共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Rats were trained to forage for food on a four-arm radial maze. Each arm of the maze was defined as a patch and contained four feeding stations. Each patch contained a total of 20 45-mg food pellets, with the first feeding station in each patch baited with 1 pellet and the remaining stations baited with 1, 5, or 13 pellets. In Experiment 1, one group of rats was tested with feeders open and food readily accessible, and another group was tested with metal covers on the feeders, which necessitated extra time to gain access to food. With open feeders, the rats visited each feeder in a patch in the order in which they encountered the feeders, from the center of the maze to the end of the arm. The rats in the group with the covered feeders often visited the feeders containing 5 or 13 pellets first and the feeders containing 1 pellet last. In Experiment 2, it was found that the rats switched readily between these two foraging strategies when tested with covered and open feeders on alternate sessions. The extra time and effort required to uncover food appeared to produce selective foraging in rats. 相似文献
2.
William A. Roberts 《Learning & behavior》1991,19(4):305-316
A four-arm radial maze containing 10 feeders in each arm (patch) was used to study patch sampling in rats. In each of three experiments, rats foraged for 30 sessions. On each session, two randomly chosen patches were baited with food and the remaining two patches were empty. In Experiment 1, the number of baited feeders in baited patches (6) was varied from 1–10 over five groups of subjects. Mean visits to empty patches was an inverse function of 6, as predicted by an optimal foraging model. In Experiments 2 and 3, rats’ ability to discriminate between baited and empty patches was examined when food in baited patches was placed in fixed locations, either in clumps (Experiment 2) or distributed throughout the patch (Experiment 3). Rats in fixed-food-location conditions reliably visited fewer feeders in empty patches than did rats in randomly changing control groups. Examination of within-patch foraging patterns indicated that rats in fixed-food-location groups selectively sampled potentially baited locations and abandoned the patch if food was not found. It is suggested that processes of patch discrimination were responsible for these effects. 相似文献
3.
Hoffman, Timberlake, Leffel, and Gont (1999) concluded that the tactic of effective trail following (in the form of arm and wall travel), rather than distance minimizing, central-place search, or random search, best characterized the locomotion of rats on a radial arm maze placed flat on the floor of an arena (a floor RAM). The present experiments analyzed further the stimulus control and function of arm and wall travel. Experiment 1 showed that arm travel was controlled more by the edge of a maze arm than by its surface. Experiment 2 showed that rats with whiskers clipped on one side traveled along arms less and along walls more than did intact rats. Experiment 3 showed that maze arms increased search effectiveness and decreased suppression of locomotion by bright light and a novel environment. The results support the hypothesis that arm and wall travel are based on mechanisms of trail following, which, in natural settings, contribute to food finding and regulation of social relations and fear. 相似文献
4.
Cynthia M. Hoffman William Timberlake Joseph Leffel Rory Gont 《Learning & behavior》1999,27(4):426-444
Norway rats have been shown to depend on short-term spatial memory to find food on a radial arm maze (RAM), but what locomotor search tactics are involved in using this memory effectively? Four experiments distinguished tactics of distance minimizing, central-place search, trail following, thigmotactic search, and random search by using different configurations of a RAM placed flat on the floor of an arena. These search tactics make similar predictions on an elevated RAM but predict different outcomes on a floor RAM because the rats are free to approach the food from any direction. After initial trials dominated by exploration, rats traveled along arms to food, even when the resultant distance was up to three times the minimum distance. With no food present, rats also traveled along arms; with no arms up to present, they traveled along walls to food. It appears that both maze arms and arena walls engage mechanisms related to trail following in rats. 相似文献
5.
The effects of food reward on rats’ behavior in radial and Dashiell tunnel mazes were examined in two experiments. In the first, with animals at ad-lib body weights, food reward reduced speed of movement at the food locations, but did not affect the patterns of movement in either maze. Exploratory efficiency in the Dashiell maze was unaffected by food reward, and spontaneous patrolling of the radial maze by the nonrewarded animals was comparable to the behavior, reported by others, of rats running for food reward on elevated eight-arm mazes. In the second experiment, with subjects maintained at 80% of ad-lib body weights, there was some evidence for “winstay” learning: food-rewarded rats in the Dashiell maze were relatively more active near the food locations than were the nonrewarded animals, and more rewarded than nonrewarded rats revisited all food locations in the radial maze. Nonetheless, exploratory efficiency in the Dashiell maze was unaffected by food reward, as was patrolling efficiency in the radial maze, which was again comparable to that of rats on elevated mazes. The similarity in behavior of rewarded and nonrewarded animals in these mazes implies that the major determinant of their behavior, whether or not food reward is provided, is a spontaneous tendency to avoid places recently visited. 相似文献
6.
Experiment 1 showed that laboratory-reared desert kangaroo rats, like domestic Norway rats, efficiently search for food on a radial arm maze (RAM) by avoiding revisiting arms within a trial. By placing an RAM on the floor so the animals could approach food from any direction, Experiment 2 tested whether efficient search by kangaroo rats was based on tactics of distance minimizing, central-place foraging, trail following, or meandering. In contrast to the dominant trail-following tactic of domestic Norway rats (Hoffman, Timberlake, Leffel, & Gont, 1999), kangaroo rats tended to distance minimize, whether maze arms were present or not. Experiment 3 indicated that kangaroo rats treated a floor configuration of eight food cups as twopatches of four, based on beeline travel between patches and meandering within them. We conclude that similar performance in an elevated RAM by different species can be based on different tactics, and we suggest that a laboratory apparatus can be used to cast light on niche-related mechanisms. 相似文献
7.
In two experiments, we examined how the introduction of vertical or horizontal irregularities in the perfectly regular shape of a radial maze affected rats’ performances. The introduction of various tilts in each arm of an eight-arm radial maze had a slightly positive effect on accuracy. However, when intra- and extraraaze cues were dissociated by rotating the maze before maze completion, the rata relied preferentially on extramaze cues associated with the horizontal direction of the arms but not with the tilts. On the other hand, the rats showed poor performances when trained on a horizontally distorted maze (uneven angles between the arms instead of repeated 45° angles). The high number of errors was related to the neglect of particular arms, the disorganization of the patrolling sequences, and the tendency to chain the visit of five arms that formed a regular ahape. Other animals, trained in the same maze, displayed similar biases even after a pretraining phase with constrained choices. Results from the horizontally distorted maze confirm and extend data from the spontaneous alternation literature that choice behavior is influenced by rules of movement that favor large angle transitions and regular subdivisions of space. They also stress the relation between performance in the radial maze and spontaneous exploratory and foraging behaviors. 相似文献
8.
Rats were trained in a standard 12-arm radial maze task. Following training, each trial consisted of a sequence of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 choices, followed by a 15-min delay, which then was followed by a choice between a single arm and a response manipulandum mounted in the center of the maze. An arm visit was reinforced if the arm had not been visited prior to the delay, whereas a manipulandum response was reinforced if the arm had been visited. It was found that rats are relatively more likely to reject arms by responding to the manipulandum following a delay occurring late in the choice sequence. This indicates that the choice criterion used by rats in the radial maze becomes more strict as the choice sequence progresses. Such a process provides an alternative explanation for some of the data recently reported by Cook, Brown, and Riley (1985). 相似文献
9.
The relative importance of intramaze cues and extramaze cues in directing choice behavior on a radial arm maze was examined using a discrimination procedure which selectively rewarded rats for following only one set of cues. Rats in the intramaze group obtained food from a food cup on the end of each arm. Rats in the extramaze group obtained food from a food cup on a small platform just beyond the end of each arm. All rats were first shaped to perform correctly with the maze in a constant position. Then the maze was rotated to a new position after every choice. For rats in the intramaze group, the food moved with the arms, making intramaze cues relevant. For rats in the extramaze group, the food remained on the platforms (in the same position in the room), making extramaze cues relevant. Rats in the extramaze group performed almost perfectly during maze rotation, demonstrating that intramaze cues were not necessary to support accurate choice behavior. Rats in the intramaze group never performed better than chance, demonstrating that intramaze cues (from the rats, the reinforcement, and the apparatus) were not adequate to control choice behavior. The results of the present experiment are compared to those of other experiments describing the influence of “odor trails” or other olfactory stimuli on choice behavior in mazes. 相似文献
10.
Social memory was investigated in the context of a spatial working memory task. Pairs of rats were tested in an eight-arm
radial maze. Under most conditions, there was a tendency to choose maze locations that had been visited earlier by the other
rat. The possibility that this tendency is produced by common preferences for particular maze locations was ruled out. An
opposite tendency to avoid visits to locations that had been visited earlier during the trial by another rat was found only
when the maze location contained two pellets (rather than an undepletable supply), the rats’ ability to see each other in
the maze was restricted to the central arena, and the maze location had been previously visited by the focal rat. The amount
of food available in maze locations did not otherwise modulate social influences on spatial choice. The results indicate that
memory for a rat’s own previous choices is combined with memory for the choices made by another rat. 相似文献
11.
Time-place discrimination has been shown reliably in several avian and insect species, but only occasionally in rats and fish. In the present experiments, we explored the effects of response cost on time-place discrimination by rats. In the first experiment, we increased the cost of making a choice and the cost of recovering from a wrong choice in two types of maze, a radial arm and a vertical maze. In the radial arm maze, we found only general place preference, whereas in the vertical maze, we obtained evidence of time-place discrimination. In the second experiment, we found that the proportion of rats showing time-place discrimination increased with the height and, therefore, the response cost of the vertical maze. These results suggest that rats do not automatically store and/or retrieve the time and place of reward events but that response cost is an important trigger for time-place discrimination. 相似文献
12.
Rats are typically less accurate in their arm selections in the radial maze over successive trials in a session (Roberts & Dale, 1981). In the present study, rats’ choice accuracy declined when such trials were separated by 2-min (massed) but not by 2-h (spaced) intertriai intervals. Changing intramaze visual/tactile arm stimuli (Experiments 1 and 3) or extramaze landmark stimuli (Experiment 4) between trials weakened the massed-trials effect, but changing the number of food pellets per arm, either alone or in conjunction with changes in intramaze cues (Experiments 2 and 3), did not. The rats also tended to avoid the spatial locations of their last four choices on a previous trial during their first four choices on a current trial, and more so with massed than with spaced trials. These findings indicate that intertriai proactive interference (PI) occurred only with massed trials and was weakened by changing intra- and extramaze cues between such trials. 相似文献
13.
John D. Batson Michael R. Best Deborah L. Phillips Hemlata Patel Kevin R. Gilleland 《Learning & behavior》1986,14(3):241-248
Thirsty rats were trained to collect small water rewards from the end of each arm of an eight-arm radial maze. During these training trials and subsequent testing trials, the subjects were allowed to choose a maximum of eight arms. “Preference” for a target maze location was studied by noting when, in the sequence of eight choices, the target was selected. During testing, when one maze location was consistently devoid of water, rats decreased their preference for this arm over trials (Experiment 1). Similarly, rats that learned a saccharin-lithium association demonstrated lower preferences for a maze location that consistently held the conditioned saccharin solution. This was true for animals that received saccharin-lithium conditioning on the maze (Experiment 3A) and for animals conditioned to saccharin in a separate context (Experiment 3B). An increase in preference for a target maze location consistently containing a sweet chocolate milk solution was observed in animals that were water- and food-deprived (Experiment 2). These studies demonstrate that animals will modify their responses toward (preferences for) maze locations that predictably contain an altered reward. 相似文献
14.
Brown MF Knight-Green MB Lorek EJ Packard C Shallcross WL Wifall T Price T Schumann E 《Learning & behavior》2008,36(4):327-340
In two experiments using a radial-arm maze, pairs of rats made choices among eight maze locations, each containing a large
quantity of one of two food types. The choices made by 1 rat affected the choices made by the other rat. Under most conditions,
visits by 1 rat increased the tendency of the other rat to subsequently choose that maze location. However, the effect depended
on the quality of the food available in a particular location. When it was possible for the rats to observe each other on
the maze arms and a rat had experienced that a location contained the less preferred food type, a previous visit to that location
by the foraging partner decreased the tendency to visit that location. These effects are attributed to working memory for
the spatial choices of another rat, and they indicate that memory produced by a rat’s own visit to a maze location is integrated
with memory for the behavior of another rat to determine spatial choice 相似文献
15.
In an enclosed four-arm radial maze, after sampling three experimenter-selected baited arms (thestudy segment) and following rotation of the maze, rats had to find the fourth baited arm among all four unblocked arms (test segment). The rats learned this task with two sets of arm cues, objects at arms’ entrances and full arm inserts, each maintained
in a fixed configuration. When we changed the configuration of one set of arms to itsmirror image and that of the other set to a moremixed variation by switching opposite and adjacent cued arms, the rats’ accuracy was similarly disrupted (Experiment 1). In Experiment
2, the same rats rapidly recovered their high search accuracy on four new configurations recombined from pairs of adjacent
arms and pairs of opposite cued arms from the previous final two configurations. Their test segment search accuracy, however,
was again disrupted when these configurations were varied either only over trials’ study segments or only over trials’ test
segments. In Experiment 3, however, these rats attained accuracy as high on two sets of cued arms with constantly changing
configurations as on two sets with constant configurations. Thus, the rats were able to separately represent four different
spatially stable configurations, and then they could learn to represent two of these configurations as lists of spatially
irrelevant items. We discuss these findings in terms of association theory and parallel map theory (Jacobs & Schenk, 2003). 相似文献
16.
Michael F. Brown 《Learning & behavior》1990,18(1):13-22
Rats trained in a 16-arm radial maze with arms half the standard length demonstrated extremely low, but above chance, choice accuracy (Experiment 1). Rats trained in a 12-arm maze with short arms demonstrated a substantially higher degree of adjacent-arm responding than did rats trained in the same maze with long maze arms and, when response stereotypy was disrupted by a forced-choice procedure, the short-arm group chose less accurately than the long-arm group (Experiment 2). In a 16-arm maze with 8 short arms and 8 long arms, there was a strong preference for short arms and no evidence for a difference in the ability to discriminate previously visited arms from unvisited arms as a function of arm length, as measured by a two-alternative forced-choice procedure (Experiment 3). These results are interpreted as indicating that arm length affects a choice criterion, with a relatively lax criterion being applied to shorter arms. 相似文献
17.
Laura A. Hogarth William A. Roberts Shelley Roberts Benjamin Abroms 《Learning & behavior》2000,28(1):43-58
We performed six experiments in order to examine the ability of rats to use moving beacons and landmarks as cues to the location of reward on an eight-arm radial maze. In Experiments 1–4, the cues and goals were moved before each trial, and groups in which a single beacon was placed on the rewarded arm, a single landmark indicated that reward was on the arm immediately to the left of a landmark, or two landmarks were placed on each side of the reward arm were compared. The rats rapidly learned to track the reward in the beacon condition, failed to find the reward sooner than chance expectation with a single landmark, and did only slightly better than chance with two landmarks. In Experiments 5 and 6, the rats were trained in five trials per day, with the landmark and goal locations constant over daily rewarded trials, and in two extinction trials that were inserted among the rewarded trials. The rats found the goal arm at substantially better than chance expectancy with both one and two landmarks. Our results, in agreement with data from recent swimming pool experiments (A. D. L. Roberts & Pearce, 1998), show that rats will use the relationship between moving landmarks and a goal in order to find reward. 相似文献
18.
The resource-distribution hypothesis states that the ability of an animal to remember the spatial location of past events is related to the typical distribution of food resources for the species. It appears to predict that Norway rats would perform better than domestic pigeons in tasks requiring spatial event memory. Pigeons, tested in an eight-arm radial maze, exhibited no more than half of the memory capacity observed in rats in the same apparatus and may not have used spatial memory at all. The results were interpreted as supporting the hypothesis. 相似文献
19.
Rats were trained on an interval time-place learning (TPL) task in which the location of food availability depended on the
time since the start of the session. Each of four levers (numbered 1, 2, 3, 4) provided food on an intermittent schedule for
two nonconsecutive 3-min periods. The order in which the levers provided food was 1, 2, 4, 3, 2, 3, 1, 4. This order was consistent
across sessions. Previous research conducted in our lab has shown that when only four “places” are used, rather than the eight
in the present study, rats use a timing strategy to track the location of food. Pizzo and Crystal (2004) recently trained
rats on an interval TPL in which each of eight arms of a radial arm maze provided food. They found evidence suggesting that
rats used both spatial and temporal information. In the present study, in which a revisiting strategy was used (i.e., each
lever provided food on more than one occasion), the rats tracked both the spatial and the temporal availability of food for
the first half of the session. Interestingly, in the second half of the sessions, the rats appeared to be timing the availability
of food even though they did not know where it would occur. That is, the rats knew the temporal, but not the spatial, contingencies
for the second half of the session. It appears that the requirement of revisiting a previously reinforced lever resulted in
rats' no longer being able to solve the spatial aspect of the task. 相似文献
20.
Treatments that interfere with animals’ short-term retention (e.g., in delayed matching-to-sample) were studied using a spatial memory task. Rats performed in an eight-arm radial maze in which choosing each arm without repetition was the optimal behavior. Performances were interrupted between fourth and fifth choices for a delay of 15 sec to 2 min. A variety of events occurring during the delay interval did not disrupt memories for prior choices (as assessed by the accuracy of postdelay choices). The ineffective treatments included variations in visual and auditory environments, removal from the maze, food consumed during the delay, a distinctive odor added to the maze, or combinations of these manipulations. Additionally, performance on another spatial task (a four-arm maze) during the delay between Choices 4 and 5 did not interfere with performance in the eight-arm maze. These findings suggest that rats’ memories for spatial locations are immune to retroactive interference, at least within the range of conditions reported, and that the rat can successfully segregate memories for spatial locations established in different contexts. 相似文献