首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
中超联赛主场优势凸显因素的分析   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
运用文献资料、数理统计、逻辑分析等方法,对中超联赛四个赛季的706场比赛进行分析,结果表明:中超联赛主场优势客观存在。且主场胜率、效果量与国外不同性质的足球联赛相同;主场观众、裁判、心理差异、体育习惯是引起主场优势的主要因素:  相似文献   

2.
运用数理统计、逻辑分析、文献资料等研究方法对C BA常规赛9个赛季共1186场比赛进行分析。结果表明:C BA常规赛客观存在主场优势,且主场胜率、效果量与国外不同性质的篮球联赛及国内甲A足球联赛相同;裁判、心理差异、场地认知、观众是影响主场优势的主要因素。  相似文献   

3.
运用文献资料法、数理统计法,结合中国自然地理等理论和知识,对我国CBA常规赛进行了研究。结果发现:我国CBA常规赛具有明显的主场优势,但行程并不是影响CBA常规赛主场优势的因素。  相似文献   

4.
体育比赛中主场优势的研究   总被引:3,自引:2,他引:1  
通过对国内、外研究体育比赛中主场优势的文献进行归纳和演绎,得出主场优势普遍存在于任何类型的集体和个人项目的体育比赛之中。熟悉性和旅途不是影响主场优势的主要原因,规则因素则不会引起主场优势。其主要归因于众多观众的主场助威和影响裁判无意识地支持主队所致。认为今后主场优势的研究方向应加强和其他学科间的联系,着力探讨具有非衡性竞赛特点的主场优势。  相似文献   

5.
以CBA2008-2009赛季各队主客场比赛成绩为研究对象,对主场胜率和客场胜率进行配对样本T检验,发现CBA联赛主场胜率明显高于客场胜率,表明CBA联赛中存在主场优势.对各参赛队主场优势进行聚类分析,把我国男子甲A18支球队划分为高主场优势队、中主场优势队和低主场优势队3个层级.最后综合各队本赛季竞技实力、主场小分差落后场数和主场优势大小确定各队下赛季的参赛目标.  相似文献   

6.
对全国排球联赛主场致胜因素的研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
根据主场效应已有的研究结果,结合1996~1997年度全国甲A排球联赛的数据统计,对主场优势进行了研究。结果显示:我国甲A排球联赛存在主场优势,并对致胜有重要影响。提出了引起主场效应的主要因素为:客观环境、队伍水平、竞技状态的调控  相似文献   

7.
爷们语录     
“如果需要我增加上场时间才能赢下与奥兰多、波士顿和洛彬矶的(主场优势)竞争,那么就让我多上场吧。我对这个没意见。”—为了主场优势,“小皇帝”拼了!他打算增加上场时间以确保骑士能在东部季后赛中拿到主场优势。  相似文献   

8.
主场优势是影响运动成绩和运动结果的因素之一,本文运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法对主场优势的含义进行了分析,并提出了主场优势的概念。在运动竞赛或体育比赛中,指出由于主场所造成的有利于主队发挥水平的各种因素。  相似文献   

9.
运用文献资料法等,梳理我国部分学者对体育地理学的研究内容,对当前我国体育地理学研究提出建议,并构建出我国体育地理学研究的内容框架。得出:在开展我国体育地理学的研究时,应借鉴国外优秀成果,融入当代体育思想,借助地理信息技术等;在我国体育地理学研究内容框架构建上,建议将体育地理学划分为体育文化地理学、体育社会地理学、体育经济地理学和体育环境地理学等。  相似文献   

10.
本文采用文献资料法和数理统计法,针对当前研究较少的中超联赛技术层面,通过对2018赛季中超球队的各项数据对其技术特征进行研究,分析形成中超联赛主场优势的影响因素。结论表明:中超联赛确实存在较为明显的主场优势现象(H/AD=21%>5%),对主、客场14项技术指标数据进行独立样本t检验和判别分析,探索出真正影响主场优势的关键技术指标:场均射门次数(SC=0.702)、定位球进球数量(SC=0.584)、点球进球数量(SC=0.416)和场均失球数量(SC=-0.366)。对影响中超联赛中主场优势的重要因素进行定性与定量分析,得出观众、环境、判罚、心理以及旅途是影响主、客场球队技术发挥的主要因素。以期为中超球队如何合理利用其主场优势,以及如何避免对手主场优势的无限放大提供理论参考和借鉴。  相似文献   

11.
Many of the factors identified as influencing the home advantage have an underlying social basis, presumably through the influence exerted by the home crowd. Beliefs in the home advantage and the causes of that advantage also have a social basis: sports coverage and fan discourse focus on some aspects of the phenomenon at the expense of others. This paper compares home advantage research with the use of the concept in media narratives and fan Internet postings. While there are many similarities across sources, the findings suggest three major differences. Fans, and to a lesser extent the media, (1) focus almost exclusively on winning as the evidence for a home advantage, (2) see crowd noise as the main factor for the home advantage, and (3) treat the phenomenon as much more transient than is suggested by academic studies. I identify several features of the phenomenon that facilitate popular views of the home advantage and suggest how future research may benefit from incorporating those views.  相似文献   

12.
Many of the factors identified as influencing the home advantage have an underlying social basis, presumably through the influence exerted by the home crowd. Beliefs in the home advantage and the causes of that advantage also have a social basis: sports coverage and fan discourse focus on some aspects of the phenomenon at the expense of others. This paper compares home advantage research with the use of the concept in media narratives and fan Intemet postings. While there are many similarities across sources, the findings suggest three major differences. Fans, and to a lesser extent the media, (1) focus almost exclusively on winning as the evidence for a home advantage, (2) see crowd noise as the main factor for the home advantage, and (3) treat the phenomenon as much more transient than is suggested by academic studies. I identify several features of the phenomenon that facilitate popular views of the home advantage and suggest how future research may benefit from incorporating those views.  相似文献   

13.
This paper had three aims. The first was to review research carried out on the home advantage from 1992 to the present. The second was to examine the extent to which a conceptual framework proposed by Courneya and Carron () was/is viable as a tool to highlight and organize an understanding of the home advantage. The final aim was to provide suggestions for future research.  相似文献   

14.
This paper had three aims. The first was to review research carried out on the home advantage from 1992 to the present. The second was to examine the extent to which a conceptual framework proposed by Courneya and Carron (1992) was/is viable as a tool to highlight and organize an understanding of the home advantage. The final aim was to provide suggestions for future research.  相似文献   

15.
高飞 《体育科学》2011,31(4):90-97
比较体育究竟是一门独立学科还是某一研究领域或研究方法的问题始终拷问着国内外研究者,至今围绕这一问题所做出的种种回答反映了学界6种具有代表性的观点,或执着于一种研究方法的追求,或倾向于一门独立学科、一门兼应用学科和理论学科于一身的交叉学科的主张,或衷情于一门最贴近现实的前沿性综合学科或某一研究领域、某一涵盖体育所有事实乃至整个领域的学科群的见解。诸如此类观点或多或少地具有某些积极特征且又存在着明显不足,因而有关比较体育学科性质的分歧与争鸣将会继续存在。  相似文献   

16.
Officiating bias is thought to contribute to home advantage. Recent research has shown that sports with subjective officiating tend to experience greater home advantage and that referees' decisions can be influenced by crowd noise, but little work has been done to examine whether individual referees vary in their home bias or whether biased decisions contribute to overall home advantage. We develop an ordinal regression model to determine whether various measures of home advantage are affected by the official for the match and by crowd size while controlling for team ability. We examine 5244 English Premier League (EPL) match results involving 50 referees and find that home bias differs between referees. Individual referees give significantly different levels of home advantage, measured as goal differential between the home and away teams, although the significance of this result depends on one referee with a particularly high home advantage (an outlier). Referees vary significantly and robustly in their yellow card and penalty differentials even excluding the outlier. These results confirm that referees are responsible for some of the observed home advantage in the EPL and suggest that home advantage is dependent on the subjective decisions of referees that vary between individuals. We hypothesize that individual referees respond differently to factors such as crowd noise and suggest further research looking at referees' psychological and behavioural responses to biased crowds.  相似文献   

17.
The results of this study on home advantage in Australian rules football demonstrate that individual clubs have different home advantages. Traditional measures of home advantage as applied to whole competitions such as percentage of games won, and alternative measures such as average margin of victory for the home team, are calculated. Problems with these measures are discussed. Individual home advantages for each team are obtained using a linear model fitted to individual match margins; the resultant home advantages are analysed, and variations and possible causes or groupings of home advantage are proposed. It is shown that some models allowing different home advantages for different clubs are a significant improvement over previous models assuming a common home advantage. The results show a strong isolation effect, with non-Victorian teams having large home advantages, and lend support to the conclusion that crowd effects and ground familiarity are a major determinant of home advantage.  相似文献   

18.
Abstract

Officiating bias is thought to contribute to home advantage. Recent research has shown that sports with subjective officiating tend to experience greater home advantage and that referees' decisions can be influenced by crowd noise, but little work has been done to examine whether individual referees vary in their home bias or whether biased decisions contribute to overall home advantage. We develop an ordinal regression model to determine whether various measures of home advantage are affected by the official for the match and by crowd size while controlling for team ability. We examine 5244 English Premier League (EPL) match results involving 50 referees and find that home bias differs between referees. Individual referees give significantly different levels of home advantage, measured as goal differential between the home and away teams, although the significance of this result depends on one referee with a particularly high home advantage (an outlier). Referees vary significantly and robustly in their yellow card and penalty differentials even excluding the outlier. These results confirm that referees are responsible for some of the observed home advantage in the EPL and suggest that home advantage is dependent on the subjective decisions of referees that vary between individuals. We hypothesize that individual referees respond differently to factors such as crowd noise and suggest further research looking at referees' psychological and behavioural responses to biased crowds.  相似文献   

19.
The results of this study on home advantage in Australian rules football demonstrate that individual clubs have different home advantages. Traditional measures of home advantage as applied to whole competitions such as percentage of games won, and alternative measures such as average margin of victory for the home team, are calculated. Problems with these measures are discussed. Individual home advantages for each team are obtained using a linear model fitted to individual match margins; the resultant home advantages are analysed, and variations and possible causes or groupings of home advantage are proposed. It is shown that some models allowing different home advantages for different clubs are a significant improvement over previous models assuming a common home advantage. The results show a strong isolation effect, with non-Victorian teams having large home advantages, and lend support to the conclusion that crowd effects and ground familiarity are a major determinant of home advantage.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号