首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   451篇
  免费   11篇
教育   378篇
科学研究   8篇
各国文化   8篇
体育   41篇
文化理论   3篇
信息传播   24篇
  2023年   4篇
  2022年   7篇
  2021年   5篇
  2020年   21篇
  2019年   19篇
  2018年   25篇
  2017年   25篇
  2016年   21篇
  2015年   14篇
  2014年   15篇
  2013年   100篇
  2012年   15篇
  2011年   19篇
  2010年   13篇
  2009年   15篇
  2008年   13篇
  2007年   6篇
  2006年   11篇
  2005年   9篇
  2004年   7篇
  2003年   4篇
  2002年   6篇
  2001年   6篇
  2000年   5篇
  1999年   4篇
  1998年   1篇
  1997年   2篇
  1996年   7篇
  1995年   9篇
  1994年   1篇
  1993年   5篇
  1992年   6篇
  1991年   4篇
  1990年   3篇
  1989年   9篇
  1988年   5篇
  1985年   3篇
  1984年   2篇
  1983年   2篇
  1982年   1篇
  1981年   2篇
  1979年   4篇
  1977年   2篇
  1976年   2篇
  1973年   3篇
排序方式: 共有462条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
81.
Doctoral dissertations reflect academic specialization in physical education in terms of both graduate programs and authors' future academic orientations. This research project examined specialization as reflected in virtually all of the dissertations written in physical education between 1964 and 1983. Through sequential matching of listings in Dissertation Abstracts Interntioml, Completed Research in Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, and American Doctoral Dissertations, abstracts of 5,344 physical education dissertations were identified and subsequently coded. Selected results included the following: (a) functional effects was the most common academic specialty, (b) the distribution of dissertations among specializations across time changed minimally, (c) the most common academic specialty for DA, EdD, and PED degrees was program development, but the most common specialty for PhD degrees was functional effects, and (d) there was no association between specialties and doctoral program prestige. The results are discussed within the context of the field of physical education in higher education.  相似文献   
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
Post-secular schooling: freedom through faith or diversity in community   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
Post-secularism and neo-liberalism have converged in education policy and theory to generate a new enthusiasm for faith schools, along with criticism of the publicly-funded common or community school. However, in a post-secular social context, where religious and spiritual pluralism exponentially increases, and belief positions are both polarised and syncretised, the democratic notion of the common or community school appears even more crucial to address community understanding. There need to be strong reasons, therefore, for abandoning the common or community school in favour of faith schools. This article presents a critique of recent key philosophical defences of the public funding of faith schools, put forward by Richard Pring and Harry Brighouse, and by the Christian educationalist, Trevor Cooling. It also gives support to Michael Fielding and Peter Moss’ arguments for radicalising and reforming the common school, to enable it to be a community for understanding in an increasingly challenging post-secular environment.  相似文献   
87.
88.
The purpose of this paper is to help teachers better understand the struggles that people with disabilities experience in attaining their educational goals and to encourage the development of teaching and learning strategies that help to respect and facilitate the struggle itself. The authors share the generative themes that emerged using a critical pedagogy approach (dialogic interviews) to elicit the voices of adults with disabilities speaking about their public school experiences. In discussing the implications for teachers, the authors show the intersections of educational psychology's concept self-regulation and critical pedagogy's concept conscientization and special education’ s concept self-determination. Why the ‘struggle’ itself is important (from the perspectives provided by conscientization, self-regulation, and self determination) is discussed.The major question is whether or not teachers can structure the awareness process that results in learners becoming aware enough to verbalize, “I have difficulties”. What do teachers do to stimulate the metacognitive thinking processes that makes it possible for students with disabilities to think, “I can monitor myself!”? How can teachers capture the power of the conscientization experience that leads students with disabilities to experience the generative will power “to use the powers that I have to make a difference in my life's situation?” How do adults with disabilities come to these kinds of awareness and how can teachers help facilitate the awareness?  相似文献   
89.
90.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号