共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 881 毫秒
1.
Shih-Diing Liu 《Inter-Asia Cultural Studies》2013,14(2):252-271
How do governed postcolonial subjects perform resistance in the age of the internet? What are their oppositional practices, networks and creativity? This paper offers an empirical analysis of the emerging network politics in Macau, the former colony of Portugal whose sovereignty was returned to China in 1999, by focusing on netizens' engagement with the postcolonial governance. This research considers “government” as consisting of not only power but freedom. It starts with an interest in the “failure” of the government—that is, how the new regime, which attempts to insert the postcolonial subject into a new power structure, actually fails to produce a completely uniform and obedient subjectivity. Instead, its rule is saturated with a multiplicity of “netwars” which take advantage of the opportunities and resources offered by the new media environment. The network struggle, which is not unified under any single authority, enables a segment of the governed population to do politics and constitute subjectivity otherwise. In particular, I illustrate how egao, which opens official icons of the administration to negotiation and contestation, allows the governed to make their own political statements. The postcolonial cyberpolitics is simultaneously agonistic and playful, expressing what Foucault calls the refusal “to be ruled in such manners”, or the desire for alternative mode of governing. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
世纪课题：关于《三国演义》的成书年代 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
20世纪80年代以来，《三国演义》研究取得了长足进展，研究的广度和深度都超过了历史上的任何一个时期。然而，一些重要而又是基本的问题，至今尚未解决。《三国演义》的成书年代问题，就是这样的一个“世纪课题”。 相似文献
8.
契丹是中国古代史上具有悠久历史的一个北方游牧民族,从公元4世纪后半叶见诸典籍记载,经过几个世纪的发展,至916年,耶律阿保机在中国北方建立了幅员辽阔的契丹辽朝政权,影响远播亚欧.1125年辽朝灭亡后,小部分契丹人西迁中亚建立西辽（哈喇契丹）,大部分契丹人则沦为金朝的臣民.成吉思汗兴起后,契丹人降附了蒙古,随之东征西讨,南征北战.元朝建立后,契丹人分散在各地.当元朝在中原统治结束,明朝建立后,契丹人逐渐消失得无影无踪.那么,一个具有如此辉煌历史的民族是如何消失的呢？在今天,还有契丹人的后裔吗？下面试对这一历史过程进行一下解析,并对其现存后裔作简单介绍. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
《Cultural and Social History》2013,10(4):493-510
ABSTRACTThe picture discussed apparently represents a ‘snapshot’ of eighteenth-century family life. However, it is argued in this article that it is problematic to approach such visual material as if it can render direct evidence of a past, historical reality. This is not simply because art may distort or misrepresent its subject matter. Such an approach is also in danger of ignoring the potential evidence embodied in the representation itself – in this case, both a highly self-conscious ‘display’ of modern life and an historically meaningful act of artistic prowess. 相似文献
19.