排序方式： 共有158条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
71.
Sean Kearney 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2013,38(7):875-891
Innovative assessment practices have the potential to shift the way universities function. By focusing on well-designed assessment tasks, where students are expected to work collegially and are actively involved in self- and peer-assessment, the opportunity to engage students in the assessment process is realised. This article contends that students are significantly and detrimentally disengaged from the assessment process as a result of traditional assessments that do not address key issues of learning. Notable issues that arose from observations and questioning of students indicated that vast proportions of students were not proofreading their own work were not collaborating on tasks; had not been involved in the development of assessment tasks; and that students had insufficient skills in relation to their ability to evaluate their own efforts. These facts led the author to conceptualise new models of assessment focusing on authentic learning and the authentic assessment of that learning through self- and peer-assessment. Authentic assessment for sustainable learning (AASL) and Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning (ASPAL) were trialled with approximately 300 undergraduate education students at the University of Notre Dame Australia. This article explains the conceptual development of the models and provides justification for their implementation. 相似文献
72.
Little is known as to how students process tutor feedback. In this study, 36 final-year biological sciences undergraduate students from four higher education institutions took part in interviews or focus groups. Students were assigned according to tutors’ judgements as being either high achieving or non-high achieving, and focus groups consisted of a single student type. A thematic approach was used to analyse the interview data. There were overall major differences in how both types of students processed tutor feedback. These differences concerned primarily three areas: (1) self-assessment, (2) the role of external regulation and (3) the role of peer discussion. The findings are discussed in terms of dispositions to learning and conceptions of learning. It is concluded that guidance to students regarding their use of feedback needs to be designed with respect to encouraging the development of students’ self-assessment practices. 相似文献
73.
Greet M.J. Fastré Marcel R. van der Klink Dominique Sluijsmans Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2013,38(5):611-630
One of the goals of current education is to ensure that graduates can act as independent lifelong learners. Graduates need to be able to assess their own learning and interpret assessment results. The central question in this article is how to acquire sustainable assessment skills, enabling students to assess their performance and learning throughout life, and preparing them to meet their own future learning needs. This article presents an integrated model for developing sustainable assessment skills, consisting of three components: conditions necessary for the development of sustainable assessment skills, elements of sustainable assessment and instructional methods for guiding students in the development of sustainable assessment skills. The article concludes with suggestions for future research to further develop the proposed model. 相似文献
74.
在成人词汇学习中引入自我评估和同辈评估,并经过系统的训练,学生不仅词汇量得到了极大地提升,而且自我评估能力及信心也大大增强了。 相似文献
75.
朱艳华 《黑龙江教育学院学报》2009,28(8):169-171
通过对调查问卷、访谈等结果的定量定性分析,发现把自我评估引入课堂教学有助于学生找到听力学习过程中存在的长处和不足,增强了自信心,提高了自我监控和自我评价的能力,并可显著提高学生的听力成绩。研究证明:自我评估的运用是培养和提高学习者自主性的有效途径。 相似文献
76.
评估是语言教学过程中的一个重要环节,自我评估是评估方式中的一种。本文阐述了自我评估的理论依据及其重要性,介绍了如何运用当前国际上流行的自我评估工具——学生学习档案,对学生开展自我评估训练。通过对学生的问卷调查和访谈发现,学生认为通过建立学习档案进行自我评估训练,他们的学习意愿和学习动力得到加强,自主学习能力也有所提高。 相似文献
77.
形成性评价是教学过程中进行的过程性和发展性评估,即根据教学目标,采用多种评估手段和形式,跟踪教学过程,反馈教学信息,促进学生全面发展。在大学英语口语教学中实施形成性评价,有利于对学生的口语学习过程进行观察、评价和监督,从而促进学生有效地学习口语,提高其口语水平与能力。 相似文献
78.
CAS专业标准是美国高校学生事务管理广泛使用的专业标准,CAS专业标准自我评估指引(SAG)则是美国各高校利用标准进行自我评估的最重要的参照工具。本文着重介绍如何运用SAG进行CAS专业标准的自我评估,并指出SAG以自我调整和自我评估的价值取向为前提,以良好的校园环境和发展机构为保障,以评估团队的全员化与专业化为要求,以重视评估过程、追求卓越为目标的特点,以期对我国学生事务管理专业标准的建立及评估有所启示。 相似文献
79.
80.
Karim Sadeghi 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2015,40(5):641-665
This study investigated the effect of assessment type (self vs. peer vs. teacher) on university students’ academic achievement and students’ attitudes toward them. In the main study, 82 undergraduate English-as-a-Foreign-Language students in four classes at three universities in Iran were randomly assigned into one of self-, peer- and teacher-assessment or control groups. A pre-test was designed to measure students’ initial knowledge in the subject Teaching Methods. Then experimental groups were subjected to one of the assessment types; however, the control group received no intervention. Thirty-eight students from experimental groups completed an attitude questionnaire. A similarly designed follow-up study was conducted with two classes of BA Chemistry students taking a General English course at Urmia University. The application of one-way analysis of covariance on the main study post-test data indicated differences in performances of all groups, with peer-assessment group performing the best. Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicated that both self- and peer-assessment, as well as the teacher-assessment group, had positive attitudes toward their assessment experiences. The application of one-way analysis of variance on replication study data showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on the post-test and that students in the former group had positive attitudes toward self-assessment. 相似文献