共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Increasingly, tests are being translated and adapted into different languages. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses are often used to identify non-equivalent items across language groups. However, few studies have focused on understanding why some translated items produce DIF. The purpose of the current study is to identify sources of differential item and bundle functioning on translated achievement tests using substantive and statistical analyses. A substantive analysis of existing DIF items was conducted by an 11-member committee of testing specialists. In their review, four sources of translation DIF were identified. Two certified translators used these four sources to categorize a new set of DIF items from Grade 6 and 9 Mathematics and Social Studies Achievement Tests. Each item was associated with a specific source of translation DIF and each item was anticipated to favor a specific group of examinees. Then, a statistical analysis was conducted on the items in each category using SIBTEST. The translators sorted the mathematics DIF items into three sources, and they correctly predicted the group that would be favored for seven of the eight items or bundles of items across two grade levels. The translators sorted the social studies DIF items into four sources, and they correctly predicted the group that would be favored for eight of the 13 items or bundles of items across two grade levels. The majority of items in mathematics and social studies were associated with differences in the words, expressions, or sentence structure of items that are not inherent to the language and/or culture. By combining substantive and statistical DIF analyses, researchers can study the sources of DIF and create a body of confirmed DIF hypotheses that may be used to develop guidelines and test construction principles for reducing DIF on translated tests. 相似文献
2.
Two simulation studies investigated Type I error performance of two statistical procedures for detecting differential item functioning (DIF): SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel (MH). Because MH and SIBTEST are based on asymptotic distributions requiring "large" numbers of examinees, the first study examined Type 1 error for small sample sizes. No significant Type I error inflation occurred for either procedure. Because MH has the potential for Type I error inflation for non-Rasch models, the second study used a markedly non-Rasch test and systematically varied the shape and location of the studied item. When differences in distribution across examinee group of the measured ability were present, both procedures displayed inflated Type 1 error for certain items; MH displayed the greater inflation. Also, both procedures displayed statistically biased estimation of the zero DIF for certain items, though SIBTEST displayed much less than MH. When no latent distributional differences were present, both procedures performed satisfactorily under all conditions. 相似文献
3.
Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST, which have known difficulty in detecting non-unidirectional differential item functioning (DIF), have been adapted with some success for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This study adapts logistic regression (LR) and the item-response-theory-likelihood-ratio test (IRT-LRT), capable of detecting both unidirectional and non-unidirectional DIF, to the CAT environment in which pretest items are assumed to be seeded in CATs but not used for trait estimation. The proposed adaptation methods were evaluated with simulated data under different sample size ratios and impact conditions in terms of Type I error, power, and specificity in identifying the form of DIF. The adapted LR and IRT-LRT procedures are more powerful than the CAT version of SIBTEST for non-unidirectional DIF detection. The good Type I error control provided by IRT-LRT under extremely unequal sample sizes and large impact is encouraging. Implications of these and other findings are discussed. 相似文献
4.
In this study, the effectiveness of detection of differential item functioning (DIF) and testlet DIF using SIBTEST and Poly-SIBTEST
were examined in tests composed of testlets. An example using data from a reading comprehension test showed that results from
SIBTEST and Poly-SIBTEST were not completely consistent in the detection of DIF and testlet DIF. Results from a simulation
study indicated that SIBTEST appeared to maintain type I error control for most conditions, except in some instances in which
the magnitude of simulated DIF tended to increase. This same pattern was present for the Poly-SIBTEST results, although Poly-SIBTEST
demonstrated markedly less control of type I errors. Type I error control with Poly-SIBTEST was lower for those conditions
for which the ability was unmatched to test difficulty. The power results for SIBTEST were not adversely affected, when the
size and percent of simulated DIF increased. Although Poly-SIBTEST failed to control type I errors in over 85% of the conditions
simulated, in those conditions for which type I error control was maintained, Poly-SIBTEST demonstrated higher power than
SIBTEST. 相似文献
5.
第二语言学习者专业背景对HSK阅读成绩影响的项目功能差异检验 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文旨在考察HSK应试者的专业背景是否会对他们的阅读成绩产生影响。运用MH方法和SIBTEST方法对2009年HSK(初中等)考试阅读题目进行DIF筛查,把专业背景为自然科学的HSK考生设为目标组,专业背景为人文社会科学的HSK考生设为参照组。MH方法的结果是没有找到含有DIF的题目;SIBTEST方法的结果如下:第一轮DIF筛查检测到一个题目,第二轮DBF筛查检测到一组题目。这组题目有利于人文社会学科专业背景的被试。就检测DIF的方法而言,本研究认为SIBTEST方法更加敏感,DBF检验更加适合像阅读理解测验这样的一组或多组相互关联的题目。 相似文献
6.
Analyzing examinees’ responses using cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) has the advantage of providing diagnostic information. To ensure the validity of the results from these models, differential item functioning (DIF) in CDMs needs to be investigated. In this article, the Wald test is proposed to examine DIF in the context of CDMs. This study explored the effectiveness of the Wald test in detecting both uniform and nonuniform DIF in the DINA model through a simulation study. Results of this study suggest that for relatively discriminating items, the Wald test had Type I error rates close to the nominal level. Moreover, its viability was underscored by the medium to high power rates for most investigated DIF types when DIF size was large. Furthermore, the performance of the Wald test in detecting uniform DIF was compared to that of the traditional Mantel‐Haenszel (MH) and SIBTEST procedures. The results of the comparison study showed that the Wald test was comparable to or outperformed the MH and SIBTEST procedures. Finally, the strengths and limitations of the proposed method and suggestions for future studies are discussed. 相似文献
7.
SIBTEST is a differential item functioning (DIF) detection method that is accurate and effective with small samples, in the presence of group mean differences, and for assessment of both uniform and nonuniform DIF. The presence of multilevel data with DIF detection has received increased attention. Ignoring such structure can inflate Type I error. This simulation study examines the performance of newly developed multilevel adaptations of SIBTEST in the presence of multilevel data. Data were simulated in a multilevel framework and both uniform and nonuniform DIF were assessed. Study results demonstrated that naïve SIBTEST and Crossing SIBTEST, ignoring the multilevel data structure, yield inflated Type I error rates, while certain multilevel extensions provided better error and accuracy control. 相似文献
8.
Daniel M. Bolt 《Journal of Educational Measurement》2000,37(4):307-327
This paper considers a modification of the DIF procedure SIBTEST for investigating the causes of differential item functioning (DIF). One way in which factors believed to be responsible for DIF can be investigated is by systematically manipulating them across multiple versions of an item using a randomized DIF study (Schmitt, Holland, & Dorans, 1993). In this paper: it is shown that the additivity of the index used for testing DIF in SIBTEST motivates a new extension of the method for statistically testing the effects of DIF factors. Because an important consideration is whether or not a studied DIF factor is consistent in its effects across items, a methodology for testing item x factor interactions is also presented. Using data from the mathematical sections of the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT), the effects of two potential DIF factors—item format (multiple-choice versus open-ended) and problem type (abstract versus concrete)—are investigated for gender Results suggest a small but statistically significant and consistent effect of item format (favoring males for multiple-choice items) across items, and a larger but less consistent effect due to problem type. 相似文献
9.
Randall D. Penfield 《Journal of Educational Measurement》2007,44(3):187-210
Many statistics used in the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in polytomous items yield a single item-level index of measurement invariance that collapses information across all response options of the polytomous item. Utilizing a single item-level index of DIF can, however, be misleading if the magnitude or direction of the DIF changes across the steps underlying the polytomous response process. A more comprehensive approach to examining measurement invariance in polytomous item formats is to examine invariance at the level of each step of the polytomous item, a framework described in this article as differential step functioning (DSF). This article proposes a nonparametric DSF estimator that is based on the Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimator ( Mantel & Haenszel, 1959 ), which is frequently implemented in the detection of DIF in dichotomous items. A simulation study demonstrated that when the level of DSF varied in magnitude or sign across the steps underlying the polytomous response options, the DSF-based approach typically provided a more powerful and accurate test of measurement invariance than did corresponding item-level DIF estimators. 相似文献
10.
11.
《教育实用测度》2013,26(3):217-233
The standardization and Mantel-Haenszel approaches to the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) are described and compared. For rightwrong scoring of items, these two approaches, which emphasize the importance of comparing comparable groups of examinees, use the same data base for analysis, namely, a 2 (Group) x 2 (Item Score: Correct or Incorrect) x S (Score Level) contingency table for each item studied. The two procedures differ with respect to how they operate on these basic data tables to compare the performance of the two groups of examinees. Whereas the operations employed by Mantel-Haenszel are motivated by statistical power considerations, the operations employed by standardization are motivated by datainterpretation considerations. These differences in operation culminate in different measures of DIF effect-size that are very highly related indicators of degree of departure from the null hypothesis of no DIF. 相似文献
12.
Jeffrey A. Douglas Louis A. Roussos William Stout 《Journal of Educational Measurement》1996,33(4):465-484
This article proposes two multidimensional IRT model-based methods of selecting item bundles (clusters of not necessarily adjacent items chosen according to some organizational principle) suspected of displaying DIF amplification. The approach embodied in these two methods is inspired by Shealy and Stout's (1993a, 1993b) multidimensional model for DIF. Each bundle selected by these methods constitutes a DIF amplification hypothesis. When SIBTEST (Shealy & Stout, 1993b) confirms DIF amplification in selected bundles, differential bundle functioning (DBF) is said to occur. Three real data examples illustrate the two methods for suspect bundle selection. The effectiveness of the methods is argued on statistical grounds. A distinction between benign and adverse DIF is made. The decision whether flagged DIF items or DBF bundles display benign or adverse DIF/DBF must depend in part on nonstatistical construct validity arguments. Conducting DBF analyses using these methods should help in the identification of the causes of DIF/DBF. 相似文献
13.
In this paper a new approach to graphical differential item functioning (DIF) is offered. The methodology is based on a sampling-theory approach to expected response functions (Lewis, 1985; Mislevy, Wingersky, & Sheehan, 1994). Essentially error in item calibrations is modeled explicitly, and repeated samples are taken from the posterior distributions of the item parameters. Sampled parameter values are used to estimate the posterior distribution of the difference in item characteristic curves (ICCs)for two groups. A point-wise expectation is taken as an estimate of the true difference between the ICCs, and the sampled-difference functions indicate uncertainty in the estimate. Tbe approach is applied to a set of pretest items, and the results are compared to traditional Mantel-Haenszel DIF statistics. The expected-response-function approach is contrasted with Pashley's (1992) graphical DIF approach. 相似文献
14.
Rebecca Zwick Dorothy T. Thayer Marilyn Wingersky 《Journal of Educational Measurement》1995,32(4):341-363
In a previous simulation study of methods for assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in computer-adaptive tests (Zwick, Thayer, & Wingersky, 1993, 1994), modified versions of the Mantel-Haenszel and standardization methods were found to perform well. In that study, data were generated using the 3-parameter logistic (3PL) model and this same model was assumed in obtaining item parameter estimates. In the current study, the 3PL data were used but the Rasch model was assumed in obtaining the item parameter estimates, which determined the information table used for item selection. Although the obtained DIF statistics were highly correlated with the generating DIF values, they tended to be smaller in magnitude than in the 3PL analysis, resulting in a lower probability of DIF detection. This reduced sensitivity appeared to be related to a degradation in the accuracy of matching. Expected true scores from the Rasch-based computer-adaptive test tended to be biased downward, particularly for lower-ability examinees 相似文献
15.
W. Holmes Finch 《教育实用测度》2013,26(1):30-45
ABSTRACTDifferential item functioning (DIF) assessment is a crucial component in test construction, serving as the primary way in which instrument developers ensure that measures perform in the same way for multiple groups within the population. When such is not the case, scores may not accurately reflect the trait of interest for all individuals in the population. Most DIF research has focused on the two groups case. However, in practice researchers may wish to investigate DIF for more than two groups; that is, for examinee ethnicity, nation of origin, or treatment condition, among others. DIF detection methods for such cases have been proposed, but little empirical work has been done to investigate their performance. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to use a simulation methodology to compare four proposed methods for assessing DIF in the multiple groups case, including the Generalized Mantel-Haenszel test, Generalized Logistic Regression, Lord’s chi-square test, and the multiple group alignment procedure. Results showed that the Generalized Mantel-Haenszel and alignment procedures provided the optimal combination of Type I error control and power. 相似文献
16.
In this study, we investigate the logistic regression (LR), Mantel-Haenszel (MH), and Breslow-Day (BD) procedures for the simultaneous detection of both uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning (DIF). A simulation study was used to assess and compare the Type I error rate and power of a combined decision rule (CDR), which assesses DIF using a combination of the decisions made with BD and MH to those of LR. The results revealed that while the Type I error rate of CDR was consistently below the nominal alpha level, the Type I error rate of LR was high for the conditions having unequal ability distributions. In addition, the power of CDR was consistently higher than that of LR across all forms of DIF. 相似文献
17.
Youngsuk Suh 《Journal of Educational Measurement》2016,53(4):403-430
This study adapted an effect size measure used for studying differential item functioning (DIF) in unidimensional tests and extended the measure to multidimensional tests. Two effect size measures were considered in a multidimensional item response theory model: signed weighted P‐difference and unsigned weighted P‐difference. The performance of the effect size measures was investigated under various simulation conditions including different sample sizes and DIF magnitudes. As another way of studying DIF, the χ2 difference test was included to compare the result of statistical significance (statistical tests) with that of practical significance (effect size measures). The adequacy of existing effect size criteria used in unidimensional tests was also evaluated. Both effect size measures worked well in estimating true effect sizes, identifying DIF types, and classifying effect size categories. Finally, a real data analysis was conducted to support the simulation results. 相似文献
18.
We analyzed a pool of items from an admissions test for differential item functioning (DIF) for groups based on age, socioeconomic status, citizenship, or English language status using Mantel-Haenszel and item response theory. DIF items were systematically examined to identify its possible sources by item type, content, and wording. DIF was primarily found in the citizenship group. As suggested by expert reviewers, possible sources of DIF in the direction of U.S. citizens was often in Quantitative Reasoning in items containing figures, charts, tables depicting real-world (as opposed to abstract) contexts. DIF items in the direction of non-U.S. citizens included “mathematical” items containing few words. DIF for the Verbal Reasoning items included geocultural references and proper names that may be differentially familiar for non-U.S. citizens. This study is responsive to foundational changes in the fairness section of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, which now consider additional groups in sensitivity analyses, given the increasing demographic diversity in test-taker populations. 相似文献
19.
Identifying the Causes of DIF in Translated Verbal Items 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Avi Allalouf Ronald K. Hambleton Stephen G. Sireci 《Journal of Educational Measurement》1999,36(3):185-198
Translated tests are being used increasingly for assessing the knowledge and skills of individuals who speak different languages. There is little research exploring why translated items sometimes function differently across languages. If the sources of differential item functioning (DIF) across languages could be predicted, it could have important implications on test development, scoring and equating. This study focuses on two questions: “Is DIF related to item type?”, “What are the causes of DIF?” The data were taken from the Israeli Psychometric Entrance Test in Hebrew (source) and Russian (translated). The results indicated that 34% of the items functioned differentially across languages. The analogy items were the most problematic with 65% showing DIF, mostly in favor of the Russian-speaking examinees. The sentence completion items were also a problem (45% D1F). The main reasons for DIF were changes in word difficulty, changes in item format, differences in cultural relevance, and changes in content. 相似文献
20.
This Monte Carlo study examined the effect of complex sampling of items on the measurement of differential item functioning (DIF) using the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Data were generated using a 3-parameter logistic item response theory model according to the balanced incomplete block (BIB) design used in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The length of each block of items and the number of DIF items in the matching variable were varied, as was the difficulty, discrimination, and presence of DIF in the studied item. Block, booklet, pooled booklet, and extra-information analyses were compared to a complete data analysis using the transformed log-odds on the delta scale. The pooled booklet approach is recommended for use when items are selected for examinees according to a BIB design. This study has implications for DIF analyses of other complex samples of items, such as computer administered testing or another complex assessment design. 相似文献