共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 72 毫秒
1.
明代律令规定了对各类度量衡违法行为的不同处罚,帝王也多次下诏重申加强度量衡法制管理力度。清代相当重视度量衡法制管理,制订、颁布了与度量衡管理相关的多条法律条令。 相似文献
2.
3.
韩中两国是友好邻邦,自古以来贸易和交流很频繁,两国又都在使用汉字,但在度量衡单位上存在着很多不同点。本文仔细分析两国的度量衡的发展历史,并指出不同点。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
翟艳荣 《科技成果管理与研究》2011,(4):104-105
李峰,男,副研究员,河南省新乡县人,1986年毕业于河南省百泉农专;2002—2005年在河南职业技术师范学院进修生物科学系;现任新乡市农科院食用菌研究所所长,河南省现代农业产业技术体系食用菌新乡综合试验站站长,河南省微生物学会理事,河南省食用菌协会理事,新乡市食用菌协会秘书长。他长期致力于食用菌研究,先后完成10个项目的研究,共引进培育了30多个新菌株,在豫北地区进行大面积推广,取得了很好的经济效益; 相似文献
7.
8.
目的:应用同质化管理,规范各科室备用药品,保障备用药品使用安全性与及时性。方法:备用药品管理小组应用同质化理念,运用PDCA循环管理方法对我院83个科室备用药品种类、分类、定位储存、使用、记录和领取进行质量持续改进。结果:实施同质化管理后,备用药品的种类在我院由432种减少到196种,减少了54. 63%;备用药品总储备显著减少,其中,注射剂由32574支下降到11263支,下降率为65. 42%;各类备用药品规范管理,第三周期PDCA检查中达到"备用药品质量合格率100%"的管理目标;对比同质化管理实施前后的护理人员的相关知识掌握情况及备用药管理质量发现,实施PDCA循环管理模式后,护理人员的备用药相关知识掌握情况评分与备用药管理质量评分,均显著高于管理前(P0. 05);在实施同质化管理前后分别对备用药管理情况进行抽查,对比备用药管理问题发生率,管理后的管理问题发生率为6. 67%,显著低于管理前的30. 00%(P0. 05)。结论:同质化管理提高了各科室的备用药品管理质量,保障患者用药安全,提高了管理效率,值得在临床实践工作中推荐。 相似文献
9.
10.
在大力推进素质教育的今天,体育教师素质培养已经成为教育改革关键.素质是体育教师在从事教育活动中必须遵守的道德规范和行为准则.面时新形势的要求,只有把握新形势下体育教师素质培养的度量衡,才能提升素质的水平. 相似文献
11.
情报科学史研究：现状、功能及其建制化初探 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
本文讨论了情报科学史研究的主要功能，学科性质与地位以及中外情报科学史研究的概况和存在的问题，提出了加强我国情报科学史研究的建议，同时，探讨了我国情报科学史学科建制化的必要性及其模式。 相似文献
12.
本文将以环保理念为着眼点,对广东地区出土的几件汉代考古器物进行初步分析,揭示广东地区汉代出土器物中的科学环保理念,并结合现代环境保护的定义对这些器物中所包含的环保理念进一步解读,目的是为了让更多的人重视环境保护问题。同时,为环境保护史的研究提供一个新的研究选材范围,从古代文物本身工艺设计及实用性的方面研究古代环境保护的相关问题。 相似文献
13.
《明史记》是一部未完成也未曾问世的史学著作。本文旨在梳理这部史书编纂的缘起、过程和最后的命运,重点叙述了吴炎、潘柽樟为编纂《明史记》所付出的种种努力,包括吴、潘二人与钱谦益的书信辩难,以及钱谦益和顾炎武对《明史记》所给予的期盼和帮助。康熙初年的"庄氏史狱"给《明史记》的编纂带来了的致命打击,本文也叙述了吴潘二人受其牵连而惨死的过程,王锡阐和顾炎武对两位挚友的哀悼。最后则探讨了潘柽樟的异母弟不顾众多师友的规劝入明史馆参修明史原因和王锡阐等人对《明史记》遗稿的保存和整理等事。 相似文献
14.
《Endeavour》2020,44(4):100733
The history of science as a discipline took place in the period of the German Empire, but the historiography of its development insufficiently recognizes both its proto-institutionalization during this period and the critical role played by Germans in effecting its initial development. In this article, while alluding to the several areas in which Germans took the lead in establishing the discipline, the focus is on one representative area: the mounting of temporary and permanent exhibitions relating to the history of science during the Empire period. Reasons why Germans were motivators in these efforts include the importance of past and present excellence in science, eminence in and fascination with historical research to the new nation’s construction after German unification in 1871, and of the assertion of the nineteenth century German bourgeoisie in its role in advancing the culture of the nation. The larger argument, that subjects of the German Empire achieved critical institution-building in history of science, is supported by the incidence of displays organized by Germans, and buttressed by the fact that a number of these organizers also participated in the field’s enlarged late nineteenth and early twentieth century scholarship that was most marked among Germans of any national group. 相似文献
15.
《Research Policy》2013,42(10):1706-1715
The article reviews theoretical approaches and methods of conventional economics and economic history to address the fundamental question of why the world's economy has experienced unprecedented growth rates only after 1800, following millennial relative stagnation. The intellectual challenge put forward by economic historians and historians of technical change is to explain the role of technology broadly interpreted in affecting economic change, offering a richer picture than the mere accumulation of production factors. This includes the analysis of the processes leading to the accumulation of ‘inventive people’. 相似文献
16.
魏刘伟 《科学技术与辩证法》2011,(3):81-87
美国科学史学会每年颁发各种奖项,在国际科学史界有巨大影响,对科学史的研究起到了积极的推动作用。文章对2007—2009年所颁发奖项的获奖者和获奖作品,包括萨顿奖、菲泽奖、戴维斯奖、罗西特科学中的妇女史奖、普赖斯／韦伯斯特奖、内森·莱茵戈尔德奖、海泽教育奖八个奖项作了述评。 相似文献
17.
《Research Policy》2013,42(10):1695-1705
This introductory article raises a methodological challenge for scholars of technical change and innovation, on the one hand, and historians of technical change, on the other. We ask to what extent have economists and historians of technical change engaged in cross-fertilisation with regards to methods and the identification of relevant questions. We then provide an overview on the use and methods of history within the field of Economics of Technical Change and Innovation Studies (ETIS), which is traditionally considered as ‘history-friendly’. We locate the work and intellectual heritage of Nick von Tunzelmann among that of a small group of scholars in which history and economics of technical change have co-habited happily. We reflect on the variety of historical methods proposed by the contributors to this special issue, who were invited to respond to the above methodological challenge. Finally, we propose a way ahead in terms of the identification of relevant questions and pertinent methodological approaches. 相似文献
18.
19.