共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
机构知识库:学术交流与资源共享新模式 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
机构知识库能提供一个长久保存科研成果的学术交流平台,通过机构内数字内容和资产长期保存和管理,实现资源的共享和开放获取,是数字学术环境中一种新的资源存储形式和服务方式.本文概述了机构知识库的定义及特点,分析机构知识库在数字学术环境下对学术交流与资源共享的作用,并提出需要解决的问题.参考文献11. 相似文献
2.
李霞 《中国科技资源导刊》2009,41(6)
概述机构知识库产生的背景和含义,分析学术机构构建机构知识库的作用,探讨目前机构知识库构建中存在的问题,并提出构建机构知识库中可以采用的策略.认为机构知识库是由学术机构建立的,用于收录并长期保存机构内部所产生的各种数字学术资源和某些相关的外部资源,按照开放标准与相应的互操作协议,供机构内外用户开放荻取,进行交流、工作的数据库服务平台.机构知识库是数字学术环境中基于开放理念、以用户为中心的一种新的学术资源组织形式和学术交流方式. 相似文献
3.
李霞 《中国科技资源导刊 (中国信息导报)》2009,(6):47-52
概述机构知识库产生的背景和含义,分析学术机构构建机构知识库的作用,探讨目前机构知识库构建中存在的问题,并提出构建机构知识库中可以采用的策略。认为机构知识库是由学术机关建立的,用于收入并长期保存机构内部所产生的各种数字学术资源和某些相关的外部资源,按照开放标准与相应的互操作协议,供机构内外用户开放获取,进行交流、工作的数据库服务平台。机构知识库是数字学术环境中给予开放理念、以用户为中心的一种新的学术资源组织形式和学术交流方式。 相似文献
4.
李楠楠 《图书馆理论与实践》2012,(10)
科研人员作为机构知识库的目标用户群体,其工作需求的满足应成为机构知识库设计的指导原则.科研人员工作需求包括科研成果长期保存需求、科研成果开放获取需求、学术成果追新需求、学术价值肯定需求、学术交流需求5个方面.不论是机构知识库数字学术资源收藏标准的制定,抑或是机构知识库服务功能的设计都必须基于这5点需求而进行. 相似文献
5.
机构知识库建设机制探析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
机构知识库是在开放获取的环境下产生的一种以学术机构为轴心的数字资源集合,从国内外机构库建设的实践来看,技术已不再是关键问题,相关政策和相应的支撑机制乃是机构知识库得以持续、健康发展的根本。该文分析了机构知识库建设的战略机制、组织机制、政策机制、管理服务机制、激励机制和技术机制。 相似文献
6.
[目的/意义]从阐释数字学术的基本问题到进一步对比数字学术服务的内容特点,以期为图书馆及出版机构的研究者与从业者理解、探索、推进数字学术服务提供理论和实践两个维度的现实参考。[方法/过程]首先采用系统综述方法梳理数字学术概念内涵的现有研究概貌,展示数字学术对不同学科领域产生的影响和改变,并呈现连接图书馆、出版机构与数字学术活动的主要方式。然后,采用比较研究方法对15所图书馆2017年和2022年数字学术服务的名称与形式、内容及分类、框架要素、组织形式等进行对比分析。此外,采用比较研究方法对图书馆和出版机构数字学术服务的内容与形式进行对比分析。[结果/结论]人们对数字学术的认识已经相对清晰,数字学术内容丰富、影响多样,其核心在于数字技术赋能;图书馆和出版机构的数字学术服务角色源于传承和争取。从2017年到2022年,图书馆数字学术服务的名称与形式、内容及分类的整体情况有变化但不明显,个体图书馆的变化较大;图书馆与出版机构的数字学术服务在内容上互为补充、在形式上各有特色;数字学术及数字学术服务将在数字技术的驱动下持续发展。 相似文献
7.
机构知识库建设及其法律问题研究 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
机构知识库（IR）是学术机构为捕获并保存机构的智力成果而建立的面向机构和社区的数字资源库。本文主要探讨国内外机构知识库建设的发展情况,以及我国在建设机构知识库中的法律问题及法律政策。 相似文献
8.
9.
学术图书馆中的机构知识库 总被引：16，自引：0，他引：16
介绍机构知识库的概念及其创建意义，并分析创建机构知识库过程中所面临的问题;探讨创建机构知识库的工具、机构知识库的服务模式等问题，目的是使学术图书馆积极适应信息技术的转变，以稳固其知识交流中心的地位。 相似文献
10.
在新的学术信息交流环境下,机构知识库需要提升服务功能,为科研用户提供更多的增值服务。分析了新一代机构知识库应具有的基本架构和主要功能服务。在此基础上,利用关联数据关键技术,解决新一代机构知识库的功能实现问题,从而为机构知识库实现个性化、知识化的增值服务提供有效途径,进一步推动机构知识库发展和学术资源的开放共享。 相似文献
11.
This paper examines changing research practices in the digital environment. A review of the literature and our own field research in Australia suggest that there is a new mode of knowledge production emerging, changing research practices and bringing new information access and dissemination needs. Adjustments will be required to accommodate these changes, but new opportunities are emerging for more cost‐effective and sustainable information access and dissemination. It will be necessary, however, to take an holistic approach and treat the creation, production and distribution of scholarly information, the management of information rights and access, systems of review and evaluation and the underlying infrastructure as parts of a single research information and scholarly communication system. 相似文献
12.
In the current information environment, libraries need to leverage on the latest digital technologies as well as the traditional paper technologies towards building practical digital libraries and electronic information systems. Digital libraries built exclusively out of nascent electronic publications such as e-journals, e-books, e-reference works (Web-based training programs, computer-based training programs, etc.), digital scholarly works (monographs, etc. in the public domain) and digitized documents conforming to standard digital formats are proving to be an uphill and unfinished task. Perhaps this could be the major reason why the start-success-finish ratio of most of the digital library initiatives, particularly initiated by isolated/individual libraries, is still left at alarmingly low numbers. We find the motivational and emotional bonding among the stakeholders melting down eventually as the digital library development process gets fired up. There are a host of problems the enthusiastic library fraternity face in their digital library development endeavours starting from copyright issues, technology complexities, infrastructure threats, diverse publication types, multiplicity of digital object formats and above all the publishers’ stringent policies and monopolies. It is therefore essential that the libraries adopt necessary strategies towards developing digital libraries from the lessons learnt. The monolithic and all-in-one-container approach is no longer feasible and no more advocated. It is imperative on the part of the information professional to have a componentized and a multi-system approach to knowledge technologies and information management. Seamless aggregation and meticulous integration of diverse datastreams, embracing the print as well as the electronic information, is the most appropriate strategy to be adopted and applied. This paper shares Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode's experience in creating a state-of-art digital library information system by seamlessly integrating and aggregating the print as well as the diverse and distributed digital content penetrating into its knowledge domain. The paper highlights significant features of IIMK's digital information system—the content aggregation and the content integration strategies we adopted for designing a scholarship Web portal and developing a digital library using the ‘Greenstone’ open source digital library software. The paper also highlights the role of libraries in promoting open access by setting up scholarly institutional repositories (IR). In summary, today's digital library information system is to be seen from a much wider and more holistic perspective, and provided with a much broadened meaning to hold and put together all the print, digital and electronic information available and accessible to the library. 相似文献
13.
在开放数字网络环境下,学术交流的内涵发生了极大的扩展和变化。以开放存取理念和Web2．0技术应用为主导的新型学术信息交流模式和环境已经极大地改变了传统意义上的学术交流生态。学术交流系统得到重构,非正式学术交流渠道开始复兴,支撑数字科研的学术交流体系正在形成。 相似文献
14.
15.
Beth E. Tumbleson 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(3):224-234
Academic librarians engage students in the learning management system to provide information literacy instruction and answer individual reference questions related to scholarly research. When collaborating with faculty, embedded librarians deliver the library’s authoritative electronic resources to students working on research projects. Trends in academic publishing and technological innovations make possible online search for a generation reliant on mobile devices. Although students are able to access much digital content available through academic libraries and open access initiatives, they still appreciate guidance from embedded librarians who visit their learning management system courses to explain the complexities of scholarly research and suggest solutions. 相似文献
16.
Amy J. KIRCHHOFF 《Learned Publishing》2008,21(4):285-294
The research of the future requires access to the research of the past. This access cannot be assured without reliable long‐term preservation of scholarly digital content. Near‐term access can be guaranteed with backup and access system redundancy. Mid‐term access can be protected with byte replication. But assurance of long‐term access requires digital preservation – the series of management policies and activities necessary to ensure the enduring usability, authenticity, discoverability, and accessibility of content over the very long term. Portico, with a mission to preserve scholarly digital content, is one organization providing such long‐term digital preservation. 相似文献
17.
Simeon Warner 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(3):177-185
Recent debate on the reform of scholarly communication has focused on access issues. Although important, access is only one dimension in which the scholarly process can be transformed. Scholars are embracing highly collaborative and data‐intensive standards of practice influenced by powerful computing and network technologies. This dramatic transformation of scholarship demands a natively digital, network‐based scholarly communication system that is able to capture the scholarly record, make it accessible, and preserve it over time. I will offer a technological perspective on how these demands might be met. 相似文献
18.
论述建设数字化学术资源中心的必要性和信息产业的发展与数字化学术资源中心的关系。认为建设数字化学术资源中心的目标是:建设图书馆统一资源门户,提供参考链接扩展服务,实现多种元数据格式的管理,开展文献传递和馆际互借服务,并分析与介绍国内外为实现上述目标已取得的技术成果。 相似文献
19.
GOOGLE学术搜索工具及其在我馆的应用 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
分析了Google学术搜索在学术资源服务体系中的积极作用。Google学术搜索继承了Google的优点,吸引了大批用户。它基本上可以正确地甄别资源的学术性,在搜索的效果方面也有不错的表现,在弥补图书馆对公开获取资源的资源服务方面,起到很好的补充作用。但是也有不足之处。比如没有考虑用户的资源环境,不能很好地解决“合适版本”的问题,不能避免用户的无效链接现象。最后介绍了北京师范大学图书馆对Google学术搜索的理解和实际应用的做法。以及通过参加Library Link计划,将Google学术搜索成功纳入图书馆学术资源服务体系的成功案例。最后的统计数字说明Google学术搜索在该校起到了很好的资源服务作用。 相似文献
20.
Christine Baldwin 《Learned Publishing》2002,15(3):165-174
The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) is currently developing a new electronic information environment that will revolutionize how users at academic institutions discover and access scholarly material. This new information environment will provide seamless and integrated access to national and local collections, including content licensed from publishers. This article describes the reasons why the new information environment is being developed, how it will work, and why publishers should find out more. 相似文献