Para-reflections     

Sorensen  Roy 《The British journal for the philosophy of science》2003,54(1):93-101

  相似文献   

Preface     

Karen Anderson  Eric Ketelaar  Elizabeth Yakel 《Archival Science》2006,6(3-4):265-265

  相似文献   

Utilizing intact and embedded headings as processing aids with nonnarrative text     

Charles D. Holley  Donald F. Dansereau  Selby H. Evans  Karen W. Collins  Larry Brooks  David Larson 《Contemporary educational psychology》1981,6(3):227-236

This study examined the utility of intact (i.e., topic outline format) and embedded (i.e., appropriately positioned within the text) headings as processing aids with nonnarrative text. The argument was advanced that headings potentially provide useful cues for both input and output processing but that little empirical evidence exists to either support or refute this proposition. It was further argued that each of the prior studies reviewed were subject to one or more methodological criticisms which may attenuate the generality of the findings. The results of the present study indicated that no advantage accrued to students on the basis of training; however, limitations of this finding are discussed in terms of the amount of training provided and the time available to the students for integrating the new strategies with their existing techniques. The major result of this investigation was that students provided with text containing intact and embedded headings significantly outperformed students whose text did not contain these processing aids. The major benefits were observed at delayed testing; the text-with-headings students recalled approximately 11% more information at immediate testing and 44% more information at delayed testing than the text-without-headings students. Implications of these results and future research issues are discussed.  相似文献   

Levels of question formulation in negotiation of information need during the online presearch interview: A proposed model     

Karen Markey 《Information processing & management》1981,17(5):215-225

In a seminal article on question negotiation, Taylor outlines four levels of question formulation which pertain to the client-information professional interview session. The literature which supports Taylor's theory is covered. It is proposed that Taylor's four levels may be inadequate for describing question negotiation in the online presearch interview. An altered model is given with suggestions for testing the model in the online environment. Some recommendations concerning the importance of discovering such a model are offered.  相似文献   

犹他州的数字仓储创新——建立机构仓储支撑体系     

Karen Estlund  Anna Neatrour  张卫 《数字图书馆论坛》2007,(12):53-56,70

随着机构仓储(IR,Institutional Repositories)的发展日益成熟,越来越多的图书馆利用协会或是区域关系为机构仓储的发展提供资助、方法、专门技术.对于那些没有专门的机构、时间或者基础的组织来说,采用这种方式建立机构仓储是可行的.犹他州数字仓储计划(http//harvester.lib.utah.edu/utan_ir/)由ISTA提供基金支持,目的是建立一个全州范围的仓储模型.项目主要研究犹他州大学图书馆机构库的发展和增长情况,项目建立在西山数字图书馆(MWDL,Mountain west Digital Library)现有框架基础上.犹他州数字仓储计划提供了一个图书馆员操作的工具箱、培训机制和技术支持,在这个过程中,试验点(pilot sites)发展成为IR.对任何规模的图书馆这个框架模型都可以为他的机构仓储工作的开展提供支持.用户在一个网站上就能对多个数据库的数据进行集成检索.文章除了为读者提供了开发过程中的调查资料和统计资料外,主要目标是为了让图书馆都参与到资源共享的过程中来.  相似文献   

Defending the group from the terror within     

Karen Canfell  Hamish G. Spencer  Ben Oldroyd 《Metascience》2001,10(2):192-202

  相似文献   

ROOME TO GUESSE     

Karen L. Edwards 《Metascience》2006,15(2):367-369

  相似文献   

Conceptualising knowledge for access in the sciences: academic development from a social realist perspective     

Karen Ellery 《Higher Education》2017,74(5):915-931

Whilst arguing from a social realist perspective that knowledge matters in academic development (AD) curricula, this paper addresses the question of what knowledge types and practices are necessary for enabling epistemological access. It presents a single, in-depth, qualitative case study in which the curriculum of a science AD course is characterised using Legitimation Code Theory (LCT). Analysis of the course curriculum reveals legitimation of four main categories of knowledge types along a continuum of stronger to weaker epistemic relations: disciplinary knowledge, scientific literacies knowledge, general academic practices knowledge and everyday knowledge. These categories are ‘mapped’ onto an LCT(Semantics) (how meaning relates to both context and empirical referents) topological plane to reveal a curriculum that operates in three distinct but interrelated spaces by facing towards both the field of science and the practice of academia. It is argued that this empirically derived differentiated curriculum framework offers a conceptual means for considering the notion of access to ‘powerful’ knowledge in a range of AD and mainstream contexts.  相似文献   

Politics,Advocacy, and Research: What Have We Learned and What Remains?     

Karen Seashore Louis 《Peabody Journal of Education》2017,92(1):141-147

  相似文献   

Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains     

Kathleen Scalise  Michael Timms  Anita Moorjani  LaKisha Clark  Karen Holtermann  P. Shawn Irvin 《科学教学研究杂志》2011,48(9):1050-1078

This research examines science‐simulation software available for grades 6–12 science courses. The study presented, funded by the National Science Foundation, had two objectives: a literature synthesis and a product review. The literature synthesis examines research findings on grade 6–12 student learning gains and losses using virtual laboratories and science‐simulation software, derived from a review of 79 relevant studies identified. Based on that literature, significant aspects of how such products influence student learning are identified. Tables summarize the research‐based evidence about best practices in instructional design for such virtual lab and simulation products. Some products were then reviewed as case studies to determine in what ways and to what extent they implement such research‐identified best practices. The overall goal was to consider where the most progress is being made in effective virtual‐lab and simulation products, and what directions future development should take. The intent is to inform science educators, teachers, administrators, and policy makers who are using, buying, and examining middle and high school instructional materials. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 1050–1078, 2011  相似文献