共查询到10条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
针对目前学界存在的对文件连续体理论的一些误读,本文系统梳理和阐释了文件连续体理论的核心概念、产生背景、主要内容及其应用,指出文件连续体理论是在澳大利亚基于证据和连续体的文件管理思想、文件系列体系思想的基础上,借鉴后保管主义及结构化理论建构的后现代主义文件保管的新范式。它强调文件并非是中立物,文件的运动具有时空延伸性。该理论的终极诉求是建立一个自下而上的、可靠的文件保存体系,以完整保存集体记忆,促进社会民主发展。要实现这一诉求,文件的保存就需多方主体的参与和合作。文件连续体理论为文件管理提供了重要的理论框架,对建构完整的社会记忆具有重要的指导价值,同时也为对传统档案学的核心概念及理论进行批判性反思提供新的视角和工具。 相似文献
2.
Ilerbaig J 《美国档案工作者》2010,73(2):463-482
For the past two decades, scholars in archival science have begun to question traditional assumptions about the nature of the record. Drawing on theories from fields such as sociology, organization theory, and science studies, and on their own ethnographic studies, they propose more inclusive definitions and widening the contexts of analysis of record making and recordkeeping. This paper continues this critical consideration of the concept of record by examining the nature of nonprototypical records in the scientific world. The paper focuses on the system of specimens and field notes established by biologist Joseph Grinnell at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (University of California, Berkeley) as a means of examining several aspects of the nature of the scientific record: materiality, representation, and the triad evidence/memory/accountability. Focusing on the creation and management of these scientific records, the paper argues that further analyses of scientific record making and recordkeeping are bound to benefit both scientific work, which depends more and more on databases and archives, as well as archival science, which is becoming more relevant beyond its traditional realm of the legal/business/administrative world. 相似文献
3.
Håkan Lövblad 《Archival Science》2003,3(2):131-155
The contextual approach gives the impression that we are moving into the 21st century with three competing scientific traditions
of interpretation. Another understanding is the systemic view, which indicates a paradigm with complementing traditions of
interpretation, depending on ontological level. The paradigm of archival science is, like that of many other sciences, influenced
by positivism, systems theory and hermeneutics. The relevance of the paradigm depends on personal beliefs. The hermeneutic
understanding of archival science emphasizes the context and deconstructs central concepts. Hermeneutics emphasizes the influence
of conceptual changes and technological advances on perception. Hermeneutics stresses the need for a socio-cultural and historical
orientation of archival science. The positivistic tradition is coloured by the myths about an ideal science. This is reflected
firstly in the analogy comparing archives with nature, and secondly in the deductive method. Positivism is instrumental in
its demands for distinct definitions of concepts and its insistence on the record as the basis of archival science. The flexibility
of systems theory highlights the complex relations between context and record. Systems theory can, at its best, serve as a
meeting-place for researchers, archivists and users and accordingly form the basis for new knowledge and theory formation.
Systems theory enables a materialistic/dialectic epistemology based in reality and inspired by other relevant sciences. The
result may be the foundation of a systemic-functionalist archival science with activities, records creation and evidential
values in focus. 相似文献
4.
传统的档案及其学术起源说本质是一种修辞表征,不仅存在演绎逻辑混乱,还将学科发展路径固限于记录及其载体的方向。档案学研究的起点应该为包括管理活动在内的社会实践之记录、资源和要素,因而须从档案的内容、载体和管理三个方向推进研究,并以档案的管理作为研究重心。 相似文献
5.
Helen R. Tibbo 《Archival Science》2006,6(2):231-245
Archivists in North America have described, discussed, and debated the necessary and optimal content, configuration, and venue
for archival education for close to a century but have given little consideration to integrating technology within archival
curricula. Increasingly, archivists are faced with a high tech world in which they must understand issues including information
systems, the nature of electronic records and databases, record migration, digitization, and web design and creation for provision
of access. This paper explores the nature and extent of information technology and information science coursework and knowledge
discussed in the Society of American Archivists’ Guidelines for a Graduate Program in Archival Studies and that students have
available to them while in archival programs. It concludes with a proposal for Library and Information Science education programs
that prepare archivists to explore developing Certificate of Advanced Studies programs in archival management on top of master’s
degrees to allow for additional information science coursework. 相似文献
6.
Kimberly Anderson 《Archival Science》2013,13(4):349-371
This paper provides an analysis of the archival concepts of “record” and “evidence” as socio-cultural constructs arising out of a particular view of time. Archival records are usually characterized as having certain relationships to evidence in its temporal aspects—specifically, the requirement for a temporal disconnect between creation and use. This disconnect also necessitates a break between knowledge and the knower in which the record must be externalized and set aside from its creator in order to have “recordness”. This paper explores how Western concepts of time impact concepts of records and archival evidences and proposes an alternative framing. Since records have such power in our lives and societies, practitioners must begin to work with an expanded concept of record and sensitivity to differing time frames and worldviews. The paper proposes a new definition of “record” as an intentional, stable, semantic structure, which is used to identify three broad categories of record types, based on event-orientation or object-orientation, that are flexible enough to account for differing cultural and spiritual understandings of time. 相似文献
7.
Brien Brothman 《Archival Science》2002,2(3-4):311-342
In the last ten years, influential voices within and on the periphery of the record keeping community have succeeded in establishing
the preservation of “evidence” as the governing purpose of contemporary archival theory and methods development. Afterglow
offers a critique of the concept of evidence in archival discourse. Its main contention is that one can put records into evidence;
one cannot set out to put evidence into records. The argument rests on the following assertions: (1) current discussions of
evidence rest on a blindness to certain contradictions embedded in claims that record keeping principally involves evidence
keeping, or “evidence management”; (2) a politics of temporality, under which an interplay of disciplinary knowledge claims
and professional interest is discernible, helps to account for the contemporary rhetoric describing the relationship between
“record” and “evidence”, and (3) the late-twentieth century legal, political, and cultural climate, along with the technological
environment, explain the increasing prominence of “evidence” in these knowledge claims and professional ambitions. The essay
concludes with recommendations for addressing these issues.
Thanks go to Terry Cook, Visiting Professor in the Archival Studies Programme, Department of History, University of Manitoba,
and co-editor of this series of essays, for his close reading and detailed comments on this essay. Particularly invaluable
was his knowledge of historical and contemporary archival thinking on the notion of evidence. 相似文献
8.
9.
Jennifer Meehan 《Archival Science》2009,9(3-4):157-164
This article traces an alternative to the evidence/memory dichotomy in archival discourse by highlighting the nexus between archival ideas about the nature, value, and use of records as viewed and imagined through the lens of an archival concept of evidence as a relation between record and event. This article then explores how “the archival nexus” provides a different framework for understanding the various meaning-making processes surrounding archives both within and outside the archival repository, and for rethinking the role of the archivist and the position of the archival discipline with regard to other disciplines that explicitly address and engage with the archive. 相似文献