共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
为探索科技期刊集群化运营模式,以中国煤炭学会煤炭领域精品科技期刊刊群建设实践为例,介绍了煤炭领域科技期刊的基本情况,阐述了当前刊群建设的主要进展：设立了期刊出版部、学术期刊工作委员会和新媒体事业部;推动建设了行业第一个期刊集群化数字出版平台——中国煤炭行业知识服务平台。并详细阐述了主要建设成果和下一步的工作思路：实施“煤炭精品期刊建设工程”,增强行业期刊凝聚力;加大“煤炭领域精品科技期刊刊群”新刊吸纳力度,扩大刊群规模;加大“中国煤炭行业知识服务平台”创新力度,推动期刊由信息服务向知识服务转型;打造共同发展、合作共赢的集群运营模式,以期建立起一套与“煤炭领域精品科技期刊刊群”发展相适应的集群运营模式、管理机制和实施路径。 相似文献
6.
2018年的研究数据显示,无论是在发表数量上还是在引用数量上,我国的科技论文都已处于世界前列水平,但是我国科技期刊发展水平却相对滞后。细致研究国际科技期刊发展的运作模式和成功经验,其无论是严格的编审制度、数字技术的应用,还是专业化的定位、产品集群化的发展,都对我国科技期刊发展具有重要的借鉴意义。 相似文献
7.
8.
为打造煤炭精品期刊群,实现50余种煤炭科技期刊协同高质量发展,中煤炭学会自2015年以来,加强期刊发展顶层设计和系统谋划,成立了学术期刊工作委员会,带领刊群在期刊集群化管理探索、办刊模式创新、刊物质量提升、数字出版传播平台建设;促进行业学术交流,密切与学术共同体的关系,吸引优秀人才加入办刊队伍,提升期刊科技服务能力、培养优秀编辑人才等方面开展了大量工作。经过7年的建设,煤炭科技期刊集群化建设已初具成效,在团结科技期刊编辑出版工作者,推动科技期刊事业发展,整体提升刊群学术影响力等方面取得了实效,为做大做强煤炭期刊集群奠定了坚实的基础。 相似文献
9.
随着国家对科技期刊建设的重视,中国科技期刊正迎来快速发展的重大机遇,在学习国际科技期刊出版先进方法的同时,需要从中国的现实国情和科研需求出发进行规划和采取措施.本文结合国家已经推出的各项政策,尝试对当前中国科技期刊建设的原则和重大措施进行探讨.中国科技期刊应该坚持社会效益第一,以促进学术交流为目标,以提高所发表论文水平和加强论文传播力度为抓手,立足国情走中国特色期刊发展道路,迫切需要建立良好科研氛围,集中力量建设公益性的统一数字化知识服务平台,因刊施策实现差异化发展. 相似文献
10.
11.
Masoud Negahdary 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2017,33(4):456-470
The importance of identifying high quality journals in order to publish scientific achievements is very essential and unavoidable task. In this study, identifying the quality of journals and publishers were introduced and described which can be used as a comprehensive and global training for users and eliminate the challenges in distinguishing high quality journals from poor-quality journals. The authors are considered as the main pillars for journals and publishers progress; aware and conscious authors in identifying offered quality features by journals and publishers are the most important item in order to stop and remove poor-quality journals. Implementation and adherence to the quality principles by journals and publishers will ensure the international progress in scientific researches and publication fields. 相似文献
12.
在互联网和媒体融合快速发展的今天,传统的编辑职能在科技期刊出版中仍然发挥着直接的、主要的作用.编辑工作者必须遵循科技期刊编辑出版工作的规律,以严肃的职业态度、严谨的科学精神、严格的用稿程序勤奋工作,并且在编辑工作实践中做到研究数据真实、标准规范落实、编校功力扎实,为社会提供高质量的科技期刊,为加快我国由出版大国迈向出版强国的步伐做出应有的贡献. 相似文献
13.
The journal impact factor (JIF) has been questioned considerably during its development in the past half-century because of its inconsistency with scholarly reputation evaluations of scientific journals. This paper proposes a publication delay adjusted impact factor (PDAIF) which takes publication delay into consideration to reduce the negative effect on the quality of the impact factor determination. Based on citation data collected from Journal Citation Reports and publication delay data extracted from the journals’ official websites, the PDAIFs for journals from business-related disciplines are calculated. The results show that PDAIF values are, on average, more than 50% higher than JIF results. Furthermore, journal ranking based on PDAIF shows very high consistency with reputation-based journal rankings. Moreover, based on a case study of journals published by ELSEVIER and INFORMS, we find that PDAIF will bring a greater impact factor increase for journals with longer publication delay because of reducing that negative influence. Finally, insightful and practical suggestions to shorten the publication delay are provided. 相似文献
14.
不同文种"一稿两投"的国际规范及我国应采取的编辑政策 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
就生物医学论文以不同的文种、在不同的国家再次发表的行业国际规范进行调研,认定同一论文以不同的文种在国内外生物医学期刊上相继发表不属于国际生物医学期刊界违反版权法和科学道德的一稿多投行为.提出为了既有利于扩大我国高水平的生物医学科研成果在国际上的影响,又能使这些成果在国内学术期刊上有所反映,满足国内广大读者的需要, 可以将在国际生物医学期刊上发表的英文论文以中文全文再次发表在国内生物医学期刊上, 或以"述评""摘要"等多种形式在国内生物医学期刊上予以介绍.然而中文全文的再次发表必须是有选择的、有比例的,同时必须满足国际规范的各项规定和要求. 相似文献
15.
16.
在当今我国建设世界一流科技期刊的大环境下,一些高校学报积极行动,抓住机遇、准确定位、努力提升办刊质量。《华南农业大学学报》(以下简称《学报》)以内容为王、立足学校的优势学科为抓手,以服务学校的学科建设和人才培养为目的,近年来在专题(栏)策划方面积极探索,成功地出版了多个专题,提升了《学报》的办刊质量。本文总结了《学报》近年来专题(栏)策划出版的成功案例。结果表明:专题出版集中展示了某一学科的科研成果,促进了学科建设和人才培养;高质量专题拓展了《学报》优质稿源,有助于解决期刊优质稿源缺乏的问题和困境,提升了办刊质量。专题的出版不仅提高了期刊学术影响力,也吸引了读者和作者的关注,提升了后续的来稿质量,是提高办刊质量的有效途径。 相似文献
17.
为了解国内医学期刊的优先数字出版情况,选择中华医学会161种系列杂志(其中中华系列96种)为调查对象,对这些杂志在中华医学会杂志社优秀科研成果优先出版平台上的优先出版情况进行调查分析。结果显示,自创建以来,虽然该平台优先出版的论文总数仅为40篇,出版的频率也较低,但是论文质量较高,发表意义较大。其中,新型冠状病毒肺炎专题论文优先出版后在万方数据库的总被引频次高达1 476次。中华系列31篇论文的篇均优先出版时滞为66 d,与国内外优先出版相比,优先出版时滞过长。建议从进一步缩短优先出版时滞,提升编辑业务能力,优化管理和评价体制等方面来提升医学期刊的优先出版水平。 相似文献
18.
变相重复发表--一种值得科技期刊界关注的现象 总被引：7，自引：3，他引：4
变相重复发表与传统意义的一稿两投和二次发表不同,由于来自期刊、编辑、审稿人、作者、版权、读者等诸多因素的影响,显得更加隐蔽.在总结变相重复发表的5种主要类型的基础上,分析其可能产生的危害,剖析产生此类现象的原因,提出了关于减少并杜绝此类现象发生的建议. 相似文献
19.
Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh Muzammil Tahira A. Abrizah 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2017,33(4):421-432
Over the years, the number of journals indexed in Scopus has increased, although it varies significantly between countries. The increasing proportion of international journals of a country provides new venues for papers from that country to be seen by other researchers worldwide. In this work, we evaluate the relationship of a country’s scientific performance or publication success with both its journals’ quantity and quality. The specific objective of the study is to identify the relationship between the country’s publication success and the quantity and quality of those country’s journals indexed in Scopus during 2005–2014. The publication success of 102 individual countries, measured by their scientific productivity, impact and collaboration indicators, the quantity of country’s Scopus-indexed journals in 2014 (a total of 22,581 journals) as well as the quantity of its journals were investigated. Scopus-indexed journals are predominantly from Western Europe (48.9%) and North America (27.7%), with the United States and the United Kingdom dominate with a total 51%. The contribution from the peripheral countries is comparatively small, however there are a good number of contributions from the South-East Asian countries. Estonia is the fastest growing country in terms of having indexed journals in Scopus, following by Iran and Malaysia. Among the studied indices, it was found that publication success (total publications and total citations) of 102 countries are strongly correlated with quantity (number of indexed journals and number of documents published in indexed journals) and quality (citations per paper, SJR, h-index, CiteScore and SNIP) indicators of country’s journals. We can conclude that the scientific productivity of a country depend critically on the number of journals indexed from that country in citation databases. The study provides a context with which the relative success of publications can be assessed, yielding new insights into the scientific impact of individual countries and the performance of journals that they published. 相似文献