共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 590 毫秒
1.
Collis Betty Margaryan Anoush 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2004,52(4):38-52
Business needs in many corporations call for learning outcomes that involve problem solutions, and creating and sharing new
knowledge within worksplace situation that may involve collaboration among members of a team. We argue that work-based activities
(WBA) and computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) are appropriate components for courses in such learning situations.
Via this approach, collaborative work situations become the core of a course. We further describe how activity theory can
provide a framework for the design of courses that involve WBA and CSCL as part of a workplace-oriented activity system for
learning. The use of this design approach for courses offered by the Learning and Leadership Development organization of Shell
International Exploration and Production is described and an example is elaborated. Finally, we identify four main issues
and challenges that arose during the use of the design approach. 相似文献
2.
Omid Noroozi Maria C. Busstra Martin Mulder Harm J. A. Biemans Hilde Tobi Anouk Geelen Pieter van’t Veer Mohammad Chizari 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2012,60(2):193-221
This study used a sequential set-up to investigate the consecutive effects of timing of supportive information presentation
(information before vs. information during the learning task clusters) in interactive digital learning materials (IDLMs) and
type of collaboration (personal discussion vs. online discussion) in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) on student
knowledge construction. Students (N = 87) were first randomly assigned to the two information presentation conditions to work individually on a case-based assignment
in IDLM. Students who received information during learning task clusters tended to show better results on knowledge construction
than those who received information only before each cluster. The students within the two separate information presentation
conditions were then randomly assigned to pairs to discuss the outcomes of their assignments under either the personal discussion
or online discussion condition in CSCL. When supportive information had been presented before each learning task cluster,
online discussion led to better results than personal discussion. When supportive information had been presented during the
learning task clusters, however, the online and personal discussion conditions had no differential effect on knowledge construction.
Online discussion in CSCL appeared to compensate for suboptimal timing of presentation of supportive information before the
learning task clusters in IDLM. 相似文献
3.
When inquiry-based learning is designed for a collaborative context, the interactions that arise in the learning environment can become fairly complex. While the learning effectiveness of such learning environments has been reported in the literature, there have been fewer studies on the students’ learning processes. To address this, the article presents a study of science learning in a computer-supported learning environment called Collaborative Science Inquiry (CSI), which integrates guided inquiry principles for activity design, employs modelling and visualisation tools for promoting conceptual understanding and incorporates key computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) elements for enabling students’ collaboration. With the aim of understanding the process of students’ conceptual changes supported by the CSI learning environment as used in a secondary school, data on students’ test achievements, responses to learning tasks and peer discussions in collaboration were collected, analysed and discussed. The results of the qualitative and quantitative data analysis indicated that guided inquiry coupled with CSCL elements facilitated by the CSI system can engage students in inquiry activities and promote their conceptual understanding in a progressive way. 相似文献
4.
5.
CSCL环境中的社会交互 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
现在有很多关于计算机支持下协作学习(CSCL)异步环境中分布式学习团体(DLGs)的实证研究。研究表明当前的CSCL环境并不能完全满足人们对其支持交互的团体学习、知识共享、知识的社会建构及能力的培养的需要。在CSCL环境中,主要有两个因素阻碍我们取得预期的社会交互的成果:一是将社会交互看作是自然而然发生的,二是忽视与学习任务本身无关的社会心理交互。当前解决这个问题的办法主要是依靠教育者和教师鼓励协作学习,为了让教师从这样的负担中解脱出来,我们必须改进CSCL环境,激发和支持学习者的社会交互。 相似文献
6.
7.
The development of new tools for collaboration, such as social software, plays a crucial role in leisure time and work activities. The aim of this article is to summarize the research in the field of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). This is done particularly from the perspective of the blurred line between individual (personal) and group-level (shared) learning that the use of the new tools has forced us to re-think. First, individual and group-level perspectives to learning are discussed to make sense of the major notions of how learning is understood in CSCL research. Second, based on this theoretical grounding, it will be further elaborated what this means to the pedagogical design of educational practices utilizing emerging technological landscapes. And third, two different empirical examples will be presented to illustrate the variety of emerging technological landscapes meeting the needs of future learning. 相似文献
8.
国际视野中的CSCL研究与发展的十个主题——访CSCL研究国际著名专家皮埃尔·狄隆伯格教授 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
国际学习科学协会(ISLS)前主席,皮埃尔.狄隆伯格(Pierre Dillenbourg)教授是瑞士洛桑联邦理工大学(EPFL)培训及其技术研究与支持中心(CRAFT)的主任,也是《计算机支持的协作学习丛书》(CSCL Book Series)的主编。本次访谈为中国读者提供了一个关于计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)的研究与发展概要。狄隆伯格教授认为,CSCL的贡献不仅在于为专业培训领域提供了增进知识生产的学习技术,更在于其所包含的一系列的概念、思想和取向等对整个教育系统的渗透。协作学习,无论有没有计算机,都不是一个可以自动导致预期学习结果的处方。CSCL研究者已经研究了导致小组(或团队)生产积极学习结果的必要互动类型,并将技术运用于设计、研究和增进必要的互动。应当从一个"整合的学习"的视角认识CSCL,可以借助对情节的设计和不同工具的支持,将CSCL活动嵌入到正式或非正式学习场景更为综合的活动系列中。与此相应,CSCL研究者提出了十个方面的研究主题:即社会互动与个人化、媒体有效性、共享知识的建构、模仿倾向、中介作用、脚本、互动分析、表征、计算装置和虚拟共同体。 相似文献
9.
Carol K. K. Chan 《Metacognition and Learning》2012,7(1):63-73
This discussion paper for this special issue examines co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning
(CSCL) environments extending research on self-regulated learning in computerbased environments. The discussion employs a
socio-cognitive perspective focusing on social and collective views of learning to examine how students co-regulate and collaborate
in computer-supported inquiry. Following the review of the articles, theoretical, methodological and instructional implications
are discussed: Future research directions include examining the theoretical nature of collective regulation and social metacognition
in building models of co-regulated learning; expanding methodological approaches using trace data and multiple measures for
convergence and construct validity; and conducting instructional experiments to test and to foster the development of co-regulated
learning in computer-supported collaborative inquiry. 相似文献
10.
Nadira Saab 《Metacognition and Learning》2012,7(1):1-6
Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is an approach to learning in which learners can actively and collaboratively
construct knowledge by means of interaction and joint problem solving. Regulation of learning is especially important in the
domain of CSCL. Next to the regulation of task performance, the interaction between learners who work in a CSCL environment
needs to be regulated as well. Despite its importance, the regulation of learning in CSCL has received relatively little attention
in research. In the contributions of this special issue different labels are used for various forms of regulation of learning
during CSCL. During collaborative learning, the regulation of activities can take place at different levels of social interaction:
the individual level, the dyadic level, and the group level. Regulative activities of all three levels are presented in the
three studies. All studies have investigated whether the use of regulative activities affected performance, and have found
that regulation at the dyadic and/or group level was positively related to group performance. In sum, these three contributions
provide a constructive overview of the role of regulation of the (collaborative) learning process in CSCL, both in terms of
the impact of regulation on learning processes and learning results as well as the influence of different kinds of support
on the regulation of collaborative learning. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
柳华盛 《宁波广播电视大学学报》2011,9(2):122-124
随着计算机和网络技术的发展,基于WEB的协作学习已经成为CSCL的研究热点。本文通过对协作学习（CL）、计算机支持的协作学习（CSCL）和基于网络的协作学习（WEBCL）的介绍,讨论了影响WEBCL有效性的因子,构建了一个WEBCL的应用模式,并在教学上进行试验,取得了一定的成果。 相似文献
14.
Jeroen Janssen Gijsbert Erkens Paul A. Kirschner Gellof Kanselaar 《Instructional Science》2010,38(1):59-88
This research investigates the role of representational guidance by comparing the effects of two different representational
tools. We used a design with two different groups defined by the type of argumentative diagram students co-constructed while
working in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. The Graphical Debate-tool offered different representational
guidance than the Textual Debate-tool. The results show that groups that worked with the Graphical Debate-tool constructed
representations of higher quality and wrote essays that were better in terms of grounds quality. Furthermore, working with
the Graphical Debate-tool was found to have a positive effect on students’ learning as measured by a knowledge post-test.
In contrast to our expectations however, there was little difference between the two conditions regarding the online collaboration
process. It can be concluded that representational guidance has an impact on group and individual performance and should therefore
be taken into account during instructional design. 相似文献
15.
David H. Jonassen Lucia Rohrer-Murphy 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》1999,47(1):61-79
The epistemic assumptions of constructive learning are different from those of traditional instruction, so classical methods of needs and task analysis are inappropriate for designing constructivist learning environments (CLEs). This paper argues that activity theory provides an appropriate framework for analyzing needs, tasks, and outcomes for designing CLEs. Activity theory is a socio-cultural, socio-historical lens through which designers can analyze human activity systems. It focuses on the interaction of human activity and consciousness within its relevant environmental context. Since conscious learning emerges from activity (performance), not as a precursor to it, CLEs should attempt to replicate the activity structures, tools and sign systems, socio-cultural rules, and community expectations that performers must accommodate while acting on some object of learning. After explicating assumptions of activity theory and briefly describing the components of CLEs, this paper describes a process for using activity theory as a framework for describing the components of an activity system that can be modeled in CLEs.His current research focuses on designing constructivist learning environments, cognitive tools for learning, knowledge representation methods, problem solving, computer-supported collaborative argumentation, cognitive task analysis, and individual differences and learning.His current research focuses on designing constructivist learning environments, cognitive tools for learning, knowledge representation methods, problem solving, computer-supported collaborative argumentation, cognitive task analysis, and individual differences and learning.Her research interests include activity theory and structural knowledge. 相似文献
16.
《Learning and Instruction》2007,17(4):389-393
Research on collaborative learning, both face-to-face and computer-supported, has thrived in the past 10 years. The studies range from outcome-oriented (individual and group learning) to process-oriented (impact of interaction on learning processes, motivation and organisation of collaboration) to mixed studies. Collaborative learning research is multidisciplinary. This introduces a multitude of theoretical accounts for collaborative learning, accompanied by a broad spectrum of methods to study processes and outcomes of collaboration. This special issue will provide an overview of methods that are at the core of current research effort, but also identifies opportunities and problems to sensibly combine methods into mixed method approaches. 相似文献
17.
Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments provide learners with multiple representational tools for storing, sharing, and constructing knowledge. However, little is known about how learners organize knowledge through multiple representations about complex socioscientific issues. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate learners’ knowledge organization (KO) through multiple representations in a CSCL environment. We designed a learning unit on nuclear energy and implemented it with a group of 20 college students. The participants used a web-based hypertext KO platform that incorporated three representational modes: textual, pictorial, and concept map. The platform interlinked learners’ knowledge entries based on similar keywords. Utilizing mixed methods research we analyzed the individual entries and the knowledge base to determine KO both at the individual and the collective levels. We found that the density of the knowledge base was high; the learners mostly benefited from their text- and concept map-based entries, though the picture-based entries were also an important means for connecting entries with similar content and hence creating a dense knowledge base. Our results suggest that KO with multiple representations can create a more comprehensive knowledge base. Using distinct analytical approaches will allow CSCL researchers to better identify KO both at the individual and collective levels. 相似文献
18.
STEM教育注重通过跨学科的协作学习发展学生的知识和技能。近年来,计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)被广泛应用于STEM教育。然而,其效果如何?其采用的各类技术和教学策略对学习效果有何影响?上述问题的明确有助于完善STEM教育中跨学科的协作学习设计。基于对2009至2019年间发表在国际期刊上的142项相关实验和准实验研究成果的元分析发现:在STEM教育中应用CSCL整体上有助于提升学习效果,且相较于过程类和情感类,其对认知类学习效果的作用最为明显;从学科来看,其对科学、工程学和教育学的影响相对较大;从采用的技术来看,通信技术、动态呈现技术和共享共建技术对学习效果的影响更加显著;从教学策略来看,案例式、游戏化、知识建构和探究式等教学策略更能提升学习效果。因此,在将CSCL应用于STEM教育时,应当加强针对情感类目标的设计以激发高水平的认知活动和认知成果,注重发挥共享共建类技术在知识可视化表征、知识追踪等方面的作用,通过整合多种教学策略推进协作探究学习。 相似文献
19.
The increasing amount of empirical research shows that the role of regulatory processes is critical in CSCL and collaborative learning settings. However, the current conceptual definitions and specificity of the findings vary. This is most probably because of limitations in the methods investigating regulated learning in a collaborative learning context. This study aimed to provide empirical evidence for how self- and shared regulation activities are used and whether they are useful for collaborative learning outcomes. Eighteen graduate students worked in collaborative groups for seven weeks in a CSCL course and the data of this study focuses on three one week online collaborative learning phases in the course. Temporal and sequential analysis of chat discussions and log file traces were matched to find evidence about whether the students' collaboratively planned regulatory activities became shared in practice. The results show evidence that collaborative planned regulatory activities become shared in practice. The groups that achieved good learning results used multiple regulatory processes to support their learning and also reached shared regulation. The four microlevel examples demonstrate simplified patterns of the activation of self-regulation and shared regulation. In conclusion, individual socially shared regulation plays a critical role in successful collaborative learning. 相似文献
20.
This study investigates when and how students activate co- and socially shared emotion and motivation regulation in collaborative learning and whether the S-REG mobile application tool can support this regulation. In a mathematics course, 44 higher education students worked with a collaborative assignment. The S-REG tool traced groups' emotional and motivational states in different sessions, and the occurrence of co-regulation and shared regulation of motivation and emotions were coded from video-recorded collaborative work (44 h). The groups activated more co-regulation than shared regulation of emotions and motivation, but the shared-regulation episodes were longer-lasting. The groups’ emotional and motivational states were associated with the occurrence of co-regulation in the beginning of the learning sessions. The results suggest that the S-REG tool balanced collaboration by prompting the groups to regulate emotions and motivation right in the beginning of the motivationally and emotionally challenging learning sessions. 相似文献