共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
简述了多媒体网络电子期刊的发展,现已查询到科学技术类多媒体网络电子期刊8大类约200种。论述了多媒体网络电子期刊的优势,即免费全文与易获取优势、多媒体优势、互动交流优势、低成本和发行优势、资金支持优势、广告传播优势。介绍了多媒体网络电子期刊的下载和利用,如在线阅读利用、离线阅读利用、复合阅读利用及多媒体网络电子期刊的阅读使用。 相似文献
2.
国内外纯网络电子期刊的比较分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
对评价纯网络电子期刊的各种指标进行了概述,并在此基础上对国内外具有代表性的纯网络电子期刊《中国科技论文在线精品论文》和《D—LibMagazine》进行了比较评价分析,总结出我国在发展网络电子期刊上的一些优势和不足。 相似文献
3.
期刊网络化是期刊在网络上出版、发行,并通过网络向用户提供远程或本地在线浏览、在线拷贝、网络传真和电子邮件等服务的一种形式。目前,我国的期刊网络化尚不发达,要加速发展,需做到以下四点。 相似文献
4.
网络电子期刊出版模式及其对传统期刊的挑战 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
总结了网络电子期刊3种类型9种形式的出版模式,分析了网络电子期刊出版模式对传统期刊稿件组织、编辑出版和管理监督的十大挑战. 相似文献
5.
每个人对期刊都有一个模糊的认识,但极少有精到的见解。本对期刊进行这样的定义：“一份以本为主的公开出版物,该出版物定期发布新的内容,并一直有意这么做下去”。而数字期刊的到来,则扩展了期刊的内涵;它们包括纸质杂志的精选本及不同的版本;评论同行的学术杂志;在线报纸;为商业决策人而出版的微型精品电子过期刊物或分 相似文献
6.
网络电子期刊的出版 ,在理论上有 3种模式 :跨学科的出版系统 ,单一学科的网络电子出版 ,期刊的分解出版。一个理想的网络电子期刊出版框架应是基于一个管理文章、用户信息、专家评审信息和读者评论信息的Web数据库系统。参考文献 7。 相似文献
7.
网络电子期刊后台管理系统的设计 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
通过对期刊网络出版的技术与管理现状分析 ,设计了期刊网络出版的后台管理系统 ,并提出了该系统应该具备的系统级功能和工作级功能 ,以及实现该系统的技术手段和技术途径 ,进而展示该系统对于网络电子期刊的工作流程、网站维护、网站管理、信息发布的作用。 相似文献
8.
期刊网络品牌的保护与推广 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
与刊名对应的域名、网站名、网站LO-GO、智能化服务以及网络声誉构成期刊重要的网络品牌资源.传统出版资源与网络出版资源优势互补,注册和保护域名、网站名,创新数字出版模式,开展期刊网络化、数字化服务,有利于弘扬期刊品牌,提高期刊的国际知名度与市场竞争力. 相似文献
9.
科技期刊网络出版与发行问题探讨 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
通过分析网络出版的不同形式 ,提出网上刊登论文文摘是现阶段期刊网络出版的较好形式 ;针对论文网络检索的需要 ,研究了实现论文检索的技术和方法 ;通过介绍期刊网络订购发行 ,指出未来的期刊发行将以论文单印本的形式实现 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
以媒介融合为背景,分析科技期刊传统传播模式与网络传播模式日渐融合的趋势,提出了科技期刊以编辑出版为核心,建构OTO(online to offline)融合传播模式,即"线上到线下模式",使传统模式与网络深度融合,促进科技期刊的发展与传播。 相似文献
13.
14.
Andrew Berin 《Learned Publishing》2002,15(2):109-112
15.
PURPOSE: The research sought to determine the impact of online journals on the use of print journals and interlibrary loan (ILL). SETTING: The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria is a regional site of the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Library with a print journal collection of approximately 400 titles. Since 1999, UIC site licenses have given students and faculty affiliated with UIC-Peoria access to more than 4,000 online full-text journal titles through the Internet. METHODOLOGY: The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria has conducted a journal-use study over an extended period of time. The information collected from this study was used to assess the impact of 104 online journals, added to the collection in January 1999, on the use of print journals. RESULTS: Results of the statistical analysis showed print journal usage decreased significantly since the introduction of online journals (F(1,147) = 12.10, P < 0.001). This decrease occurred regardless of whether a journal was available only in print or both online and in print. Interlibrary loan requests have also significantly decreased since the introduction of online journals (F(2,30) = 4.46, P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in use of the print collection suggests that many patrons prefer to access journals online. The negative impact the online journals have had on the use of the journal titles available only in print suggests users may be compromising quality for convenience when selecting journal articles. Possible implications for collection development are discussed. 相似文献
16.
Sandra L De Groote Mary Shultz Marceline Doranski 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2005,93(2):223-228
PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine the impact of online journals on the citation patterns of medical faculty. This study looked at whether researchers were more likely to limit the resources they consulted and cited to those journals available online rather than those only in print. SETTING: Faculty publications from the college of medicine at a large urban university were examined for this study. The faculty publications from a regional medical college of the same university were also examined in the study. The number of online journals available for faculty, staff, and students at this institution has increased from an initial core of 15 online journals in 1998 to over 11,000 online journals in 2004. METHODOLOGY: Searches by author affiliation were performed in the Web of Science to find all articles written by faculty members in the college of medicine at the selected institution. Searches were conducted for the following years: 1993, 1996, 1999, and 2002. Cited references from each faculty-authored article were recorded, and the corresponding cited journals were coded into four categories based on their availability at the institution in this study: print only, print and online, online only, and not owned. Results were analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The number of journals cited per year continued to increase from 1993 to 2002. The results did not indicate that researchers were more likely to cite online journals or were less likely to cite journals only in print. At the regional location where the number of print-only journals was minimal, use of the print-only journals did decrease in 2002, although not significantly. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: It is possible that electronic access to information (i.e., online databases) has had a positive impact on the number of articles faculty will cite. Results of this study suggest, at this point, that faculty are still accessing the print-only collection, at least for research purposes, and are therefore not sacrificing quality for convenience. 相似文献
17.
18.
Since the emergence of the world’s first academic journal in 1665, numerous academic journals have been launched and ceased publication. At the turn of the twenty-first century, academic journals are experiencing a dramatic revolution amidst increasingly fierce competition. However, limited research has investigated the survival pattern and the reasons why some academic journals have survived and others have not. Drawing on the data of academic journals in Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory from 1950 to 2013, this study examined the life cycle of academic journals and revealed contributing factors related to the survival probabilities of academic journals using a Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank statistics, Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching. The results show that (1) the average survival rate of all the academic journals presents a rising-decreasing-rising pattern; (2) the third year after commencement is a peak year for academic journals to cease publication; (3) academic journals published in the UK, China, India and Russia, those in the field of technology, and those published in a single language cease publication sooner than their counterparts; (4) academic journals that provide online formats at launch time have a higher probability of surviving than non-online ones and those that provide online formats after launch time; (5) academic journals that provide print versions at launch time are more likely to survive than those without print formats and those that provide print formats after launch time; (6) academic journals that have a peer-reviewed process and that are published in multiple languages have a higher chance of survival; (7) academic journals published in English in China and Japan suffer a higher risk of termination than those published in native languages; (8) academic journals in the field of technology are more likely to cease publication than journals in the field of natural science; and (9) academic journals published in China can survive with a relatively high probability. 相似文献
19.
Obst O 《Health information and libraries journal》2003,20(1):22-32
This study in an academic medical sciences library setting examines the correlation of usage of a matched set of print and online titles, the validity of e-journals usage statistics and the impact of online journals on print journal usage. The print and online usage was determined for 270 journals, both versions of which were available. Print usage was determined annually since 1997 using the reshelving and the error-copies method. Online usage statistics were delivered by five publishers and corrected for redundant multiple accesses. Print journal usage decreased by 22.3 and 30.2% respectively over each of 2 years after the introduction of online journals. Journals published both in print and online lost 30.4% of their print usage within 2 years. The total loss of usage of print-only titles in the same period was somewhat higher, at 45.8%. The average correlation between online and print usage is 0.60 and 0.67 respectively. For the examined titles, users accessed the online versions ten times as often as the print version. Two clearly distinguishable groupings emerged: while with Academic Press and Elsevier, e-journal usage exceeded print usage by a factor of 3 or 4, the e-journals of Blackwell, HighWire and Springer were used on average 14.6 times as frequently as the corresponding print journals. Each usage of a print article cost 2.79-50.82 Euro, each usage of an online article 0.31-15.10 Euro, depending on the publisher. On average, the usage of an online article was 5.4 times cheaper. Within 2-3 years the usage of online journals has outstripped that of print titles by a factor of ten, but the specific spectrum of usage remains much the same as when only print journals alone existed. Print titles not available online suffer a greater decline in usage compared with print/online journals. This confirms that what is read or purchased is determined primarily by ease of access and that there is a steady tendency to reduce the multiplicity of access modes to a manageable few. The availability of journals online seems to have created a new clientele, at least in the case of the German-language Springer journals. The connection between supplier and supply is much less clear with e-journals than it is with print titles. Therefore it is very important to stress and encourage the role of the library as the supplier of this sort of information in the university environment. Collection building issues are discussed in the light of the results. 相似文献
20.
介绍国外一些重要学术期刊在其网络版上添加在线辅助信息的情况.在线辅助信息是对论文内容的一种有益补充,有助于提高论文的完整性和完美程度,也有助于监督学术诚信.还没有在网站上发现我国有此类内容的中文科技期刊,仅有个别的英文版期刊有此内容,应该引起我国期刊界的重视.对在线辅助信息的一般编排规范和我国期刊界应该采取的措施做了探讨. 相似文献