共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 578 毫秒
1.
浅谈语言礼貌原则的级别性 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
蒋小元 《常德师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2001,26(6):109-111
礼貌原则是有级别性的，其级别性主要表现在语言手段的礼貌级别和话语内容上的礼貌级别。当然，礼貌原则的级别性也是相对的，它与会话参与者之间的社会距离，权势关系有关。 相似文献
2.
孙顺莲 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》2003,2(1):130-132
礼貌是文化和语言中的一种普遍现象，语言是表现礼貌的主要手段，不同的语言形式有礼貌和不礼貌之分。各种礼貌语言形式之间也存在着礼貌程度的差异。文章指出英语情态助动词是情态意义的主要表现形式，具有礼貌功能，并分别在三个礼貌层级上对英语情态助动词的礼貌功能进行了论述。 相似文献
3.
礼貌原则与礼貌语言的层级性 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
陈英 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》2006,5(1):97-99
文章以Grice的会话含意理论及Leech的礼貌原则为切入点,从语言学的角度探讨礼貌语言的层级性。 相似文献
4.
5.
人们在交际中运用语言表示礼貌。传统观点认为,语言的礼貌级别由交际双方社会地位的差异决定。而本文认为社会距离和语言礼貌级别是交互作用的,其关系与语言和社会的交互作用关系相同,具有辩证统一性。社会距离对人际的言语形式有相当的决定作用,但这种作用力不是单向的,人们在交际过程中随着交往的深入,会对其语言形式进行调整进而有意识的影响双方的社会距离。 相似文献
6.
金晓冬 《浙江教育学院学报》2007,(1):66-71
商务谈判中,为谈判交际目的服务的礼貌语言呈现出其在商务谈判中独有的特点和规律。布朗和列文森的礼貌理论为商务语言的礼貌研究提供了理论依据。根据商务语言内在的礼貌含义,谈判语言区分为词汇和句法两个礼貌层级以及面子维护、关系建立、融洽气氛、策略便通、利益维护等五种语用功能。 相似文献
7.
礼貌是文化和语言中的一种普遍现象,它是有级别的。“请求”是一种具体的言外行为,在实施“请求”指令的过程中往往需要选用比较礼貌的方式。选择合适的礼貌策略,才能既满足说话者的请求愿望,又维护说话者和听话者之间的良好关系,避免出现语用失误,从而达到完满的交际效果。 相似文献
8.
黄东花 《湖南广播电视大学学报》2003,(3):42-43
礼貌是人类社会的共有现象。礼貌不仅是伦理学的研究范畴，也是社会语言学和语用学的研究课题。中外语言学提出各种礼貌原则以解释语言中的礼貌现象。本试图比较各种礼貌原则，说明礼貌言语的表达方式，并对比分析中西化的不同体现。 相似文献
9.
银珊 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》2008,7(6)
人们在日常交往中,往往会策略地、礼貌地使用语言,以达到一定的交际目的。选择不同的情态动词对礼貌的有重要影响。文章从情态动词语法范畴入手,通过分析情态动词的可能级和可能相,来阐释情态动词与礼貌层级的关系。 相似文献
10.
语用能力的培养在英语教学中受到越来越多的重视,而遵循礼貌是语用能力的重要一环。调查表明,学习者的礼貌语用能力过多地体现在语用语言能力方面,没有充分考虑到语境的制约作用。据此,在英语教学中应该着重培养学生的社交语用能力,凸显礼貌的级别性与文化特殊性。 相似文献
11.
TIANJin-ping ZHAIJian-hong 《邢台职业技术学院学报》2005,22(2):31-33
As we all know, different people hold different views about politeness. To be polite, Leech thinks you should follow “Politeness Principle” while Levinson suggests paying attention to others‘ “Face Wants” Sometimes what the Chinese people considered to be polite may not be true according to western culture. In order to adequately provide an educated answer to this heartfelt question, this paper attempts to shed light on some of the important differences on politeness between Chinese and western culture. 相似文献
12.
礼貌是语用学的一个重要研究课题。话语礼貌与社会距离存在象似关系,社会距离增大,语符增多,话语礼貌程度相对较高,但这只是不考虑语境生成的作用,静止地从语言形式本身来判断礼貌的程度,因而在语言的具体使用过程中,要动态地考虑交际生成语境。文章主要从顺应性的认知视角来研究距离象似性与话语的礼貌程度。 相似文献
13.
丁文娟 《和田师范专科学校学报》2008,28(2)
在社会交往中,每个人都不可避免的与陌生人打交道。那么究竟怎样把握交往的方式与尺度呢?本文从语用学的角度,主要包括礼貌原则,合作原则等,对这个过程中语言交际进行了一系列的理论分析,以望能给一些怯于与陌生人打交道之士提供借鉴。 相似文献
14.
情态量值对礼貌等级的影响和制约 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
在人与人交往当中,人们总要实施一定的言语行为,满足一定的交际目的。为了达到既定的交往意图,说话人往往会采用间接的、含蓄的、礼貌的方式来表达话语。情态系统的选用是其中的主要方法之一。如何选用情态表达法来有效地遵循礼貌原则,提高礼貌程度,保证交际的顺利进行,这则与情态系统的量值大小有着极其重要的关系。研究表明情态系统的量值影响并且制约着人们表达话语时的礼貌等级。 相似文献
15.
“90后”大学生人格特质的实证分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
刘正荣 《扬州大学学报(高教研究版)》2011,15(2):34-37
采用《艾森克人格问卷》对某高校2010级2 214名新生进行调查,结果显示：＂90后＂大学生的精神质、内外向、神经质量表得分与常模存在极其显著性差异,在掩饰程度量表得分上与常模无显著差异;有161人的神经质得分大于等于65,占8.0%;男女大学生在精神质、掩饰程度维度上存在显著性差异;＂90后＂与＂80后＂大学生在内外向、神经质维度上存在显著性差异。因而,＂90后＂大学生人格特质整体状况良好,但部分学生的心理健康问题不容忽视。 相似文献
16.
王晓娜 《通化师范学院学报》2007,28(5):88-90
虽然B＆L（Brown ＆ Levinson）没有对“礼貌”给出一个确切的定义,但众所周知,恰当的礼貌言行在日常生活中会调节人们之间的关系。然而,在探讨礼貌问题时,必须要考虑语境（context）——即语言环境和非语言环境对礼貌的影响。因为礼貌在语境的影响下存在着转变为非礼貌或普通话语的危险,即从无标记（Unmarkedness）到有标记（Markedness）过程。这里旨在讨论语用学视角下被标记礼貌性语言的内涵及形成过程。 相似文献
17.
英语中礼貌请求的语言表达 总被引：3，自引：1，他引：2
张佐成 《湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2000,(1)
在社会生活中 ,人与人之间离不开相互交流。在交际中讲话人必须要顾及对方的脸面 ,才能使交际愉快而顺利地进行 ,这就是言语交际中的礼貌现象。礼貌的实现手段主要有赖于语言 ,本文旨在讨论英语中礼貌请求的语言表达手段和礼貌级差对表达手段的影响。 相似文献
18.
Abstract The widely used New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale was recently revised to address concerns about its dimensionality and validity. As an ever larger number of researchers from an increasing variety of disciplines incorporate environmental issues into their research, the need for environmental concern measures such as the NEP will broaden. The authors evaluated the predictive validity of the original and revised versions of the NEP scale, some abbreviated NEP-derived scales, and a non-NEP environmental attitudes scale. All of these scales explained a significant amount of the variance in a measure of intention to engage in proenvi-ronmental behavior. Based on the results, the authors suggest how researchers should use these scales in their research. 相似文献
19.
This study compared the statistical properties of four job analysis task survey response scale types: criticality, difficulty in learning, importance, and frequency. We used nine job analysis studies spanning two fields, medical imaging and allied health professionals, to compare the job analysis scales in terms of variability and interrater agreement. Results showed that frequency scales using absolute anchors had greater between-task variability and higher interrater agreement for all nine studies. This may have occurred due to what has been described by past research as self-presentation bias. In this case, an aggregate base percentage of respondents always responded that tasks in their domain are highly critical, highly important, and easy to learn. These results showed that frequency scales with absolute anchors yielded data with better statistical performance than other more subjective scales. These properties do not answer the question of whether a scale matches an exam's purpose, which is the most important consideration for job analyses. They do, however, suggest that, if statistics are a primary deciding factor, strong consideration should be given to using frequency scales with absolute anchors. 相似文献
20.
Lanktree CB Gilbert AM Briere J Taylor N Chen K Maida CA Saltzman WR 《Child abuse & neglect》2008,32(6):621-625
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the convergent and discriminant validity of two trauma symptom measures, the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC) [Briere, J. (1996). Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources] and the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC) [Briere, J. (2005). Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources]. METHODS: Children's scores on the TSCC and their caretakers' ratings on the TSCYC were analyzed in a study of 310 children presenting to one of two child abuse treatment centers. RESULTS: TSCC and TSCYC scales generally converged in their assessment of symptomatology in maltreated children. Equivalent scales measuring anxiety, depression, anger, dissociation, and sexual concerns were generally most correlated with one another. Similarly, the Posttraumatic Stress-Intrusion (PTS-I) scale of the TSCYC correlated highest with the Posttraumatic Stress (PTS) and Anxiety (ANX) scales of the TSCC, the TSCYC Posttraumatic Stress-Arousal (PTS-AR) scale was correlated with the TSCC ANX scale, and the TSCC PTS scale was most correlated with the TSCYC ANX, PTS-I, and Sexual Concerns (SC) scales. The TSCYC Posttraumatic Stress-Avoidance scale was unrelated to any TSCC scale. Discriminant function analysis revealed that the TSCC PTS scale was the best single predictor of sexual abuse-related PTSD status as identified by the TSCYC. CONCLUSIONS: The TSCC and TSCYC display moderate convergent and discriminant validity with respect to one another, despite different information sources. Nevertheless, the relatively small association between relevant TSCC and TSCYC scales indicates that different symptom informants may have different perspectives on the child's symptomatology; an outcome that may be beneficial when both measures are administered simultaneously. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These results reinforce the notion that both child- and parent/caretaker report measures should be used in the evaluation of traumatized children, so that multiple sources of information can be considered simultaneously. In the current context, administration of the TSCC to the child and the TSCYC to the caretaker, when appropriate (i.e., in children 8-12 years of age) may yield more clinical information on the child's symptomatology than either measure would alone-perhaps especially in cases when one of the two respondents under- or over-reports the child's distress. 相似文献