共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2022,(4)
近年来全球教育治理成为新的教育热点议题。作为全球教育治理重要参与主体,韩国政府在总结自身受援经验的基础上,将“回馈国际社会”、“输出韩国经验”、“全球化国家建设”、“培养全球公民”作为理念的基础,并逐步形成全球教育治理五大参与路径——传播国际组织理念的全球公民教育、输出韩国经验的职业教育、宣扬全球共同利益的国际教育援助、面向国际组织的各层次人才输送体系、培养全球责任意识的国民教育。韩国的全球教育治理呈现出国家利益与全球利益价值耦合的政策理念特征,全方位、多渠道的参与路径特征,国民积极参与的人员保障特征。 相似文献
2.
2020年11月7日至8日,中国教育学会比较教育分会第二十届年会在重庆顺利举办。本次年会由中国教育学会比较教育分会主办,西南大学教育学部承办。年会以"后疫情时代的全球教育变革"为主题,分别研讨了后疫情时代中国比较教育学科新使命与发展前瞻、各国教育政策应对、教育实践创新、国际教育组织的教育主张与贡献、国际教育交流与跨境教育、全球教育治理体系重塑等重要议题,体现了全球疫情背景下我国比较教育的使命与价值。 相似文献
3.
作为国土面积世界第一的大国、联合国安理会常任理事国和传统教育强国,俄罗斯在全球教育治理舞台上的作用起伏多变、影响力不断扩展.俄罗斯参与全球教育治理的逻辑起点在于维护国家核心利益,恢复教育大国形象.依托全球性国际组织增强话语权、强化区域教育治理能力、开展国际教育援助、加强国际教育合作等构成俄罗斯参与全球教育治理的多样化路径.由意识形态导向转为经济利益驱动、对苏联模式的路径依赖与新时期的创新发展并存、以强大的文化自信赢得话语权等是俄罗斯参与全球教育治理的突出特点.在参与全球教育治理进程中,俄罗斯亦面临缺乏顶层设计与协调管理、内忧外患并存、国家教育品牌吸引力有待提升等问题. 相似文献
4.
《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2019,(1)
国际组织在全球教育治理中扮着演越来越重要的角色。实现"教育2030"的目标,需澄清主要国际组织参与教育治理的路径、内容与理据。随着国际对话、交流与合作的加强,国际组织表现出多边主义的合作范式,人文主义与工具理性是其运作的内在张力。在参与全球教育治理的过程中,国际组织需提高地方政府的积极性,以系统设计与推进为全球共治的前提,以人的发展为终极目标。 相似文献
5.
为应对新冠肺炎疫情期间全球教育所面临的挑战,经济合作与发展组织参与全球教育治理,适时为各国提供教育理论与实践指导.经济合作与发展组织借助复杂性理论揭示教育系统所处的复杂时代情境,并结合韧性理论倡导各国识别教育系统中的脆弱性,构建韧性教育生态系统.同时,经济合作与发展组织发挥其国际组织职能在新冠肺炎疫情期间为组织成员国和其他国家进行相关数据搜集和统计分析,提出了循证教育治理建议、促进国际间教育合作和倡导人道主义教育援助等有效举措.未来,增强教育系统韧性和建立教育国际合作伙伴关系将成为实现全球教育可持续发展目标的可行方向. 相似文献
6.
全球教育治理-鸟瞰国际组织在世界教育发展中的作用 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
王晓辉 《北京大学教育评论》2008,6(3):152-165
全球教育治理已见端倪。国际组织对世界教育产生了重大影响,主要体现在重视人力资本、倡导教育平等、发动全民教育、开展国际评估、统一大学学制、构建学习化社会等几个方面。各个国家应当关注国际组织在教育发展上的政策优先点.作为制定本国教育政策的参照,并努力建设独具特色的教育系统和政策体系,由此奠定国际教育治理的"和而不同"。 相似文献
7.
新冠肺炎疫情使全球教育受到严峻挑战。为了抗击疫情、缓解冲击、重建疫情后的世界教育、维护人类共同利益,多个国际组织呼吁各国提供教育国际公共产品。通过回溯"公共产品"概念的出现与形成,梳理"国际公共产品"理念的发展,探讨国际公共产品对全球治理的价值,分析国际公共产品的类型,尝试对教育国际公共产品进行分层分类。此外,通过检视中国为提供国际公共产品所做的努力,向中国比较教育工作者提出了共同奋斗的建议。 相似文献
8.
国际教育援外是全球教育治理的重要组成部分,但新冠肺炎疫情发生以来遭遇了价值危机、合作危机以及行动危机。在深度参与全球教育治理的过程中,中国教育援外提倡以构建“人类命运共同体”来推动全球治理。在行动策略上,构建了科学的分级管理体制,持续优化教育援外运行机制,采用多元化的教育援外方式等,走出了中国教育援外促进人文交流、赋能全球教育治理的新路径。新时代,我国教育援外工作应始终遵循“不附带任何政治条件”的基本原则,彰显“互惠互利”的道义本色;立足构建人类命运共同体、打造全球教育发展成果共享新平台;继续面向联合国可持续发展目标,以教育援外推进我国深度参与全球教育治理。 相似文献
9.
全球教育治理涉及多元利益主体,其中国际非政府组织以其成员众多、机制灵活、影响广泛等特点而在参与和推动全球教育治理上发挥重要作用。作为高等教育领域的国际非政府组织,国际大学协会致力于成为高等教育机构的全球性代表并为全球高等教育机构提供全方位服务。该组织积极引领高等教育机构的可持续发展、国际化、领导力和数字化转型等事业的发展,通过数字式治理、规范式治理和认知式治理参与全球教育治理,呈现出人文主义与工具理性并存、大众需求与个性服务兼顾、静态控制与动态调整结合的特点。国际大学协会相关实践可为我国在构建“一带一路”或区域教育共同体,秉持共商共建共享的理念参与全球教育治理方面提供有益借鉴。 相似文献
10.
作为东南亚地区规模较大的政府间国际组织之一,东南亚教育部长组织在全球教育治理中发挥了独特作用。这一组织的发展可分为初创、介入教育及扩大影响力3个阶段。东南亚教育部长组织积极参与全球教育治理,在此过程中形成了组织层面、区域中心层面、民族国家层面的3种作用机制：即以战略引领提升教育质量;以优先领域推进教育专题发展;以监测项目评估教育实践。东南亚教育部长组织在参与全球教育治理的过程中具有体现地区内系统治理的方式、具备与其他组织协作的意识和具有应对教育突发状况的能力等特征。 相似文献
11.
Although international student assessments and the role of international organisations (IOs) in governing education via an evidence-based educational policy discourse are of growing interest to educational researchers, few have explored the complex ways in which an IO, such as the OECD, gains considerable influence in governing education during the early stages of test production. Drawing on a comparative analysis of the production of two international tests – the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) – we show how the OECD legitimises its power, and expertise, and defines ‘what counts’ in education. The OECD deploys three mechanisms of educational governance: (1) building on past OECD successes; (2) assembling knowledge capacity; and (3) deploying bureaucratic resources. We argue that the early stages of test production by IOs are significant sites in which the global governance of education is legitimated and enacted. 相似文献
12.
David Rutkowski 《Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education》2015,36(5):683-699
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has recently piloted the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA)-based Test for Schools in the USA. In this paper, I contend that by connecting directly with local school boards this new initiative has the potential to further promote the OECD's educational agenda in local policy debates. I begin to develop this argument by providing an overview of the OECD and its work. I then lay out a theoretical framework around global governance and knowledge production within the context of the OECD. Next, I provide a brief overview of the traditional PISA study and compare it to the new PISA-based Test for Schools initiative. This context provides the foundation for a discussion of the ways in which a school-based international assessment can operate as a governance tool, allowing international organizations to have greater influence in the formation and implementation of local educational policies. 相似文献
13.
14.
高等教育国际化既是新时代我国高等教育高质量发展的应然要求，也是参与全球教育治理体系和彰显全球教育治理能力的重要尺度。从全球治理的视域出发，构建“价值共识-制度公约-组织协商”的多维度分析框架，以此梳理我国高等教育国际化实践从接纳共享到输出共享、从场外接轨到场内共建、从松散联合到协作共商的演变特征，并揭示出当前我国高等教育国际化发展面临三大矛盾：价值共识共享中的路径依赖掣肘、制度公约共建中的本土角色暗淡、组织协商共商中的合力发挥不足。基于此，我们应加强文化自觉，构建中国高等教育国际话语体系；提升制度能力，深度参与高等教育国际规则的实施与制定；注重多元面向，打造分层分类的国际化网络协商新格局，以提升我国高等教育国际化水平和全球教育治理能力。 相似文献
15.
美国操作一些国际金融机构对国际社会放送国际竞争力话语,以凸显教育问题作为一种危及社会前景的社会风险,并运用效能之名吹捧商业解决方案的功用。此种情境开启政策网络,使得商业、慈善、社会机构等构成混杂性科层统治方式,政府得以远离责任,但又通过设定标准与目标进行远程操控。同时,资本家得以介入教育决策,将教育服务商业化。其创新性的集体智慧被吹嘘成确保社会繁荣的万灵丹,这种社会贡献等同于实践社会的道德责任,慈善更进一步美化这些商业团体的利益行径。由此而言,效能是全球化教育改革运动的催化剂,市场逻辑是构成社会新思维的媒介,这促使许多政府运用效能、国际竞争力、创新性集体智慧与社会前景等话语,来塑造社会大众的自我知识,从而获得大众对这些话语的主动认可甚至支持。这种社会治疗学是统治艺术的实践,因为它引导他们如何思考与如何行动,这是新自由主义治理性的明显特征。 相似文献
16.
在经济日益全球化的进程中,国际社会对教育问题的关注和重视已使教育的全球治理成为一种必然之势。本文首先对教育进入全球治理的议程进行了探讨;其次,以世界全民教育为例并从比较的角度分析了联合国教科文组织在全球教育治理中的比较优势;最后从三个方面展望了全球教育治理的未来发展。 相似文献
17.
Ben Williamson 《Learning, Media and Technology》2015,40(1):83-105
This article examines the emergence of ‘digital governance’ in public education in England. Drawing on and combining concepts from software studies, policy and political studies, it identifies some specific approaches to digital governance facilitated by network-based communications and database-driven information processing software that are being discursively promoted in education by cross-sectoral intermediary organizations. Such intermediaries, including National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, Demos, the Innovation Unit, the Education Foundation and the Nominet Trust, are increasingly seeking to participate in new digitally mediated forms of educational governance. Through their promotion of network-based pedagogies and database-driven analytics software, these organizations are seeking to delegate educational decision-making to socio-algorithmic forms of power that have the capacity to predict, govern and activate learners' capacities and subjectivities. 相似文献
18.
Lawrence Angus 《教育政策杂志》2013,28(1):23-41
The tendency in education writing on globalization has been to examine the congruence of educational policies in western societies and the international effects of global governance of education by powerful transnational institutions such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Union. The authors tend to identify massive changes in approaches to educational governance, including the establishment of a broadly common policy and management agenda that is characterized by ‘new managerialism’, devolution, and rigid accountability structures, entrepreneurialism, and school effectiveness, that have been imposed largely as a result of globalization. These measures are often seen as being directly related to the ‘hollowing out’ of the state, and the emergence of neo‐liberalism as the informing ideology of both international capitalism and residual nation‐states. There are few studies, however, of the dynamics of educational life and micro‐political activities that enable or challenge or bring about the kinds of educational reshaping and renorming that are typically associated with globalization. This study attempts to analyse such micro‐shaping, which, through reporting an ethnographic study in a site of educational practice, examines how school managers and teachers dealt with government policy intervention and, in the process, both willingly and unwillingly implemented significant educational change. 相似文献
19.
R. Maithreyi 《比较教育学》2018,54(3):352-369
This paper examines the shifting relations between the family and the state in Indian education policy. It charts how family resources, responsibility, and participation have been variously called upon by the state across three historical conjunctures of education reform: the decades of post-independence planning for school expansion and nation-building after 1947; the global development era of economic liberalisation and decentralisation in the 1990s and early 2000s; and the present turn to a rights-based approach in the context of intensified educational marketisation, as marked by the 2009 Right to Education Act (RTE). Across these periods, we identify an enduring paternalism of welfare governance alongside strategies for devolving state responsibility in matters of school education. The analysis situates the conditions of family responsibility for education under the contemporary RTE, in which parents are expected to be ‘morally’ compelled to meet the state's education goals. Through this analysis, we bring to the fore the politics of family governance in education policy, a politics that is largely overlooked by, despite being central to, research on education and international development. 相似文献
20.
Clara Morgan 《比较教育学》2018,54(3):285-308
Although scholars have examined the effects of global tests on national and regional educational governance, few researchers have studied their impact on education in the Arabian Gulf. This research fills the knowledge gap by studying the international spectacle of PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS results in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – two small rich states at the periphery of knowledge production processes. I argue that an analysis of these narratives reveals how global accountability discourses are translated into the Arabian Gulf context as truth claims that performance in league tables is an accurate and objective representation of educational quality. Four themes emerge from the analysis: integration of test results into national visions; measurement of educational progress based on test results; ranking of student performance; and policy changes to improve test results. In conclusion, I suggest that the over-dependence on global tests in defining educational quality in Qatar and the UAE erodes educational sovereignty and restricts the capacity of small states to develop and nurture alternative, indigenous and localised solutions for guiding educational reforms. 相似文献