共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 917 毫秒
1.
目前高校面临着学费虚高与学生欠费的困境,其实质是高等教育成本合理分担与高校学费定价问题.该文从社会满意度的视角探索了高校学费定价问题,认为社会满意度是高校完善学费定价机制的战略工具,是高校走出当前困境的有益途径. 相似文献
2.
王倩 《黑龙江教育学院学报》2010,29(5):24-26
教育市场中高校学费的本质是高等教育的服务价格,但教育市场不同于完全竞争下的商品市场,教育市场中的高校教育有其自身的功能和政策目标,高校教育更关注的是社会收益和教育公平问题。高校学费是高等教育经费收入的主要来源之一,高校学费的标准应遵照市场机制中的价格机制,并兼顾受教育者的个人收益和社会收益,高校学费政策的主要目标是促进高等教育的有效供给,保证高等教育的机会公正。 相似文献
3.
多视角下的高等教育学费标准确定模型 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文综合与学费定价相关的"高校-家庭-社会"三大主体及其涉及的地域、时间、专业、公平四大因素,多角度分析高等教育定价问题,建立了基于高等教育成本的学费优化模型、基于家庭收入的学费预测模型、基于社会效益的仿真定价模型.最后通过整合以上三模型,均衡高校、家庭、社会各方面利益,制定最优学费模型. 相似文献
4.
学费具有成本分担功能和价格两种属性,我国高校成本变化情况和高校学费标准研究表明,我国普通本科院校尤其是研究型大学的学费标准偏低。这样的现状既无法体现出效率,也难以体现公平。应尽快提高我国普通本科院校尤其是研究型大学的学费标准,同时建立学费的动态调整机制,使得学费标准能够随着物价及教育成本变化及时得到相应的调整。 相似文献
5.
本文针对高等教育界出现的一种观点--认为高校学费实质上是一种教育价格,学费收取的标准取决于高等教育价格的供求关系--提出质疑,并从实践过程与经济本源中去界定和论证学费的属性、依据和标准.根据高等教育价格的供求关系来收取学费,可能会导致理论上的误导和实践中的损害. 相似文献
6.
关于高校学费问题的实证分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
目前,我国公办高校和民办高校学费采用两种不同的定价方式,公办高校执行成本补偿,根据学生培养成本来合理分担比例,民办高校实行全成本定价。不同类型的高校提供了不同形态的教育服务,相同类型高校提供的教育服务质量不同,它们的学费水平存在显著差异;与民办高校相比,公办高校的教育服务质量与学费水平倒挂。在公办高校系统内部,专业教育学费水平差异不显著,价格信号作用不明显,不利于学校之间的公平竞争,也不利于高校专业和教育结构的调整。在社会主义市场经济与高等教育大众化的双重选择下,政府应该放松管制,让公办学校学费进行自主定价,使公办高校学费定价方式逐步从政府主导向市场主导转变。 相似文献
7.
正视教育信息,找准教育民意,作出积极回应并上升至政策层面的改革与完善,是教育舆情分析的特殊使命.以英国高校学费改革政策为切入点,运用教育舆情分析理论探寻出英国高校学费改革的问题症结,即高等教育由普及化向精英化的转变,高等教育经费投入无法承受之痛以及高等教育学费结构比重不可忽视,揭示出学费改革政策面临的情势,最终为政策实施奠定科学的理论机制,促进政策在执行过程中更加优化和完善. 相似文献
8.
高校扩招和交费上学是当前教育实践和教育理论中的一个热点话题.一方面,高校扩招增加了人们接受高等教育的机会;另一方面,高昂的学费把处于社会弱势群体的学生推向了失学的边缘,这引发了人们对教育平等问题的广泛关注. 相似文献
9.
丁瑞常 《学位与研究生教育》2016,(8):72-76
分析了英国研究生教育学费定价制度的特点,指出英国赋予高校以高度的研究生教育学费定价自主权,建立了全国统一的研究生教育成本核算方法体系,并在研究生教育学费定价中实现了政府调控与市场调节双重机制的耦合。基于英国的得失,认为我国今后应当提高高校的学费定价自主权并逐步建立社会参与的价格听证制度,进一步规范教育成本核算工作并逐步建立成本核算结果公开制度,适应性地均衡学费定价中政府调控与市场调节的关系。 相似文献
10.
随着高校大规模的扩招,我国高等教育蓬勃发展,学生学费收入已成为办学经费的主要来源之一.目前,高校学生欠学费现象日趋严重,已经影响到高校的建设和发展以及学校教学秩序的正常运转.因此,加强高校学费欠费管理工作迫在眉睫,刻不容缓. 相似文献
11.
关于加强高校学生收费管理的思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
高校学生收费管理工作是高校财务管理工作的一项重要内容,如何加强高校学生收费管理工作是当前的一个重要研究课题。文章对目前学生收费管理中存在的问题进行了分析,并提出了加强高校学生收费管理的措施。 相似文献
12.
宋述龙 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2010,33(2):68-70
在高等学校中实施收学费、住宿费制度和收费标准、收费办法是全社会关注的热点问题之一,为此国家相继出台了一系列规范高等教育收费的若干规定。但社会指责高等学校乱收费、收费标准高等呼声仍然比较强烈。对此我们就高等学校收费的相关问题提出几点建议。 相似文献
13.
Jean Gasen Romaniuk 《Educational gerontology》2013,39(4):279-292
Abstract In the last decade, a majority of states has developed legislation or centralized policy directives which encourage the participation of older adults in institutions of higher education through tuition‐reduction or tuition‐waiver. However, very little research has been conducted to assess their impact on participation and program development. This paper is intended to analyze the awareness and impact of tuition‐waiver policies among older adults and institutions of higher education in the state of Virginia. In addition, this paper is intended to provide an expository framework for the synthesis of secondary data sources which address state policy issues in gerontology and higher education. Results from the analysis indicate a high level of awareness among administrators at the institutional and state level in higher education and among state legislators, while somewhat less awareness is evident among older adults. In terms of impact, results indicate that older adult participation remains extremely low, and the priority of cost in participation decisions is not well understood. The actual financial burden on institutions is still relatively small; however, with no tuition or state reimbursed funds, the incentives for program development remain insufficient. Several additional policy and research questions follow from the analysis. Questions must be raised concerning who is benefitting from the legislation and who should be benefitting, what kinds of incentives are necessary for institutions to develop programs, and what role the state should play in facilitating program development. Additionally, a re‐evaluation of tuition‐waiver policies versus other kinds of financial incentives is recommended. 相似文献
14.
J. L. Azad 《Higher Education》1976,5(1):1-7
The contribution of tuition fees to the income of higher education institutions in India is reviewed against a background of inadequate financial support. A differential system of tuition fees is proposed under which students not deemed suitable for higher education would be admitted to universities or colleges subject to payment of tuition fees which reflected the full costs of their higher education.The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views/policies of the Planning Commission. 相似文献
15.
我国普通高等学校学费问题已经成为社会关注的热点问题。文章根据普通高等学校生均实际学费的特点,在分析学费影响因素的基础上,建立了普通高校学费的计量模型,并有针对性地提出一些建议。 相似文献
16.
Sarah A. Parrott 《Tertiary Education and Management》2013,19(3):261-268
As the borders between higher education systems continue to erode and competition for qualified students increases, many institutions are exploring variable pricing options, known in the USA as “tuition discounting.” The goal of tuition discounting is to use institutional funds to attract and retain desired students while maximizing net revenue to the institution. Recent changes in higher education funding and tuition structures in non‐US countries have led to interest in how to most effectively allocate institutional aid. This article outlines the basic concepts of tuition discounting, and shares insights for institutions that might be considering this option. 相似文献
17.
Manuel S. González Canché 《Research in higher education》2017,58(2):141-183
More than 40 years of research has found a positive relationship between increases in the proportion of non-resident students enrolling in an institution and increases in the tuition prices this institution charges to these same students. Notably, this line of research has consistently treated this non-resident student body as if they constitute a homogeneous group in terms of their socioeconomic well-being, when in reality these students come from states with differing levels of socioeconomic prosperity. Notably, given that tuition and fee charges to non-resident students are market-based, institutions charge what out-of-state students are willing to pay. Under this rationale, it follows that the wealthier the student body of an institution is, the more institutions will be able to charge them in terms of tuition and fees for their education. The purpose of this study is twofold. First, it offers a method to measure the level of wealth of the non-resident student body enrolling at an institution considering the level of wealth of these students’ home states, therefore creating a measure of heterogeneity of the non-resident student body. The second purpose is to evaluate whether this measure of heterogeneity is associated with larger increases in the net tuition and fee prices charged to these students compared to the increases related to the homogeneous structure that ignores these students’ home-state wealth. This twofold purpose was addressed utilizing a dataset built from regional, state, and institutional information of 1743 public and private not-for-profit 4-year institutions across the contiguous United States. Since all the outcome variables were found to be spatially dependent, spatial econometrics techniques were employed for model estimation. Results corroborated that treating non-resident students as a homogeneous structure rendered downwardly biased estimates of institutions’ abilities and/or decisions to set higher or lower tuition and fee prices compared to the estimates obtained using the heterogeneous structure. Considering current general disinvestment of states in higher education, the analysis of factors driving non-resident tuition and fee price-setting has become especially relevant for public policy officials and decision-makers at both the institution- and state-levels. Accordingly, this study examines a critical issue in the finance of higher education—the setting of institutional tuition and fees for non-resident students. 相似文献
18.
This study considers the impact of state-level guaranteed tuition programs on postsecondary tuition levels. The analytic framework argues that state-level laws requiring flat tuition rates for four years contain inflationary risk, which encourages institutions to set tuition higher than they otherwise would with annual adjustments. To empirically test this idea, this study uses a national panel dataset and a quasi-experimental difference-in-difference methodological approach, with Illinois’ Truth-in-Tuition law serving as the treatment condition. On average, institutions subject to this law increased annual tuition by approximately 26–30% and aggregate four-year tuition by approximately 6–7% in excess of the amount predicted by the trend for institutions not subject to the law. These findings are robust to multiple alternative specifications and support the idea that state-level guaranteed tuition programs encourage large institutional tuition increases. Implications of these findings for state policymakers, higher education institutional leaders, and college-age students and their families are also discussed. 相似文献
19.
张万朋 《清华大学教育研究》2007,28(2):51-56
本文尝试运用规制经济学中的收费理论来讨论如何合理地确定高等学校的收费水准。首先分析了确定高校收费水准时应当遵循的六大管理目标,在此基础上讨论了四种可能的高校收费水准的决定方式,最后指出,在高等学校中,只能采取以公正报酬率计算方式为主的平均成本定价策略,同时辅之以混合型定价方式。此外,高校与政府之间应当加强相互信赖和信息公开。 相似文献
20.
Interrogating institutionalized establishments: urban–rural inequalities in China’s higher education
China’s urban–rural disparities are a fundamental source of China’s overall educational inequalities. This article addresses the issue with data collected through interviews with members at various Chinese higher education institutions. It interrogates China’s current policies together with the socio-political institutional arrangements that underlie them and assesses the effectiveness of existing schemes to support higher education students. Based on China’s experience, it challenges market transition theory’s claim and debates the classical economic theory which postulates that expansion of education will reduce inequality. Believing that the educational gap is only part of China’s urban–rural disparities, of which many resulted from social institutional arrangements, it calls for changes to established institutions and a reconsideration of the role of private financing mainly through tuition fees. 相似文献