共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 953 毫秒
1.
国外教学质量监控与评价及其特点分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
教学质量的稳步提高是各国政府进行教育改革的目标。目前,世界各国都致力于教育各个方面的改革,如何在改革的过程中保证教育质量的提高,是各个国家非常关注的问题。为此,一些国家进行了教学质量监控与评价的探索,国际上也成立了这方面的专门研究机构。其中比较有代表性的有经济合作组织负责的国际学生评价项目(PISA)、国际教育成就评价协会(IEA)开展的第三次数学和科学成就比较研究(TIM SS)、美国教育部所属的全国教育统计资料中心管理的教育进展评价(NAEP)。一、国外教学质量监控与评价的发展概况1.国际学生评价项目(PISA)PISA(t… 相似文献
2.
由国际教育成就评价协会（IEA）组织的国际数学和科学教育的比较研究（简称TIMSS）以及国际经济合作与发展组织（OECD）主持的国际学生评价项目（简称PISA）,是当前国际间最著名的学生评价项目,它们所提供的指标在国际上具有广泛的影响,已经引起世界各国的高度关注。这些评价项目关注数学、科学等领域,代表国际上学生评价的先进水平。 相似文献
3.
4.
PISA是目前世界上最有影响力的国际学生评价项目之一。其评价的结果具有高度的可比性、可信性和有效性,能为教育改革和发展提供有益的启示。本文通过对芬兰、德国与英国三国PISA测验结果的解析,结合PISA项目对三国教育改革的影响,阐述了作者对我国教育评价研究与发展的思考和建议。 相似文献
5.
关于三项著名国际学生评价项目的比较 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
全国教育进展评价 (简称NAEP)、第三次国际数学和科学教育的再研究 (简称TIMSS -R)和国际学生评价项目 (简称PISA)是当前国际间最为著名的学生评价项目 ,本文拟就 2 0 0 0年NAEP的 8年级评估、TIMSS -R的 8年级评估和PISA三项评价项目的数学和科学领域评估做一比较 ,以便我们了解这些评估的实施背景、基本框架和评估内容 相似文献
6.
教学质量的稳步提高是各国政府进行教育改革的目标。目前，世界各国都致力于教育各个方面的改革，如何在改革的过程中保证教育质量的提高，是各个国家非常关注的问题。为此，一些国家进行了教学质量监控与评价的探索，国际上也成立了这方面的专门研究机构。其中比较有代表性的有经济合作组织负责的国际学生评价项目（PISA）、 相似文献
7.
学生成绩的国际比较为衡量参与国的教育制度的效益提供一个外部的参考视角,日益受到世界各国的重视,并引发了一些国家的基础教育改革。本文对当前影响范围较广的基础教育阶段国际性学生评价项目：国际学生评价项目（PISA）、第三次国际数学和科学研究（TIMSS）和国际阅读素养进展研究（PIRIS）进行了考察和比较,并对其评价结果及影响做了分析,以期为我国的基础教育阶段的教育评价等方面的改革提供参考。 相似文献
8.
除了PISA(国际学生评估项目)以外,经济合作与发展组织还研发了关注教师专业发展和学校教学的TAMS项目(国际教学调查项目)、调查高等教育学生学习情况的AHELO项目(高等教育学习成果测评)和对16～65岁成人进行能力评估的PIAAC(国际成人能力测评项目)。这些国际教育测试分别针对不同的教育人群进行能力评估,以更好地使各国政府了解自身的教育状况,在世界范围内进行跨文化比较,为教育的发展制定更加科学合理的教育政策。 相似文献
9.
专业视野中的PISA 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
近来,国际学生评估项目(PISA)备受国内外关注。PISA项目缘于发达国家对基础教育质量的反思,是一项以改善教育政策为导向的跨国测试研究。本文解读了PISA测试独创的素养及其内涵结构,探究了PISA研究试图解释的学生素养形成与学生个人参与及学习策略间的关系,分析了PISA研究试图发现的学生素养与家庭影响、学校均衡、教育公平的关系。本文认为,公平而卓越正在成为发达国家和国际组织衡量基础教育质量的新尺度;多维度、多学科、重数据与国际参照已经成为教育研究与教育评价的重要发展方向;教育政策的制定应该建立在研究、数据和证据的基础上。 相似文献
10.
PISA是国际学生评估项目的缩写（Programme for International Student Assessment）,是经济合作与发展组织（OECD）的成员共同开发的项目,其目的是测试15岁学生是否掌握了参与未来知识社会所必需的基础知识和基本技能,从而建立一套学生评价方面的教育指标,为各国制定教育政策提供参考。从2000年开始,PISA每三年实施一次。根据本文研究的选题,以下将以2003年的PISA（以下简称PISA2003）数学试题为例进行探讨。 相似文献
11.
Jeongwoo Lee 《Peabody Journal of Education》2014,89(1):106-122
Attracting significant attention from the media and policymakers, international student assessments are serving as pressures on and challenges for individual countries. Even so, paying attention only to publicly released rankings in international student assessments may lead to superficial interpretations of the assessment results. Simply equating the rankings with educational outcomes can be a questionable perspective because the assessment results can be interpreted differently. In this context, this article has explored student achievement in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests in comparison with civic knowledge achievement in the IEA Civic Education Study across 17 countries. This article has also evaluated efficiency in educational processes by assessing outputs (student performance in PISA) against inputs (educational spending and learning time) directly used in the education system. These two approaches clarify that publicly released rankings in PISA change to some extent when the rankings are reevaluated by taking other factors into consideration. This implication should be allowed for in interpreting the results of international assessment and the relative rankings of participating countries. 相似文献
12.
近年来,P ISA(国际学生评价项目)已成为了国内社会各界人士广泛关注的重大教育事件。通过P ISA测试我们看到了上海卓越的教育表现以及在教育质量与均衡上取得的显著成绩。除了赞美与掌声之外,PISA还能引发我们怎样的教育思考呢?众所周知,P ISA并不是第一个国际性的针对学生素养的大型测试项目,它的独特之处不在于可以供我们对各国15岁学生的学业成绩进行比较而在于测试设计及理念上的多方面创新。其中,PISA"素养观"就是最具变革性的理念之一。本文旨在通过梳理PISA素养观内涵及其描述框架的内容结构来阐述P ISA测试背后所蕴含的深刻的教育学转向及其立场,从而引发我们对素养及其学习模式的思考。 相似文献
13.
14.
Barbara W. LeRoy Preethy Samuel Marcella Deluca Peter Evans 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2019,26(4):386-396
AbstractSince 2003, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has included students with special educational needs (SEN), identified as those with functional disabilities, those with cognitive/behavioural/emotional disabilities and those with limited test language proficiency. While the number of countries and included students has increased with each test administration, the percentage of students with SEN remains extremely low. The inclusion of these students is not an intentional PISA design parameter but rather a response to the interaction between the need to maintain strict sampling criteria and country-level educational mandates to include SEN students in standardised testing. Based on the analysis of student participation and performance across four cycles of PISA (2003–2012), this paper examines the challenges that exist in current PISA procedures related to: student sampling, eligibility and identification; assessment methodology; and reporting results. PISA practices, their limitations for scientific inferences and recommendations for design improvements are given. 相似文献
15.
大规模教育质量的评价在很大程度上影响着国家和地区教育发展的走向。本文以PISA2006结果报告为中心,解析PISA对大规模教育质量和相关影响因素评价的理念和方法,为研究和开展我国大规模教育质量评价提供借鉴。 相似文献
16.
David Pepper 《Educational Measurement》2020,39(4):8-20
The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing identify several strands of validity evidence that may be needed as support for particular interpretations and uses of assessments. Yet assessment validation often does not seem guided by these Standards, with validations lacking a particular strand even when it appears relevant to an assessment. Consequently, the degree to which validity evidence supports the proposed interpretation and use of the assessment may be compromised. Guided by the Standards, this article presents an independent validation of OECD's PISA assessment of mathematical self-efficacy (MSE) as an instructive example of this issue. OECD identifies MSE as one of a number of “factors” explaining student performance in mathematics, thereby serving the “policy orientation” of PISA. However, this independent validation identifies significant shortcomings in the strands of validity evidence available to support this interpretation and use of the assessment. The article therefore demonstrates how the Standards can guide the planning of a validation to ensure it generates the validity evidence relevant to an interpretive argument, particularly for an international large-scale assessment such as PISA. The implication is that assessment validation could yet benefit from the Standards as what Zumbo calls “a global force for testing”. 相似文献
17.
Matthias von Davier Kentaro Yamamoto Hyo Jeong Shin Henry Chen Lale Khorramdel Jon Weeks 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2019,26(4):466-488
ABSTRACTBased on concerns about the item response theory (IRT) linking approach used in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) until 2012 as well as the desire to include new, more complex, interactive items with the introduction of computer-based assessments, alternative IRT linking methods were implemented in the 2015 PISA round. The new linking method represents a concurrent calibration using all available data, enabling us to find item parameters that maximize fit across all groups and allowing us to investigate measurement invariance across groups. Apart from the Rasch model that historically has been used in PISA operational analyses, we compared our method against more general IRT models that can incorporate item-by-country interactions. The results suggest that our proposed method holds promise not only to provide a strong linkage across countries and cycles but also to serve as a tool for investigating measurement invariance. 相似文献
18.
NINA BONDERUP DOHN 《Journal of Philosophy of Education》2007,41(1):1-16
This article gives a critique of the methodology of OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). It is argued that PISA is invalidated by the fact that the methodology chosen does not constitute an adequate operationalisation of the question of inquiry. Therefore, contrary to the claims of PISA, PISA is not an assessment of the 'knowledge and skills for life' of students, but only of 'knowledge and skills in assessment situations'. Even this latter form of assessment is not fully reliable, however, because of problems at the level of concrete test items and because of an inherent confusion of relative and absolute evaluation. 相似文献
19.
The introduced policy of “synchronized enrollment of public and private schools” has once again triggered the debate on the effectiveness of public and private schools. Based on the data of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018 from four Chinese provinces and municipalities, this paper explores whether private schools gain a relative advantage in student academic performance through student “screening” or academic “meritocracy,” through a hierarchical linear model (HLM) and an empirical test of the propensity score matching (PSM). It has been found that the academic performance of students in private schools is significantly better than that in public schools. But with background, metacognitive ability, and learning hours of students in private schools controlled for, such academic performance is not significantly superior, suggesting that private schools rely heavily on student “screening” to achieve a relative advantage in student academic performance. This finding has also verified the scientific nature of the above policy. 相似文献