共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 178 毫秒
1.
2.
近年来,中国企业知识资源寻求型海外投资日益增加,而实施海外子公司向母公司的逆向知识转移是获取东道国知识的有效途径之一。本文将从母公司视角切入探讨中国企业如何通过逆向知识转移获取海外知识资源,在问卷调研和实证检验后得出结论：母公司国际化战略导向、母子公司控制程度、吸收能力和转移支持制度对逆向知识转移效果具有显著影响,前两类为战略因素,后两类为能力因素。同时,基于上述两类母公司因素的影响差异,本文将逆向知识转移影响机制分为四类,即同时关注战略导向和吸收能力的主导型;侧重知识吸收能力和创新的应用型;侧重知识寻求战略导向的调度型;以及两者均较弱的被动型。 相似文献
3.
吸收能力、制度环境与跨国公司逆向知识转移——基于中国海外投资企业的问卷调研 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
我国企业对外投资向发达国家和新兴经济体转移的趋势日益明显,这与我国企业日益重视先进知识资源的寻求密切相关,为实现知识寻求目标,我国企业母公司逐渐关注海外子公司向其进行的逆向知识转移。本文从母公司视角切入探讨了吸收能力和制度环境对逆向知识转移的影响作用,基于对我国海外投资企业的问卷调研和实证分析,我们发现,输入方母公司的知识吸收能力从知识共享、学习和应用以及知识再创新能力三个层次对逆向知识转移产生不同影响,而企业内部制度环境也从创新文化、学习型组织、管理信息系统、资源支持和沟通渠道等方面为知识转移提供支持。同时在对不同类型知识的转移频率,不同层次知识转移效果的具体研究中,上述因素的影响作用呈现显著差异。 相似文献
4.
知识创新量与储备量的多寡决定了企业创新能力的强弱,尤其需要高度重视。文章利用系统动力学方法,从社会资本视角出发,分析知识获取型跨国并购情境下,母子公司需求与意愿对母公司知识创新与储备的积极影响。研究发现：子公司知识转移意愿对关系资本与认知资本有较高的灵敏度,母公司知识需求意愿对结构资本有较高的灵敏度；子公司知识转移意愿积极影响母子公司间知识转移量,母公司知识需求意愿积极影响母公司知识吸收量。同时,知识转移总量与母公司知识吸收量的提升有助于母公司知识创新量与储备量的增加。 相似文献
5.
6.
海外子公司实施逆向知识转移,对母公司获取知识资源,提升竞争实力具有重要意义。本研究收集中国跨国公司的132家海外子公司数据,采用回归分析,检验假设模型,以探究海外子公司自主权,对其逆向知识转移的影响机制。研究发现：海外子公司自主权与逆向知识转移、逆向市场知识转移、逆向技术知识转移之间均存在显著的倒U型曲线关系;自主权与逆向管理知识转移之间的倒U型关系不显著;母公司吸收能力能够负向显著调节自主权与逆向管理知识转移间的关系。研究结论表明：新兴经济体跨国公司赋予海外子公司适度的自主权,有助于实现逆向知识转移,但自主权过多会出现“过犹不及”现象。 相似文献
7.
在中国企业实施“走出去”战略的情境下,本文旨在研究中国与东道国之间的制度距离对海外子公司股权进入模式选择的影响,并探讨不同的多元化战略对制度距离与股权进入模式选择间关系的调节作用。研究表明,在对外直接投资( FDI)的过程中,制度逆差对海外子公司的股权进入模式选择具有正向影响;而制度顺差对股权进入模式选择具有负向影响。另外,母公司实施相关多元化战略和非相关多元化战略对制度距离与股权进入模式选择间的关系分别具有正向和负向的调节作用。本文的研究结论有助于母公司在进入国际市场时根据制度环境和自身的多元化战略选择合理的股权进入模式,从而实现母公司对海外子公司的合理控制。 相似文献
8.
以2013年中国100大跨国公司中的30家跨国公司作为研究样本,通过多元线性回归分析我国企业并购发达国家企业过程中存在的逆向知识转移问题。实证研究表明,子公司知识的价值、母公司对知识的知觉水平、子公司所处国家的发达程度与中国企业跨国并购逆向知识转移呈显著正相关关系,社会文化距离和制度距离与中国企业跨国并购逆向知识转移呈显著负相关关系,子公司的战略重点不会影响中国企业跨国并购逆向知识转移。 相似文献
9.
10.
从母公司向子公司转移知识是跨国公司在东道国快速复制企业运作经验的快捷途径,也是其高效获取全球竞争优势的重要手段。本文通过实证研究发现,知识特性对跨国公司知识转移工具的选择有显著影响,即转移知识的特性不同,选择的知识转移工具的类型也有显著不同。研究还发现,如果同时考虑母子公司间的知识差距与战略差异的调节效应,根据知识特性选择转移工具的合理性就更明显。 相似文献
11.
C. Annique Un 《Research Policy》2008,37(10):1812-1828
Despite the growing involvement of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in foreign-based research and development (R&D), there has been little research comparing R&D investments of subsidiaries of foreign MNEs to domestic firms. Subsidiaries of foreign MNEs enjoy advantages that help them compete against domestic firms. However, when deciding on R&D investments, these advantages exert competing influences on their R&D investment decision. On the one hand, better access to and transfer of knowledge and technologies from the MNE and other subsidiaries and centers of excellence may encourage the subsidiary of a foreign MNE to invest less in R&D relative to a domestic firm. On the other hand, better access to sources of capital through the MNE and other subsidiaries may induce the subsidiary to invest more in R&D in comparison to domestic firms. We find that subsidiaries of foreign MNEs invest less in total R&D than domestic firms. The reason is that they invest less in external R&D than domestic firms; however, they have similar internal R&D investments compared to domestic firms. These findings support the notion that the transfer of technology and knowledge from other parts of the MNE acts as a substitute for the purchase of external R&D while internal R&D acts as a complement to the technology and knowledge transferred from other parts of the MNE. 相似文献
12.
13.
This paper examines how innovation-related capabilities for production, design and marketing develop at the subsidiary level within multinational enterprises (MNEs). We focus on how subsidiary autonomy and changing opportunities to access external (host country) sources of capability contribute to the accumulation of specialist capabilities in five Taiwan-based MNE subsidiaries in the semiconductor industry. Longitudinal analysis shows how the accumulation process is subject to discontinuities, as functional divisions are (re)opened and closed during the lifetime of the subsidiary. A composite set of innovation output measures also shows significant variations in within-function levels of capability across our sample. We conclude that subsidiary specialisation and unique subsidiary-specific advantages have evolved in a way that is strongly influenced by the above factors. 相似文献
14.
逆向溢出知识结构与国内投资企业技术进步 《科学学研究》2022,40(12):2216-2227
逆向溢出知识对投资企业技术进步发挥的促进效应持续受到学界关注,但既有研究体系尚未从更深层面揭示其内在机理。本文借助知识结构理论,从广度、深度和强度3个维度出发剖析逆向溢出知识在投资企业技术进步中发挥的作用,并借助123家国内制造业上市企业数据对其进行检验,主要结论有：增加逆向溢出知识广度和深度有助于促进投资企业技术进步,而且该促进效应受到逆向溢出知识强度的正向调节作用;随着OFDI逆向溢出知识增加,溢出知识广度对投资企业技术进步的促进效果愈发增强,而溢出知识深度的促进效果逐渐减弱。依据所得结论,文中提出了相应的管理启示。 相似文献
15.
16.
This study applies a capabilities perspective to examine how source-recipient knowledge absorption platforms affect the relationship between foreign tacit knowledge resource and multinational enterprises’ (MNEs) product innovativeness. Theoretically, this study moves beyond internal absorptive capacity into a capabilities perspective of MNEs’ product innovativeness. By using dynamic capabilities theory and absorptive capacity to frame source-recipient knowledge absorption platforms as dynamic capabilities, we build a model that enables the continued interaction between the tacit knowledge resource gained from foreign subsidiaries (source) and the focal (recipient) MNEs’ product innovativeness. For managerial implications, we focus on three organizational practices in terms of entrepreneurial competence, relationship harmony, and information communication technology (ICT) competence as potential enhancements to convert foreign tacit knowledge resource into MNEs’ product innovativeness. 相似文献
17.
This paper explores what factors determine the nature, extent, and location of Japanese multinationals’ R&D activities abroad. Taking advantage of a rich micro-level dataset from the survey on Japanese overseas subsidiaries, the study distinguishes between two types of overseas R&D: basic/applied research and development/design. We find several differences between the determinants of those R&D activities. These differences confirm the view that basic/applied research of overseas subsidiaries aims at the exploitation of foreign advanced knowledge, whereas their development/design activities are mostly influenced by the market size of the host country. Our results provide a convincing and comprehensive explanation of the geographical distribution of overseas R&D by Japanese MNEs. 相似文献