共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
山西省高校图书馆自动化建设工作在省教委及图工委的领导下,有组织、有计划地进行是从1995年12月晋教高字[95]56号文"关于加强高校图书馆自动化建设的通知"(以下简称"通知")下发开始的,而对图书馆自动化建设的专项评估工作是按照省教委[98]32号文"关于印发山西省高等学校图书馆自动化建设评估暂行办法和评估标准的通知"(以下简称《暂行办法和评估标准》的要求安排的. 相似文献
6.
关于修订高校图书馆评估项目和指标的两点看法 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
文章指出了目前高校图书馆评估指标体系滞后,无法概述新时期高校图书馆的整体工作。提出同一系统内设定同一的、高标准的指标以保证评估方案的先进性。建议根据发展需要扩大自动化、网络化建设项目的权重比例。探讨比较新型完整的评估体系,以达正确导向高校图书馆工作并促进高校图书馆建设。 相似文献
7.
陕西省普通高等学校图书馆评估工作的回顾与反思 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
从五个方面回顾和反思了本省高校图书馆的评估工作,并对评估数据进行了分析,对于了解陕西省高校图书馆的文献资源建设和自动化建设现状,提供了确切真实的数据和分析资料。对于开展图书馆评估工作,具有一定的借鉴意义。 相似文献
8.
评估--再次挑战高校图书馆 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
高洁 《大学图书情报学刊》2005,23(5):18-20
新形势下高校图书馆评估成为促进图书馆事业发展的机遇,在高校图书馆迎接评估、追求达标过程中,对图书馆文献资源建设、自动化、服务和科学管理等方面进行了探讨,指出目前评估体系存在的问题并提出建议,使图书馆真正达到以评促改、以评促建. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
图书馆自动化系统评价指标体系研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
尝试通过层次分析法确定图书馆自动化集成系统评价指标,划分指标层级,计算指标权重;并运用多指标综合评分法确定各级评价指标的分值,最后采用调查问卷法和专家群判断法获得评价数据,以期构建一个科学、合理、可行的图书馆自动化集成系统评价指标体系。 相似文献
12.
Peter Maruniak 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(1):57-63
IDRC has telecentre evaluation initiatives in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Each of these is in the process of establishing evaluation frameworks and each is adopting very different approaches. The current paper seeks to build on the outputs of IDRC's Far Hills Workshop on Telecentre Evaluation (September 1999) to explore the experiences in two of the three regions. These explorations will in turn contribute to IDRC's current initiative to develop a framework for ICTs evaluation.The Far Hills Workshop, and the resulting report entitled Telecentre Evaluation: A Global Perspective, had as objectives to explore challenges and opportunities for telecentre evaluation; understand and compare emerging evaluation frameworks and methodologies; assess needs and resources available; identify salient issues affecting telecentre performance; and provide an opportunity to exchange experiences and lessons across regions. 相似文献
13.
[目的/意义]机构知识库评价研究意义重大,通过对国内外机构知识库评价研究实践的总结和分析,揭示当前机构知识库评价研究进展,为进一步研究提供方向.[方法/过程]基于文献分析,从评价内容、评价指标、评价方法三方面进行机构知识库评价研究评述.其中,机构知识库评价内容主要包括系统软件、数字资源管理、机构成员态度、实践建设、影响因素、绩效评价等方面;评价指标主要包括8种类型;评价方法主要包括平衡记分卡法、焦点小组访谈法、链接分析法等.[结果/结论]目前机构知识库评价研究已取得显著进展,但在用户多元化评价、定量指标设置等方面仍有待进一步研究. 相似文献
14.
《International Information and Library Review》2002,34(1):57-78
IDRC has telecentre evaluation initiatives in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Each of these is in the process of establishing evaluation frameworks and each is adopting very different approaches. The current paper seeks to build on the outputs of IDRC's Far Hills Workshop on Telecentre Evaluation (September 1999) to explore the experiences in two of the three regions. These explorations will in turn contribute to IDRC's current initiative to develop a framework for ICTs evaluation.The Far Hills Workshop, and the resulting report entitled Telecentre Evaluation: A Global Perspective, had as objectives to explore challenges and opportunities for telecentre evaluation; understand and compare emerging evaluation frameworks and methodologies; assess needs and resources available; identify salient issues affecting telecentre performance; and provide an opportunity to exchange experiences and lessons across regions. 相似文献
15.
Kamel Asali 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(2):171-183
AbstractLibrary automation assumed a great deal of importance in libraries in the mid 1960’s. Since then it has become a household word in librarianship. Library automation in university libraries in Ghana is a relatively new concept. Even though computers have been installed in the three university libraries in Ghana, computerization has not had much impact on the services provided by these libraries. This paper reviews the computerization projects in the university libraries in Ghana, with a particular reference to the Balme Library of the University of Ghana. Reasons for automation, areas of application and problems associated with automation are discussed. Also highlighted are barriers militating against successful university library automation, like financial problems, attitudinal problems, lack of co-operation among university libraries, hardware and software problems and personnel problems. Recommendations are made for the improvement of automation at the university libraries in Ghana. These include evaluation of existing systems, properly planned automation project, financial support and co-operation among the university libraries. 相似文献
16.
17.
图书馆网络信息服务绩效评价的指标与方法 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
图书馆网络信息服务绩效评价应该包括三个方面：一是网络信息服务系统建设绩效评价，二是网络信息资源建设绩效评价，三是用户感知的服务绩效评价。其评价方法可以按照评价主体分为三类：自我评价；第三方评价；用户评价。这三类方法各有侧重，自我评价主要用于评价网络信息服务系统建设绩效，第三方评价主要用于评价网络信息资源建设绩效，用户评价主要用于评价用户感知服务绩效，但也不是泾渭分明，也可以综合使用。 相似文献
18.
《International Information and Library Review》1995,27(2):171-181
Library automation assumed a great deal of importance in libraries in the mid 1960's. Since then it has become a household word in librarianship. Library automation in university libraries in Ghana is a relatively new concept. Even though computers have been installed in the three university libraries in Ghana, computerization has not had much impact on the services provided by these libraries. This paper reviews the computerization projects in the university libraries in Ghana, with a particular reference to the Balme Library of the University of Ghana. Reasons for automation, areas of application and problems associated with automation are discussed. Also highlighted are barriers militating against successful university library automation, like financial problems, attitudinal problems, lack of co-operation among university libraries, hardware and software problems and personnel problems. Recommendations are made for the improvement of automation at the university libraries in Ghana. These include evaluation of existing systems, properly planned automation project, financial support and co-operation among the university libraries. 相似文献
19.
20.
国内外信息素养评价标准比较研究 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
信息素养评价标准是信息素养教育评价的依据,也是准确判断人们信息素养程度与水平的标尺。国外信息素养评价标准的研究已经成为热点并出台了比较成熟的各种信息素养评价标准。本文在回顾国内外主要信息素养评价标准的基础上,对比分析得知,两者在信息素养评价标准的框架结构、核心内容,以及标准的可操作性都不强上具有相同点。但两者在研制主体、规范成熟程度、图书馆在其中的地位和作用以及标准的实施方式等方面存在明显的差别。最后,文章提出为加快我国信息素养评价标准的研制,应尽快成立国家层面的管理机构,出台国家性质的通用信息素养评价标准,确立图书馆专业协会在其中的作用,完善我国信息素养评价标准的指标体系和标准的实施方式。 相似文献