共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
一种新的评价形式——档案式评估 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
LI Jing-hua 《湖北招生考试》2008,(8)
教育是一个长期的过程,人的智能是多元化的,作为教育重要环节的评价,对学生知识和能力的估量亦应该是多元的。在新课程标准的教育改革背景下,我们实践中的评价形式更应多样化,而不能仅限于考试一途。档案式评估完全是一种新的评价方式。因为档案式评估对学生实施真实性的过程评价,可以有效地激发学生的主动性和积极性,改变其在传统教学中被动学习的局面,同时还能有效地转变教师传统的教学观念,进而为升学等高风险的决策提供更翔实有效的参考。 相似文献
2.
英国北部设菲尔德市儿童医院开发了一种用门诊病人医案来评定儿科医生临床技能的量表,并估计了该量表的信度、可行性、效度和教育的影响。实践表明该量表是可行的,在对培训中的儿科注册医师进行年度评定中它提供的结果是可靠的,量表的反馈有利于被评医生提高自身的临床书面交流能力。这一考评方法具有操作简便、信度和效应较好的优点,它可以作为评定综合性临床能力的一部分,经过试验,这一方法也可用于其他医疗专业的考评。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
新课程理念下课堂教学评价的标准 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
新课程理念下课堂教学评价的标准已发生重大变革,准确理解新课程课堂教学评价理念,认真研究新的课堂教学评价标准,对教师分析与反思课堂教学行为,提高专业化水平都有直接帮助.以新课程的评价理念为依据,按照现代课堂教学要求,探讨新课程课堂教学评价的标准. 相似文献
6.
Language Development Hypermedia Research Group 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》1992,40(2):59-67
Described in this article is the development of a tool compatible with the constructivist approach to learning and instruction.
Constructivism holds that instruction is less a process whereby knowledge is communicated to learners and more a matter of
nurturing the processes whereby learners come to understand, construct interpretations in real-life settings, appreciate multiple
perspectives, develop and defend their own positions while recognizing other views, and become aware of and able to manipulate
the knowledge construction process itself. Bubble Dialogue is a HyperCard-based technique which combines elements of role
play, comic strip creation, and reflexive dialogue analysis enacted in everyday settings. Based upon evidence accumulated
over several years of development, the authors feel that this tool responds to the need for classroom-based techniques for
promoting knowledge construction. 相似文献
7.
The report is a translation of part of a Swedish paper entitled “On Students' Achievement in Mathematics after Finishing Comprehensive School”. The intention of the investigation was to - diagnose the retention of some basic skills in some topics in algebra and geometry, - reveal difficult steps in the learning processes in these topics. Starting with a complicated question, e.g. the equation \(\frac{{3x - 2}}{2} = \frac{x}{3}\) a sequence consisting of 5–15 problems were constructed. Each new problem followed by the preceding one by taking away one or two details. \(\begin{gathered} 3(3x - 2) = 2x \\ {\text{ 9}}x - 6 = 2x \\ {\text{ 7}}x - 6 = 0 \\ {\text{ 7}}x = 6 \\ \end{gathered} \) is an example of a sequence belonging to the equation above. From about 10 complicated problems (“top-items”) and their sequences, in all 130 items, 10 sub-tests were put together in such a way that the pupils who took the test were not aware of the sequences but found no connection between the problems. Many surprising results were found, e.g., that the students scored higher on 14/(x+2)=2 than on 4/x=3, that the difficulty in finding the area of a triangle depended on the position of the triangle and that the problems “Simplify a/a 2, a2/a, a/a” were of quite unequal difficulty. A discussion about the students' thinking in patterns and mechanically learning ends the report. 相似文献
8.
This paper is about a design-based research project which evaluated the novel use of Lesson Study for assessment (LSfA) purposes. It starts by explaining the principles and design of LSfA procedures based on a Lesson Study model and dynamic assessment principles. It outlines the training and support provided to six Lesson Study teams in three primary and three secondary schools, each involving two class teachers and the school’s SEN coordinator. The evaluation findings focused on the LSfA processes and procedures, for example, the outcomes of LSfA for teacher confidence and knowledge, assessment capabilities and continued benefits. The LSfA process was seen to involve processes such as honest and constructive observations, analysing lessons to see what to change and using knowledge about learning difficulties. Some of the context factors that supported and inhibited the process are also outlined. Analysis of the pre-post LSfA pupil assessments showed a decrease in identifying areas of pupil difficulties and an increased identification of enabling factors. This is interpreted as evidence for the LSfA having dynamic assessment potential. The paper concludes with an account of how the LSfA procedures were adapted in response to this evaluation and suggestions for future development and research. 相似文献
9.
建立新型教育评价体系基本要素刍议 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
张易陶 《四川教育学院学报》2003,19(6):3-3
新型教育评价体系的基本要素 ,可以概括为 :一个核心、两个标准、三个特点。一、素质教育是新型教育评价体系的核心。素质教育是为全体学生服务的发展性教育 ,是以人的素质不断提高、人格人性的不断完善升华并与社会发展标准相结合为价值取向的教育。素质的基本定义 ,即高于具体知识技能的思维方法和能力。在建立新型教育评价体系的过程中 ,要始终抓住素质教育这一核心。以素质教育为中轴 ,使其他评价细则成为“扇面” ,按照素质教育“思维方法和能力”的精髓 ,制定出科学的、动态的评价标准。以能力为例 ,它涵盖了学生的沟通能力、表达能力… 相似文献
10.
《International Journal of Educational Research》1994,21(3):341-350
This chapter briefly reviews each of the preceding chapters and then outlines a set of issues that confront the development and use of performance assessments in school settings. For performance assessments to be useful, the following issues need to be kept in the forefront: conceptual clarity in the link between instruction, assessment, and reporting; support from the measurement community to assist teachers in using and interpreting results for instructional and student decision making; fairness across raters, tasks, administration, scoring procedures, and student subgroups; and cost-feasibility given current high monetary, time, and human-resource costs for development and use. 相似文献
11.
Formative assessment has been recognised as a critical element in teaching for conceptual development. A case study research design was employed to: (1) characterise the assessment thinking of three science instructors at a research‐based university; and (2) examine the complex relationship between instructor thinking and practice by encouraging experimentation with alternative assessment strategies. Interviews, reflective journals, field notes and course documents were the data sources used to create a single case study that documented the development of these university instructors’ assessment thinking during their experimentation with formative assessment strategies. Throughout two semesters of experimentation, the instructors’ assessment thinking became more sophisticated; they grew to view the purpose of assessment less as a summative activity used for the assignment of marks and more as a tool for diagnosing student learning. However, more sophisticated thinking was not associated with revisions in teaching practice based on formative assessment data. Further investigations are needed to more completely understand the nature of assessment thinking and how assessment thinking influences assessment practices. Implications for professional development of university‐level science instructors include personalised experiences through which instructors can become active participants in gathering evidence of student learning that promotes growth in assessment thinking. 相似文献
12.
在评价方面,高中新课程要求建立以促进发展为目标的多元、多样的评价模式,全面反映学生的成长历程和目标达成情况。评价方式主要有纸笔评价、表现性评价、学习档案袋评价。表现性评价是反映学生学习本章知识的过程情况如何,是否达到情感态度与价值观目标。下面就人教版选修5《第二章烃和卤代烃》表现性评价的设计谈谈自己的想法和做法。 相似文献
13.
Sheena Bevitt 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2015,40(1):103-119
The impact of innovative assessment on student experience in higher education is a neglected research topic. This represents an important gap in the literature-given debate around the marketisation of higher education, international focus on student satisfaction measurement tools and political calls to put students at the heart of higher education in the UK. This paper reports on qualitative findings from a research project examining the impact of assessment preferences and familiarity on student attainment and experience. It argues that innovation is defined by the student, shaped by diverse assessment experiences and preferences, and therefore its impact is difficult to predict. It proposes that future innovations must explore assessment choice mechanisms which allow students to shape their own assessments. Cultural change and staff development will be required to achieve this. To be accepted, assessment for student experience must be viewed as a complementary layer within a complex multi-perspective model of assessment, which also embraces assessment of learning, assessment for learning and assessment for lifelong learning. Further research is required to build a meta-theory of assessment to enhance the synergies between these alternative approaches and minimise the tensions between them. 相似文献
14.
介绍了一种利用MBER土壤固化剂作为建筑材料的塑性施工工艺,并分析了利用该工艺施工的土壤固化剂蓄水装置的水体水质状况.试验于2012年7月收集集流面径流,并进行后期贮存.采集的集流面和窖水水样的监测指标包括浊度、COD、总氮、硝酸盐和氨氮.结果表明,集流面径流中污染物含量呈现出随降雨历时增加而逐渐减小的变化趋势,因此降雨初期阶段的雨水应该弃用.贮存窖水中硝酸盐浓度呈现随贮存时间增加而逐渐增大的变化趋势,而其余污染物浓度均呈现随贮存时间增加而逐渐减小的趋势.上述指标的监测结果均未超过国家饮用水卫生安全标准.研究表明该种装置可用于提供家庭用水. 相似文献
15.
本文阐述了实施物理新课程要树立发展性教学评价观念 ;确定多元化的评价内容和标准 ;运用多样化的评价方法 相似文献
16.
《Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties》2013,18(1):20-27
Abstract A simmering controversy has been running in the United States since 1995 over the perceived conflict between the maintenance of academic standards and the rights of disabled university students. Recent developments are set to raise the same issue in Australian universities. The first of these developments is the shift in the emphasis of academic standards with the implementation of the Generic Skills Assessment (GSA) program. The second is the release of draft disability standards for education to streamline enforcement of the Commonwealth's Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). The DDA protects disabled people against discrimination in education. Amongst the many types of disabled people protected are those who are unable to read, write or communicate effectively because of learning disabilities, and others who are unable to concentrate and pay attention properly because of mental disorders. Hitherto, universities have found ways to comply with the DDA without compromising academic standards by providing these types of disabled students with accommodations that take the form of alternative methods of examination, extra exam time, technological assistance, scribes, readers, etc. However, the GSA has been designed for standardised implementation and doesn't allow for this type of flexibility. Further, generic skills testing specifically discriminates against students with learning disabilities and some mental disorders because it is the inability to master particular types of generic skills that defines these types of disabilities. 相似文献
17.
历史新课程推进过程中 ,历史教学评价的改革具有十分重要的意义。新课程背景下的历史教学评价改革重视发展性评价 ,强调评价主体的多元化 ,评价内容的综合化和评价方法的多样化 相似文献
18.
Enthusiasm for interventions designed to improve organizational quality has far outpaced interest in assessing their effects. This article describes two procedures for systematic quality assessment. First, distributional assessment provides a way to monitor individual, group or unit performance by establishing real and maximum‐feasible parameters. Second, a cost assessment system based on utility analysis provides a way to assign dollar values and benefits to quality interventions targeted at specific jobs and job functions. Both procedures are described and illustrated. They resolve a long‐standing problem with quality assessment, arising from the difficulty of accounting for situational influences which can constrain the effects of interventions designed to improve organizational performance, product or service delivery, and customer satisfaction. 相似文献
19.
Carlos Soneira José Antonio González-Calero David Arnau 《Educational Studies in Mathematics》2018,99(1):43-56
We present two empirical studies with 241 and 211 pre-service teachers that evaluate the explanatory power of word order matching and static comparison as models for the reversal error. We used tasks consisting of generating an algebraic equation representing a comparison given in a verbal statement. We introduce the types of magnitude involved in the statement as variables of analysis, something that was not previously tackled in previous works. Our results show that there are no statistical differences in the production of reversal errors depending on the information included in the name used to designate the variable, and that there are statistical differences depending on the syntactic configuration as well as the type of magnitude involved in the statement. The interpretation of these results indicates that both word order matching and static comparison have some potential as explanatory models for the reversal error, and that neither one of them, alone, is enough to completely explain the phenomenon. 相似文献