共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
高等教育资格框架作为各国高教质量保障的一环，在联系国际问学位文凭互认中是很必要的。英国的高等教育资格框架是一个授予不同类型高等教育学历、学位的学术资格框架。本文主要介绍英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰高等教育资格框架的形成机制与内容．然后举出其特点以期对中国在建立一个完善的高等教育框架时有所启示。 相似文献
2.
3.
《武汉职业技术学院学报》2013,(3):121
现代职教体系构建的三大基本问题:(1)职教与普教等值思考:同层次不同类型。应构建一个普通高等教育、高等职业教育及其与之等值的学历(学位)资格与职业资格,包括正式或非正式学习获得资格的国家资格框架,并在此框架 相似文献
4.
在高等教育大众化和普及化的背景下,以美国、英国、澳大利亚为代表的发达国家和地区普遍在高等教育专科阶段设立了学位。对澳大利亚这一层次学位发展和实践的研究表明,这一层次学位同时发挥了促进学生就业和升学的双重功能,并把这一层次学位纳入到了国家的资格框架体系中。然而,这一层次学位在推行实践中也面临与本科衔接不畅、定位不准等问题。借鉴国际社会的经验和教训,我国应从一种系统的角度看待高职专科学位建设问题,应以高职专科学位建设为突破口,建立各教育层次和类型紧密衔接、互相融通的资格框架体系。 相似文献
5.
英国高等教育资格框架(FHEQ)是一个以学习成果为基础、将所有高等教育资格分为5个级别的框架。该框架在保障高等教育质量、促进教育系统内部的沟通与衔接、加强高等教育与利益相关者的联系以及促进国际交流等方面起到了重要的作用。我国要建立高等教育资格框架,既需要制定详细的资格指标体系,又需要提高高等教育质量保障的透明度。 相似文献
6.
加拿大是世界上高等教育参与率最高的国家之一,由于人口急剧增长对大学学位需求显著增加、高等教育机构超越传统二元模式、高等教育学位授予权逐步扩大至非大学领域等因素,加拿大设置副学士学位、应用学位、联合学位等高等职业教育学位制度以满足加拿大学位需求,但在制度建设中存在高等职业教育机构“学术漂移”现象、缺乏国家学位认证程序及审查机构、高等职业教育学位流动性相对较弱等问题。借鉴加拿大经验,我国应明确高等职业教育学位证书的实践导向,建立统一的国家学位证书资格框架,规范高等职业教育学位标准和认定程序,进而推动我国高等职业教育学位制度的构建。 相似文献
7.
南非高等教育资格框架自实施以来遇到了资格的包容性及连续性等问题,南非高等教育委员会在征求各方意见的基础上从资格的类型、衔接路径、资格指标等方面对资格框架进行了修订。新版高等教育资格框架的实施将会进一步增强高等教育系统的连贯性和灵活性,为制定高等教育质量保障标准提供基础,增加高等教育资格的透明性。其经验对我国建立高等教育资格框架具有一定的启示意义。 相似文献
8.
欧洲高等教育区的学位标准和质量保证准则 总被引：6，自引：1，他引：6
传递欧洲高等教育区2005年5月卑尔根会议的信息,即被会议采纳的高等教育学术资格框架和质量保证标准和准则,并对之进行评析;论述标准和准则的重要性,并且对我国的学位条例和质量保证提出评论、质疑和建议。 相似文献
9.
高等教育质量是高等教育的生命线。加拿大通过立法、绩效考核、会员资格、大学排名、专业认证与评估,以及学位质量保障等多种途径和方法对高等教育质量实施评估和监控。面对欧洲"博洛尼亚进程"的机遇和挑战,加拿大的高等教育质量保障体系正在不断完善,并努力构建"泛加拿大"的基本框架,以提升其国际竞争力。 相似文献
10.
英国高等教育质量保证署在不断研究和改进评估方法的过程中,建立了一套符合英国高等教育系统的学术规范体系,以便评估机构开展工作,也便于高等教育机构内部质量管理作参考。学术规范体系包括四个部分,即学位资格框架、学科基准、课程规格和实施规则。这四个部分是高等教育学术质量保证的基元,对我国高等教育质量保证体系的建设有借鉴意义。 相似文献
11.
南非政府在高等教育变革和重建的宏观背景下,通过制定一系列的政策和法规构建了由南非资格局、国家资格框架和高等教育质量委员会组成的、统一的高等教育质量保障体系.该体系具有理念上创新性、价值取向上多元性、体系上全面性、程序和策略上互补性等特色,尽管其实施情况良好,但仍面临一些问题与挑战. 相似文献
12.
非正规学习成果认证是终身学习实现的重要制度之一,我国当前已经实现了部分非正规学习成果的认证。已有的认证一般较为注重对个体学习的过程和结果进行证明,主要形式有成人高等教育学历证书、高等教育自学考试学历证书和职业资格证书等。 相似文献
13.
在工程教育质量保证和工程师国际流动两个主题下,资历框架(Qualification Framework)和能力标准(Competence Standard)已经成为国际工程界和工程教育界的热门话题。本文首先介绍国际上两大质量鉴定和认证系统;并以英国为例,详述其三类工程师的专业能力标准;最后探讨两个有特色的资历框架与能力标准的建构。 相似文献
14.
孙翠香 《河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2021,(2)
质量保障机制应成为资格框架建立及运行过程中的核心问题。作为涵盖苏格兰311个组织11500个“资格”在内的“苏格兰学分与资格框架”,其质量保障机制的特色是“‘共担责任’的质量保障模式”“坚守质量保障‘原则’”以及“将‘学分评级机构’作为资格框架质量保障的核心和关键环节”。“苏格兰学分与资格框架”的质量保障机制,对推动“苏格兰学分与资格框架”成为国际上最成熟的资格框架之一功不可没,其经验可以为我国尚处于探索阶段的国家资历框架建设提供重要的借鉴。 相似文献
15.
Martin Dyke 《International Journal of Lifelong Education》2013,32(4):266-275
There has been widespread discussion that a new ‘settlement’ is emerging in post‐compulsory education, a political settlement that has progressive educationists, unions, business, the Labour Party, the New Right and Government sharing a similar vision of vocational education for the 21st century. It is argued that this policy consensus is consistent with the post‐Fordist analysis of economy and that such an analysis may ‘offer bonuses to radicals’ (Kumar 1992: 66). This paper provides evidence in support of Avis (1993) that a new ‘settlement’ exists, and that a consensus has emerged in policy proposals for the rationalization of the ‘New Qualifications Framework’, a consensus in which parity of esteem between vocational and academic qualifications was central and supported by government in the introduction of the General National Vocational Qualification (GNVQ). Yet GNVQ as part of the New Qualifications Framework has been characterized as a form of tripartite education post‐16. This paper will examine the New Qualifications Framework and argue that a settlement has emerged which will facilitate further rationalization of the post‐16 curriculum, rationalization that will provide an overarching Advanced/NVQ, Level Three Award, similar to the ‘British Baccalaureate’ or ‘General Education Diploma’ of the National Commission on Education. If the New Qualifications Framework proves credible, modularization within the framework provides a key to incremental change towards comprehensive tertiary education. 相似文献
16.
Alison Glover Yvonne Jones Jane Claricoates Jan Morgan Carl Peters 《Innovative Higher Education》2013,38(1):75-86
Mainstreaming Education for Sustainable Development in higher education is vital if graduates are to possess the abilities, skills, and knowledge needed to tackle the sustainability issues of the future. In this article we explain the development and piloting of a baselining tool, the Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship Development Framework, developed with support from the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales. We draw comparisons with the Sustainability, Tracking, Assessment and Rating System Program, developed by the North American Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. The resulting framework offers consistency with existing Welsh Government strategic documentation, builds on increasing momentum, and has relevance across the higher education sector globally. 相似文献
17.
This article argues for a flexible model of learning for adults which allows them to make choices and contextualise their learning in a manner appropriate to their own professional practice whilst also developing as a member of a learning community. It presents a design based around online ‘learning activities’ which draws on ideas of constructivism, collaborative learning and reflective practice. The model was developed for adult learning in Higher Education, and has been adapted and extended to a number of different programmes. Implementation of the model for the Teaching Qualification (Further Education) has been the subject of an interpretative evaluation using a multiple methods approach. Learners' experiences of this programme together with issues associated with the application of the model to other programmes are discussed. 相似文献
18.
全纳的创新资格框架:英国的QCF 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
2011年1月,英国最新的资格学分框架——QCF正式运行。QCF的产生有其特定的背景:原资格框架(NQF)的高层次普职等值不尽人意;原资格框架(NQF)和互换标准不够清晰;学习者个性化的需求无法得到满足。基于此,QCF以其全新的结构、要素、运行机制以及不同资格证书的比较新路径,保障了资格的全纳性,有利于真正实现等值互换,保障了资格框架的可视性,保障了学习者多元化的需求,对我国资格框架的建立以及"双证书"制度的完善具有一定的参考价值。 相似文献
19.
Linda A. Barkas Jonathan M. Scott Nicola J. Poppitt Paul J. Smith 《Journal of Further & Higher Education》2019,43(6):801-813
The Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), originally proposed in the UK government’s Higher Education White Paper, now the Higher Education and Research Act 2017, is a national mechanism to assess teaching quality in universities. This article provides a critical account of the TEF, underpinned by an overview of the policy context and marketisation and employability agendas exploring the rationale for implementing TEF within universities. We argue, first, that the White Paper’s narrative, the rhetoric of the TEF, seems positive but its implementation appears to be conceptually flawed. Second, its complex quality metrics system demands yet another layer of bureaucracy in an already micro-managed system of higher education. Third, claims made by the White Paper must be supported by evidence-based research to ensure that the objectives are clear. We conclude by questioning whether the quality of the student experience can be improved by the TEF reforms. 相似文献
20.
Martin Trow 《Higher Education Quarterly》1992,46(3):213-226
The White Paper Higher Education: A New Framework, (May 1992), announced a set of new policies for British universities and polytechnics without offering either argument or evidence. The policies include the end of the binary system, the creation of new higher education funding councils, and a strong emphasis on new mechanisms for quality assessment and control. The White Paper projects rapid enrolment growth, but says nothing about the resources needed for the expansion or the significance for growth of Further Education or the European Community. 相似文献