首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1579篇
  免费   35篇
  国内免费   4篇
教育   1167篇
科学研究   146篇
各国文化   25篇
体育   107篇
综合类   2篇
文化理论   18篇
信息传播   153篇
  2021年   23篇
  2020年   17篇
  2019年   28篇
  2018年   45篇
  2017年   43篇
  2016年   54篇
  2015年   25篇
  2014年   50篇
  2013年   435篇
  2012年   22篇
  2011年   34篇
  2010年   29篇
  2009年   39篇
  2008年   39篇
  2007年   38篇
  2006年   34篇
  2005年   26篇
  2004年   19篇
  2003年   23篇
  2002年   27篇
  2001年   15篇
  2000年   17篇
  1999年   18篇
  1998年   16篇
  1997年   20篇
  1996年   22篇
  1995年   19篇
  1994年   22篇
  1993年   22篇
  1992年   11篇
  1991年   16篇
  1990年   13篇
  1989年   18篇
  1988年   17篇
  1987年   9篇
  1986年   9篇
  1985年   20篇
  1984年   9篇
  1983年   19篇
  1982年   20篇
  1981年   13篇
  1980年   9篇
  1979年   11篇
  1978年   9篇
  1977年   9篇
  1975年   8篇
  1974年   13篇
  1973年   13篇
  1970年   8篇
  1965年   7篇
排序方式: 共有1618条查询结果,搜索用时 27 毫秒
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
This article seeks to analyse, comprehend and apprehend the appropriation processes of Ovide Decroly’s ideas in Brazil through the translation of his books and that of Amélie Hamaïde into Portuguese. The article discusses the following questions. Why did Brazilian intellectuals and teachers need to import Decroly’s ideas to be applied in Brazilian schools? Did the translation of Decroly’s and Hamaïde’s books play an innovative role in Brazilian society? Did the release of these books bring about changes, and did it stabilise and legitimise discourses that were already present in Brazil? Who were the translation agents of those books? First, discussions concerning travelling knowledge and cultural translation, as well as translation and the role of translation agents, are introduced. The translated books and their (production) contexts are then presented, comparing and analysing the source books and the translations. The analyses aim at understanding this journey and answering these questions, and it will be shown that Decroly’s ideas were torn apart into “pieces of knowledge” gaining life and autonomy throughout the journey, and turning into facts. It is advocated that his ideas were appropriated as “indigenous foreigners” in Brazil.  相似文献   
86.
This study examined how specific guidelines and heuristics have been used to identify methodological rigor associated with single‐case research designs based on quality indicators developed by Horner et al. Specifically, this article describes how literature reviews have applied Horner et al.'s quality indicators and evidence‐based criteria. Ten literature reviews were examined to ascertain how literature review teams (a) used the criteria recommended by Horner et al. as meeting the 5‐3‐20 evidence‐based practice (EBP) thresholds (five studies conducted across three different research teams that include a minimum of 20 participants) to assess single‐case methodological rigor; and (b) applied the 5‐3‐20 thresholds to determine whether the independent variables reviewed qualified as potential effective practices. The 10 literature reviews included 120 single‐case designs. This study found that 33% of the reviewed single‐case designs met Horner et al.'s quality indicator criteria. Three of the literature reviews concluded that examined practices met criteria to qualify as an EBP. Recommendations related to quality indicator criteria and EBP established by the literature review teams as well as directions for future research are discussed.  相似文献   
87.
88.
89.
Instructional Science - Extensive research has established that successful learning from an example is conditional on an important learning activity: self-explanation. Moreover, a model for...  相似文献   
90.
Single-case research designs are useful for learning disability researchers interested in refining novel interventions (e.g., new mathematics intervention) before scaling, small n populations (e.g., students with comorbid learning and emotional and behavioral disabilities), and testing unique conditions (e.g., remote locales). Much attention has been devoted to developing research quality standards, which is essential for replication and implementation fidelity; however, little is known about the reporting quality of single-case design studies. To gain insight into the quality of learning disability single-case research design study reporting, we analyzed 72 articles published between 2010 and 2021 in six learning disability-focused journals using the Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioral interventions (SCRIBE) standards. Findings suggest that reporting quality has remained stagnant, and none of the studies reviewed met all of the reporting standards. Alignment with standards ranged from 33% to 77%. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号