共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
<档案管理>2007年第3期刊载的摘自<档案界>网站<建国前的地方志应作为档案管理>一文的意见是正确的,我极为赞成.什么是资料?并无定论.在现代汉语中,"资料"是使用得极为广泛的一个词,如生产资料、生活资料、技术资料、水文资料、图书资料、文献资料、音像资料等. 相似文献
2.
<察世俗每月统记传>是近代期刊中目前见到的第一种中文期刊,现在很难看到其实物资料.以该刊"封面,,<序><释疑篇><告帖>和<月食>等文章体裁及其出版形式的影印件为材料,对刊物创刊前的准备概况、出版内容、编辑特征和刊物的出版贡献等进行探讨. 相似文献
3.
郑春颖 《图书馆理论与实践》2009,(11)
<梁书·高句骊传>是研究高句丽历史的重要参考资料.其主要史料来源是<论衡><魏略><三国志><后汉书><魏书>及两晋、梁代有关资料.经过姚思廉的努力纠正了前史中的一些讹误,完善了<高句丽传>的编纂体例.同时,某些文献的缺失,史料分歧的错误解读,对重要资料的忽视等主客观因素又使<梁书·高句骊传>错误纷然. 相似文献
4.
<正>实物地质资料是指地质工作中产生的岩(矿)心、标本、样品、光(薄)片等。这些实物地质资料同成果地质资料、原始地质资料一样,是国家经巨大投入取得的信息资源,具有重要档案保管意义和开发利用价值。国土资源部在2008年发布了《实物地质资料管理办法》,根据该管理办法的要求,广东省国土资源厅于2010年10月开展了实物地质资料汇交、保管和利用工作,并由广东省 相似文献
5.
《李郃墓志》是重要的地方文献史料和古代实物档案。其文献学价值体现在档案史料的真实性,可补正史不足,丰富历史资料。校勘史料对李郃身世家族、个人贡献、社会影响等记载,有助于了解当时社会生活现象、礼制制度与社会风尚,便于史学研究者更接近历史真实。 相似文献
6.
<正>一座保存完好的古建筑,既是研究某一阶段的历史文化的重要实物资料,又是一个地区的社会、文化发展的历史见证,更是一个城市发展过程的记忆。笔者所在的湛江市保存了不少具有历史文化价值的古民居、古村落和历史文化街区。如具有欧陆和南洋风情的骑楼,距今已有80多年的历史,随着岁月侵蚀,建筑保存 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(1-2):103-119
Abstract This study provides an empirical, practical measure of the citation practices of the two highest courts in the state of Indiana during a recent ten-year span (1994-2003). It focuses on the type of legal materials most frequently cited as authority, examining the importance of both primary and secondary sources. It also demonstrates the importance of housing and maintaining complete appellate briefs from the two highest courts in the state of Indiana. 相似文献
12.
《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(4):65-75
The lack of attention given to federal court rules in legal curricula and lack of uniformity in bibliography coverage creates a problem for researchers in locating and using rules; the reference librarian must overcome this problem. This article is a guide to federal court rules, providing the location of these sets in standard legal bibliographic sources and information regarding commentaries and other interpretive works. 相似文献
13.
15.
《Government Information Quarterly》2006,23(2):309-324
Between the years 1855 and 1863, the opinions or “reports” of the United States Court of Claims were delivered to the House of Representatives for final consideration. In total, 296 cases were conveyed, but in the process, Report 42 was lost and, according to indexes of such documents, “never received by [the] House.”This article cites examined records of the Court of Claims, from both the United States Congressional Serial Set and original documents now in the National Archives, which support the contention that there was a completed opinion for Court of Claims Report 42 that was lost sometime during its transfer between the Court and the House.This 150-year-old case – Letitia Humphreys, Administratrix of Andrew Atkinson – was one in a long list of judicial proceedings, involving over 100 claimants, that resulted from the 1812 invasion of Florida by the United States, and that concerned the payment of interest to those compensated under the last clause of the ninth article of the 1819 Treaty of Amity, Settlement, and Limits, Between the United States of America and His Catholic Majesty. These Florida petitions were examples of early claims actions against the federal government, in many cases after decades of inaction. 相似文献
16.
《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(1-2):139-149
SUMMARY Two former Texas Supreme Court justices recently offered to donate their personal court files to the Tarlton Law Library, University of Texas at Austin. These offers forced the Law Library, the Texas Supreme Court, and the State Archives to confront several issues. Should such files ever be made public? If so, what would be an appropriate waiting period? What research value, if any, do such papers have? These working files would be valued not only by legal historians, but also by litigants, voters, and political opponents, raising some sticky access issues. 相似文献
17.
《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(4):275-299
Abstract This article describes the electronic revolution that is currently taking place within court systems across the nation. Digital archiving of documents is becoming a well-established practice. Electronic filing of documents is gathering momentum as a viable method of conducting the daily business of the courts. Although court functions remain relatively the same, the manner in which their daily business is being affected is changing dramatically. 相似文献
18.
《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(2-4):285-309
No abstract available for this article. 相似文献
19.