排序方式： 共有18条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
Galina B. Bolden 《Communication monographs》2014,81(2):208-238
This article aims to advance an interactionally sensitive, emic view of intercultural communication by exploring the organization of “intercultural moments” in conversation—moments during which cultural and linguistic differences between people become exposed. Field video recordings of ordinary face-to-face interactions in Russian–American immigrant families are analyzed using the methodology of conversation analysis. The article focuses on sequences in which participants deal with actual or anticipated understanding problems and examines how participants' assumptions about their asymmetric cultural and linguistic expertise are revealed in their actions. Some interactional payoffs in adopting the role of a cultural expert vis-à-vis a novice are described to show how an ostensible non-understanding is both a participants' problem to be solved and a resource for social action. 相似文献
12.
David Nicholas Eti Herman David Clark Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo Abdullah Abrizah Anthony Watkinson David Sims Marzena 'Świgoń Jie Xu Galina Serbina Hamid R. Jamali Carol Tenopir Suzie Allard 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):128-140
After two-years of repeat interviewing early career sciences/social sciences researchers from around the world about their work life and scholarly communications in pandemic-times, the Harbingers-2 project is in a position to release quantitative data on the pandemic's overall impact. The data comes from around 50 questions asked in the third and final round of interviews with 147 early career researchers (ECRs), which had a codifiable element to them (such as yes, no, do not know). The 19 scholarly topics covered include: pandemic-related research; research funding; changes to the workplace/working from home; pandemic-incurred stress and anxiety; teaching; employment security; career progression; mentoring; assessment (including metrics); collaboration; searching/finding information; ethics; networking; informal communication; publishing; sharing; pre-prints; outreach; and scholarly transformations. The main findings are that in six broad aspects of ECRs' work-life and scholarly behaviour, more than 50% of ECRs were impacted by the pandemic, with remote teaching having the greatest impact. By way of comparison, in another six aspects there was little change, least of all when it came to sharing activities. Among the countries studied, Malaysia stood out as being the most impacted, and of the disciplines it was the medical sciences and the soft social sciences most impacted. 相似文献
13.
This article considers the relevance and implementation of European approaches to quality assurance in the context of the Russian educational system. It covers the issues of transformation of the higher education system during the post-Soviet period, specific features of the state accreditation system, the impact of the European Standards and Guidelines (ESG) ( http://www.enqa.eu/files/ESG_3edition%20(2).pdf )on Russian Quality Assurance system and trends in quality assurance of higher education. 相似文献
14.
This article draws on the discourses of educational policy in Europe to focus on the implications of the Bologna Process for higher education in Russia. The Bologna Process, as a multi-dimensional discourse involving a variety of social actors, reflects some of the complexities and contradictions of globalisation, in many local cases evoking responses and leading to outcomes which were neither planned nor predicted by the official educational policy planners. The role of international organisations in the reform of Russian higher education is considered and the barriers, limitations and possible consequences of Bologna for the Russian situation are explored. 相似文献
15.
Peg Griffin Alexandra Belyaeva Galina Soldatova 《European Journal of Psychology of Education - EJPE》1992,7(4):269-286
Observations of children using mathematics software are the empirical base for this article. The conceptual base is the socio-historical school of psychology. Our purpose was to develop an ability to characterize and contribute to the children’s learning. To guide observations of the children and interactions with them, we relied on some aspects of the theory that have often been used in studies of learning and development (the use of auxiliary means, the contrast between reduced and elaborated forms, the zone of proximal development) and other concepts that are less well promulgated (activity variations, analysis by units, and models). At the same time, an enriched understanding of the theoretical concepts arose as we grappled with the children’s varied performance on the specific tasks embedded in the software (representation, repetition, and re-analysis). The data are collapsed and annotated field notes of the experience, reshaped to make them available for more general use. The main point is that the two bases are mutually informative. 相似文献
16.
This case study of an advanced physics class analyzes the implications of a practice that creates opportunities for groups of science students to share thoughts and observations, defend viewpoints, and negotiate consensus about their thinking. The activity that facilitates such sense-making processes is computerized journaling. Because these documents are more than a static mechanism for organizing notes and observations, they are called learning logs. A system of analysis drawn from the literature on writing and learning in science was developed and systematically applied to characterize the formal and stylistic elements of writing contained in learning logs and to investigate changes in the nature and pattern of science discourse over time. These scientific conversations were found to support a dynamic classroom environment that helped learners to make sense of complex science topics. Writing in learning logs provides a vehicle for students and teachers to make their knowledge public, and builds an atmosphere for valuing the conceptual understanding of others. The journals also mediate an ongoing dialogue between the instructor and students, a feature that redefines traditional classroom roles and responsibilities. Conversing about science through the medium of computerized learning logs resulted in a closely knit community of reflective learners. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 相似文献
17.
The article describes and critically analyzes how Russian education researchers approached the topic of quality evaluation in education between 1990 and 2014. Evaluation and quality have grown into major policy issues in education across the world, simultaneously acting as powerful steering mechanisms on national and transnational levels. Russia is no exception to this global phenomenon, but little is known about how Russian education researchers discuss the topic in national academic journals. This article discusses four major periods, each characterized by a shift in the focus of discussion and/or the introduction of a completely new agenda. These periods capture the dominant themes, titled “effective management and customization of education,” “the rise of broad-scale assessments,” “systemic approach to quality evaluation,” and “toward a more nuanced usage of evaluation data.” We interpret the findings within two intertwined conceptual frameworks: governance at a distance and New Public Management. How these frames help us understand the academic discussion on quality evaluation in Russian school education is also discussed. 相似文献
18.
David Nicholas Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo Eti Herman Abdullah Abrizah David Clark Galina Serbina David Sims Marzena Świgoń Jie Xu Anthony Watkinson Hamid R. Jamali Carol Tenopir Suzie Allard 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):319-322
- 170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.
- The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.
- The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.