共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
支架式教学模式是建构主义教学模式之一,支架式教学模式及其在英语写作教学中的运用,可以降低学生英语写作中的困惑度,以及在写作过程中了解写作、学习写作和解决写作问题的作用。 相似文献
2.
《佳木斯教育学院学报》2019,(1)
英语专业以往所用教法,无法满足当代社会对英语人才的宏观需求。因此,国内院校正对英语专业进行改良。本文以"互联网+"作为研究背景,设定英语专业语篇思辨式写作教学模式,为研究主体。文章分为三部分,第一部分,研究国内英语专业写作教学现存问题。第二部分,研究思辨式写作教学开展的理论依据。第三部分,研究教学模式的实践方法。 相似文献
3.
王荟 《黄冈职业技术学院学报》2013,(4):54-56
修改是写作中一个必不可少的重要环节。然而,在传统的成果式写作教学模式下,学生几乎没有修改的意识,把写作当成一劳永逸的行为。"以改促写,以改促学"的写作教学模式更多地关注写作的全过程,把学生自主修改、自我纠错放在突出位置。这不仅在一定程度上减轻了教师的负担,更调动了学生写作的自觉性和主观能动性,激发了写作兴趣,增加了学生的自信心和成就感,使其在修改中不断提高写作水平,进而带动听、读、说、译等各方面技能的提高。 相似文献
4.
传统的大学英语写作教学注重写作成品,而忽视生生及师生之间的交际与互动,教学成果不显著,问题诸多。Wiki作为一种面向社群的协作式写作系统,以其开放共享协同创作的学习环境,为实现计算机技术与语言写作教学的整合提供了良好的契机。本研究利用Wikia网,开展写作实验教学。研究结果表明,基于Wiki的大学英语协作式写作教学模式能够激发学生的写作兴趣,促进生生及师生交流,提高学生的个人写作能力。 相似文献
5.
刘芬 《开封教育学院学报》2014,(2):179-180
在英语写作教学中,运用支架式教学模式能实现写作资源介入、学习策略介入和情感策略介入,激发学习者的学习动机,培养他们的认知能力与自主学习能力,使之建构自己的写作认知结构,促进学生自我评估、师生和生生之间的相互评估,使评估能够及时提供诊断、处方和发展潜能的信息,从而有效促进英语写作水平的提高。 相似文献
6.
王悦 《辽宁教育学院学报》2013,(6):51-56
近年来,对英语写作的教学方法研究得很多,但就教学模式而言,只限于对某个教学模式的应用性研究,如协作与合作式教学模式.合作式教学模式尚且还有建构主义的理论支撑.我国的英语写作研究受到了国内外语教学界越来越多的关注,其研究成果对推动我国外语写作教学改革起到了积极的作用. 相似文献
7.
<正>传统的"教师命题—学生写作—教师批改、讲评"的写作教学模式对于学生而言毫无吸引力。如何改造传统的写作教学模式,实施有效的写作教学,提高学生整体写作水平,是值得我们探讨的问题。一、传统初中英语写作教学模式存在的问题1.教师重"成果"轻"过程"传统的写作教学中,教师往往将主要精力用于批改、讲评学生的"成果",却忽略了学生在写作过程中遇到的问题,当然更谈不上去帮助学生解决问题了。这样 相似文献
8.
在介绍建构主义学习理论的基础上,结合我国大学英语写作教学的实际情况,分析了将建构主义教学模式纳入到传统英语写作课堂的可行性,探讨了建构主义随机通达教学、支架式教学、抛锚式教学、合作学习教学模式在英语写作教学中的应用,旨在有效提高英语写作课教学质量。 相似文献
9.
姜辉 《张家口职业技术学院学报》2012,(4):74-77
写作在大学英语教学中占有举足轻重的地位,但是长时间以来"费时低效"。国内研究一些偏重"过程法"与"结果法"的比较,一些偏重于形成性评估和终结性评估的定量定性研究,鲜见全面深入地探索写作教学模式。大学英语写作教学可完整地分为教师讲授、写作练笔、教学评价三部分,即"三位一体",共同作用于写作教学。 相似文献
10.
《中国小学语文教学论坛》2019,(4)
结合建构主义的支架式教学模式,对高中议论文作文教学中的各个环节进行分析,了解教学中常见的问题,并通过该模式的创建情境、搭建支架、引导探索三个部分来具体探讨高中议论文写作教学中的支架式教学模式。 相似文献
11.
针对北京林业大学大学英语写作教学的现状和弊端,在分析写作过程教学法特点的基础上,拟定了一套新的大学英语写作教学模式,并通过为期两年的实验对比教学实践证明了这一模式的有效性。与成果教学法相比,过程教学法可帮助学生理解和内化写作的全部过程,提高了学生的写作兴趣,通过写作过程的培养,学生逐步获得了写作技巧。 相似文献
12.
夏元佐 《遵义师范学院学报》2007,9(4):30-32
写作的理论探究和写作的实践体验是写作教师生命形式的一种展示。写作理论的"知"最终完形于写作实践的"行",写作理论和写作实践"合一"的成果是"文章",写作的过程是"知行合一"的过程。写作——生命的形式,写作是精神家园的守望。 相似文献
13.
刘弘 《暨南大学华文学院学报》2014,(2):43-50
如何提高汉语二语学习者的写作能力是国际汉语教学中一个重要的问题。本研究尝试通过一个小型实验,观察直接写作法、翻译写作法和提纲写作法这3种不同的写作方式对于3位写作者写作过程和写作成品的影响,分析3种写作方式各自的优缺点。研究结果显示,提纲写作法能比较好地平衡写作时间与作文质量之间的矛盾,具有一定的优势。研究同时发现,在西方二语写作中受到较高评价的翻译写作法并不适合于汉语二语学习者。 相似文献
14.
If writing matters, how can we improve it? This study investigated the nature of writing plan quality and its relationship to the ensuing writing scores. Data were drawn from the 1998 Provincial Learning Assessment Programme (PLAP) in Writing, which was administered to pupils in Grades 4, 7, and 10 across British Columbia, Canada. Common features of writing quality were qualitatively identified in a sample of writing plans across the three grade levels. An analytic scoring scheme based on (i) identified features of writing quality in writing plans, (ii) evaluative terms commonly used as criteria to measure writing performance in both large-scale and classroom assessments, and (iii) theory and research in writing, was developed and used to assess a sample of 1,797 writing plans. Correlation and regression analyses were used to determine relationships between quality of writing plans and writing scores. Evidence of features of writing quality in writing plans was associated with higher writing scores. Identification of features of writing plan quality provides valuable instructional information to promote student writing. 相似文献
15.
现代应用文写作策略是写作主体自觉、积极的智力活动，是特定写作语境下为实现写作目的预先设计的写作方法、手段和措施，是写作行为的策划和写作活动的部署及构想，包括文本写作策略和文本包装传播策略，核心是写作应对思路和行为控制。现代应用文写作策略可以决定写作行为的成败，因此，认识现代应用文写作策略有益于应用写作实践，提高现代应用写作社会效益。同时还可以提升写作主体智慧的地位和价值，有利于主体创造才能的发挥和培养。 相似文献
16.
李明 《邢台职业技术学院学报》2008,25(6):51-53
本文从本科毕业论文写作的角度出发,结合实际情况详细地介绍并探讨了本科毕业论文写作中的各个步骤以及需要注意的问题和相关应对策略。从整体上总结了与写作相关的要点,介绍了写作内容,探讨了写作的方法及注意事项。通过论述,作者旨在诠释本科毕业论文的写作,说明写作过程,为本科毕业论文的写作奠定基础。 相似文献
17.
概要写作是高考英语写作的新题型,是把读、思、写融为一体,让学生对语言材料理解吸收、内化整理后表达输出的一种创新型写作方式。文章分析概要写作的内涵、学生的英语写作现状,探究以读促写在高三英语概要写作教学中的应用策略,以不断提高概要写作教学效率,提高学生的英语写作水平。 相似文献
18.
A random sample of teachers in grades 3 and 4 (N = 157) from across the United States were surveyed about their use of evidence-based writing practices, preparation to teach writing, and beliefs about writing. Teachers’ beliefs included their efficacy to teach writing, their orientations to teach writing, their attitude about teaching writing, and their attitudes about their own writing. The teachers’ responses raised some concerns about the quality of writing instruction third- and fourth-grade students receive, as teachers reported spending only 15 min a day teaching writing and students spend only 25 min a day at school writing. While teachers indicated they used a variety of evidence based writing practices in their classroom, a majority of these were applied infrequently. Further, three out of every four teachers reported that their college teacher preparation programs provided no or minimal instruction on how to teach writing. They further rated their preparation to teach writing lower than their preparation to teach reading, math, science, or social studies. On a more positive note, a majority of teachers asked students to write multiple paragraph texts relatively frequently (4 times a month or more often) and complete at least one narrative, informative, and persuasive writing assignment monthly. Teachers were also generally positive about teaching writing, their efficacy to teach writing, and their beliefs about their own writing. Finally, efficacy to teach writing and philosophical orientations to teaching writing each made a unique contribution to predicting teachers’ use of evidence based practices, whereas teacher preparation did the same for reported time spent teaching writing and reported time students wrote at school and home. 相似文献
19.
《Educational Assessment》2013,18(3):227-253
Our objective was to study the relation between (a) the kinds of writing skills that can be elicited in a relatively brief, standardized writing assessment and (b) several nontest indicators of prospective graduate students' writing skills. Various nontest indicators were considered as criteria, but a particular focus was the quality of students' course-related writing samples. Two such writing samples were collected from each participant, along with considerable information about the nature of these samples. Thus, we were able to analyze the conditions and circumstances under which performance on a standardized writing assessment is (and is not) related to performance on course-related assignments. The results reveal modest relations between writing assessment essays and the various nontest indicators of writing skill. Performance on the writing assessment exhibited the strongest relation with course-related writing samples, arguably the most compelling of the nontest indicators of students' writing ability. There was no indication that the relation between performance on the writing assessment and the quality of course-related writing samples may depend on particular characteristics of the writing samples. 相似文献
20.
Gary A. Troia Allen G. Harbaugh Rebecca K. Shankland Kimberly A. Wolbers Ann M. Lawrence 《Reading and writing》2013,26(1):17-44
A convenience sample of 618 children and adolescents in grades 4 through 10, excluding grade 8, were asked to complete a writing motivation and activity scale and to provide a timed narrative writing sample to permit an examination of the relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, writing performance, and the student characteristics of grade, sex, and teacher judgment of writing ability. Female students and older students wrote qualitatively better fictional stories, as did students with higher levels of writing ability based on teacher judgment. With respect to writing activity, more frequent writing in and out of school was reported by girls, better writers, and younger students. In a path analysis, grade and sex directly influenced writing activity, while sex, teacher judgment of writing ability, and writing activity directly influenced some aspects of writing motivation. Overall, teacher judgment of writing ability, grade level, and motivational beliefs each exerted a significant direct positive influence on narrative quality, whereas performance goals exerted a significant direct negative impact on quality. 相似文献