界的根本要求。探求学者们的需要并及时作出反应是科技期刊贯彻学术友好理念最基本的步骤。为了实现学术友好,就应当在出版活动的各个环节贯穿友好的意识:从详细的写作指导、方便使用的投稿系统、严谨的同行评议、照顾阅读流畅的版式、以读者容易正确理解为目的的简洁文风等都应显示友好。作为科技期刊与学者们交流的窗口,作者指南是科技期刊根据学者们的需求所作的反应的一种表达,因此,从作者指南入手提高科技期刊的学术友好度是实现友好理念的有力措施。本文阐明作者指南的获取、形式和内容,解读作者指南需要涵盖的各个方面,以提高科技期刊的学术友好度。 相似文献
4.
Kristin Antelman 《Learned Publishing》2006,19(2):85-95
Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so‐called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self‐archiving. This study looks at the self‐archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self‐archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self‐archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self‐archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self‐archiving, as well as significant self‐archiving of the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers' self‐archiving policies have no influence on author self‐archiving practice. 相似文献
5.
科学杂志的未来 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
Bernald DONOVAN 《编辑学报》2000,12(2):120-124
科学论文肯定还将长期存在,因为如果只进行研究而不发表结果,投入的时间和金钱就不能产生效益,不少人把科学杂志仅仅看作是论文的合订本,这样科学杂志是否还将长期存在,便不象科学论文那样肯定,然而,一项由学术与专业学会出版商协会（Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers,ALPSP）完成的研究表明,科学论文的潜在作者十分看重期刊的声望,影响因子和同行评议的质量,优秀的期刊还汇聚有关领域的研究兴趣,推进着学科的进步,日趋明郎的是,电子数据库或者电子期刊将难以替代印刷版期刊,这不仅因为作者喜见自己的作品刊在高质量的期刊上,而且还因为电子产品在长期保存方面的许多问题,这些以及有关细节将予讨论。 相似文献
6.
Clive Hemingway 《Learned Publishing》1997,10(2):127-131
If publishers of learned journals are going to make a success of their web publishing, they should not forget all the skills they have developed in publishing in print. This paper reviews the application of familiar journal publishing skills in the context of electronic journals or electronic editions of printed journals, and pinpoints areas where these skills apply in web publishing and where new skills are necessary. 相似文献
7.
Mark Ware 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(3):193-199
This article is a revised version of a talk given at the ALPSP seminar of the same name in February 2005. The current state of play with electronic‐only (‘e‐only’) journals is reviewed, along with some data on the different ways print and electronic editions are used. The drivers for and against a move to e‐only journals are discussed, including economic and commercial issues, long‐term access and preservation, and the growing divergence between the capabilities of print and electronic journals. 相似文献
8.
The article processing charge (APC) is currently the primary method of funding professionally published open access (OA) peer‐reviewed journals. The pricing principles of 77 OA publishers publishing over 1,000 journals using APCs were studied and classified. The most commonly used pricing method is a single fixed fee, which can either be the same for all of a publisher's journals or individually determined for each journal. Fees are usually only levied for publication of accepted papers, but there are some journals that also charge submission fees. Instead of fixed prices, many publishers charge by the page or have multi‐tiered fees depending on the length of articles. The country of origin of the author can also influence the pricing, in order to facilitate publishing for authors from developing countries. 相似文献
9.
A. M. Elizarov D. S. Zuev E. K. Lipachev 《Scientific and Technical Information Processing》2014,41(1):66-72
In this article, the authors present modern information systems for the automatization of the full cycle of electronic scientific journal creation and publishing. The advantages of using open-access journal systems are shown. The choice of the Open Journal System (OJS) as the platform for creating an electronic base of scientific journals is substantiated. The authors present the structure of an electronic scientific journal-management system and describe the features of its implementation within the framework of the pilot system of the e-Government of the Republic of Tatarstan. 相似文献
10.
This study examines aspects of scholarly journal publishing in the Nordic countries. On average half of Nordic journals publish online. In most Nordic countries, commercial publishers predominate; however, in Finland the majority are society publishers. The number of open access journals is low, in line with international figures. There is concern to maintain local languages in journal publishing. A majority of the journals publishing in local languages are within social science, humanities, and arts; the STM sector publishes in English. English‐language publications are favoured in research assessments, international recognition, and impact, while the visibility of local‐language scholarly journals in international databases is low. The Nordbib program supports Nordic scholarly journals and fosters co‐operation with publishing companies and learned societies over migration to e‐publishing; it also supports open access. The article discusses future challenges for journal publishing, pointing out the problems of small journal publishers and the need for co‐operation between stakeholders. 相似文献
11.
Elke BARTHOLOMÄUS Sandy GOLDBECK‐WOOD Meike SEWERING Christopher BAETHGE 《Learned Publishing》2015,28(4):283-291
Bilingual publishing has become a strategy employed by journals from the non‐Anglophone world to gain wider recognition. Beyond anecdotal evidence, however, there are no published accounts of the experiences of editors and authors of bilingual journals with the process of bilingual publication. It is also unclear how authors writing in bilingual journals judge the quality of the translations and whether they consider this sort of publishing as beneficial for their aims. Consequently, we carried out two surveys: one among editors of bilingual journals and one anonymous survey among authors and translators of articles published in Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, the bilingual journal of the German Medical Association. Eight of nine journals as well as 233 of 353 authors and 4 of 6 translators took part. Most journals reported that bilingual publication helped in becoming indexed in important databases (e.g. Medline), receiving or improving an Impact Factor, and in attracting authors. All journals plan to continue publishing bilingually. Authors were ‘satisfied’ (40.8%) or ‘very satisfied’ (57.8%) with translations. Almost all (96.7%) were in favour of bilingual publication of their work. They did not view an English translation as an obstacle to another related English language paper. Translators highlighted challenges relating to specialized terminology and to terms specific to the regional healthcare system. 相似文献
12.
13.
Surveys were carried out to learn more about authors and open access publishing. Awareness of open access journals among those who had not published in them was quite high; awareness of ‘self‐archiving’ was less. For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact. Authors who had not published in an open access journal attributed that to unfamiliarity with such journals. Forty per cent of authors have self‐archived their traditional journal articles and almost twice as many say they would do so if required to. 相似文献
14.
Quan‐Hoang Vuong 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(4):314-324
This article discusses the emergence of academic publishing in a fast‐growing transition economy, Vietnam, where the race has heated up to publish in international journals, preferably with a high impact factor, and to accelerate the indexing of domestic journals. Within the fields of SSH alone, the publication output grew by 17% a year in the 2008–2018 period, encouraged by government policies and financial incentives for researchers. This review demonstrates an environment where there is sufficient financial growth to support increased R&D but limited skills and knowledge of how to increase quality publication output, either within national or international journals. The article highlights the drivers of increasing scientific publication output, as well as the traps and pitfalls that follow this competition. It suggests that there are opportunities for publishers and other organizations to improve ethical and practical publishing issues and to develop co‐publishing agreements that will increase the visibility of the country in international academia. The article indicates the harsh reality of pursuing higher publishing standards in academia, a world that has long been dominated by authors and publishers from industrialized countries. 相似文献
15.
科技期刊数字优先出版较好地解决了出版时滞长、学术论文难以快速出版等问题,加快了科技成果的传播速度.单篇优先灵活性大,出版速度更快;整期优先版面完整,灵活、便捷.纸质期刊出版后不宜覆盖数字优先版本,以解决版本冲突、DOI不确定等问题.同一文献无论数字优先还是纸质版,都应纳入文献引用频次统计.科技期刊出版工作更应强化互联网思维,尽快把数字出版文献纳入学术评价范畴,加强数字优先出版版权保护.无纸化网络出版是大势所趋,未来单篇数字优先出版将逐渐占据数字优先出版主导地位,乃至全部.期待依托网络时速性及大数据、云计算优势,构建独具特色、性格独特的科技期刊,促进学术环境健康发展. 相似文献
16.
Simon Inger 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(4):279-285
The British Library, under the auspices of the Joint Committee on Legal Deposit's sub‐committee for e‐journals, is conducting a pilot project to lay the groundwork for possible legislation for the legal deposit of electronic journals. One component of the project has been to understand the production environment that governs the creation of the published data, the content management systems that publishers have deployed and the ways in which publishers are able to distribute content to their partners. This work is a snapshot of a cross‐section of the UK journal‐publishing industry taken in May 2005. 相似文献
17.
18.
原始数据共享能提高学术诚信、减少科研浪费.期刊有义务帮助促进数据共享.本文通过对中华医学会系列杂志在2016年中国科技论文统计源期刊目录中的111种期刊,以及《中华医学杂志》(英文版)2016年发表文章的438名作者进行调查,了解中华医学会系列杂志及作者对原始数据共享政策的支持情况,并与BMJ出版集团出版的62种期刊(BMJ Journals)相比较,探索中国医学期刊推动数据共享政策的途径,提出中国医学科技期刊可从发表相关述评类或观点类文章、制定相应的编辑政策、开展丰富的互动活动等方面来推动原始数据共享. 相似文献
19.
Bo‐Christer Bjrk 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(3):227-236
The number of open access (OA) journals and their share of all scholarly journals are usually estimated based on indexing in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). DOAJ's coverage of OA journals from different regions of the world is, however, far from complete, particularly of journals publishing in languages other than English. Using alternative data sources for identification and manual verification, 437 scholarly OA journals published in the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) were identified, and some key characteristics were studied. Of these, only 184 were indexed in DOAJ. A vast majority of the journals was published by scholarly societies or universities. Social sciences and humanities dominated as topics, and few journals charge authors. National or university‐specific OJS portals have played a major role in enabling OA publishing. Around a third of the Nordic scholarly journals are currently OA. 相似文献
20.
不同语种科技期刊稿件互荐刊登的意义及方法 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
通过从读者、作者、科技期刊3个方面阐述不同语种科技期刊稿件互荐刊登的现实意义与深远影响.强调实施它的必要性和实际价值,并探讨其可行方法和具体措施. 相似文献