共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 102 毫秒
1.
2.
国内多数医学期刊英文摘要中没有背景信息部分描写,而国外多数知名医学期刊摘要中则有背景信息部分。该文从医学论文英文摘要的篇章结构入手,分析国外期刊摘要中背景信息存在的原因,指出背景信息有助于语篇的语义连贯,增强摘要的可读性,提高读者的阅读兴趣和对文摘内容的记忆力。国内期刊应与国际期刊接轨,增加背景信息部分。 相似文献
3.
通过案例分析,指出医学期刊摘要中出现的各种统计著录问题,让医学期刊编辑同行了解,清楚明了地交代抽样或分组方法、统计分析方法并给出具体的统计量值和P值,才是摘要中统计学的正确著录,才能全面、客观地体现医学论文作者的统计设计和统计分析方法。 相似文献
4.
5.
我国医学期刊论文,根据联合国教科文组织的要求,都提倡附有英文摘要,以便在全世界进行交流。 论文摘要主要有二种类型:信息性摘要(informative abstract)和指示性摘要(indic-ative abstract)。信息性摘要是对论文简明扼要的叙述。医学论文的正文一般包括引言、材 相似文献
6.
结构式摘要在医学期刊中的应用镇江医学院科研处汪玉芳赵峰截止到１９９２年底，世界上有７个国家和地区的６４种生物医学期刊应用了结构式摘要［１］。目前国内期刊也陆续开始应用结构式摘要，传统式的摘要将逐渐被结构式摘要取代。１．文摘的发展趋势是结构式摘要全国文... 相似文献
7.
介绍英译医学期刊论文英文题名和摘要应注意的几个问题,即:题名如何体现文章重点,副题名的表达。语言表达的差异,避免滥用缩写词和结构式摘要的标题,时态的用法,标点符号的用法,人称的用法和句子表达的规范性等。探讨英文题名和摘要的规范化处理。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
5种医学期刊中经济利益冲突问题的调查及分析 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
为了解我国医学期刊中经济利益冲突问题的现状并与国外期刊进行比较,审查了中华医学会系列杂志中5种医学期刊1990、1995、2000年的全部述评和评论、论著、论著摘要、综述和讲座及其他涉及潜在经济利益冲突的文章,以及这5种期刊稿约中关于经济利益冲突方面对作者的政策,结果令人遗憾.认为编辑应提高对医学期刊中经济利益冲突问题的认识,有关部门应制定明确的制度,以杜绝由经济利益冲突所致的科研结果报道中的偏差. 相似文献
11.
12.
Takeo Nakayama Nobuko Hirai Shigeaki Yamazaki Mariko Naito 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2005,93(2):237-242
BACKGROUND: The use of a structured abstract has been recommended in reporting medical literature to quickly convey necessary information to editors and readers. The use of structured abstracts increased during the mid-1990s; however, recent practice has yet to be analyzed. OBJECTIVES: This article explored actual reporting patterns of abstracts recently published in selected medical journals and examined what these journals required of abstracts (structured or otherwise and, if structured, which format). METHODS: The top thirty journals according to impact factors noted in the "Medicine, General and Internal" category of the ISI Journal Citation Reports (2000) were sampled. Articles of original contributions published by each journal in January 2001 were examined. Cluster analysis was performed to classify the patterns of structured abstracts objectively. Journals' instructions to authors for writing an article abstract were also examined. RESULTS: Among 304 original articles that included abstracts, 188 (61.8%) had structured and 116 (38.2%) had unstructured abstracts. One hundred twenty-five (66.5%) of the abstracts used the introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) format, and 63 (33.5%) used the 8-heading format proposed by Haynes et al. Twenty-one journals requested structured abstracts in their instructions to authors; 8 journals requested the 8-heading format; and 1 journal requested it only for intervention studies. CONCLUSIONS: Even in recent years, not all abstracts of original articles are structured. The eight-heading format was neither commonly used in actual reporting patterns nor noted in journal instructions to authors. 相似文献
13.
Hartley J 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》2000,88(4):332-337
BACKGROUND: There is a small body of research on improving the clarity of abstracts in general that is relevant to improving the clarity of abstracts of systematic reviews. OBJECTIVES: To summarize this earlier research and indicate its implications for writing the abstracts of systematic reviews. METHOD: Literature review with commentary on three main features affecting the clarity of abstracts: their language, structure, and typographical presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The abstracts of systematic reviews should be easier to read than the abstracts of medical research articles, as they are targeted at a wider audience. The aims, methods, results, and conclusions of systematic reviews need to be presented in a consistent way to help search and retrieval. The typographic detailing of the abstracts (type-sizes, spacing, and weights) should be planned to help, rather than confuse, the reader. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
Current findings from research on structured abstracts. 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
James Hartley 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2004,92(3):368-371
BACKGROUND: Structured abstracts were introduced into medical research journals in the mid 1980s. Since then they have been widely used in this and other contexts. AIM: The aim of this paper is to summarize the main findings from research on structured abstracts and to discuss the limitations of some aspects of this research. METHOD: A narrative literature review of all of the relevant papers known to the author was conducted. RESULTS: Structured abstracts are typically longer than traditional ones, but they are also judged to be more informative and accessible. Authors and readers also judge them to be more useful than traditional abstracts. However, not all studies use "real-life" published examples from different authors in their work, and more work needs to be done in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings generally support the notion that structured abstracts can be profitably introduced into research journals. Some arguments for this, however, have more research support than others. 相似文献