共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
一个期刊是否被读者认可,很大程度上取决于这个刊物的编辑团队的创造性劳动.科技期刊水平和质量的高低与编辑团队的素质及其对科技期刊创造性劳动密切相关.如果说作者的劳动是一种文化首创性劳动,那么编辑的劳动就是一种文化再创造劳动. 相似文献
4.
一个期刊是否被读者认可,很大程度上取决于这个刊物的编辑团队的创造性劳动.科技期刊水平和质量的高低与编辑团队的素质及其对科技期刊创造性劳动密切相关.如果说作者的劳动是一种文化首创性劳动,那么编辑的劳动就是一种文化再创造劳动. 相似文献
5.
科技期刊编辑是科技创新信息传播的组织者、守门人,也是经济社会发展的重要推手之一.基于工作实践,认为在新形势下,科技期刊编辑只有用心践行编辑职业要求,才能彰显风采、谋求作为,不断提升职业价值.这种用心主要表现在6个方面:一是用恒心落实办刊宗旨;二是用热心服务作者读者;三是用细心维护刊物声誉;四是用狠心净化学术环境;五是用真心对待编辑岗位;六是用决心提升核心能力. 相似文献
6.
7.
协调好编辑部门和广告部门的关系,处理好刊物、读者、客户的关系是办好科技期刊带有根本性的问题.广告部门可以从容户的广告信息中捕捉最新行业动态,对编辑部开辟期刊编辑报道新思路有所贡献:编辑部门可以把从工作中了解到的广告信息反馈给广告部,使其扩大广告来源;双方可以相互配合,优势互补,共谋刊物发展. 相似文献
8.
正提起编辑,人们常常将其称作"为人作嫁"的幕后人物;然而,作为新时期的科技期刊编辑,如果我们总是以这种"幕后人物"自居,甚至甘于这种"默默无闻",则必然不利于刊物影响力的提升,不利于刊物学术友好度的建立,不利于编辑职业认同感的形成,也不利于编辑发展空间的拓展,更为重要的,这有愧于当前我国正追求文化大发展大繁荣的伟大时代。笔者认为,科技期刊办刊者应审时度势,努力把科技期刊编辑打造成不辱使命的"时代人",要通过切实可行的措 相似文献
9.
质量是竞争的第一要素.科技期刊尤其学术期刊的市场竞争,其核心就是刊物质量的竞争.影响科技期刊质量的要素有很多,外在包括装帧、印刷质量等;内在包括稿件的内容质量和编辑质量.其中,作为学术期刊最重要的内在质量就是稿件的学术水平. 相似文献
10.
科技期刊编辑是科技成果公开的首位介入者、交流的重要推动者,不仅应拥有丰厚精深的专业知识,而且其稿件处理艺术也直接影响编辑水平和刊物声誉。科技期刊编辑应具备的稿件处理艺术包括:客观公正、诚实守信、积极主动处理来稿;急作者之所急,想作者之所想;多一份对作者的包容与耐心,少一点苛责;有创见地对待个性品质鲜明的来稿;关注社会进步,将社会需求和刊物选题用稿的方向紧密结合起来。高明的稿件处理艺术,从根本上说,是科技期刊编辑深厚的人文素养在实际工作中的体现。 相似文献
11.
Timothy D. Stephen 《Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian》2013,32(2):63-71
The problem of how to rank academic journals in the communication field (human interaction, mass communication, speech, and rhetoric) is one of practical importance to scholars, university administrators, and librarians, yet there is no methodology that covers the field's journals comprehensively and objectively. This article reports a new ranking methodology based in empirical criteria. The new system relates independent measures of the prestige of the field's doctoral departments to information about where faculty members from those departments have published scholarly articles. This new approach identifies the field's most influential journals as those that more frequently publish the work of the field's top scholars and programs as perceived by their peers. This system was used to compute prestige weights (P-weights) for 65 communication journals. P-weights were found to be strongly correlated with ISI Web of Science journal impact factor scores and can be used to identify an overall prestige hierarchy for communication journals as well as prestige rankings by subject specialty. 相似文献
12.
Massimo Franceschet 《Journal of Informetrics》2010,4(1):55-63
The status of a journal is commonly determined by two factors: popularity and prestige. While the former counts citations, the latter recursively weights them with the prestige of the citing journals. We make a thorough comparison of the bibliometric concepts of popularity and prestige for journals in the sciences and in the social sciences. We find that the two notions diverge more for the hard sciences, including physics, engineering, material sciences, and computer sciences, than they do for the geosciences, for biology-medical disciplines, and for the social sciences. Moreover, we identify the science and social science journals with the highest diverging ranks in popularity and prestige compilations. 相似文献
13.
Business faculty were surveyed to determine their attitudes toward institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and open access journals. The majority of faculty was unaware of institutional repositories at their local institutions. However, approximately one third are using disciplinary repositories and are receiving encouragement from their departments to do so. Likewise, many faculty are unaware of open access journals. Open access journals are seen as lacking prestige and being lower quality publications in the business field due to the lack of prestigious publishers and editors. Many faculty believe their prestige would fall if they published in an open access journal. 相似文献
14.
15.
Borja González-Pereira Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote Félix Moya-Anegón 《Journal of Informetrics》2010,4(3):379-391
A size-independent indicator of journals’ scientific prestige, the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator, is proposed that ranks scholarly journals based on citation weighting schemes and eigenvector centrality. It is designed for use with complex and heterogeneous citation networks such as Scopus. Its computation method is described, and the results of its implementation on the Scopus 2007 dataset is compared with those of an ad hoc Journal Impact Factor, JIF(3y), both generally and within specific scientific areas. Both the SJR indicator and the JIF distributions were found to fit well to a logarithmic law. While the two metrics were strongly correlated, there were also major changes in rank. In addition, two general characteristics were observed. On the one hand, journals’ scientific influence or prestige as computed by the SJR indicator tended to be concentrated in fewer journals than the quantity of citation measured by JIF(3y). And on the other, the distance between the top-ranked journals and the rest tended to be greater in the SJR ranking than in that of the JIF(3y), while the separation between the middle and lower ranked journals tended to be smaller. 相似文献
16.
口腔医学期刊论文引证现况的比较分析与发展对策 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
为了适时客观地分析比较我国口腔医学期刊的发展状况与水平,将列入2003年、2004年版中国科技信息所中国科技论文统计源期刊的13种口腔医学期刊的总被引频次、影响因子、基金论文比、国际论文比、即年指标、平均引文数、他引率等7项指标与当年全部统计源期刊平均值进行比较,并将口腔医学期刊的各项指标均值与6种其他医学类期刊的平均值进行比较,进而将口腔医学期刊的学术影响力和学术影响力增长率与6种医学类期刊进行分析比较.结果发现口腔科技期刊规模大,种类多,各具特色,代表和集中了中国口腔医学研究的精粹;但与其他医学类期刊相比,缺乏在本研究领域中优于其他期刊的精、优、名牌期刊.为此,提出了成立口腔医学期刊研究会和强化口腔医学专科期刊建设的发展策略. 相似文献
17.
Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
The impact factor of a journal reflects the frequency with which the journal's articles are cited. It is the best available measure of journal quality. For calculation of impact factor, we just count the number of citations, no matter how prestigious the citing journal is. We think that impact factor as a measure of journal quality, may be improved if in its calculation, we not only take into account the number of citations, but also incorporate a factor reflecting the prestige of the citing journals relative to the cited journal. In calculation of this proposed “weighted impact factor,” each citation has a coefficient (weight) the value of which is 1 if the citing journal is as prestigious as the cited journal; is >1 if the citing journal is more prestigious than the cited journal; and is <1 if the citing journal has a lower standing than the cited journal. In this way, journals receiving many citations from prestigious journals are considered prestigious themselves and those cited by low-status journals seek little credit. By considering both the number of citations and the prestige of the citing journals, we expect the weighted impact factor be a better scientometrics measure of journal quality. 相似文献
18.
科技期刊编辑跟踪学术前沿的途径 总被引：3，自引：2，他引：1
科技期刊的发展要求其编辑应了解所关注领域的学术前沿动态和发展方向,跟踪以新理论、新方法、新问题、前瞻性为标志的"学术前沿"对于科技期刊提高学术影响力具有重要意义.目前科技期刊编辑对学术前沿问题研究的整体性和深度的把握还存在较大不足,可通过综合利用国内外高水平期刊和数据库、关注业内专家的学术研究动态、关注国家的科技政策、关注国家重大科研项目的申请指南及批准情况、参与学术交流、参与科研工作等途径,培养编辑人员对学术前沿的领悟力、洞察力和判断力,敏锐地把握学术发展方向,促进期刊学术质量的全面提升. 相似文献
19.
《资料收集管理》2013,38(3):29-36
A comparison of a Bradford-ranked list of journals in the field of mathematics with a list of the same journals ranked by citation counts finds little correlation between the two. A previous study by Lamb shows a high correlation between a ranking based on citation frequency for these journals and a ranking based on the prestige of individual contributors. Lamb's study suggests that a selection policy based on choosing journals publishing the most papers on a topic will result in the acquisition of high quality papers. The results of this study cast doubt on Lamb's conclusions. 相似文献