Can a culture of error be really developed in the classroom without teaching students to distinguish between errors and anomalies?     

José María Ariso 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2019,51(10):1030-1041

It is expected that children increasingly learn to identify errors throughout their schooling process and even before it. As a further step, however, some scholars have suggested how a culture of error should be implemented in the classroom for the student to be able not only to locate errors but also, and above all, to learn from them. Yet the various proposals aimed at generating a culture of error in the classroom keep regarding error as all those responses and reactions that are not considered as true or correct in each specific case, thereby not realizing that many of these alleged errors are really anomalies with very different characteristics and consequences despite their seeming resemblance. In this paper, I rely on Ludwig Wittgenstein’s On Certainty to clarify the difference between errors and anomalies. Subsequently, I provide guidelines that may be adapted by each teacher to her students’ needs and development level in order to foster a culture of error that begins by distinguishing error from anomaly, which constitutes a practical as well as conceptual necessity particularly in Child and Primary Education, as it is just then when anomalies most frequently arise in the form of questions and answers.  相似文献   

Development of a cross-disciplinary investigative model for the introduction of microarray techniques at non-r1 undergraduate institutions          下载免费PDF全文

Walker DE  Lutz GP  Alvarez CJ 《CBE life sciences education》2008,7(1):118-131

  相似文献   

Planning Inclusion: The Need to Formalize Parental Participation in Individual Education Plans (and Meetings)     

María Cioè-Peña 《The Educational forum》2020,84(4):377-390

Abstract

Inclusive education is promoted as an educational setting that brings together students with disabilities alongside non-disabled peers. As the rise in inclusive education continues, many recognize the Salamanca Statement of 1994 as an influencer. This paper discusses how the vision of inclusion grounded in “the need to work towards ‘schools for all’” remains unfulfilled through a lack of intersectionality. Centering the experiences of Spanish-speaking mothers of emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled, this paper presents how educators limit parents’ abilities to engage as equal stakeholders. Therefore, this paper explores the tensions culturally and linguistically diverse mothers encounter during Individual Education Plan (IEP) meetings and the possibilities that can come from reimagining IEPs and IEP meetings in ways that allow stakeholders to actively tend to the intersectional vision of inclusive education that Salamanca put forth and that emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled desperately need.  相似文献   

The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance: Does It Work with Low-Income Urban Children?   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

John W. Fantuzzo  Paul A. McDermott  Patricia Holliday Manz  Virginia R. Hampton  Nancy Alvarez Burdick 《Child development》1996,67(3):1071-1084

The present study represents a twofold investigation wherein ( a ) the construct validity of the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children (PSPCSA) and ( b ) the developmental appropriateness of the PSPCSA were empirically examined for urban Head Start children. Data were collected from a sample of 476 African-American children (48–64 months) representing children enrolled in a large metropolitan Head Start program. In the first study, neither replication of the test author's statistical procedures nor a series of exploratory factor analyses produced psychologically meaningful constructs. A second study tested the assumption that the PSPCSA administration format is developmentally appropriate for preschool children. Results from this study did not support the assumption that the PSPCSA is developmentally appropriate for preschool children. Implications for establishing valid assessment methods for urban Head Start children were discussed.  相似文献   

Development and validation of the DIGIGLO,a tool for assessing the digital competence of educators     

Rafael Alarcón  Elena del Pilar Jiménez  María Isabel de Vicente-Yagüe 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2020,51(6):2407-2421

  相似文献   

School discipline and the building of values in the daily life of secondary schools     

Ana María Cerda  Jenny Assaél 《Prospects》1998,28(4):571-585

  相似文献   

Young Children Are Wishful Thinkers: The Development of Wishful Thinking in 3- to 10-Year-Old Children     

Adrienne O. Wente  Mariel K. Goddu  Teresa Garcia  Elyanah Posner  María Fernández Flecha  Alison Gopnik 《Child development》2020,91(4):1166-1182

Previously, research on wishful thinking has found that desires bias older children’s and adults’ predictions during probabilistic reasoning tasks. In this article, we explore wishful thinking in children aged 3- to 10-years-old. Do young children learn to be wishful thinkers? Or do they begin with a wishful thinking bias that is gradually overturned during development? Across five experiments, we compare low- and middle-income United States and Peruvian 3- to 10-year-old children (N = 682). Children were asked to make predictions during games of chance. Across experiments, preschool-aged children from all backgrounds consistently displayed a strong wishful thinking bias. However, the bias declined with age.  相似文献   

The Scientific Periphery in Spain: The Establishment of a Biomedical Discipline at the Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, 1956-1967     

Santesmases  María Jesús  Muñoz  Emilio 《Minerva》1997,35(1):27-45

  相似文献   

Justification and Persuasion about Cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s Paper and Journalistic Reported Versions   总被引：4，自引：4，他引：0  

María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre  Marta Federico-Agraso 《Research in Science Education》2009,39(3):331-347

We examine the argumentative structure of Hwang et al.’s (2004) paper about human somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT, or ‘therapeutic cloning’), contrasted with four Journalistic Reported Versions (JRV) of it, and with students’ summaries of one JRV. As the evaluation of evidence is one of the critical features of argumentation (Jiménez-Aleixandre 2008), the analysis focuses on the use of evidence, drawing from instruments to analyze written argumentation (Kelly et al. 2008) and from studies about the structure of empirical research reports (Swales 2001). The objectives are: 1) To examine the use of evidence and the argumentative structure of Hwang et al.’s Science, 303: 1669–1674 (2004) original paper in terms of the criteria: a) pertinence of the evidence presented to the claims; b) sufficiency of the evidence for the purpose of supporting the claims; and c) coordination of the evidence across epistemic levels. 2) To explore how the structure of Hwang’s paper translates into the JRV and into university students’ perceptions about the evidence supporting the claims. The argumentative structure of Hwang’s paper is such that its apparently ostensible main claim about NT constitutes a justification for a second claim about its therapeutic applications, for which no evidence is offered. However, this second claim receives prominent treatment in the JRV and in the students’ summaries. Implications for promoting critical reading in the classroom are discussed.  相似文献   

Supporting Teaching and Learning Using Authentic Scientific Texts: A Rejoinder to Danielle J. Ford   总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0  

Anat Yarden  Hedda Falk  Marta Federico-Agraso  María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre  Stephen P. Norris  Linda M. Phillips 《Research in Science Education》2009,39(3):391-395

In her commentary Danielle J. Ford mainly focused on three issues that highlight the promises and challenges for the use of Adapted Primary Literature (APL) in science curricula: the possible contribution of APL to authentic experiences in secondary schools, implementation issues of APL including the support required for the teachers, and the possibilities to extend the use of APL to younger and older students. In this rejoinder, we first offer some general comments on Ford’s commentary. Then we offer more specific comments on two areas of her response, authenticity and the support for teachers.  相似文献