共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 250 毫秒
1.
符号学就是研究符号与意义的学问及其相关理论.符号教育学即以符号学为武器批判教育的一种教育学理论形态.符号教育学者在教育符号域(教育情境和教育活动)中观察和解释符号及其意义、探究教育符号行为的心理动机、意义及各种指称关系中的认知和释义过程,并通过对符号的研究来认知教育现象和思考教育问题,从符号学视角描述、解释、预测、改进教育.符号教育学时代,意义与意义感将成为人生与教育的中心目的 .未来符号教育将是无时、无界、无人,借助虚拟现实与人工智能和基因修复技术,将会出现"万径人踪灭,空山不见人",因而教师教育和教育政策亟需革故鼎新,应对虚拟符号主宰的未来世界. 相似文献
2.
符号学作为一门科学,它的开端通常是以瑞士语言学家费迪南·德·索绪尔的符号学理论为标志的,而美国实用主义哲学创始人皮尔斯的符号学思想则加速了符号学的形成。经过众多学者的努力,符号学的影响越来越大,它的研究范围也已从当初的纯语言符号向泛符号方向扩展,并提出了“一切都是符号”的观点。在这种符号观指导下,我们把充斥在生活中的各种各样的广告视为一种符号系统, 相似文献
3.
程然 《山东教育学院学报》2015,(1):1-6
符号学勃兴于上世纪60年代,至今不仅构建了比较成熟的理论体系,而且与其它学科联姻,形成了诸多边缘学科,然而却没有一门教育符号学。教育符号学的理论构建,基于人的符号性,符号的元工具性及社会性与个性的统一特质,是教育应该把握的人的符号性的核心要素;而人的符号化,则是通过符号思维和符号行为的训练,有效地将人培养成符号人。 相似文献
4.
符号域（semiosphere）作为文化符号学的重要理论,是塔尔图学派的领军人物尤里＆#183;洛特曼留给其继承者们的宝贵学术遗产。在新一代塔尔图符号学家的共同努力之下,符号域理论得以和塔尔图的另一宝贵学术资源---乌克斯库尔的环境界（Umwelt）理论相融合,从而形成了新塔尔图学派的理论基石。在此基础上,塔尔图的符号学者们将符号学研究推进至生命符号学的领域,从而极大地拓展了符号学的疆界,为当代的符号学发展做出了重要贡献。 相似文献
5.
国内符号学研究往往把皮尔士和索绪尔分别当作现代符号学的两支源头．认为二者观点互不相干,然而经仔细研究．二者的符号学观中却有惊人的相似之处,具体体现在其反对的对象,符号及符号学界定,符号意义,作用,分类,发展及符号的依赖关系上．了解这些相似点,有助于国际符号学交流,统一认识,推动符号学的发展。 相似文献
6.
在现代符号学领域,索绪尔的贡献得到了广泛的认同。在此我们有必要重新认识索绪尔的语言符号任意性理论,以追溯符号学的过去,展望其未来,加深对语言符号的认识和研究。 相似文献
7.
符号学认为,符号是人类特有的一种文化现象,是通过某种密码赋予对象以意义的创造性语言。符号学创始人美国哲学家皮尔斯把符号分为象征符号、象形符号和标志符号。数学符号作为象形符号(如有“△”表示三角形)和标志符号(如用“×”表示数字相乘),具有视觉上的直观性和表意上的简明性、形象性。语文教学中适当运用数学符号,有助于学生理解课文思想内容,把握课文写作艺术,提高学生的抽象思维能力、形象思维能力和不同学科之间的知识迁移能力,培养学生的审美情趣。 相似文献
8.
9.
在符号学理论研究中,索绪尔、皮尔士代表了两种不同的观点。
索绪尔提出语言符号单位由两部分组成：一个是概念,即符号的所指;一个是音响形象,即符号的能指。在语言符号中能指和所指的结合是任意的,不可论证的。任意性原则是索绪尔语言符号学研究的出发点。 相似文献
10.
11.
John Deely 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2017,49(3):207-219
Semiotics is the study of signs addressing their action, usage, communication and signification (meaning). Edusemiotics—educational semiotics—is a recently developed direction in educational theory that takes semiotics as its foundational philosophy and explores the philosophical specifics of semiotics in educational contexts. As a novel theoretical field of inquiry, it is complemented by research known under the banner ‘semiotics in education’, which is largely an applied enterprise. In this respect edusemiotics is a new conceptual framework for both theoretical and empirical studies. Edusemiotics has also been given the status of being a new branch of theoretical semiotics and it was launched as such at the 12th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies in September 2014 at the New Bulgarian University in Sofia. The article presents ‘semiosis’ as the action of signs across culture AND nature and posits ‘learning’ in terms of developing semiotic consciousness and semiotic competence. Semiosis is a process and as such it defies the Cartesian philosophy of substance-dualism that still informs the culture of education. The paper focuses specifically on university education permeated by disciplinary boundaries and the fragmentation of knowledge grounded in objective science inherited from modernity. Where is semiotics as the science of signs (or relations) in the context of academic culture? The authors conclude by affirming the transdisciplinary character of semiotics and edusemiotics and specify the distinctive focal points of transdisciplinary knowledge afforded by edusemiotics. 相似文献
12.
《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(10):1135-1144
In this article, I attempt to describe how certain theoretical constructions of semiotics could be applied in educational theoretical work. First I introduce meaning as a basic concept of semiotics, thus also touching on concepts such as action, competence and causality. I am then able to define learning as a change of competences, and also refer to the pedagogical concept of learning i.e. Bildung, which can be roughly defined as valuable human learning. I then take up the problem of education as pedagogical direction and communication. Finally, I conclude with some considerations on the famous Greimassian semiotic square. 相似文献
13.
Donald J. Cunningham 《Educational Psychology Review》1992,4(2):165-194
In this paper, I argue that educational psychology is deeply embedded in an objectivist epistemology, the consequences of which seriously undermine our ability to inform educational practice. In the remainder of the paper, I provide an introduction to semiotics, the doctrine of signs, and offer four global concepts (the sign, semiosis, inference, and reflexivity) that I believe set semiotics apart from other, more or less related, approaches within psychology and educational psychology (e.g., constructivism). I conclude the paper by responding to some of the more frequently asked questions I have encountered in attempting to define an educational semiotic. 相似文献
14.
皮尔斯与索绪尔符号观比较 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
李巧兰 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2004,(1):115-120
皮尔斯和索绪尔分别为现代西方符号学中哲学传统和语言学传统两个源流的开创者.本文在比较他们的符号基本理论的同时,一方面透过皮尔斯的符号观分析其语言观,另一方面则从索绪尔的语言符号观看其一般符号观.本文认为,索绪尔二元的符号观忽视了符号与外部的交际价值,而皮尔斯的符号观则弥补了其不足,强调符号的过程是一个动态的认知和交际的过程. 相似文献
15.
现代教育技术与更新教师教育观念关系初探 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
现代教育技术的强大功能使人们联想到将之运用于对教师教育观念的改造,分析两个案例,发现教师们在学习技术的过程中教育观念也发生了变化。引起的思考是:值不值得对现代教育技术培训加以特别的关注?作为工具的现代教育技术能否在促进教师观念的更新中直接发挥作用?结论是应该运用现代教育技术构建新的教师培训模式。 相似文献
16.
In recent years, semiotics has become an innovative theoretical framework in mathematics education. The purpose of this article
is to show that semiotics can be used to explain learning as a process of experimenting with and communicating about one's
own representations (in particular ‘diagrams') of mathematical problems. As a paradigmatic example, we apply a Peircean semiotic
framework to answer the question of how students develop a notion of ‘distribution' in a statistics course by ‘diagrammatic
reasoning' and by forming ‘hypostatic abstractions', that is by forming new mathematical objects which can be used as means
for communication and further reasoning. Peirce's semiotic terminology is used as an alternative to concepts such as modeling,
symbolizing, and reification. We will show that it is a precise instrument of analysis with regard to the complexity of learning
and communicating in mathematics classrooms. 相似文献
17.
18.
偏远地区的英语教学水平始终是我国中学英语教学的薄弱环节。甘肃偏远山区尽管在英语教学中投入大量精力,效果却始终不明显。当前符号学的发展为研究语言提供了另一种途径。教师应通过探讨语言的符号属性,将语言看作是一种符号化的知识系统,并依据此视角在教学过程中尝试将符号与映像表征对应,以增强学生学习兴趣,提高其学习效率。 相似文献
19.
《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(2):239-246
Taking as its exegetic point of departure Peirce's outline of a semiotic theory of cognition from the mid 1890s, this paper explores the relevance of this outline to a theory of learning and also to a broader, normative vision of education. Firstly, besides providing for fallibilism in philosophical inquiry Peirce's outline accords with critical strategies of his fellow pragmatists, such as William James's detection of the ‘psychologist's fallacy’ and John Dewey's rejection of the ‘philosophical fallacy’. It is pointed out that this merit of Peirce's outline is due to his abstract and often neglected notion of a prespecialised scientific intelligence. Secondly, the paper shows that Peirce's semiotic approach to prescientific learning processes conditioning all kinds of theoretical activity may indeed complement James's and Dewey's contributions: giving careful attention to the work of linguistic and paralinguistic signs in such learning processes Peirce's analysis captures indexical and iconic aspects, as well as symbolic aspects of linguistic interaction and experientially constrained dialogue. Following Peirce's analysis the paper considers how the iconicity of linguistic structure, ostensive acts and the practical situatedness of language use are pre‐conditions of experiential learning in every day life as well as in scientific learning. It is also shown how this semiotic analysis is connected with Peirce's important notion of abduction. Finally, it is pointed out that a broader vision of education may issue from Peirce's semiotic analysis and that such a vision would emphasise that the life experience of individuals entering educational institutions should be made to bear on the objectives as well as the teaching practices of educational institutions. 相似文献
20.
Andrew Stables 《课程研究杂志》2013,45(4):373-387
Cartesian mind‐body dualism, while often explicitly denied, has left a legacy of conceptions that remain highly influential in education. I argue that trends in both analytic and continental philosophy of language point towards a post‐Cartesian settlement in which the distinction between ‘signs’ and ‘signals’ is collapsed, and which thus construes all living (and learning) as semiotic engagement. I begin to explore the implications of such a view for learning theory, teaching and the curriculum, educational and social research, and broader social policy. 相似文献