共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 244 毫秒
1.
教育研究中的技术与方法 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
ZENG Tian-shan 《教育理论与实践》2008,(4)
最有价值的知识是方法的知识,科学方法是通向科学知识或真理的唯一入口。从科学史的角度看,科学发展的每一次大的突破都与方法的革新有关。在教育研究中,方法论的知识成为获得研究成果的有效工具,现今的教育研究活动逐渐从相对简单、单一的操作发展到复杂的综合运用,有质量的教育科研必然是严格遵守学术规范和注重科学研究方法,注重定性和定量相结合,有能力的教育研究者一定是掌握了先进的教育研究方法和技术的研究者。 相似文献
2.
张意忠 《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012,45(6):118-122
崇尚科学、追求真理是大学教授的神圣使命,它需要教授敬畏学术、培养独立人格。学术是有尊严的,只有敬畏学术,才能培养独立人格,摆脱权力与金钱的桎梏;需要以学术为业,追求卓越。教授对学术应具有内在的期盼,执着追求,痴心不改;需要开展学术批评,提高学术水平。科学发展的无限性与人类智力的有限性需要通过学术批评发现错误,接近真理;需要遵守学术道德,承担学术责任。道德是学术的根基与标杆,是教授学术职业的道德底线,不可逾越。 相似文献
3.
罗蔚 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2011,3(3)
女性主义关怀伦理理论建立了一种不同的道德推理与道德实践模式。这种道德理论改变主流伦理学理论的知识论进路,是在女性主义认识论的基础上进行理论建构的。它提出,寻求普遍道德原则的道德真理的过程,其实是以他者经验、他者感受和具体性为手段的,道德知识总是嵌入在社会立场与经验中。 相似文献
4.
科学精神是统帅科学知识的灵魂,培养学生的科学精神是化学教育的重要一环,它不仅有助于学生对化学知识的理解、掌握,而且对于学生思想修养、心理素质、道德情操、审美情趣的健康发展,都具有重要作用。 1.追求真理,热爱真理的信念追求真理,热爱真理是一种高尚情操,人类文明不断进步, 相似文献
5.
沃勒斯坦社会科学观的发展经历了形成、确立和完善三个阶段,在重现社会科学的演变历程及知识体系现状后,沃勒斯坦表达了重塑社会科学,建立整体社会科学知识观的愿望,在世界体系分析和历史社会科学的方法论支撑下,将“否思”批判和道德选择作为社会科学的价值追求。沃勒斯坦的社会科学观引起了社会科学内部的争论、反思,启发社会科学研究者要正视社会科学知识的动态建构,更新社会科学的方法论范式,重塑高等教育学术体系,秉持研究者的责任自觉,辩证对待全球化与民族文化。 相似文献
6.
生活德育所猛烈批判的知性德育是且只能是实然的知性德育,而非本然的知性德育。道德有两种形态,相应地,道德教育也包括品德教育(或道德规范教育)和知性德育两种,后者有独立的价值和意义,是德育家的理想追求。当代西方的知性德育偏重于形式与能力,忽视了科学的道德知识、道德真理等实质内容。只有从真正的马克思主义立场出发,才最有可能获得科学的道德知识、道德真理。知性德育的直接目的不是培养"有道德的人",而是培养真正"懂道德的人"。当前,我国学生在道德方面的"知行分离"现象在于其"知"非"真知"。真正"懂道德的人"必然会经常作出道德行为。 相似文献
7.
目前学术界对于科学道德和学术规范问题比较关注,高等院校是学术研究和知识传播的重要组成部分,对此问题当然更要重视。但当前高校比较注重学生的人生观、价值观和世界观的教育,要求他们遵守学校规章制度和社会公德,言行举止符合社会要求,却一定程度上忽视了对他们进行科学道德和学术规范教育。正如唐纳德·肯尼迪在《学术责任》一书中所说的“:我觉得我们在培养年轻的学术接班人时偏重于他们各自的学术领域,却忽视了那些让他们成为成功的负责任的学术公民所必需的其他知识和技能。”[1]一、科学道德和学术规范科学道德、学术规范是学术研究… 相似文献
8.
《基础教育课程改革纲要》指出,教师应是教育教学的研究者,那么教师就必须从知识的传授者、道德的师范者这一传统角色中挣脱出来,向学习型、研究型教师发展. 相似文献
9.
思想政治课的威力是靠真理的力量.所谓真理的力量,是指政治课教师通过正确的教学方法把自己所掌握的科学理论转化为学生的思想和行为.所谓人格的力量,是指政治课教师个人的政治品格、知识才能、道德情感、意志作风等,即通过他们的言传身教,对学生产生一定的影响.真理的力量是巨大的,然而真理的力量通过政治课教师的人格示范才能得到充分发挥.由此可见,政治教师的人格示范作用十分重要. 相似文献
10.
大学道德危机 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
王建华 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2009,27(1):23-32
历史长河中,大学一直是一个充满道德优越感的地方,曾被誉为社会的良心、道德的领袖.但17世纪以降,以牛顿的经验主义与笛卡儿的理性主义为主导的现代主义范式逐渐控制了知识界,事实与价值、知识与信仰、科学与道德开始分道扬彪.从此在价值问题上理性必须保持沉默,知识不再意味着美德.19世纪以后自洪堡到纽曼都主张,大学的目的是理智的而非道德的.时至今日,随着大学里科研至上、系科主义盛行,加之教学科研活动中对价值中立的制度性诉求,道德之于大学已越来越成为一种奢侈或装饰,大学已日益成为一个不讲道德只讲真理的组织机构.今天的大学越来越成为科学探究的场所.大学教师越来越倾向于放弃道德教育的责任.道德探究与德性践行的缺失使得现代大学失去了应有的活力.在今天以及未来,单单凭借对高深知识的生产、传播与应用,大学已不足以赢得人们的尊重.如果大学不能恢复对于道德探究和德性践行的热情;如果仍然是只讲真理不讲道德,那么,人们将很难信服在未来大学继续有资格在各种社会组织中拥有诸多的特权. 相似文献
11.
Science and religion: implications for science educators 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Michael J. Reiss 《Cultural Studies of Science Education》2010,5(1):91-101
A religious perspective on life shapes how and what those with such a perspective learn in science; for some students a religious
perspective can hinder learning in science. For such reasons Staver’s article is to be welcomed as it proposes a new way of
resolving the widely perceived discord between science and religion. Staver notes that Western thinking has traditionally
postulated the existence and comprehensibility of a world that is external to and independent of human consciousness. This
has led to a conception of truth, truth as correspondence, in which our knowledge corresponds to the facts in this external
world. Staver rejects such a conception, preferring the conception of truth as coherence in which the links are between and
among independent knowledge claims themselves rather than between a knowledge claim and reality. Staver then proposes constructivism
as a vehicle potentially capable of resolving the tension between religion and science. My contention is that the resolution
between science and religion that Staver proposes comes at too great a cost—both to science and to religion. Instead I defend
a different version of constructivism where humans are seen as capable of generating models of reality that do provide richer
and more meaningful understandings of reality, over time and with respect both to science and to religion. I argue that scientific
knowledge is a subset of religious knowledge and explore the implications of this for science education in general and when
teaching about evolution in particular. 相似文献
12.
Four themes of scientific literacy have been synthesized to analyze science textbooks for this purpose: (a) science as a body of knowledge, (b) science as a way of investigating, (c) science as a way of thinking, and (d) the interaction among science, technology, and society (STS). The intercoder agreement between two researchers who coded the units of analysis for the four themes was high. The life science textbooks examined in this study seem to stress two aspects of scientific literacy—science as a body of knowledge and science as a way of investigating. These textbooks devote practically no text to science as a way of thinking. Very little text is devoted to the interaction of science, technology, and society. There was at least one chapter in each textbook that addressed the nature of science and its relationship to life science. Most of the analyzed textbooks present the stereotypical steps of the scientific method and do not provide a balance of scientific literacy themes. 相似文献
13.
蔡元培大学教育理念对大学学术管理的启示 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
匡尹俊 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》2004,3(6):123-125
蔡元培的大学教育理念可概述为：大学是“研究高深学问”的机关，“研究高深学问”是大学理想的价值取向；大学是“囊括大典，网罗众家”之学府，民主、自由是大学理想的氛围；大学以“养成硕学闳材，应国家需要为宗旨”，培养“健全之人格”的大学生。蔡元培大学理念给当前大学的学术管理以启示：学术管理是大学内部管理的核心；在学术管理活动中必须建立以学术权力为主导的权力运行机制；必须确立教师在大学学术管理中的主体地位。 相似文献
14.
Cecilia Agudelo-Valderrama Diana Martínez 《International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education》2016,14(4):719-737
In this paper, we offer illustrations of a mathematics teacher’s difficulties with content knowledge when trying to find connections between school mathematics and science; we do so by describing the development of this teacher’s thinking and learning in her pursuit of connections between the concepts of slope of a line and density of matter. The paper is based on a sub-study that is part of a larger Colombian project, PROMESA (Creating Science and Mathematics Connected Learning Experiences that Open Opportunities for the Promotion of Algebraic Reasoning), which incorporated a Professional Learning Programme (PLP) seeking to integrate school science and mathematics teachers into working teams, in order to create science and mathematics connected learning experiences that considered the promotion of algebraic reasoning. The ‘challenging questions’ that emerged for this teacher, during the workshops of the induction stage of the PLP, became the driving force for her continued engagement in learning mathematics content in a connected way, as opposed to the compartmentalised content-item thinking that she had experienced as a school student. We provide illustrations of first steps in the development of a teacher’s mathematical understanding, which can support growth of mathematical knowledge for teaching. 相似文献
15.
Amanda Berry John Loughran Kathy Smith Simon Lindsay 《Research in Science Education》2009,39(4):575-594
This paper reports research from a three-year Australian science teacher professional learning project, the Science Teaching
and Learning (STaL) Project, in which groups of science teacher participants (across years K – 12) worked with academics over
a one-year period as teacher researchers. Through reflecting on their experiences within the STaL Project and collecting data
from their classrooms related to specific science teaching concerns, teacher participants constructed cases around particular
aspects of their professional learning. The cases that these participants developed elicited rich insights into their teaching
and their students’ learning of science. This paper discusses how the cases were developed by the teacher researcher participants
and uses exemplars as a way of illustrating the nature of the professional knowledge developed. 相似文献
16.
鲍凌云 《宁波教育学院学报》2007,9(4):94-95
语文教学中的审美教育既可以启真,又可以储美,能使受教育者丰富知识,涵养美德。文艺作品中的审美教育要注重创设审美情境,品味语言美,挖掘形象美。科普作品中的审美教育要让学生体验到科学现象的奥妙美和科学精神的崇高美。 相似文献
17.
科学课程是科学课程决定者以社会意识形态的媒介、个体看问题的特定视角来选择、组织科学知识而形成的。科学课程是与一定社会的意识形态、科学课程决定者看待科学知识的角度等密切相关的,是具有“价值性”、“社会性”和“选择性”的。这一新的阐释将使研究者、师生认识到科学课程是不可避免地要涉及到特定社会的价值因素以及个体看问题的“角度”的,科学课程知识并不完全代表人类探索自然的真实状况,而是具有局限性、境域性和片面性的,是需要不断完善、修正与发展的。只有放弃“客观”、“价值中立”、“普遍正确”的科学课程理念,不断反思和追问科学课程知识的真理性,才能真正深化科学教育研究、深入进行科学教育实验。对于师生而言,在科学课程面前是人人平等的,没有人掌握着永远正确、不容反驳的知识真理,由此促使教师在教学以及社会生活中以平等、宽容的态度对待学生,并在实践中尊重学生的个体差异,建立民主、平等的师生关系。 相似文献
18.
Keith S. Taber 《Cultural Studies of Science Education》2017,12(1):81-91
Lisa Borgerding’s work highlights how students can understand evolution without necessarily committing to it, and how learners may come to see it as one available way of thinking amongst others. This is presented as something that should be considered a successful outcome when teaching about material that many students may find incompatible with their personal worldviews. These findings derive from work exploring a cause célèbre of the science education community—the teaching of natural selection in cultural contexts where learners feel they have strong reasons for rejecting evolutionary ideas. Accepting that students may understand but not commit to scientific ideas that are (from some cultural perspectives) controversial may easily be considered as a form of compromise position when teaching canonical science prescribed in curriculum but resisted by learners. Yet if we take scholarship on the nature of science seriously, and wish to reflect the nature of scientific knowledge in science teaching, then the aim of science education should always be to facilitate understanding of, yet to avoid belief in, the ideas taught in science lessons. The philosophy of science suggests that scientific knowledge needs to be understood as theoretical in nature, as conjectural and provisional; and the history of science warns of the risks of strongly committing to any particular conceptualisation as a final account of some feature of nature. Research into student thinking and learning in science suggests that learning science is often a matter of coming to understand a new viable way of thinking about a topic to complement established ways of thinking. Science teaching should then seek to have students appreciate scientific ideas as viable ways of making sense of the currently available empirical evidence, but should not be about persuading students of the truth of any particular scientific account. 相似文献
19.
Clarence W. Joldersma 《Educational theory》2011,61(3):275-293
In this essay Clarence Joldersma explores radical constructivism through the work of its most well‐known advocate, Ernst von Glasersfeld, who combines a sophisticated philosophical discussion of knowledge and truth with educational practices. Joldersma uses Joseph Rouse's work in philosophy of science to criticize the antirealism inherent in radical constructivism, emphasizing that Rouse's Heideggerian critique differs from the standard realist defense of modernist epistemology. Next, Joldersma develops an alternative conception of truth, in terms of disclosure, based on Lambert Zuidervaart's work in aesthetics. Joldersma concludes by arguing that this notion of truth avoids the pitfalls of both realism and antirealism, giving educational theorists a way forward to accept some of the major insights of constructivism with respect to learning and teaching without having to relinquish a robust notion of truth. 相似文献
20.
Background: Past studies have shown significant associations between students’ conceptions of learning science and their science learning self-efficacy. However, in most of the studies, students’ science learning self-efficacy has often been measured by a singular scale.Purpose: Extending the findings of these studies, the present study adopted a multi-dimensional instrument to assess Taiwanese high school students’ science learning self-efficacy and investigate the relationships with their conceptions of learning science.Sample: A total of 488 Taiwanese high school students (265 male and 223 female) were invited to participate in this survey.Design and method: All the participants responded to the Conceptions of Learning Science (COLS) questionnaire regarding ‘Memorizing’, ‘Testing’, ‘Calculating and practicing’, ‘Increase of knowledge’, ‘Applying’ and ‘Understanding and seeing in a new way’ and the Science Learning Self-Efficacy (SLSE) instrument, including ‘Conceptual understanding’, ‘Higher-Order cognitive skills’, ‘Practical work’, ‘Everyday application’ and ‘Science communication’.Results: The path analysis results derived from the structural equation modeling method indicated that, of all five SLSE dimensions, the ‘Understanding and seeing in a new way’ COLS displayed as a positive predictor, while the ‘Testing’ COLS was a significant negative predictor. The ‘Applying’ COLS item can only positively contribute to the SLSE dimensions of ‘Higher-Order thinking skills’, ‘Everyday application’ and ‘Science Communication’.Conclusions: In general, students in strong agreement with learning science as understanding and seeing in a new way or the application of learned scientific knowledge are prone to possess higher confidence in learning science. However, students who consider learning science in terms of preparing for tests and examinations tend to hold lower science learning self-efficacy. 相似文献