共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 453 毫秒
1.
考试作弊及其防治的简单博弈分析 总被引：13，自引：0，他引：13
学生考试作弊是严重违纪的行为，虽“屡禁”而“不止”。从博弈论经典模型“囚徒困境”的特点和条件入手，讨论学生考试作弊的收益。成本，有助于我们了解学生考试作弊的博弈心态；从完全信息纯策略静态博弈的视角分析学生考试作弊的原因和条件，有助于我们制定鼓励学生诚实应考的政策。教师监考是否得力对学生考试作弊有重要的影响，分析运用教师监考手段防治考试作弊的作用和条件，讨论师生博弈完全信息混合策略静态均衡的概率分布及其影响因素，有助于我们从博弈视角提出防治学生考试作弊的条件和措施。 相似文献
2.
作者对当代大学生的考试作弊问题进行了动机和心理因素分析,从考生作弊和老师监考两个方面分析了二者的博弈关系,通过分析发现要在这个博弈问题中实现"双赢",必须从学生主观上降低作弊的动机和概率,从老师和学校层次上加大监管力度,据此提出了遏制学生作弊与加强老师发现作弊的对策和建议,希望通过两方面的努力可以大大减少目前大学生作弊严重的现象,从而建立起我国当代大学生的诚信局面。 相似文献
3.
4.
大学生考试作弊博弈分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在大学校园里,作弊已经成为考试过程中普遍存在的不良现象,有些课程的作弊问题还特别严重。本丈试用博弈论的知识,建立一个关于学生作弊与教师监管行为的博弈均衡模型,来解释考试过程中的学生作弊、教师监管的博弈现象。从博弈角度引出学校在教育,监管等方面应该采取的措施。 相似文献
5.
根据博弈论,考生之间的囚徒困境博弈使得考生尤其是绩优生陷入"不作弊即吃亏"的心理怪圈,混合策略的监考博弈与处理作弊行为的动态博弈揭示了影响考生作弊行为及监考教师处理作弊行为的主要因素。基于此,应对考生加强诚信教育,进行诚信激励;应对监考老师进行监考激励,减小其秉公处理作弊行为的机会成本,鼓励其树立良好的职业声誉。 相似文献
6.
何彤 《广东技术师范学院学报》2011,(2):108-111
本文以博弈理论为基础,建立了一个关于高校学生考试作弊与教师监管行为的博弈均衡模型,对学生考试作弊的影响因素之一:教师监管方面的博弈现象进行了探讨,并引出高校在教学、考试监管等方面应该考虑采取的应对措施。 相似文献
7.
针对屡禁不止的考试作弊现象,究竟应该采用怎样的监管措施？文章运用经济学中“博弈论”的思想分析了学生考试作弊和教师监考偷闲的原因,认为作弊是学生和教师双方博弈的结果.学生作弊概率不是取决于对学生的惩罚力度,而是取决于教师对学生频繁作弊作出的反应,因此不仅要加大学生作弊的成本,更要加强对教师的监管,才能有效减少考场作弊. 相似文献
8.
基于经济学视角的考试作弊分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
本文根据目前适应和选拔两种考试类型,从经济学中的博弈和委托代理两个角度对考试作弊问题进行了分析,并提出了应提高考试作弊成本,精心组织考试,建立良好考试氛围,研究和探索不同考试规律的措施,旨在于防止考试作弊现象。 相似文献
9.
何彤 《广东技术师范学院学报》2011,32(1)
本文以博弈理论为基础,建立了一个关于高校学生考试作弊与教师监管行为的博弈均衡模型,对学生考试作弊的影响因素之一:教师监管方面的博弈现象进行了探讨,并引出高校在教学、考试监管等方面应该考虑采取的应对措施. 相似文献
10.
通过简单的师生间的博弈分析,结合东华理工大学实际情况简要分析学生常用的作弊方式,提出一些解决及改进的对策。 相似文献
11.
Tina L. Freiburger Danielle M. Romain Blake M. Randol Catherine D. Marcum 《Journal of Criminal Justice Education》2017,28(2):222-247
Using a factorial survey administered to college students at two Universities, this study examines students’ tendencies to engage in academic misconduct. The relation of strain, self-control, and deterrence theories to likelihood of cheating are further explored. The results suggest that increasing the severity of the punishment for cheating does not deter academic misconduct; however, several variables indicating an increased certainty of being caught did decrease the likelihood of cheating behaviors. Only the strain variables that indicated a student had an ill family member or that the student found the course difficult significantly increased academic misconduct. Although self-control did not have a direct effect on cheating it indirectly affected cheating behaviors through students’ perceptions of getting caught and their perception of wrongfulness of the cheating behavior. Policy and future research implications of the findings are further discussed. 相似文献
12.
《Contemporary educational psychology》2002,27(2):209-228
Academic cheating has become a widespread problem among high school and college students. In this study, 490 students (ages 14 to 23) evaluated the acceptability of an act of academic dishonesty under 19 different circumstances where a person's motive for transgressing differed. Students' evaluations were related to self-reports of cheating behavior, sex, school grade, and psychological variables. Results indicated that high school and college students took motives into account when evaluating the acceptability of academic cheating. Cheating behavior was more common among those who evaluated cheating leniently, among male students, and among high schoolers. Also, acceptance of cheating and cheating behavior were negatively related to self-restraint, but positively related to tolerance of deviance. The results are discussed with reference to biological, cultural, and developmental factors. 相似文献
13.
大学生考试作弊问题日益凸显。运用质性研究方法探析个案大学本科生考试作弊根源,发现教师监考不严,考试内容偏重记忆性知识,学生学习投入不足是大学生考试作弊的直接原因。而学生的学业准备度低,自我管理能力不足,无法适应大学的学习要求是诱发大学生考试作弊的深刻原因。由此,该个案大学应通过加强教师应对学术诚信问题的培训,改革考试方式,为学生提供学业帮助和支持,完善学术诚信政策等一系列相应举措来消除学生考试作弊的根源,从根本上促进大学生的学习和发展。 相似文献
14.
考试是检测学生对知识掌握的情况、了解教师的教学效果的重要途径。但目前高校存在着严重的考试作弊问题。考试作弊的手段不仅多种多样,还产生了许多危害和不良影响。大学生考试作弊的主要原因与大学生自身、学校、社会有着密切的关系。遏制大学生考试作弊,可从五个方面来着手:加强对大学生的诚信教育;完善考场监督管理机制;改革考试方法;有关部门严厉打击社会上以帮助考试作弊来盈利的人员;利用现代科学技术防止大学生作弊。 相似文献
15.
蔡丹丰 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》2016,(5):83-086
目的:分析大学生考试作弊相关影响因素,为降低考试作弊率提供科学决策依据。方法:采用自愿填写问卷调查表的方式,对600名来自浙江宁波三所高校的大学生进行问卷调查,并采用logistic回归模型分析不同因素对大学生作弊的影响。结果:“学习成绩”“年级”“教学质量”“作弊被抓概率”“作弊惩罚力度”对大学生考试作弊率没有影响,“性别”“对作弊的态度”“效仿作弊情况”对考试作弊率影响显著。结论:为了降低大学生考试作弊率,学校应积极对监考老师进行相关培训,大力加强对大学生的思想品德教育。 相似文献
16.
大学教育考试“零作弊”的实现策略 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
大学生考试作弊现象在各大高校中已然成风,高校需要根据学生作弊的新特点,加强大学生诚信教育,改革课堂教学模式,改进教学评价机制,坚持过罚相当的做法并加强对作弊后学生的心理危机干预,以真正实现考试育人的目的。 相似文献
17.
Tracey Bretag Rowena Harper Kiata Rundle Philip M. Newton Cath Ellis Sonia 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(1):125-139
AbstractThis article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators’ experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers (NUHEPs). It compares survey responses from 961 students and 91 educators at four NUHEPs with previously reported findings from eight universities (14,086 students and 1,147 staff). NUHEP and university students report engaging in contract cheating in similar ways. However, while NUHEP educators spend more time teaching academic literacies and discussing contract cheating, NUHEP students are 12 times more likely than university students to report use of a professional academic writing service. Both NUHEP and university educators require systematic professional development regarding the relationship between the teaching and learning environment and students’ contract cheating behaviour. NUHEPs need to be cognisant of students’ vulnerability to commercial contract cheating services, and ensure they have access to timely academic and social support. 相似文献
18.
大学生考试作弊处理中的法律保护 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
当前,考试作弊现象愈演愈烈,对作弊学生的处分也越来越严重,但忽视了对作弊大学生的法律保护。处分是手段而不是目的,加强高校管理的宗旨是为了培养具有健全人格、创新精神、实践能力的各种专门人才,而不是对学生动辄采取诸如开除学籍等严厉处分,处理作弊考生时应予以法律保护。 相似文献
19.
Phillip Dawson Wendy Sutherland-Smith Mark Ricksen 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(4):473-482
AbstractContract cheating happens when students outsource their assessed work to a third party. One approach that has been suggested for improving contract cheating detection is comparing students’ assignment submissions with their previous work, the rationale being that changes in style may indicate a piece of work has been written by somebody else. This approach is time consuming, but recent advances in machine learning and natural language processing suggest that it may be well suited to computerization. We trialed an early alpha version of Turnitin’s Authorship Investigate tool, which compares students’ submissions against their previous work. Twenty-four experienced markers from five units of study were asked to make decisions about the presence of contract cheating in bundles of 20 student assignments, which included 14 legitimate assignments and six purchased from contract cheating sites. We asked markers to determine if each assignment was contract cheating, then provided them with an Authorship Investigate report and let them change their decision. Marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating increased significantly, from 48% to 59% after using the report, with no significant difference in false positives. These findings suggest that software may be an effective component of institutional strategies to address contract cheating. 相似文献
20.
The authors examined the relations between academic cheating and impulsivity in a large sample of adolescents enrolled in high school health education classes. Results indicated that impulsivity predicts academic cheating for students who report extensive involvement in cheating. However, students who engage in extensive cheating are less likely to report cheating when they perceive a mastery goal structure. In addition, both moderate and extensive cheaters report less cheating when they perceive the teacher as being credible. 相似文献