共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
发展指导项目的效果评估已经在世界范围广泛开展,并成为教育过程中的重要环节。本研究以我国东部、中部、西部和东北部地区64所高中的18164名学生为调查对象,通过问卷调查的方式对我国高中生参与发展指导活动的现状以及不同指导活动形式的效果进行探讨。结果表明:(1)学生参与所有发展指导活动的次数均存在显著的地域、年级差异;学生参与发展指导课程、团体辅导、专题讲座的次数在不同的学校类型上存在显著差异;学生参与实践活动、社团活动、专题讲座、个体指导的次数存在显著的性别差异。(2)参与发展指导课程对学生发展无显著促进作用;参与实践活动、社团活动、团体辅导、专题讲座、个体指导、心理咨询对促进学生积极发展和减少消极发展均有不同程度的有效性。根据我国高中学生发展指导现状及其效果的调查,我们对如何科学有效地开展发展指导活动提出了建议。 相似文献
2.
交互式在线学习活动的有效开展是提高远程教育质量的关键因素之一,同时更是促进学习者深层学习的发生、理解能力的提高和交流技能的发展的必由之路.其中,教师的有效指导行为会对在线学习活动中学员参与交互的积极性和交互的进展产生重要影响.本文从教师如何更好地指导在线学习活动入手,以学生支持的内涵和远程交互理论作为研究的理论基础,在分析目前在线学习活动中教师指导的作用与存在的问题的基础上,探析了教师在各个交互层次上进行有效指导所面临的各种误区和关注的指导重心,并紧密结合教学实践的实际需求,在各个交互层次上提供了具体的、可操作性强的指导策略与方法,期望对教师完善在线教学指导工作和全面评价教学交互是否促进学员的有意义学习有所帮助.本文对帮助教师全面认识与把握学生学习支持中高效指导的策略与方法,并最终提高在线学习活动的质量具有借鉴意义. 相似文献
3.
4.
本文从“设计基于问题情境的数学探究环境,是一切数学探究教学方法的基础：创设问题环境是指导数学探究学习的关键：探究过程要素的把握是指导数学探究学习的难点：探究成果的展示是探究学习的目的”等方面介绍了数学探究学习的课堂指导策略。 相似文献
5.
胡玉萍 《中国教育发展研究杂志》2010,7(4):196-197
数学课程《标准》指出：数学教学活动中,教师应激发学生的学习积极性,向学生提供充分从事数学活动的机会,帮助他们在自主探究和合作交流过程中真正理解和掌握基本的数学知识与技能、数学思想和方法,获得广泛的数学活动经验。由此可见数学教学中实施学法指导不仅是学生主体学习的需要,更是他们将来学会生存,谋求发展的需要。初中数学学习方法的指导是一个循序渐进的过程,要因势利导,因材施教,激发学生自主精神,培养自主学习意识。开设学法指导课,促进学生有效学习。注重学生的个体差异,加强能力的培养． 相似文献
6.
7.
田永群 《中国科教创新导刊》2010,(33):57-57
数学,作为研究数量、结构、变化以及空间模型等概念的一门学科,它也是一门深奥而又有趣味的学科。学生数学成绩的好坏,学习数学兴趣的高低,在很大程度上取决于学生的数学学习方法的优劣以及教师给予的指导有效与否。对于如何指导小学生学好数学的方法,本文拟作如下探讨。 相似文献
8.
正一、y老师的探究理念Y老师,中学数学高级教师,二十年教龄,教学成绩相当突出,在期中、期末考试中平均分、优秀率、及格率综合得分常居第一,并大大超出年级其他老师任课班级。其不但教学成绩出色,也积极参加教研,是同行、市区教研员中的"红人",常常被邀请对全区、全市教师做培训,在学生评教方面,学生讲很喜欢他教数学,认为其课堂学习效率高、学习收获大,在优质课竞赛方面,曾获得市级一等奖,是市级学科带头人,名师工作室领衔人。他的课 相似文献
9.
陈水彬 《数学学习与研究(教研版)》2013,(24):118-119
本文以新课程理念为指导,在教学实践的基础上对"初中数学学习方法"进行探究,从"学法指导的意义"、"主要的数学学法指导"及"学法指导时应注意的几个问题"三个方面进行论述个人的一些观点. 相似文献
10.
一、y老师的探究理念Y老师,中学数学高级教师,二十年教龄,教学成绩相当突出,在期中、期末考试中平均分、优秀率、及格率综合得分常居第一,并大大超出年级其他老师任课班级。其不但教学成绩出色,也积极参加教研,是同行、市区教研员中的＂红人＂,常常被邀请对全区、全市教师做培训,在学生评教方面,学生讲很喜欢他教数学,认为其课堂学习效率高、学习收获大,在优质课竞赛方面,曾获得市级一等奖,是市级学科带头人,名师工作室领衔人。 相似文献
11.
12.
谢冬冰 《江苏广播电视大学学报》2014,(2):15-19
江苏开放大学已经明确了学生的服务与管理实行"学务导师制",这是学校服务与管理体系中的关键环节。所谓"双导师制"即负责专业教学的课程导师与负责学生服务与管理的"学务导师"。"双导师"负责制是江苏开放大学与江苏电大的不同,也因此区别于其他各级各类的"网校"。学务导师是开放学生服务与日常管理的具体责任人。学务导师负责学员的学籍、选课、甚至毕业的一系列工作。 相似文献
13.
《学习科学杂志》2013,22(2):167-207
This article reviews the 10-year history of tutor development based on the advanced computer tutoring theory (J. R. Anderson, 1983, 1993). We developed production system models in ACT of how students solved problems in LISP, geometry, and algebra. Computer tutors were developed around these cognitive models. Construction of these tutors was guided by a set of eight principles loosely based on the ACT theory. Early evaluations of these tutors usually, but not always, showed significant achievement gains. Best case evaluations showed that students could achieve at least the same level of proficiency as conventional instruction in one third of the time. Empirical studies showed that students were learning skills in production-rule units and that the best tutorial interaction style was one in which the tutor provides immediate feedback, consisting of short and directed error messages. The tutors appear to work better if they present themselves to students as nonhuman tools to assist learning rather than as emulations of human tutors. Students working with these tutors display transfer to other environments to the degree that they can map the tutor environment into the test environment. These experiences have coalesced into a new system for developing and deploying tutors. This system involves selecting a problem-solving interface, constructing a curriculum under the guidance of a domain expert, designing a cognitive model for solving problems in that environment, building instruction around the productions in that model, and deploying the tutor in the classroom. New tutors are being built in this system to achieve the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) standards for high-school mathematics in an urban setting. 相似文献
14.
This study explores issues related to the tutor’s role when initiating tutoring as an institutional strategy at a conventional university. Based on a pilot tutoring program implemented in four college courses, we investigated the perceptions of instructors, tutors and students regarding the role of tutoring and whether it affected the psychological distance between the different types of participants. The results indicated that instructors’ perceptions of the tutor’s primary role and the psychological distance from the students and the tutors differed from the perceptions of the tutors and the students, perhaps because the instructors perceived tutors as a source of instructor support rather than student support. Implications and suggestions are discussed. 相似文献
15.
Teaching other students in a face-to-face manner has been shown to effectively foster both one’s own and their learning. This study experimentally investigated whether and how tutors and tutees academically benefit from three phases of face-to-face teaching: preparing-to-teach, initial-explanation, and interaction phases. Japanese undergraduates (n = 80) acted as tutors or tutees in peer tutoring. After studying with the expectation of teaching face-to-face or taking a test (the preparing-to-teach phase), tutor participants provided tutee participants with initial instructional explanations, without asking or answering questions (the initial-explanation phase), and then engaged in a question-and-answer period (the interaction phase). Tutor and tutee participants learned better by providing and receiving higher-quality explanations in the initial-explanation and interaction phases. Face-to-face teaching vs. test expectancy had no effects on the quality of tutor participants’ explanations or their learning outcomes. The results suggest that both the initial-explanation and interaction phases contribute to learning by teaching face-to-face, whereas the preparing-to-teach phase does not.
相似文献16.
Feedback is a key element in effective teaching and learning. The issue of how teachers perceive the role of feedback will impact significantly their feedback approaches, the amount of the detail of their feedback and the time and effort expended on the feedback provision. This research was designed with the purpose of exploring how a group of over 50 tutors who were supporting an online university English course perceived, understood and interpreted the processes of assignment feedback. A factor analysis study based on questionnaire data revealed three sets of tutor beliefs towards assessment and tutor feedback: traditional–autonomous–global (TAG), student‐centred (SC) and traditional‐local (TL). Follow‐up in‐depth interviews were conducted with tutors. The TAG tutors saw scores as the most important feedback to students, but doubted the value of detailed feedback. SC tutors maintained that good tutor feedback should offer more than mere scores, and that students needed feedback in order to improve. TL tutors tended to underline all the errors and provide detailed feedback. They were negative towards the idea of their feedback being monitored. The authors identified some differing and converging tutor perceptions on assessment feedback, the understanding of which could arguably play an important role in introducing changes in tutor feedback culture. 相似文献
17.
Hung-chun Wang 《Pedagogies: An International Journal》2019,14(1):1-16
Integrating service-learning into content courses is a growing pedagogical model expanding in higher education institutes in many countries. To examine the application of this approach in English L2 writing classes, this study embarked on a tutor–tutee mentoring project at a Taiwanese university. The participants in this study served as writing tutors to help non-English majors with their writing skills. They went through five phases to complete their individual services—selecting a tutee, exploring the tutee’s difficulty in writing, designing a workshop for the tutee, implementing the workshop, and reflecting upon their service experience. Probing the tutors’ responses to a project evaluation survey, this study showed that the tutors generally considered the project to be beneficial for enhancing their writing skills, writing confidence, knowledge about how to improve academic writing, and awareness of their own capabilities in helping others. However, this project was limited in several aspects, such as the amount of time demanded, the tutors’ levels of teaching knowledge and skills, and some tutors’ lack of confidence. Based on the results, this study concludes by proposing pedagogical recommendations to help English writing teachers fuse this project into their writing curricula more effectively. 相似文献
18.
Locus of control and tutor's instructional style as determinants of cross-age tutoring effectiveness
Junior high students serving as cross-age tutors taught their elementary school tutee an analogy lesson in the presence of observers who recorded tutor teaching behaviors and tutee learning as a function of students' internal-external control. Based upon results demonstrating that externals outperform internals when another person provides feedback regarding response accuracy, it was hypothesized that tutorial instruction would benefit external learners more than internal learners. Correlations between tutee externality and task performance (though in the expected direction) were not significant and failed to support the hypothesis. On the other hand, hypotheses regarding tutor behaviors were confirmed. As predicted, internal tutors expected to be more successful teachers, used more verbal and nonverbal cues in their teaching, expended more noticeable effort, and taught more analogies than external tutors. The implications of these results for the conduct of tutoring programs in schools was discussed. 相似文献
19.
Peer assessment can be important in developing active and independent learners, as well as providing more and faster feedback in large classes, compared to marking done by tutors. In addition, the evaluative, critical stance required by students in order to assess their peers' work encourages the development of higher-order cognitive skills. Changing roles from being assessed to being an assessor can also improve students' ability to judge and improve on their own work. However, peer assessment does have potential problems and there is some debate as to the appropriate academic level at which to implement it, the kinds of feedback that are given and the ways in which students respond. In addition, there is little evidence that peer assessment has an impact on academic performance. This research reports the results of an online peer assessment exercise for a macroeconomics essay conducted in a large Economics 1 class at Rhodes University. Of the 800 students, about half participated in the peer assessment exercise. Data were collected from students via a formal course evaluation. In addition, a sample of 50 essays was evaluated in terms of the relationship between peer marks and final (tutor) marks received and the impact that peer assessment had on the quality of the final essay submitted. An Ordinary Least Squares regression was used to investigate the impact of peer assessment participation on marks. Results showed that peer marks tended to ‘bunch’ in the 60–68% range, indicating the reluctance of peers to give very high or low marks. In general, peers gave more useful feedback on technical aspects, such as presentation and referencing (which were also the categories in which students most often made improvements), than on content. Regression analysis showed that peer assessment participation was not a significant determinant of final essay mark, but that economics ability and English language proficiency were. 相似文献
20.
Jonathan Galbraith 《Educational studies》2011,37(3):321-332
Drawing on role theory and socio‐constructivist ideas about learning, this study explores how peer‐tutoring can support tutors’ learning. The sample comprised ten 16–17‐year‐old biology tutors, working with twenty‐one 14–15‐year‐old students from a science class over eight weeks. Data were collected through an online wiki, tutor interviews, paired tutor discussions and video recordings. Tutors’ perceptions of their role motivated them to learn the material, and their learning was supported by discussion and explanation, revisiting fundamentals, making links between conceptual areas, testing and clarifying their understanding, and reorganising and building ideas, rehearsing them, and working through them repeatedly, to secure their understanding. When tutors employed long answer questions, there was evidence of reflection on their learning and links made between conceptual areas. When preparing to tutor, tutors could focus on key points and engage with basic ideas from alternative perspectives. Mental rehearsal of peer‐tutoring episodes helped them appreciate weaknesses in their own subject knowledge. 相似文献