Formative assessment practices for secondary mathematics have been advocated as valuable for students, but difficult for teachers to learn. There have been calls in the literature to increase the emphasis on formative assessment in mathematics teacher preparation courses. This study explored the use of peer-assessment strategies for helping pre-service secondary mathematics teachers (PSTs) cultivate formative assessment principles and practices for assessing school students. Twenty-seven PSTs participated in a peer-assessment cycle comprised of: sourcing a rich mathematics task; constructing an assessment rubric for it; and collecting and analysing a selection of secondary student responses to the task. Each PST then provided written and verbal feedback to a peer on his/her rubric and student solution assessments. We draw on theoretical conceptions of Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice to characterize the PSTs’ perceptions of their experience of formative assessment processes for learning to assess school students, in terms of cognitive and affective dimensions of their conceptions of assessment. The cohort evidenced a wide range of levels of confidence with the various aspects of formative assessment practices but on average less confidence in assessing school student task responses themselves than in assessing peer work. In addition to highlighting specific changes to different types of assessment knowledge, the PSTs also evidenced an awareness of shifts in their attitudes, in coming to view student task responses with more appreciation and humility.
相似文献 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 750 毫秒
1.
2.
分组合作学习是课堂教学活动的一种重要教学组织形式。提高小组合作学习的有效性。教师首先要注意观念引领,让学生认同合作学习;合作的前提是自主学习,教师要注意给学生充足的自主学习、合作交流、探究的时空。在课前教师要设计高质量的问题．使合作学习更深入。教师要发挥主导作用．指导学生合作的方法。把握合作时机．对小组活动进行评价总结。让小组合作学习真正从形式走向实质． 相似文献
3.
“儿童描述性评论”旨在通过描述来揭示、反思与还原儿童的真实形象,进而使教师更好地理解儿童,改善教育教学。本文在《重建课堂教学实验研究》课题开展的基础上,在具体的教育教学实践中,尝试并推广了用描述性评论对儿童进行研究的方式。无疑,这是另外一个视角。从这一视角出发,我们发现：每一个儿童都是一个复杂的个体;教育的指向应是回到儿童本身;教师即儿童哲学家;学校即儿童成长的乐园。 相似文献
4.
提高小组合作学习的质量要从精心组织、优选内容、明确要求、及时指导、教师参与、总结评价六个方面来进行小组合作学习,提高学生学习能力。 相似文献
5.
小学是学生心理发展的重要阶段，是儿童成长的重要时期。在教与学的过程中，教师不仅是知识的传授者．还是学生人格的塑造者。在小学阶段，由于儿童年龄较小．自我意识较低，许多学生对自己的评价来源于教师的评价。罗森塔尔和雅各布森于1968年公布了他们的发现．学生的行为可以反映出教师的期望。教师对学生的不同期望，使教师以不同的行为区别对待学生，学生按教师的期望做出相应的行为反应，并以教师的期望来评价和塑造自己。 相似文献
6.
合作学习是教师指导学生在小组中从事学习活动,借助学生之间互动,有效地促进学生的学习,并以团体的成绩为评价标准,共同达成教学目标．合作学习作为对传统教学组织形式的一种突破和补充,已经被教师越来越广泛地运用于以学生发展为本的课堂教学之中,这也是新一轮课程改革所倡导的自主、探索与合作的学习方式,促进了学生在教师指导下主动地、富有个性地学习．本文从科学地建立合作小组、选择合作内容、评价与反思三个方面阐述了如何有效地组织学生开展合作学习． 相似文献
7.
建构主义理论背景下的参与式学习评价 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
学习是一个知识建构的过程。在教学中教师要从课程目标、课程内容、教学过程、学习评价等方面引导学生积极参与其中。儿童的生活经验和已有知识是开展参与式学习的基础,交流分享是关键,要指导学生开展各种形式的合作学习,引导学生学会评价和理解评价。 相似文献
8.
9.
在科学课的评价中，如果不用量性的方法来评价学生．而采用描述性的评价方式让学生自评，那么这种评价方式将能促进学生学习的发展。 相似文献
10.
小学品德课是促进儿童良好品德形成与社会性发展的重要课程。在本课程的教学中,采用教师观察、与学生谈话、成长记录、描述性评语、作品评价等多种评价方法,全面反映学生实际的学习和发展状况,已成为品德教师的共识。然而,评价的结果往往受到心理因素的影响与作用,常常会出现"失真"的情况,从而导致评价结果不准确。因此,在品德教学评价改革中,教师应有效地调控评价过程中各种心理活动,尽量克服干扰和影响评价活动政策进行的负 相似文献
11.
12.
Niva Wengrowicz Yehudit Judy Dori Dov Dori 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2017,42(4):607-624
Project-based learning (PBL) facilitates significant learning, but it poses a major assessment challenge for assessing individual content knowledge. We developed and implemented an assessment approach and tool for a mandatory undergraduate systems engineering PBL-based course. We call this type of assessment student-oriented meta-assessment. Research participants included 131 undergraduate engineering students who carried out team projects requiring conceptual modelling of complex systems. Next, individual students assessed their peer team projects. Finally, the course staff assessed students individually, based on the content knowledge that was reflected in students’ comments to their peers, by using the new meta-assessment tool. The research findings validated the meta-assessment tool which can serve for assessing various PBL courses. Our contribution is twofold: a new approach for assessing project-based undergraduate engineering courses, and classification of meta-assessment methods into three types, where a student-oriented meta-assessment as one of the three meta-assessment methods is our newly introduced and validated method. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
Theodoros Vachliotis Katerina Salta Chryssa Tzougraki 《Research in Science Education》2014,44(2):239-266
The purpose of this study was dual: First, to develop and validate assessment schemes for assessing 11th grade students’ meaningful understanding of organic chemistry concepts, as well as their systems thinking skills in the domain. Second, to explore the relationship between the two constructs of interest based on students’ performance on the applied assessment framework. For this purpose, (a) various types of objective assessment questions were developed and evaluated for assessing meaningful understanding, (b) a specific type of systemic assessment questions (SAQs) was developed and evaluated for assessing systems thinking skills, and (c) the association between students’ responses on the applied assessment schemes was explored. The results indicated that properly designed objective questions can effectively capture aspects of students’ meaningful understanding. It was also found that the SAQs can elicit systems thinking skills in the context of a formalistic systems thinking theoretical approach. Moreover, a significant relationship was observed between students’ responses on the two assessment strategies. This research provides evidence that students’ systems thinking level within a science domain is significantly related to their meaningful understanding of relative science concepts. 相似文献
17.
18.
Helen A. Alexander 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》1996,21(4):357-366
The process of assessing students on clinical placements has to date been under‐researched. In particular, while the involvement of subjective judgements in assessing students has been discussed in the literature, there has been no attempt to look for systematic evidence. This paper comprises the first attempt to relate judgement theory to the assessment of vocational education. Preliminary results demonstrate that physiotherapy assessors made subjective judgements of their students, that these contributed to the determination of assessment grades, and that in certain cases these judgements were erroneous. The relationship of these subjective judgements to the awarding of grades via a supposedly objective assessment instrument is not yet known. Given the widespread use of such assessment instruments across different professions, the question raised is whether all observational assessment systems suffer from similar problems. If students are being judged on criteria not included on assessment instruments, perhaps the other criteria being used need to be made more explicit. 相似文献
19.
20.
Ineke van den Berg Wilfried Admiraal Albert Pilot 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2006,31(1):19-36
Peer assessment is understood to be an arrangement with students assessing the quality of their fellow students’ writings and giving feedback to each other. This multiple‐case study of seven designs of peer assessment focuses on the contribution of peer assessment to the acquisition of undergraduates’ writing skills. Its aim is to arrive at an optimal design of peer assessment. Factors included in this study are: the quality of peer assessment activities, the interaction between students in oral peer feedback, students’ learning outcomes, and their evaluation of peer assessment. Most students took assessing the work of their fellow students seriously, and included the peer feedback in the revision of their work. In most conversations, students provided feedback in an evaluative manner. In others, the interaction was more exploratory. For peer assessment, we recommend a combination of written and oral peer feedback. 相似文献
|
| 设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏 |
|
Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司 京ICP备09084417号 |