共查询到10条相似文献，搜索用时 265 毫秒
1.
针对中美政府信息质量的法规,从法律界定、审查机制、法律执行体系、法律实施效果等方面进行比较,提出完善我国政府信息质量法律规范的建议,包括明确政府信息质量标准的定义,规范现有政府信息质量法规,加快单行信息质量法的制定,完善社会评议制度,指定专门机构定期评估政府信息质量,提高政府工作人员的信息质量意识。 相似文献
2.
《Government Information Quarterly》2014,31(4):534-544
This paper investigates how text analysis and classification techniques can be used to enhance e-government, typically law enforcement agencies' efficiency and effectiveness by analyzing text reports automatically and provide timely supporting information to decision makers. With an increasing number of anonymous crime reports being filed and digitized, it is generally difficult for crime analysts to process and analyze crime reports efficiently. Complicating the problem is that the information has not been filtered or guided in a detective-led interview resulting in much irrelevant information. We are developing a decision support system (DSS), combining natural language processing (NLP) techniques, similarity measures, and machine learning, i.e., a Naïve Bayes' classifier, to support crime analysis and classify which crime reports discuss the same and different crime. We report on an algorithm essential to the DSS and its evaluations. Two studies with small and big datasets were conducted to compare the system with a human expert's performance. The first study includes 10 sets of crime reports discussing 2 to 5 crimes. The highest algorithm accuracy was found by using binary logistic regression (89%) while Naive Bayes' classifier was only slightly lower (87%). The expert achieved still better performance (96%) when given sufficient time. The second study includes two datasets with 40 and 60 crime reports discussing 16 different types of crimes for each dataset. The results show that our system achieved the highest classification accuracy (94.82%), while the crime analyst's classification accuracy (93.74%) is slightly lower. 相似文献
3.
Editors’ introduction to Keeping cultures alive: Archives and Indigenous human rights 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Keeping Cultures Alive investigates the relationship between Indigenous human rights and the archives through an interdisciplinary and comparative
lens, bringing together papers by Indigenous and non-Indigenous experts in Indigenous studies, human rights, law and archival
science. It explores Indigenous human rights in an international context with particular reference to the implications of
the international human rights agenda for current and future archival practice in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United
States. 相似文献
4.
[目的/意义]建立健全情报产品标准及其质量控制机制是确保情报分析产品与服务质量的重要举措。研究美国情报产品标准及其质量控制机制，为我国制定情报产品标准提供参考。[方法/过程]通过考察美国情报界和执法界情报产品规范相关法律政策与标准文件，总结归纳美国情报产品类型、规范与质量控制机制，分析美国情报产品标准设计的基本逻辑与思想。[结果/结论]美国按照项目流程和要素规范管理逻辑，秉持"合法性""实用性""实证性""用户需求导向"的基本理念，遵循"源数据控制、认知缺陷控制、分析过程控制和陈述规范控制"的基本思想，按照"假设-证据（信息）-结论（判断与建议）"的分析框架，从"一般质量要求、内容规范、形式规范、信源属性、用户反馈/质量监管、法庭证词与法律考量"出发规定情报产品标准，通过"情报分析人员自我把关、用户反馈、同行评议、主管机构监管"等四类控制机制，确保情报产品符合"准确、客观、及时、独立"的质量标准，形成相对成熟的情报产品标准与质量控制机制。建议我国借鉴美国经验，立足《国家情报法》，明确情报产品的基本要求，制定统一的情报产品标准，提供情报产品范本，建立有效的质量控制机制，以提高我国情报产品的质量。 相似文献
5.
美国在档案解密管理制度建设和实践发展方面积累了丰富经验,可为我国提供诸多有益的借鉴和启示。美国档案解密管理法规制度主要包括法律、总统行政令和部门规章三个层面,其实践历程可以分为基本没有解密活动的萌芽期（1951—1972）,以系统解密审查、强制解密审查为建设内容的形成期（1972—1995）,以自动解密为建设内容的发展期（1995—2009）和以酌情解密方式和国家解密中心的建立为标志的成熟期（2009至今）四个时期。美国档案解密管理制度建设和实践发展启示我国要健全档案解密管理法规制度体系,建立完善的档案解密管理工作机构,建设高效的档案解密管理运行机制。 相似文献
6.
《Qualitative Research Reports in Communication》2013,14(1):33-41
Data from 60 qualitative interviews reveal the presence of racial tensions in 21st-century United States. Black participants expressed experiencing racial prejudice while operating automobiles. White passengers also reported witnessing instances of driving while Black (DWB) while riding with Black drivers. Specifically, White participants reported instances of profiling, where they witnessed Black drivers pulled over by police officers, although no traffic violation occurred. Two themes emerged for Black participants: (a) fear that they would be pulled over, and (b) motivation to “survive” the law enforcement encounter. Participants’ experiences insinuate a continued racial tension between Black citizens and White law enforcement officers. While the United States has made valuable strides, we still have prejudices to overcome. 相似文献
7.
Soyeon Park 《Library & information science research》2004,26(4):399
This study investigates the current state of research methods education in Korean library and information science (LIS) programs and compares research methods education between Korea and the United States. The definition of research methods is consistent and homogeneous across Korean schools, whereas research methods are defined loosely and differently in the United States. Research methods in both the United States and in Korea appear to be in a state of methodological uncertainty where dominant methods may be taught but not necessarily applied by graduate students. Research methods, as shared knowledge, offer fields the tools needed to investigate problems and understand the process by which they are studied. Thus, if LIS wants to increase its research capacity and improve its research quality, then it will need to require research methods of all students. While the range of topics covered in Korean research methods courses may need to be expanded, those in the United States may need greater depth of coverage. 相似文献
8.
情报融合中心:美国情报共享实践及启示 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义] 情报融合是提高情报机构的能力、作业绩效的重要途径,美国的情报融合中心实践为我国的情报融合提供了新的建设性视角,对于我国情报融合实践具有重要的参考价值。[方法/过程] 主要通过相关机构的官方网站及期刊文献对美国情报融合中心的概念、作用、历史、现状等方面进行梳理,并阐述情报融合中心运作流程、建设标准和绩效评估的机制。在对美国情报融合中心取得的成绩和存在的问题深入分析后,对我国建立情报融合中心的必要性和可行性进行论证。[结果/结论] 借鉴美国情报融合中心实践,结合我国面临的安全威胁实际,构建我国国家情报融合中心,以应对国家安全挑战,如"三股势力"、公共安全、突发事件、自然灾害等。 相似文献
9.
随着情报分析师的角色逐渐在美国执法和国土安全机构中被制度化,制定统一的培训标准对于在全国范围建立具有相当知识、技能和专长的分析师队伍非常重要。近10年来,美国经过不断探索,逐步形成了初级、中级、高级分析师培训最低标准体系。介绍美国情报分析师培训最低标准的具体内容,从标准开发的主体、过程与标准内容等方面探讨美国制定情报分析师培训最低标准的经验。建议我国公安机关成立专门机构,组织协调专门力量,以广泛调查研究与讨论为基础,循序渐进、分级分类地研究制定警务情报分析师培训最低标准。 相似文献
10.
《Government Information Quarterly》2023,40(1):101761
Governments around the world are adopting facial recognition technology (FRT) to improve public services and law enforcement. Past research has shown that such applications may result in discriminatory effects and threaten privacy. This study shines light on the question of what drives public opinion regarding FRT in different socio-political contexts. Based on an online survey and semi-structured interviews, this study finds that citizens in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States differ in their acceptance of the official public use of FRT. China has the highest approval rates, Germany and the US have the lowest, and the UK lies in the middle. Our results show that people are generally more willing to accept FRT in public spheres when they trust government institutions, believe the technology should be managed by the central government, and have an affinity for technology. People's awareness of a country's previous history of surveillance further shapes their perceptions of FRT. Across all four countries, we also show that privacy concerns, especially of FRT compromising one's privacy, have the biggest influence on respondents' attitudes. Expanding on existing research into FRT acceptance and usage, our results suggest that policymakers urgently need to address the current regulatory vacuum. 相似文献