Critically reflexive dialogue and praxis: Academic/practitioner reflections throughout a formative evaluation of Circles® USA     

Mary Jane Collier  Brandi Lawless 《Journal of Applied Communication Research》2016,44(2):156-173

Reflections about the use of critically reflexive praxis by academic/practitioners are offered based on a case study of a formative evaluation of Circles^® USA, a nonprofit organization coordinating initiatives across the U.S. working to move families out of poverty. Critically reflexive praxis is theorized as featuring several themes including acknowledging different levels of context, critical dialogue with collaborators, engaging cultural difference and intersectionalities, problematizing power relations and relationships among researchers and collaborators, and occurring throughout the research project. Examples of critical dialogic reflexivity and navigating common tensions that emerge throughout such community engagement projects are detailed during three phases: planning and design; fieldwork and interviews; and outcomes, applications, and implications.  相似文献   

Valuation struggles over pricing – determining the worth of wind power     

Trine Pallesen 《Journal of Cultural Economy》2016,9(6):527-540

Public policies such as feed-in tariffs have been widely introduced to stimulate the development of renewable energies, and sustain a decarbonisation of the electricity sector. Proponents argue that these governance instruments safeguard public goods such as the climate – yet they are accused of creating political markets, and political prices, here understood as market distortion. This paper studies the ‘politics’ of pricing by following the adoption of the first feed-in tariff in France. Pricing as a way of achieving non-economic ends, such as climate mitigation, brings the values of several public goods into play, all the while prompting a translation of these values into a single price. Following the struggles over the pricing of wind power in the early 2000s, the study illustrates that rather than a pollution of the market sphere by that of politics, a politics of pricing can be observed in four distinct struggles: namely the framing of the public interest; valuation as the articulation of the future; the possible agencies of governance; and role of valuation methods and calculations.  相似文献   

数据治理——图书馆事业的发展机遇   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

顾立平 《中国图书馆学报》2016,42(5):40-56

数据驱动发现成为一种新的科学进步路线,产生了新的知识服务对象:愈加重视数据的科学家和工程师、数据科学家、数据工程师、数据分析师、公民科学家等。数据获取需要依靠国家的行政命令、资助机构的政策、研究机构和大学的管理办法等。数据共享存在于不同学科,而且已具备了基础设施,诸如:数据中心、数据云、数据知识库与数据期刊、信息技术中心、数字资源中心等。数据重用需要公共部门、企业、公众、利益相关方在“尽可能地开放,尽责任地封闭”前提下,采取协调一致的行动。在这里,数据馆员扮演重要角色。数据治理生态体系需要图书馆执行数据获取、数据共享、数据重用的政策。通过不断寻找和搜集最佳实践案例,图书馆可以支持数据治理。参考文献79。  相似文献   

试论职业资格考试对教育供求的调节     

王文成 《湖北招生考试》2005,(4)

职业资格证书制度属于国家考试制度,学历证书制度属于国家教育 制度,二者对教育供求的调节产生了不同影响。在学历社会向资格社会转轨过程 中,要实现职业资格考试对教育供求的有效调节,就必须研究职业资格考试与教 育供求调节的关系,改革国家教育培训制度,更好地适应劳动力市场的需要,这是 优化人力资源配置、加强人力资源能力建设的重要课题。  相似文献   

规则认同、个体学习与转型期社区共享资源合作治理     

夏茂森  方鸣  江玲玲 《安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2019,47(4):141-149

本文尝试将规则认同偏好、个体信念学习调整纳入多人自愿合作的分析框架,并构建了基于转型期社区共享资源合作治理的博弈理论模型,考察规则认同偏好异质性、个体学习在社区共享资源合作治理中的作用机理,并进行了相应的仿真模拟分析。研究表明,规则认同偏好的异质性影响个体的策略选择调整,进而影响社区共享资源的合作治理,尤其是当政府在部分或完全退出社区共享资源治理情况下,对避免或弥补转型期社区共享资源“治理真空”具有重要的影响作用。此外,自发治理的规则认同程度与合作治理的形成概率成正比,且规则偏好在一定程度上可以缓解共享资源合作治理的成本问题。但随着治理成本的不断上升,规则认同与合作治理两者之间的条件比率呈递减趋势。  相似文献   

Academic versus Sporting Knowledge. Robert L. Simon and the Debate about Sports on Campus     

Gunnar Breivik 《体育哲学杂志》2016,43(1):61-74

  相似文献   

An Evolution of the Migration of Taiwanese Female Basketball Players: From the ‘American Dream’ to the ‘Chinese Dream’     

Ren-Shiang Jiang  Ping-Chao Lee 《国际体育史杂志》2016,33(18):2253-2270

Abstract

This paper explores the migration of female basketball players from Taiwan to China. Governance theory is adopted as the framework in this study to analyze the phenomenon of players’ migration and to understand how it was shaped over the years. The empirical work draws on a qualitative approach, which is based on a review of documentary materials and semi-structured interviews; coding and analysis were undertaken with a content analysis approach in order to investigate the decision-making processes and their consequences for the players’ migration. The feature of systematic governance for the development of women’s basketball has been revealed in this study. Stakeholders with personal interests caused the downturn of women’s basketball development in Taiwan, and it eventually led to the players’ migration abroad. Through the lens of governance theory, it has been revealed that a number of factors – namely, political, financial, personal, socio-economic, and cultural – all intertwine with one another dynamically to influence the female players’ decision to move abroad. This finding broadens the scope for the research of Taiwanese athletes’ migration to China, extending the focus from only business or industry to other aspects, thereby highlighting the fact that the subject is more complex than previously understood.  相似文献   

应用大数据推进城市社区的治理创新研究——以贵阳市“社会和云”平台为例     

周雅颂 《广西职业技术学院学报》2019,(3):97-104

贵州省贵阳市在“新型社区·温馨家园”的战略部署下,将全市94个社区全部建成“文明社区”“绿色社区”“平安社区”。贵阳市在社区建设上所取得的成绩,得益于“社会和云”社会治理大数据云平台在助推基层社区治理中所发挥的重要作用。“社会和云”平台通过对基层数据进行信息化、数据化、自流程化、融合化,解决社会治理当中不同程度地存在的底数不清、情况不明、针对性不强、效率不优等问题。其好处在于,第一,打通基层数据通路,社区遇到问题不再通过请示汇报的方式向上级反映,只需通过社区治理平台将问题上传到“社会和云”平台即可,真正实现了“让数据跑路,给社区减负”。第二,通过“一张图+一张表”的实时动态跟踪查询功能,为各级政府开展基层治理提供了“空间可视”。第三,政务数据、社区信息、公共服务在“社会和云”平台上实现全数据融通,为搭建社区治理的多元融合模式提供了必要的保障。  相似文献   

多元学校问责:OECD国家教育治理的新趋势     

张雅慧  王阳  唐汉卫 《比较教育研究》2019,41(8):86-91

21世纪以来,受教育权力分散化、市场机制、参与式民主以及绩效问责不足等内外因素的影响,多元学校问责日益成为OECD国家教育治理的新兴方式。多元学校问责是指多个主体根据学校提供的数据和信息资源等对学校进行全方位监测,以促进学校教育质量的改善与提升。多元化的问责主体、多样性的问责方式、横向性的问责机制是多元学校问责的显著特征。在推进现代教育治理体系化背景下,多元学校问责已成为OECD国家基于各自国情而展开的一种实践方式,而精准识别利益相关主体、协调利益相关者之间的权力以及提高学校管理者的领导力也已然成为OECD国家有效实施多元学校问责的重要经验。  相似文献   

国际组织全球教育治理的路径比较研究——基于核心素养框架的分析     

乔鹤  徐晓丽 《比较教育研究》2019,41(8):52-58

20世纪末以来,联合国教科文组织、经合组织、欧盟等三大国际组织遴选并确立了各自的核心素养框架体系。联合国教科文组织将七大核心素养作为各国教育质量监测与评价的依据;经合组织通过PISA测试成功地将"核心素养"变成全球教育话题,致力于通过PISA测试推动各国教育改革;欧盟赋予成员国较大的自主权,帮助各国建构并落实各自的核心素养框架体系。这三大国际组织落实核心素养的过程具有全球教育治理的共同特征:从治理理念来看,全球教育治理以人类普世价值为基本目标;从治理主体来看,需要建构不同主体之间的互助关系;从治理过程来看,需要建立动态向心的治理体系;从治理手段来看,应以详实的数据为依据制定"游戏规则"。  相似文献