排序方式： 共有146条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
91.
程微 《安阳师范学院学报》2010,(1):13-17
评价理论由J．R．Martin创立,关注语篇中可协商的各种态度,涉及情感的强度和价值溯源、说服读者的方法。评价作为人际意义的一个重要组成部分,聚焦于态度意义。要实现语篇中态度的传达,先要“自下而上”判断态度再现的“忠实”性;同时要通过“自上而下”审视评价基调的角度来看原文与译文文本类型是否一致,以及在语域层面上是否做到了“忠实”。 相似文献
92.
姜亮夫、崔富章等学者将繁富的楚辞学著述归为四大类:辑注、音义、考证、论评。其中,"论评类"典籍是指侧重对楚辞作品及其屈原人格进行评价的典籍文献。相比较而言,学界于此类典籍的讨论尤显薄弱。故对宋代以前的十二种重要的"论评类"典籍之成书情况、评论特点、存在不足以及在楚辞学史上的贡献,作一条分缕析的概评,于"楚辞学"研究及楚辞学研究者是有所裨益的。 相似文献
93.
通过对系统安全工程能力成熟度模型的基本思想、模型结构和内容的分析研究,提出了应用该模型进行具体评估的方法,对参与评估的组织和评估过程进行了定义和解释,并提出了计算机辅助评估系统的初步设计方案,从系统所包含的知识库、事实库、推理机制等方面给出了一个实现框架。 相似文献
94.
客观、公正、准确的独立学院无形资产评估是促进独立学院健康可持续发展的基础.独立学院无形资产评估中存在产权不明晰、法律依据缺乏等问题,应通过健全相应的法制法规体系、建立专门的社会评估机构、明确产权归属等途径,构建科学完善的独立学院无形资产评估体系. 相似文献
95.
本文以评价理论为视角,分析探讨了态度系统、介入系统和级差系统在美国总统就职演讲语篇中的应用。文章丰富了对于美国总统就职演说的研究,同时为中外学者在相关学术写作中有效表达评价意义提供了有价值的启示。 相似文献
96.
彭宣维 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2011,(4):69-81
以"评价理论"诸范畴作为元范畴,考察西方文学批评史上一些代表性学者和实践者对文学艺术在批评和审美观念上的评价取向,认为文学性就是评价性:文学是以评价为特点、手段和目的的互动话语和组织方式,包括情感、判断、鉴赏三类态度、以及相应的介入和级差因素。其实,这些范畴早已散见于不同时期、不同流派、不同国别的美学和文论中,一直是人们进行美学评判和文艺理论建构的基石,只是先前缺乏这种高度概括和明确认识罢了,也没有评价理论的范畴那么具体,评价的侧重点也因着眼点不同而存在差别。 相似文献
97.
By using Appraisal Theory, this paper analyzes discrimination exposed in Black Elvis:Discrimination on theChinese,the black and the senior. 相似文献
98.
本文通过对数字环境引发的档案鉴定理论与实践调整的原因进行分析,梳理国外档案界的鉴定观,并提出对中国电子文件鉴定的启示. 相似文献
99.
关于核心期刊的评价效用问题 总被引：22，自引：0，他引：22
针对当前以核心期刊为标准评价论文学术水平的现象,分析了核心期刊作为学术评价工具客观上存在着参考性、滞后性、疑问性、局限性、或然性、偏差性,指出学术论文评价要“以文论文”,不要“以载体论文”。 相似文献
100.
《Communication monographs》2012,79(3):173-250
Two studies tested the assumption that relational contexts affect the way people react to messages that hurt their feelings. In the first, the range of responses people have to hurtful messages was explored, and underlying dimensions reflecting the responses were identified. Participants’ reactions were characterized by three broad dimensions: active verbal responses (e.g., attacking the other, defending the self, asking for an explanation), acquiescent responses (e.g., crying, apologizing), and invulnerable responses (e.g., ignoring the message, laughing). Analyses indicated that people who felt extremely hurt tended to react more often by acquiescing than those who were less hurt. Abo, those who felt the impact of hurt on their relationship was relatively low responded more often with invulnerability than those who felt the impact was high. In the second study, the association between people's reactions to hurt and the quality of their relationship with the person who hurt them was examined, as was the influence of particular types of relationships (e.g., those between family members or romantic partners) on individuab’ responses to hurt. Among other findings, the results suggested that relational satisfaction was positively associated with active verbal responses and negatively correlated both with the degree of experienced hurt and the perceived impact of the hurtful message on the relationship. Further, hurtful messages from family members tended to elicit greater feelings of hurt than those from other people—regardless of the closeness, similarity, amount of contact, or level of satisfaction reported by respondents. By comparison, messages from romantic partners had a greater effect on participants’ relationships than did those from individuab involved in family or non‐family/non‐romantic relationships. 相似文献