首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 687 毫秒
1.
人体解剖学实验室是用来进行解剖学实验教学的重要场所,人体解剖学的教学任务大多是在人体解剖学实验室里完成的,因此,加强人体解剖学实验室的环境建设,完善人体解剖学实验室的规划管理是非常必要的.  相似文献   

2.
实验教学是人体解剖学的重要组成部分,正确评价实验教学效果具有必要性和关键性。传统的实验教学评价模式在人力、物力和时间成本方面消耗较高,效率低下。文章拟将数字化评价模式引入人体解剖学实验评价中,比较数字化评价模式与传统评价模式的优劣性,为人体解剖学的实验教学评价探索新的评价途径,并为数字化评价模式的推广提供一定的理论基础。  相似文献   

3.
《考试周刊》2016,(A1):3-4
人体解剖学教学包括理论教学和实验教学,实验教学是把抽象的理论具体化,提高学生感性认识的必要途径,直接影响解剖学的教学效果,实验考试是促进实验教学的有效手段,因此解剖学教师必须加强实验教学和实验考试改革,强化解剖学教学效果。  相似文献   

4.
运动解剖学作为体育专业一门重要学科基础课,在运动对人体影响的实践中有重要指导作用,而承担实践任务的运动解剖学实验教学更显重要。但当前形势下运动解剖学实验教学存在诸多问题和不足,本文针对当前高校体育院系运动解剖学实验教学中存在的主要问题,提出高校体育院系主管部门应加强对运动解剖学实验教学的重视、更新实验教学内容体系和优化实验教学队伍等建议和举措,希冀为高校体育院系运动解剖学实验教学改革起到抛砖引玉的作用。  相似文献   

5.
人体解剖学是研究正常人体形态结构的科学,是医学生进入医学院校后最早接触的专业课程之一.学好这门课程不仅可以为后续的其它基础课程和临床课程的学习奠定良好的基础,而且决定了学生进入临床后护理技能操作的熟练程度与质量高低.人体解剖学作为一门形态学科,除了理论教学外,实验教学在其整个教学活动中占据着重要地位.实践证明,优化实验教学环境,整合实验教学内容,改进实验教学方法,规范实验考核体系,健全实验室管理制度,对提高人体解剖学实验教学质量,切实树立为临床护理服务的观念意义重大、深远.  相似文献   

6.
介绍了利用彩色电视变倍生物摄影显微镜与录放机相配合录制组织切片的方法及录制盒带在人体组织解剖学实验教学中的应用,这种方法可有效地提高人体组织解剖学实验教学的总体效果。  相似文献   

7.
《实验技术与管理》2013,(6):143-145
人体解剖学实验教学对于巩固理论知识、培养学生的创新精神和实践能力具有重要意义。针对传统的人体解剖学实验教学模式中存在的不足,从实验平台开设、教材编写、资源平台建设、实验教学方法、教学内容、考试方法等方面进行一系列改革与创新,以提高实验教学质量和学生的综合素质。  相似文献   

8.
人体解剖学是医学教育中的重要学科,是医学各学科的基础。解剖学的学习效果对进一步学习其他课程及今后的临床实践起着非常重要的作用,而实验教学担负着提升医学生动手能力及创新意识的关键作用。研究表明,综合院校构建开放实验室是提高医学生的创新和实践能力的有效途径。因此,构建人体解剖学实验开放平台能够使人体解剖学实验教学与培养医学生综合科研素养及创新能力紧密结合,旨在增强学生的主体地位、实践创新能力、科学探索精神及团队合作意识均具有非常重要的现实意义。  相似文献   

9.
人体解剖学主要研究正常人体的形态结构,属于形态学范畴。人体结构的立体构象是学生的学习重点,立体构象的建立多数在实验中完成,所以实验课堂教学质量的好坏就显得尤为重要。笔者根据多年教学经验,结合我校人体解剖学实验教学实践,进行了一些有关提高解剖学实验课堂教学质量方面的探讨。  相似文献   

10.
人体解剖学是一门重要的医学基础课,是每个医学生接触最早,而且又必须学好的医学启蒙学科之一.人体解剖学的直观性和实践性是其主要特征,所以在教学过程中,实验教学是一个非常重要的环节.在高等医学院校中,实验教学的比例占到总学时的一半,甚至达到了三分之二,可见实验教学在解剖教学中的重要性.在实验教学过程中如何全面、充分有效的利用教具是提高教学质量的关键.  相似文献   

11.
基于“互联网+”背景下,针对传统的留学生人体解剖学教学存在的问题,应运而生了“互联网+”教育模式,即利用信息技术及互联网平台,将虚拟仿真平台、慕课等新的模式和方法应用于教学,为留学生人体解剖学教学提供了新的思路和方法,从而促进了我国现阶段医学留学生解剖学课程的教学质量的提高。  相似文献   

12.
为适应素质教育的需要,在分析中学生物学教材和人体解剖生理学高考试题、正视遵义市中学生物学教师队伍的现状、总结遵义师范学院人体解剐生理学实验的教学历程和经验的基础上,提出人体解剖生理学实验教学改进的3个新思路.  相似文献   

13.
高师人体解剖生理学教学改革研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
分析了高师人体解剖生理学教学现状以及存在问题,提出了提高教学质量的教学改革思路,并且从教学内容、教学方法、教学手段等方面进行改革与实践.  相似文献   

14.
Anatomical education has suffered from reduced teaching time and poor availability of staff and resources over the past thirty years. Clay-based modeling (CBM) is an alternative technique for teaching anatomy that can improve student knowledge and experience. This systematic review aimed to summarize and appraise the quality of the literature describing the uses, advantages, and limitations of CBM compared to alternative methods of teaching human gross anatomy to students or qualified healthcare professionals. A systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted, and the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) was used to assess study quality. Out of the 829 studies identified, 12 papers met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for this review. The studies were of high quality, with a mean MERSQI score of 11.50/18. Clay-based modeling can be used to teach all gross anatomical regions, and 11 studies demonstrated a significant improvement in short-term knowledge gain in students who used CBM in comparison to other methods of learning anatomy. Eight studies that included subjective assessment showed that CBM is rated highly. However, some studies showed that students viewed CBM as juvenile and experienced difficulty making the models. Additionally, there is no evidence to suggest that CBM improves long-term knowledge. Clay-based modeling is an effective learning method for human gross anatomy and should be incorporated into the anatomists' toolkit. In the future, more randomized controlled studies with transparent study designs investigating the long-term impact of CBM are needed.  相似文献   

15.
在医学科学飞速发展的今天,作为一名解剖学教师,在把握高职护理教育人才培养目标的基础上,针对现行解剖学教学中存在的问题,如何进一步做好解剖学教学工作,是值得深思与探讨的。切实提高高职护理专业解剖学教学水平,必须从编写适用教学大纲,改变传统授课方式,保证实践教学环节,结合多媒体教学手段,加强应用解剖学教育,切实提高教师素质等几方面工作着手。  相似文献   

16.
Anatomy has historically been a cornerstone in medical education regardless of nation or specialty. Until recently, dissection and didactic lectures were its sole pedagogy. Teaching methodology has been revolutionized with more reliance on models, imaging, simulation, and the Internet to further consolidate and enhance the learning experience. Moreover, modern medical curricula are giving less importance to anatomy education and to the acknowledged value of dissection. Universities have even abandoned dissection completely in favor of user‐friendly multimedia, alternative teaching approaches, and newly defined priorities in clinical practice. Anatomy curriculum is undergoing international reformation but the current framework lacks uniformity among institutions. Optimal learning content can be categorized into the following modalities: (1) dissection/prosection, (2) interactive multimedia, (3) procedural anatomy, (4) surface and clinical anatomy, and (5) imaging. The importance of multimodal teaching, with examples suggested in this article, has been widely recognized and assessed. Nevertheless, there are still ongoing limitations in anatomy teaching. Substantial problems consist of diminished allotted dissection time and the number of qualified anatomy instructors, which will eventually deteriorate the quality of education. Alternative resources and strategies are discussed in an attempt to tackle these genuine concerns. The challenges are to reinstate more effective teaching and learning tools while maintaining the beneficial values of orthodox dissection. The UK has a reputable medical education but its quality could be improved by observing international frameworks. The heavy penalty of not concentrating on sufficient anatomy education will inevitably lead to incompetent anatomists and healthcare professionals, leaving patients to face dire repercussions. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83–93, 2010. © 2010 American Association of Anatomists.  相似文献   

17.
Publications on anatomy in medical education appear to be largely anecdotal. To explore this, we investigated the literature on anatomy in medical education, aiming first to evaluate the contribution of the literature on anatomy in medical education to "best evidence medical education" (BEME) and second to evaluate the development of this literature toward more "best evidence" between 1985 and 2009. Four databases were searched for publications on anatomy in medical education published between 1985 and 2009, resulting in 525 references. Hundred publications were characterized by five variables (journal category, paper subject, paper category, author perspective, and paper perspective). Statements from these publications were characterized by two variables (category and foundation). The publications contained 797 statements that involved the words "anatomy," "anatomical," or "anatomist." Forty-five percent of the publications contained no explicit research question. Forty percent of the statements made were about "teaching methods" and 17% about "teaching content," 8% referred to "practical value," and 10% to "side effects" of anatomy education. Ten percent of the statements were "positional," five percent "traditional," four percent "self-evident," and two percent referred to "quality of care." Fifty-six percent of the statements had no foundation, 17% were founded on empirical data, and 27% by references. These results substantiated the critical comments about the anecdotal nature of the literature. However, it is encouraging to see that between 1985 and 2009 the number of publications is rising that these publications increasingly focus on teaching methods and that an academic writing style is developing. This suggests a growing body of empirical literature about anatomy education.  相似文献   

18.
Anatomy education forms the foundation of a successful medical education. This has necessitated the development of innovative ideas to meet up with current realities. Despite these innovative ideas, there are challenges facing anatomy education, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Problems such as inadequate teaching experts and outdated curricula have made anatomy education in sub-Saharan Africa uninviting and disinteresting. Several interventions have been suggested, such as the procurement of teaching tools and upgrading of teaching infrastructure. However, in this age of information technology; anatomy education, especially in sub-Saharan Africa could benefit from the integration of electronic tools and resources. This article explores the electronic tools and resources such as three-dimensional printing, educational games, and short videos that are readily available for the teaching of anatomy in sub-Saharan Africa. The author concludes by discussing how these electronic tools and resources can be used to address many of the challenges facing anatomy education in sub-Saharan Africa.  相似文献   

19.
Anatomical education in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland has long been under scrutiny, especially since the reforms triggered in 1993 by the General Medical Council's “Tomorrow's Doctors.” The aim of the current study was to investigate the state of medical student anatomy education in the UK and Ireland in 2019. In all, 39 medical schools completed the survey (100% response rate) and trained 10,093 medical students per year cohort. The teachers comprised 760 individuals, of these 143 were employed on full-time teaching contracts and 103 were employed on education and research contracts. Since a previous survey in 1999, the number of part-time staff has increased by 300%, including a significant increase in the number of anatomy demonstrators. In 2019, anatomy was predominantly taught to medical students in either a system-based or hybrid curriculum. In all, 34 medical schools (87%) used human cadavers to teach anatomy, with a total of 1,363 donors being used per annum. Gross anatomy teaching was integrated with medical imaging in 95% of medical schools, embryology in 81%, living anatomy in 78%, neuroanatomy in 73%, and histology in 68.3%. Throughout their five years of study, medical students are allocated on average 85 h of taught time for gross anatomy, 24 h for neuroanatomy, 24 h for histology, 11 h for living anatomy, and 10 for embryology. In the past 20 years, there has been an average loss of 39 h dedicated to gross anatomy teaching and a reduction in time dedicated to all other anatomy sub-disciplines.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号