共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 328 毫秒
1.
Janet Gail Donald 《高等教育研究与发展》1988,7(1):19-36
Recent evaluations of the state of higher education have suggested that students must not only learn subject matter content but must be able to think with it. Professors in tertiary education expect that their students will come equipped to handle certain kinds of information and certain kinds of learning tasks. To describe their expectations, faculty use phrases such as the ability to think logically, or to do independent work, or to use abstract terms. But to what extent do they suppose that their students will be able to think? In a study of some learning tasks in the university, professors from three universities and six different disciplines, representatives of the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, pure and applied, were interviewed. Faculty expectations of students’ ability to think logically, independently, and abstractly were analysed to show consistencies and differences across disciplines. 相似文献
2.
阎传海 《清华大学教育研究》2009,(1)
在对人文社会科学、美国著名理工大学、著名人文社会科学学科等概念界定的基础上,利用的学科排名,对美国著名理工大学的人文社会科学特征进行了定量分析,概括出美国著名理工大学人文社会科学学科优先发展序列.根据学科结构理论,借鉴美国著名理工大学的经验,联系我国实际,结合科学教育与人文教育相融合的需要,提出了我国理工大学优先发展的人文社会科学学科. 相似文献
3.
4.
理工科大学发展人文社会科学的思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
繁荣哲学社会科学和现代高等教育的发展趋势提出了理工科大学发展人文社会科学学科的任务。理工科大学发展人文社会科学面临着一些问题,树立"人文教育与科学教育融合"的教育理念对理工科大学有着特殊的意义,理工科大学发展人文社会科学应该有自己的目标定位,特色学科和交叉学科是理工科大学发展人文社会科学的比较优势,为此理工科大学可以通过相应的思路及措施来发展人文社会科学。 相似文献
5.
理工科高校的人文社会科学的基础相对较为薄弱,如何借助理工科优势进行人文社会科学的学科交叉、发展人文社会科学成为一个亟待解决的问题。文章基于组织模式的维度和特征构建D-F模型,采用调查研究法、内容分析法分析麻省理工学院、斯坦福大学和上海交通大学人文社会科学的学科交叉的组织模式,提出思考与建议,以期对理工科高校构建特色鲜明、文理交叉的学科体系并推动人文社会科学的发展提供思路与模式借鉴。 相似文献
6.
推进文化的传承创新是我国新时期大学的神圣职责和使命。传承传统文化、创新思想文化、引领先进文化是大学完成这一职责和使命的基本要求。大学推进文化的传承创新要守护大学精神,科学定位人文社会科学的职责,充分发挥文化育人的功能,积极开展对外文化交流,展示当代中国大学风采。 相似文献
7.
The increasing importance of the competition in global university ranking has resulted in a paradigm shift in academic governance in East Asia. Many governments have introduced different strategies for benchmarking their leading universities to facilitate global competitiveness and international visibility. A major trend in the changing university governance is the emergence of a regulatory evaluation scheme for faculty research productivity, reflected by the striking features of the recent changing academic profile of publication norms and forms that go beyond the territories of nation-states in the East and West. With the expansion of the Taiwanese higher education system in the last two decades, the maintenance of quality to meet the requirements for international competitiveness has become a key concern for policy makers. Since 2005, the Ministry of Education has introduced a series of university governance policies to enhance academic excellence in universities and established a formal university evaluation policy to improve the competitiveness and international visibility of Taiwanese universities. In so doing, the government has legalized a clear link between evaluation results and public funding allocation. Research performance is assessed in terms of the number of articles published in journals indexed by the Science Citation Index (SCI), the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index and in terms of citation rates and associated factors. Therefore, evaluation has taken on a highly quantitative dimension. Despite the efforts of concerned parties to encourage academic excellence, the abovementioned quantitative evaluation indicators have resulted in bitter complaints from the humanities and social sciences, whose research accomplishments are devalued and ignored by the current quantitative indicators. In this paper, the authors describe the recent petition for collective action initiated by university faculty to protest the privileging of SSCI and SCI publications as critical indicators for academic performance regardless of faculty discipline and specialization. The article concludes its argument with a group petition calling for more diverse and reliable indicators in recognizing the research of different natures and disciplines while creating culturally responsive evaluation criteria for social sciences and humanities in the Taiwanese academe. The article not only sheds light on academic evaluation literature, especially on the uncertain paradox of globalization and market economy, but also proposes alternatives to the evaluation system for humanities and social sciences in higher education. 相似文献
8.
大学人文社会科学评鉴指标刍议 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
现阶段台湾教育部门所提出的所谓"一流大学"的考评指针,潜藏着三项特征:①完全以定量指针为准,忽视定性指针;②强调科技发展重于人文社会之研究与教学;③重视大学的研究功能远过于教学功能.虽然其具有可比较性与可操作性,但是如果彻底执行落实,则就迈向"一流大学"之目标而言,不仅如孟子所说"缘木求鱼",而且"后必有灾",因为在这些所订的指针之强力规范之下,大学教师终不能免于沦为SCI或SSCI或A＆HCI论文的生产机器,而大学的社会功能也将窄化为资本主义社会既得利益阶级后备部队的培养工厂,而大学在经济功能上也将被转化为高科技产业的研发工厂,使大学成为"有体无魂"的行尸走肉.所谓"一流大学"应有内涵包括:①一流大学应致力于知识的创新;②一流大学应参与学生生命的成长;③一流大学师生对于社会政治经济生活中的不公不义应有批判的能力与节操. 相似文献
9.
大学精神与人文学科建设关系略论 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
大学之所以为大学,不仅在于它是一种客观物的存在,更因为它是一种精神的存在,这种大学精神最重要的内涵就是其人文精神。人文精神是大学文化教育的核心,是大学的灵魂所在。构建大学的人文精神,必须加强人文科学建设。人文科学是从哲学高度对包括人文主义与人文学科在内的人文活动原理的系统研究理论。人文科学与自然科学是在现代化历史条件下分蘖出来的对立统一矛盾体,二者在当代科技与人文形势下已经趋于相互渗透与依赖。大学强化人文教育,加强人文科学建设,可采取以下几种措施:改革高等教育结构,打破文理分家、理工分校的局面;调整学科和专业设置,建立综合性的学科和专业;优化课程设置。同时还应努力营造适合大学人文精神发展的校园文化氛围,创新大学教育管理体制。 相似文献
10.
自1949年以来,中国理工科优势大学的人文社会学科发展起伏较大,先后经历了历史性的调整、缺失和重建阶段。不同性质理工科优势大学在发展人文社会学科上存在一定的差异。本文通过对理工科优势大学人文社会学科发展的形式、阶段及学科地位等方面的分析,就人文社会学科的价值问题及未来发展进行探讨。 相似文献
11.
加拿大化运动是20世纪60年代末由加拿大学术界所倡导的学术与文化民族主义运动。从1968年在卡尔顿大学兴起,到70年代意义深远的教育改革和1981年一项新的国家移民政策的制定,加拿大化运动经历了曲折的历程。它对加拿大高等教育的发展,特别是对加拿大大学的课程设置、聘任制度及其实施,以及加拿大民族主义的构建都产生了深远的影响。 相似文献
12.
大学德育过程审美文化研究论要 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
美学作为人文社会科学中的基础学科,有丰厚的基础理论,形成一批成熟的部门美学。与大学德育科学有密切关系的有审美学、审美教育学、教育美学等部门美学学科。大学德育学吸收美学研究的理论成果,大学德育施行过程中借鉴审美实践,会较好地优化和提升大学德育过程,促进大学德育过程审美化进程,切实保证和提高大学德育质量。 相似文献
13.
Gerard Dericks Edmund Thompson Margaret Roberts Florence Phua 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(7):1053-1068
Understanding the determinants of PhD student satisfaction is likely to become increasingly vital for universities as student satisfaction rankings already ubiquitous at undergraduate and master degree levels extend more broadly to the PhD level. Moreover, as PhD student populations and university competition become increasingly transnational, there is a growing need to understand cross-nationally common determinants of satisfaction. Building on prior research into PhD student satisfaction, and drawing upon relevant conceptual and metrical refinements in the measurement of satisfaction from cognate domains of psychology, we use cross-sectional data (N?=?409) from PhD candidates across the sciences, social sciences and humanities in 63 universities from 20 countries to examine how overall PhD student satisfaction is determined by, respectively and in combination, supervisor, department and peer-group, in terms of both their academic qualities and supportiveness. Taken together, we find that supervisor supportiveness is the greatest predictor of PhD student satisfaction, but that supervisor academic qualities have no significant effect. However, both the academic qualities and supportiveness of departments significantly predict PhD student satisfaction, suggesting university departments and PhD supervisors would ideally work jointly, and perhaps more closely than many currently do, to achieve competitive levels of PhD student satisfaction. 相似文献
14.
AbstractBy any metric, the twentieth century university was a successful institution. However, in the twenty-first century, ongoing neoliberal educational reform has been accompanied by a growing epistemological crisis in the meaning and value of the humanities and social sciences (HaSS). Concerns have been expressed in two main forms. The governors of tertiary education systems—governments, private investors, university managers and consultancy firms—have focused on how HaSS can adapt to the perceived research needs of the 21st century. At the same time, a competing set of discourses has been generated by scholars and researchers employed within the critical HaSS themselves. This article considers what these differing perspectives mean for reconceptualising HaSS for the twenty-first century. After surveying the contemporary climate, this article examines the findings of key reports on the future of the humanities from the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Alongside those of Western Europe, these university systems are arguably the key drivers for the global university system. It is argued that these reports provide an opportunity for emerging universities to reflect on their research priorities and developmental strategies. The article concludes with some reflections on the wider consequences of the globalising of the university system, the increase of China's influence in Asia, and ponders the prospect of post-human/ist futures of the humanities. 相似文献
15.
张晓军 《渭南师范学院学报》2014,(7):67-70,96
高校学报特色栏目的“特色”是指栏目研究对象的差异．高校学报是主办高校服务社会的主要方式之一．在网络出版条件下,要有效发挥地方本科高校社科学报服务社会的职能,就应当实现学报的特色化．学报特色化是指整体特色化．学报特色化对于社会的学科发展、社会进步以及学报自身和主办高校发展都具有重要意义．实现学报特色化的途径包括设置学科性和应用性栏目,以特色栏目占据学报,坚持质量第一的原则,主办高校支持． 相似文献
16.
论综合性大学医学教育面临的发展机遇 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
季明春 《扬州大学学报(高教研究版)》2004,8(3):46-48
医学院校加盟综合性大学，改变了过去大学单纯以文理科为支撑的局面，同时给我国医学教育发展带来了良机。如何将医学教育有机地融入综合性大学，发挥综合性大学的优势，不断发展医学教育，需要我们正确认识综合性大学医学教育所面临的发展机遇。 相似文献
17.
Kwok Keung Ho 《Higher Education》1998,36(2):195-208
Academics in Hong Kong universities are urged to increase their research output. This article investigates the measurement of publication outputs among the three faculties of business, education, humanities & social sciences in the six universities of Hong Kong. Data were collected from the 1990–95 annual reports of research and publication outputs of each university. In order to have a fair comparison of publication outputs of each academic, rank, faculty and university, a framework was developed from practical experience and from literature to investigate the problem. Results indicate that the publication outputs of academics in Hong Kong were about the same as other countries in many aspects. Pressing academics for more research publications may raise the figure in the start, but would not necessarily increase the output in the long run. 相似文献
18.
19.
Nick Forster 《Journal of Further & Higher Education》2018,42(8):1025-1039
This article explains why there are so few world-class universities in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region today. It first summarises the systemic exogenous economic, political and social problems facing all countries in the region, and the impact of these on the development of their higher education sectors in recent times. Then, with reference to the Times Higher Education and Webometrics rankings of the world’s leading universities, the article describes several endogenous explanations for the absence of world-class universities in the 19 countries of the MENA region. These include the lack of strategic investment in research and teaching in local universities; the absence of intellectual freedom and the constraints imposed on the free expression of ideas in all MENA universities; the failure of universities in the region to encourage, monitor and reward high-quality and high-impact research (and teaching) in the natural and social sciences, the humanities and the liberal arts; and the anti-scientific mind-sets of local ruling political elites, many Islamic theologians, and those who are responsible for the oversight and administration of universities in the region. The limitations of this exploratory study and suggestions for future research are then described. The article concludes by explaining why it is highly unlikely that the political and educational leadership of countries in the MENA region will initiate the institutional higher education reforms that would be required to build world-class research-teaching universities in the foreseeable future. 相似文献
20.
Much has been studied regarding university reforms and their impacts on scientific development worldwide. This paper aims to enrich current perspectives on university reform by developing a distinct concept of social science development in the context of the emergence of academic social sciences in Indonesia. Using a bibliometric method, this paper finds a significant increase in the volume of international scientific publications focusing on socio-economic and political issues. However, two issues that presently color the landscape of social scientific publications are the bifurcation of academic dependencies and limited extension of Western social theories. The future of the social sciences in Indonesia will be determined by interrelationships between the state, universities, and networks of academics who can address the former issue and ensure that academics publish in mainstream international journals emphasizing the prominence of the latter. In doing so, the social sciences will have the potential to improve future university teaching and engagement in public policymaking in Indonesia. 相似文献