Heidegger on the Education of Poets and Philosophers     

GEONGE H. DOUGLAS 《Educational theory》1972,22(4):443-449

  相似文献   

Statements,Language and Art: a Comment in Reply to Mr. Peter Scrimshaw     

Paul H. Hirst 《Cambridge Journal of Education》1974,4(1):44-46

  相似文献   

Gathering books for the saints: a history of libraries in territorial Utah     

KIRPATRICK LH 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》1954,42(1):1-2

  相似文献   

A Reaction to Mehrens's NCME Presidential Address     

Thomas H. Fisher 《Educational Measurement》1986,5(4):15-16

As a state level measurement specialist, Tom notes that some psychometricians always have a list of reasons test data cannot be used to enhance the quality of educational decisions. He welcomes Bill's exhortation to be hope-oriented and calls on measurement specialists to provide decision makers with practical, understandable ways to best use test data.  相似文献   

Anxiety about lecturing     

H. P. Ellis  A. D. Jones 《Higher Education Quarterly》1974,29(1):91-95

  相似文献   

Nineteen eighty-four and after     

David H. Flaherty 《Government Information Quarterly》1984,1(4):431-442

This article represents the final report of the Bellagio Conference on Current and Future Problems of Data Protection. The conference was held at the Rockefeller Foundation's Bellagio Study and Conference Center, Bellagio, Lake Como, Italy, April 9–13, 1984.David H. Flaherty served as conference chairman and organizer. He is also the author of the final report presented below.  相似文献   

Man Made Language: two reviews     

PAT BARRETT  W. H. MITTINS 《English in Education》1981,15(3):14-18

  相似文献   

Sietar comes of age     

Stephen H. Rhinesmith 《Int J Intercult Relat》1977,1(2):10-14

  相似文献   

Science and technology in the European communities: the history of the cost projects     

N.H. Aked  P.J. Gummett 《Research Policy》1976,5(3):270-294

On the 31st of October 1967 the Council of Ministers of the European Communities instructed a working party on scientific and technological policy, the PREST committee, to examine the possibilities for European technological cooperation in seven principal sectors. After a year long hiatus caused by a dispute over the British application to join the EEC, detailed proposals appeared in the ‘Aigrain report’. This document was sent to several non-member countries, including Britain, along with an invitation to participate. Following discussions in a committee of senior national officials drawn from 19 interested countries (the COST committee) a conference of Ministers responsible for science took place in 1971 at which agreements initiating seven so-called COST research projects were signed.This paper describes the events leading up to this final conference and the launching of the COST projects. These historical details are then used to examine the venture in terms of the concept of commitment to collaborate. Two different analytical perspectives are adopted: firstly we deal with the mechanics of COST as a formula for cooperation and consider the choice of research areas and the machinery used to implement the proposals; secondly we look at the relationship between technological cooperation in COST and the framework of the European Communities.We conclude that the structure of COST is very much related to its political milieu, but that few of the predicted advantages of Community research are likely to be realised. However, several of the difficulties associated with intergovernmental forms of cooperation do appear to have been at least partially solved. Finally, some reflections are offered upon the setbacks to the history of the projects and upon their mixed reception in terms of the conflicting goals of pragmatism, on the one hand, and an attempt, to promulgate a broadly based European science policy on the other.  相似文献   

A note on the procedures for deriving F-values from linear regression models: Response to McArthur     

C. H. Grobe 《科学教学研究杂志》1976,13(1):87-88

  相似文献