共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
当前,我国部分大学生的学术诚信意识比较淡薄,具体表现为考试作弊、捏造、学术不诚信的行为和剽窃;作业、论文抄袭现象严重,实验数据随意作假等。这些现象的出现,不仅败坏了学风和校风,而且不利于创新型人才的培养。这篇论文的目的旨在剖析引发学生学术不诚信的根源,试图提出一些有效地提高学生学术诚信的方式以及预防或制止大学生学术失信的对策,这需要学生、教师、学校管理者和社会等多方面的共同努力。 相似文献
2.
3.
大学生学术诚信教育体系建设,是维持大学人才培养和科学研究健康发展关键要素。然而,当代大学生学术失信行为层出不穷,主要表现为大学生考试作弊、学术论文抄袭、剽窃和学术数据的弄虚作假等现象。究其原因,主要是因为学术诚信环境不良、学术诚信教育的缺失、学术诚信体系建设的缺失以及大学生主观上存在学术诚信缺失等因素。基于以上原因,必须加强和推进大学生学术诚信教育制度建设以及大学生学术共同体的自律建设。 相似文献
4.
赵希婧 《时事(时事报告大学生版)》2005,(2)
一日,在学校图书馆阅览室,我偶然发现很多杂志已被同学偷偷做了“批注”,内容大致是“该文已摘用,××系”。此举可谓“用心良苦”:为了让他人在写论文时,不要摘抄了同一篇文章。一些老师惊呼,现在多数大学生成了“CV专家”(剪切和粘贴的快捷键分别为Ctrl+C和Ctrl+V)了,论文没有一点创新之处。一方学术净土开始受到诚信和道德的拷问。当抄袭突破了道德的底线,当拼凑掩盖了创新的光芒,部分同学为这般“缝缝补补”打出了“引用”的旗号,贴上了“借鉴”的标签。殊不知,在严肃的学术研究中,即使没有明显的大段抄袭,仅仅是所论泛泛,人云亦云,… 相似文献
5.
美国大学生学术欺骗行为及其对策研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
大学生的学术欺骗行为可分为考试欺骗和书面作业欺骗。美国大学生的学术欺骗行为比较普遍,但建立荣誉准则制度的高校发生学术欺骗的百分比明显偏低。学生们认为,对于不同的欺骗行为应给予不同程度的惩罚。影响美国大学生的学术欺骗行为的因素可以分为学生个体特征因素、态度/信仰因素、行为因素和外部因素等。高校可以采用建立荣誉准则制度、重视学生的参与等对策来减少大学生的学术欺骗行为。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
学生抄袭作业,就是学生不独立完成而把其他同学已经完成的作业拿过来照着抄一遍交给老师检查的行为。抄袭作业的现象不利于学生的成长和发展;降低了教育教学的效果,严重影响教育教学的质量。因此,我们要全面深入分析学生抄袭作业的原因,想方设法杜绝学生抄袭作业。 相似文献
9.
采用问卷调查法了解大学生学术道德失范的现状。对22所高校1641名学生的调查结果表明:大学生学术道德失范的普遍性和严重程度已基本显现,涉及范围广泛,涵盖了大学生的整个学业领域,考试作弊和论文抄袭是较为普遍的失范行为。为此,在净化外部社会环境的同时,高校应建立健全大学生学术道德规范并加强教育宣传,大学生自身也应加强学术道德修养并提高自律水平。 相似文献
10.
抄袭是一种严重的学术弊端,在大学生、研究生群体中抄袭日趋严重。针对这种情况,本文从学术和法律的角度,界定抄袭行为的概念并指出其严重性;同时,以个案分析的形式介绍了识别抄袭的方法,用实例展示了如何合理地使用他人的研究成果并将其融入自己作品之中;最后,还介绍了几种被广泛接受的征引文献的格式,希望能达到鼓励外语类学生养成良好的学术态度、掌握恰当的学术规范的目的。 相似文献
11.
Academic dishonesty has been an important issue. However, only few researches had been done in Asian countries, especially
a nationwide study. A sample of 2,068 college students throughout Taiwan was selected and surveyed on four domains of academic
dishonesty, including: cheating on test, cheating on assignment, plagiarism, and falsifying documents. The major findings
of this study were: (1) the prevalence rate for all types of dishonesty behaviors among college students in Taiwan was 61.72%;
(2) the top five most practiced academic dishonesty behaviors in Taiwan are provided paper or assignment for another student,
gave prohibited help to others on their assignment, copied others’ assignments, passed answers to other students, and copied
from other students; (3) students’ attitudes correlated with behaviors in all four domains of academic dishonesty; (4) females
reported less acceptable to and behaved less academic dishonesty behaviors than males; and (5) freshmen had more dishonest
practices than other class ranks. 相似文献
12.
While plagiarism has been a growing problem in higher education for a long time, the use of the Internet has made this increasing problem more unmanageable. In many countries, this problem has become a matter of discussion, and higher education institutions feel obliged to review their policies on academic dishonesty. As part of these efforts, the study aims to examine the tendencies of teacher candidates to plagiarise using the Internet, factors affecting their tendencies and the reasons for plagiarism. In this context, a questionnaire was administered to a total of 386 first- and fourth-grade college students at a college of education. The data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, the Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance. The findings revealed that the teacher candidates had, to some extent, a tendency to plagiarise using the Internet by copying material or using the same assignment in different courses. Gender, department and length of computer use were found to be significant factors affecting their tendencies to plagiarise using the Internet. Time constraints, workload and difficulty of the assignments/projects were indicated as among the major reasons for tendencies towards Internet plagiarism. 相似文献
13.
Contract cheating is currently a concern for universities and the higher education (HE) sector. It has been brought into the spotlight in recent years through the growth of online essay mills, where students can easily commission and purchase written assessment responses. This study contributes to the wider literature on academic integrity in HE by examining the phenomenon of contract cheating from a supply‐side perspective, thereby considering the essay mill offering and student interaction with it. The authors covertly engage with five essay mills, before successfully completing an assignment purchase with two of these providers. The pre‐purchase stage of an assignment transaction is first examined, unpacking ten reassurance cues used by essay mill providers in the text of their websites. These reassurance cues help to ensure the attractiveness of the essay mill product to potential student consumers. The analysis then moves to explore the ethical discourses around academic integrity that essay mills provide, revealing inconsistencies in their stance towards the potential for academic misconduct from the use of essay mill services. Finally, the article explores the quality of the essay mill product, through grading and Turnitin® reports for the two purchased essay mill assignments. Following recent calls for the outlawing of essay mills, this article provides a timely addition to current understanding of this phenomenon, and the associated challenges of contract cheating in HE. 相似文献
14.
Melisa J. Wallace 《Educational studies》2014,40(2):233-236
Contract cheating is the process whereby students auction off the opportunity for others to complete assignments for them. It is an apparently widespread yet under-researched problem. One suggested strategy to prevent contract cheating is to shorten the turnaround time between the release of assignment details and the submission date, thus making it difficult for students to make arrangements with contractors. Here, we outline some characteristics of the current market for contract cheating and demonstrate that short turnaround times are unlikely to prevent contract cheating because requested turnaround times for university-level assignments completed via contract cheating are already short (average 5?days). In addition, for every contractor awarded a job, there are an average of 10 others offering to complete it within the specified time suggesting that there is abundant excess capacity in the market. 相似文献
15.
《Journal of moral education》2012,41(2):163-166
One hundred and ninety‐six Israeli middle‐school students participated in a study that explored the effects of moral orientation (moral versus conventional)and of three situational variables on attitudes toward two types of cheating in school exams—copying from others (‘active’)and letting others copy (‘passive’). Several vignettes that were comprised of different combinations of the three situational variables—exam importance, supervision level and peers' norms—were used as the main instrument. It was found that a‐morally oriented students approved significantly more of cheating than morally oriented students. Importance of exam had marginally significant effects on active copying. Level of supervision during exam and classmates' norms had significant effects on both active and passive cheating attitudes. 相似文献
16.
Phillip Dawson Wendy Sutherland-Smith 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(2):286-293
Contract cheating is the purchasing of custom-made university assignments with the intention of submitting them. Websites providing contract cheating services often claim this form of cheating is undetectable, and no published research has examined this claim. This paper documents a pilot study where markers were paid to mark a mixture of real student work and contract cheating assignments, to establish their accuracy at detecting contract cheating. Seven experienced markers individually blind marked the same bundle of 20 second-year psychology assignments, which included 6 that were purchased from contract cheating websites. Sensitivity analyses showed markers detected contract cheating 62% of the time. Specificity analyses showed markers correctly identified real student work 96% of the time. Our results contrast with contract cheating sites’ claims that contract cheating is undetectable. However, they should be taken with caution as they are from one course unit in one discipline. 相似文献
17.
大学生考试作弊问题日益凸显。运用质性研究方法探析个案大学本科生考试作弊根源,发现教师监考不严,考试内容偏重记忆性知识,学生学习投入不足是大学生考试作弊的直接原因。而学生的学业准备度低,自我管理能力不足,无法适应大学的学习要求是诱发大学生考试作弊的深刻原因。由此,该个案大学应通过加强教师应对学术诚信问题的培训,改革考试方式,为学生提供学业帮助和支持,完善学术诚信政策等一系列相应举措来消除学生考试作弊的根源,从根本上促进大学生的学习和发展。 相似文献
18.
"以人为本"的大学生思想政治教育理念 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
周玉明 《衡阳师范学院学报》2007,28(5):127-130
大学生思想政治教育坚持以人为本,确立了大学生的主体地位和主体作用,坚持用科学的理论武装人、用换位的思维理解人、用最高的热情关心人、用平等的态度尊重人、用内心的真情感召人、用良好的形象影响人、用最好的质量服务人、最终目的是为了人的大学生思想政治教育理念。 相似文献
19.
Cath Ellis Karen van Haeringen Rowena Harper Tracey Bretag Ian Zucker Scott McBride 《高等教育研究与发展》2020,39(3):454-469
ABSTRACTContract cheating occurs when a student outsources their assessment to a third party, regardless of the third party’s relationship with the student, or whether money is exchanged. In higher education, there is a widespread belief that assessment design is a solution to the problem of contract cheating and that authentic assessment tasks are particularly effective. This research analysed two datasets – 221 assignment orders placed on academic custom writing websites and 198 assessment tasks in which contract cheating was detected – to investigate if authentic assessment can assure academic integrity. The authenticity of assessments was determined using five factors derived from the literature: frequency, fidelity, complexity, real-world impact and feed forward. Our analysis found that assessment tasks with no, some, or all of the five authenticity factors are routinely outsourced by students. 相似文献
20.
Josie Ransome 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(1):126-137
A substantial proportion of university students report committing plagiarism and related forms of misconduct. An academic integrity-focused approach to addressing plagiarism emphasises the promotion of positive values alongside education of staff and students about good, and bad, practice in writing, studying and assessment design. The concept was developed many years ago and is seen as desirable, yet it is not clear whether academic integrity features prominently in the education of academics themselves. We analysed source texts for postgraduate certificates in higher education (or equivalent) at UK universities. Overall, academic integrity was poorly addressed in these texts, and the language used (‘cheating’, ‘plagiarism’) was not reflective of an academic integrity-based approach. Newer issues, such as the purchasing of custom written assignments (contract cheating), were barely addressed. We conclude that the concept of academic integrity needs to be integrated into mainstream discourse around teaching in UK higher education. 相似文献