首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
<正>随着教育综合改革的推进,国内很多机构开始关注教育评价,着手研究国内外著名的评价项目。代表国际先进教育评价理念和评测方向的PISA测试,受到越来越多的关注。学生能力国际评价(PISA)中国独立研究项目由教育部考试中心主持,北京市房山区作为独立区域在2009年和2012年,分别组织800多名被抽样到的15岁学生参加了PISA中国独立研究,而且,区域内46所学校继续参与了PISA2015正式  相似文献   

2.
专业视野中的PISA   总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6  
近来,国际学生评估项目(PISA)备受国内外关注。PISA项目缘于发达国家对基础教育质量的反思,是一项以改善教育政策为导向的跨国测试研究。本文解读了PISA测试独创的素养及其内涵结构,探究了PISA研究试图解释的学生素养形成与学生个人参与及学习策略间的关系,分析了PISA研究试图发现的学生素养与家庭影响、学校均衡、教育公平的关系。本文认为,公平而卓越正在成为发达国家和国际组织衡量基础教育质量的新尺度;多维度、多学科、重数据与国际参照已经成为教育研究与教育评价的重要发展方向;教育政策的制定应该建立在研究、数据和证据的基础上。  相似文献   

3.
PISA是当前最知名的国际教育成效评价项目之一。本文结合2006年PISA天津测试的实践经验,从PISA测试的背景、实施流程、保密措施等方面介绍PISA的实施理念与操作规范,并在此基础上从测验实施角度,总结提出值得我国教育考试机构借鉴的有关问题。  相似文献   

4.
PISA在中国:教育评价新探索   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
本文通过对当前国际上颇具影响力的大规模教育评价项目——"学生能力国际评价("PISA)的评价理念和技术的解析,结合教育部考试中心开展PISA2006中国试测研究实践收获的启示,阐述了作者对我国教育评价研究与发展的思考和建议。  相似文献   

5.
面对知识经济时代背景和人力资本理论的拓展,教育成为人力资源的"永动机".为满足成员国持续提高国家竞争力,从国际框架审视各国教育质量和教育公平,从而推动教育改革和发展的需要,经济合作与发展组织(OECD)于1997年发起了监测成员国教育成效的PISA测评项目(The Programme for International Student Assessment,简称PISA).近来,PISA备受关注,国内关于PISA的研究集中在对其实施背景、评价理念、测评内容、测评工具和结果的分析介绍,研究多采用比较法,研究群体主要在高校研究机构.教育部考试中心PISA项目研究组先后完成了PISA 2006和PISA 2009的中国试测研究,现阶段正开展PISA 2012中国试测研究工作.同时,上海正式参加了PISA 2009.  相似文献   

6.
罗蓓 《考试周刊》2014,(55):159-160
本文简述了PISA国际学生评价项目,并对其素养观进行了分析,在此基础上,对PISA国际学生评价项目提出了完善建议。  相似文献   

7.
试析PISA科学素养测评   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
国际教育评估项目PISA对青少年科学素养的测评,因其规模、过程、内容、标准、功能等的标准化运作和成功实践,越来越引起人们的关注。文章简要介绍了PISA监测项目的概况,深入剖析其科学素养监测的特点,以期对相关研究和实践有所裨益。  相似文献   

8.
PISA科学素养评价中的生物学案例和评价方式   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
吴畏 《生物学教学》2009,34(6):15-18
2009年4月上海首次参加国际学生评价项目(PISA)测评。本文结合生物学案例,简要介绍PISA科学素养的评价方式。  相似文献   

9.
PISA是目前世界上最有影响力的国际学生评价项目之一。其评价的结果具有高度的可比性、可信性和有效性,能为教育改革和发展提供有益的启示。本文通过对芬兰、德国与英国三国PISA测验结果的解析,结合PISA项目对三国教育改革的影响,阐述了作者对我国教育评价研究与发展的思考和建议。  相似文献   

10.
广东省在首次参加PISA研究、进行2014年试测抽样的过程中,通过明确抽样范围和抽样流程、摸查PISA学生分布的基本信息、完成学校抽样和学生抽样任务,对进一步做好该项研究提出意见和建议。  相似文献   

11.
ABSTRACT

New evidence presented in this paper shows that existing accounts of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in developing countries underestimate both progress and inequality because they do not take into account the large proportion of 15–16-year olds who are ineligible for the PISA sampling frame, primarily due to dropout or delay. In such countries, who makes it into PISA (sample eligibility) heavily influences representivity and therefore the interpretation of PISA results. We use PISA in Turkey 2003–2012 as a case study to show how combining measures of access (from the Turkish Demographic and Health Surveys) and learning outcomes (from PISA) can account for changes in the underlying population. We find the percentage of 15–16-year olds reaching Level 2 in PISA is up to twice as large as that reflected in official PISA reports. These findings have strong implications for inter-country and inter-temporal comparisons using PISA, particularly for developing countries.  相似文献   

12.
王蕾 《考试研究》2009,(3):46-59
大规模教育质量的评价在很大程度上影响着国家和地区教育发展的走向。本文以PISA2006结果报告为中心,解析PISA对大规模教育质量和相关影响因素评价的理念和方法,为研究和开展我国大规模教育质量评价提供借鉴。  相似文献   

13.
14.
ABSTRACT

This paper accepts that the OECD’s PISA has become influential in policy terms globally, but analyses the ways that the main PISA and PISA for Schools tests are positioned differently in Australia and the USA because of contrasting educational federalisms in the two nations. Our argument is that while PISA is undoubtedly influential, its effects are nonetheless mediated by the political structures – here, the different models of federalism – present within different nations, which in turn leads to quite distinct ‘PISA effects’. For instance, Australia oversamples on main PISA to make its data available for national and state-level policymaking, whereas the USA, with its focus on local governance in schooling, does not oversample, meaning that main PISA does not have a comparable policy salience as in Australia. Conversely, the newer PISA for Schools test originated in the USA with pressure from educators and philanthropic interests and has been implemented in a good number of schools, but it has not been taken up in the same way in Australia. Our analyses show how these differences reflect the idiosyncratic workings of federalism in the two nations, in which the federal government has a stronger policy and funding role in Australia than has hitherto been the case for the federal government in the USA.  相似文献   

15.
PISA学习参与度评价   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
国际学生评估项目(PISA)越来越重视学生的学习参与度评价,特别是在针对具体学科领域的参与度评价上做了许多有益的探索,为我国基础教育课程中"情感态度与价值观"的评价提供了借鉴.  相似文献   

16.
《Learning and Instruction》2007,17(2):111-122
Coaching is known to improve student performance on tests with high personal relevance (“high-stakes tests”). We investigate whether the same holds for a test that has no personal relevance for the students taking it (“low-stakes test”). More specifically, we explore whether student performance on the reading and mathematics assessments of the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) can be fostered by coaching (and administering a pretest). Coaching and pretest effects were studied for each content domain separately in a pre-/posttest quasi-experimental design. To examine differential effects of academic tracks, samples were drawn from German Hauptschule and Gymnasium schools. Results show that only the combined effects of pretesting and coaching have substantial positive effects on student performance. Implications for the interpretation of large-scale assessment programs are discussed.  相似文献   

17.
18.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号