共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
本研究采用实验方法 ,研究评价者署名方式、被评者署名方式、互评关系等三个因素对同伴评价质量和效果的影响。研究发现,在定量评分方面,互评关系是作用较大的影响因素;在定性评论方面,互评关系和评价者署名方式是作用较大的影响因素;评价中存在互评关系和被评者署名方式的交互效应。对评价者情感因素及利益关系的控制可以提高同伴评价的质量。 相似文献
2.
笔者曾参加了本市科学骨干教师研修班,期间,对全市部分学校、教师和学生进行了学生评价相关问题的抽样调查,科学课评价实施的现状不容乐观。调查显示,学校科学课程评价的主体仍然是以教师为绝对评判者,教师没有给学生提供参与自评和互评的条件和机会,学生也很少具有自评和互评的意识和欲望。这种传统的单一的评价主体模式,缺乏师生互动、生生互动的评价,评价者与被评价者仍然是处于一种不平等的地位,不利于评价结果的反馈、认同,更不利于评价的改进和发展功能的发挥。 相似文献
3.
《邢台职业技术学院学报》2017,(5):13-16
同伴互评作为翻转课堂的关键步骤,其使用却不尽人意。评价者对提供评价缺乏信心,学生对同伴互评缺乏信任及评改中缺乏积极移情等现象都极大地影响着同伴互评的效果。为了优化互评效果,必须重视合理分组、同伴互评培训、教师适时介入以及加强评价中的积极移情。 相似文献
4.
高中生已经具备了互评、自改的能力和条件,教师要放手让学生自己参与评价,给他们足够的信任、尊重,努力构建＂互评、自改、后记＂的多元化作文评价体系,有利发挥学生的自主性、能动性和创造性。 相似文献
5.
＂课程标准＂要求课堂评价要多样化,教师要根据＂课标＂要求进行课堂评价改革,消除传统评价的弊端,实施学生自评、学生互评、教师点评相结合的评价方式,促进学生学习方式的改变和学习能力的提高。 相似文献
6.
王云 《课程教材教学研究(小教研究)》2004,(Z1)
传统的评价是教师对学生作出终结性的优劣判断的单一评价,新课程理念下的评价把评价作为评价者与被评价者、教师与学生共同构建意义的过程,它注重的不只是终结性评价,更看重学生学习过程中各方面能力的发展,因此,对学生学业的评价应是过程评价与结果评价的结合。同时,增加学生评价的自主权,扩大学生评价的自由度,评价形式改单一的教师对学生的评价为学生自评、小组互评、师生共评、家长参评等,创造一种民主参与、协商和交往的评价过程。一、多渠道对学生进行学业评价1.建立学生成长记录袋,关注学生过程性发展传统的学业评价观念及时间均偏重… 相似文献
7.
基于最近发展区理论,用建构英语写作同伴互评双螺旋模式,通过对70名浙江某高校英语专业学生420篇英语习作的跟踪,以及对作文前测和后测的对比,本研究发现:(1)在该模式指导下的为期16周的同伴互评训练提高了学生的评价能力。一方面,同伴互评的正确率显著提高;另一方面,学生评价的内容已经逐渐从微观语言层面扩展到文章结构、观点发展和得体性方面;(2)该模式提高了同伴间的信任感,表现为学生在习作的二稿中对同伴意见的采纳率渐次提高;(3)伴随着学生评价能力和同伴信任感的提高,学生的写作能力也得到了提升。 相似文献
8.
长期以来,试卷讲评的主体是教师,忽视了学生的互评、自评及家长评价。在这种被动接受评价的过程中,评价者与被评价者扮演的基本上是管理者和被管理者的角色,学生往往处于被动、消极的地位,大都持冷漠、应付、对立、讨厌、拒绝或者害怕、恐惧逃避的态度。它不利于学生学习积极性 相似文献
9.
郭海荣 《华夏少年(简快作文 )》2007,(12)
语文学业评价中评价者和学生都是主体,为了确保学生在语文学业中的主体地位,我们应该在评价理念、评价内容、评价形式等方面进行改革,努力实行学分制、重视学生的自评和互评、用好成长记录袋、继续加强语文中考改革等。 相似文献
10.
刘爱萍 《山西教育(综合版)》2004,(14):17-18
课堂是学生学习的主阵地。在课堂上合理、高效地对学生的学习进行评价,有助于他们获得最充分的教育和发展,使每个学生都能主动积极地表现自我。如何利用好课堂评价这个教育工具,激发学生的学习积极性,促进学生学习质量的提高及个性的全面发展呢?一、注重评价主体的多元化,突出学生的主体地位学生是学习和发展的主体,自然也是评价的主体。因此,在课堂上,教师应让学生主动参与到评价中来,使评价者和被评价者双方都处在积极的思维过程中,成为学习活动的有机组成部分。教师应该在学生自评、互评的基础上做好指导工作,为学生提供有效信息,如指导… 相似文献
11.
This study examines the impact of an assessment training module on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Seventy-eight undergraduate students participated in the study. The participants completed an assessment training exercise, prior to engaging in peer-assessment activities. During the training, students reviewed learning concepts, discussed marking criteria, graded example projects and compared their evaluations with the instructor’s evaluation. Data were collected in the form of initial and final versions of students’ projects, students’ scoring of example projects before and after the assessment training, and written feedback that students provided on peer projects. Results of data analysis indicate that the assessment training led to a significant decrease in the discrepancy between student ratings and instructor rating of example projects. In addition, the degree of student vs. instructor discrepancy was highly predictive of the quality of feedback that students provided to their peers and the effectiveness of revisions that they made to their own projects upon receiving peer feedback. Smaller discrepancies in ratings were associated with provision of higher quality peer feedback during peer assessment, as well as better revision of initial projects after peer assessment. 相似文献
12.
Duncan D. Nulty 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2011,36(5):493-507
This paper reviews the literature about peer and self‐assessment in university courses from the point of view of their use, and the suitability of their use, in the first year of university study. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part argues that although first‐year students are involved in many of the studies that report on the use of peer and self‐assessment in higher education, the proportion of these studies that do so is somewhat less than in other year levels. In addition, relatively little of this work directly and explicitly discusses the suitability of peer and self‐assessment for students and courses at this year level. The second part of the paper provides an introductory exploration of the relationship between peer and self‐assessment, and specific features of first‐year assessment, learning and teaching. Three issues relating directly to the suitability of peer and self‐assessment in the first year are explored. In the third part, the paper briefly discusses the desirability of implementing peer and self‐assessment, in general, before seeking to extend this specifically to the first year. The paper concludes by recommending that greater use can and should be made of peer and self‐assessment in the first year of university study. 相似文献
13.
The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two peer assessment methods on university students' academic writing performance and their satisfaction with peer assessment. This study also examined the validity and reliability of student generated assessment scores. Two hundred and thirty-two predominantly undergraduate students were selected by convenience sampling during the fall semester of 2007. The results indicate that students in the experimental group demonstrated greater improvement in their writing than those in the comparison group, and the findings reveal that students in the experimental group exhibited higher levels of satisfaction with the peer assessment method both in peer assessment structure and peer feedback than those in the comparison group. Additionally, the findings indicate that the validity and reliability of student generated rating scores were extremely high. Using Wiki interactive software and providing an online collaborative learning environment to facilitate peer assessment added value to peer assessment. 相似文献
14.
15.
Hongli Li Yao Xiong Charles Vincent Hunter Xiuyan Guo Rurik Tywoniw 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(2):193-211
AbstractIn recent years, there has been an increasing use of peer assessment in classrooms and other learning settings. Despite the prevailing view that peer assessment has a positive effect on learning across empirical studies, the results reported are mixed. In this meta-analysis, we synthesised findings based on 134 effect sizes from 58 studies. Compared to students who do not participate in peer assessment, those who participate in peer assessment show a .291 standard deviation unit increase in their performance. Further, we performed a meta-regression analysis to examine the factors that are likely to influence the peer assessment effect. The most critical factor is rater training. When students receive rater training, the effect size of peer assessment is substantially larger than when students do not receive such training. Computer-mediated peer assessment is also associated with greater learning gains than the paper-based peer assessment. A few other variables (such as rating format, rating criteria and frequency of peer assessment) also show noticeable, although not statistically significant, effects. The results of the meta-analysis can be considered by researchers and teachers as a basis for determining how to make effective use of peer assessment as a learning tool. 相似文献
16.
Olia E. Tsivitanidou Zacharias C. ZachariaTasos Hovardas 《Learning and Instruction》2011,21(4):506-519
The purpose of this study was to investigate secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills. Specifically, 36 seventh graders, without receiving any kind of support, were anonymously assigned to reciprocally assess their peers’ science web-portfolios. Additionally, students’ attitudes towards and intentions about the use of unsupported reciprocal peer assessment were examined. Three data sources were used, namely, interviews, screen-video captured data, and the peer assessors’ feedback produced. Findings showed that the students have positive attitudes towards unsupported reciprocal peer assessment and that they intend to implement it again. It was also found that students have the skills, at least the beginnings, needed for the implementation of peer assessment. Specifically, they were found to be able to define and use their own assessment criteria, whose overall validity and reliability, however, were found to be low. Finally, the feedback they produced included grades, positive and negative judgments, as well as suggestions for changes. 相似文献
17.
Luis R. Murillo-Zamorano Manuel Montanero 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(1):138-150
In this paper the authors analyse the competency of a sample of economics and business students in orally presenting academic content, as well as the changes that occurred after receiving feedback. The students’ presentations were videotaped, and a total of 96 were analysed at three stages: pre-test, post-test and follow-up. The participants were divided into two groups. In one, each student received feedback from a peer as part of a peer assessment with rubric activity. In the other, they received feedback from the teacher immediately after their presentation. In the post-test, the peer assessment with rubric students improved by 10% in the valuation of their presentation, while the teacher feedback students only improved by 5%. These results support the idea that undergraduates’ evaluations of their peers can be effective in improving oral presentation skills, especially when they are provided with some support instruments (videos and rubrics). However, the improvements in the peer assessment with rubric group were not maintained in the follow-up re-test. This suggests that a single session of peer assessment with rubric is insufficient to generalise any improvements in the said competency. The implications of these results with regard to the implementation of methods of formative peer assessment in higher education are discussed. 相似文献
18.
Chie Adachi Joanna Hong-Meng Tai Phillip Dawson 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(2):294-306
Despite compelling evidence of its potential effectiveness, uptake of self and peer assessment in higher education has been slower than expected. As with other assessment practices, self and peer assessment is ultimately enabled, or inhibited, by the actions of individual academics. This paper explores what academics see as the benefits and challenges of implementing self and peer assessment, through the analysis of interviews with 13 Australian academics. Thematic analysis of our qualitative data identified seven themes of benefits and five challenges. Our academics showed strong belief in the power of self and peer assessment as formative assessment, contrary to past literature which has focussed on the accuracy of students’ marking. This paper therefore brings insights as to not only what academics value about self and peer assessment but also identifies potential inhibitors in practice. Recommendations are made about improving the design and implementation of self and peer assessment in higher education. 相似文献
19.
Ahmed El-Mowafy 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2014,39(2):223-241
Fieldwork training is a key component of several practical disciplines. In this study, students’ peer assessment of fieldwork is explored as a method to improve their practical training. Peer assessment theories are first discussed. A framework for peer assessment of fieldwork is proposed, and the steps taken for preparation of students for this task are discussed. A developed marking, feedback and moderation tool of assessment are presented. Application of peer assessment in the field was investigated over a period of two years in one undergraduate unit in the geospatial discipline as an example. Reliability of peer assessment was estimated by measuring the difference between assessments carried out by groups of peer assessors, and its validity was measured by comparing students’ marks with those given by tutors. Results show that students have gained from the peer assessment process, mainly as a formative form of assessment, by better understanding and endeavouring to achieve the objectives of field tasks. Tutors use differences among assessments made by groups of students compared to tutors’ assessments to identify field components that need better explanation of their content and assessment criteria. 相似文献
20.
Peer assessment can be important in developing active and independent learners, as well as providing more and faster feedback in large classes, compared to marking done by tutors. In addition, the evaluative, critical stance required by students in order to assess their peers' work encourages the development of higher-order cognitive skills. Changing roles from being assessed to being an assessor can also improve students' ability to judge and improve on their own work. However, peer assessment does have potential problems and there is some debate as to the appropriate academic level at which to implement it, the kinds of feedback that are given and the ways in which students respond. In addition, there is little evidence that peer assessment has an impact on academic performance. This research reports the results of an online peer assessment exercise for a macroeconomics essay conducted in a large Economics 1 class at Rhodes University. Of the 800 students, about half participated in the peer assessment exercise. Data were collected from students via a formal course evaluation. In addition, a sample of 50 essays was evaluated in terms of the relationship between peer marks and final (tutor) marks received and the impact that peer assessment had on the quality of the final essay submitted. An Ordinary Least Squares regression was used to investigate the impact of peer assessment participation on marks. Results showed that peer marks tended to ‘bunch’ in the 60–68% range, indicating the reluctance of peers to give very high or low marks. In general, peers gave more useful feedback on technical aspects, such as presentation and referencing (which were also the categories in which students most often made improvements), than on content. Regression analysis showed that peer assessment participation was not a significant determinant of final essay mark, but that economics ability and English language proficiency were. 相似文献